Le fondateur de Mask répond à la prise en charge de Lens : Un produit axé sur la faible finance et le social est la future direction de Crypto

marsbitPublicado em 2026-01-21Última atualização em 2026-01-21

Resumo

Dans un contexte où les réseaux sociaux décentralisés sont souvent considérés comme un échec – avec des projets milliardaires stagnants, Farcaster se transformant en portefeuille et Nostr perdant des utilisateurs – l'annonce que Mask Network reprend le protocole Lens apparaît comme un mouvement stratégique rare. Lens, créé par le fondateur de Aave, Stani Kulechov, compte officiellement 110 000 utilisateurs actifs. Mask Network, qui possède déjà une vaste expérience dans le domaine avec l'acquisition du deuxième plus grand serveur Mastodon et le développement du client Firefly, renforce ainsi son engagement en faveur d'un écosystème social décentralisé, privilégiant les interactions sociales plutôt que la finance.

Pour la plupart des gens, le secteur des réseaux sociaux décentralisés semble avoir été discrédité. Des projets financés à hauteur de dizaines de millions il y a quelques années n'ont fait aucun progrès. Même le leader Farcaster parle de se transformer en portefeuille, on ne voit plus d'utilisateurs sur Nostr, le favori du fondateur de Twitter Jack Dorsey, et tout le monde se concentre de plus en plus sur des plateformes comme X et Threads.

Dans ce contexte, l'annonce par Mask Network de prendre en charge Lens Protocol est exceptionnellement rare.

Lens est une autre création de Stani, le fondateur très en vue de Aave dans le domaine de la DeFi. Officiellement, il compte 110 000 utilisateurs actifs. Mask Network, qui reprend le protocole, a une présence importante dans le domaine des réseaux sociaux, ayant acquis le deuxième plus grand serveur du réseau social décentralisé Mastodon et développé également Firefly, le plus grand client tiers dans le domaine des réseaux sociaux décentralisés.

Criptomoedas em alta

Perguntas relacionadas

QPourquoi l'acquisition de Lens Protocol par Mask Network est-elle considérée comme inhabituelle dans le contexte actuel des réseaux sociaux décentralisés ?

AParce que le secteur des réseaux sociaux décentralisés est largement considéré comme ayant échoué, avec des projets bien financés stagnants et une concentration croissante des utilisateurs sur des plateformes centralisées comme X et Threads.

QQuel est le positionnement produit que le fondateur de Mask défend pour l'avenir de la Crypto ?

AIl défend une approche axée sur des produits à 'faible finance et forte socialisation', privilégiant l'aspect social plutôt que financier.

QQui est le fondateur de Lens Protocol et quelle est sa notoriété dans l'écosystème crypto ?

ALens Protocol a été créé par Stani Kulechov, le fondateur très connu de Aave, un protocole DeFi majeur.

QQuelle est l'ampleur de la présence de Mask Network dans le paysage des réseaux sociaux décentralisés ?

AMask Network a une présence importante, ayant acquis le deuxième plus grand serveur Mastodon et développé Firefly, le plus grand client tiers dans l'espace des réseaux sociaux décentralisés.

QQuel est la taille de la base d'ateurs revendiquée par Lens Protocol selon l'article ?

ALe protocole Lens revendique 110 000 utilisateurs actifs.

Leituras Relacionadas

Gate Research Institute: Analysis of Chart Patterns and Breakout Trading Strategies

Gate Research Institute: Chart Pattern Analysis and Breakout Trading Strategies Chart patterns are crucial tools in technical analysis for observing market supply and demand shifts, trend continuations, and reversals. This analysis involves a comprehensive evaluation of trend, volume, support/resistance, time cycles, and breakout validity, not just rote pattern recognition. Patterns are broadly categorized into reversal patterns (e.g., Double Tops/Bottoms, Head and Shoulders) and continuation patterns (e.g., Flags, Triangles, Rectangles). An effective breakout, key for trading, requires clear support/resistance, prolonged consolidation, a prevailing trend backdrop, and volume confirmation. However, breakouts are not guaranteed, as false breakouts are common. Risk must be managed through position sizing, stop-loss orders, pullback confirmations, and profit-taking in stages. Key pattern types discussed include: * **Rectangle Patterns:** Indicate market indecision within parallel support and resistance, with breakouts projecting a move equal to the pattern's width. * **Flag & Pennant Patterns:** Short-term continuation patterns following sharp price moves ("flagpoles"). * **Triangle Patterns:** Symmetrical, Ascending (bullish bias), and Descending (bearish bias) triangles, representing consolidation before a directional move. * **Head and Shoulders Patterns:** Major reversal patterns signaling trend exhaustion. The article details breakout trading strategies, defining valid breakouts by price closing beyond a key level with increased volume and minimal immediate re-entry into the prior range. It contrasts range trading with breakout trading and outlines entry methods (immediate entry, pullback entry, scaling in), stop-loss placement (based on pattern failure), and profit-taking techniques (target-based, structure-based, trend-following). It further classifies breakout outcomes: 1. **Valid Breakouts:** Strong, sustained moves in the breakout direction. 2. **Pullback Breakouts:** Price breaks out, retests the breakout level as support/resistance, then resumes the trend—offering a lower-risk entry. 3. **False Breakouts:** Price briefly breaches a level but quickly reverses back into the prior range, a common risk managed by strict stop-losses. Key validation tools for breakouts include volume analysis, the principle of support/resistance role reversal, and momentum indicators like ATR, Moving Averages, Bollinger Bands, and RSI. In conclusion, while chart patterns and breakout analysis provide a structured framework, their effectiveness relies on multiple confirming factors—trend context, volume, and proper risk management. They should be integrated into a broader trading system rather than used as standalone signals.

marsbitHá 24m

Gate Research Institute: Analysis of Chart Patterns and Breakout Trading Strategies

marsbitHá 24m

Joseph Chalom: Ethereum is Becoming the "Settlement Layer of Trust" for Global Finance

In a speech titled "The Industrialization of Trust," Sharplink CEO Joseph Chalom (former BlackRock digital assets head) discussed the future transformation of global finance. Drawing from 20 years at BlackRock, where he led the launch of Bitcoin/ETH ETFs and tokenized funds, Chalom highlighted the immense hidden costs of establishing trust in traditional finance—estimated at over $9.3 trillion annually in the US alone due to fragmented systems, multi-day settlements, and countless reconciliations. He argued that Ethereum is emerging as the global financial "settlement layer for trust," with its robust, decentralized infrastructure securing over $300 billion in on-chain assets and most stablecoins and tokenized assets. The future, he stated, will be driven by three accelerating pillars: stablecoins (evolving beyond crypto gateways to become efficient cross-border payment rails), tokenized assets (enabling 24/7 trading and reshaping capital markets), and DeFi (providing automated, accessible financial services). A potential game-changer, Chalom added, is the fourth pillar: "Agentic Finance," where AI agents autonomously execute programmable financial transactions via smart contracts and stablecoins. He envisions individuals soon having AI-powered "CFOs in their pockets" to optimize idle capital and manage tokenized portfolios. This shift, facilitated by Ethereum's trustless settlement, could multiply on-chain transaction volume 1000x within a year, moving finance toward a seamless, digitized future.

marsbitHá 25m

Joseph Chalom: Ethereum is Becoming the "Settlement Layer of Trust" for Global Finance

marsbitHá 25m

STRC Severely Unpegged, What Risks Is the Market Pricing In?

The article analyzes the recent significant de-pegging of Strategy's perpetual preferred stock, STRC, whose price fell to approximately $89, far below its $100 face value. This discount has pushed its simple yield to around 12.9%, creating a paradox. The stock was designed as a high-yield instrument trading near par, and Strategy maintains an 11.5% annual dividend, even recently switching to semi-monthly payments to support the price. The author explores several reasons why the high yield hasn't attracted enough buying pressure to restore the par value. A key factor is potential reverse deleveraging from carry trades, where leveraged investors may be forced to sell due to margin calls as the price falls, creating a self-reinforcing downward spiral. Additionally, the tokenization and integration of STRC into DeFi protocols (like Apyx, Saturn, Pendle) have introduced faster, more transparent, and potentially more volatile price adjustment mechanisms through leverage and yield-splitting products. The emergence of a competing product, Strive's SATA, offering a 13% yield with daily dividends, has also changed the yield benchmark, challenging STRC's unique high-yield narrative. Furthermore, the market is questioning the distinction between Strategy's substantial Bitcoin reserves, which provide long-term balance sheet coverage, and the certainty of stable near-term cash flow for dividends. Ultimately, the price dip represents a stress test for this type of BTC-backed, high-yield financing tool. The future path of STRC depends on whether Strategy acts to reinforce the $100 peg (e.g., by adjusting dividends), whether DeFi-related leverage unwinds further, and how investors ultimately price the risks of leverage, competition, and cash flow uncertainty against the offered yield.

marsbitHá 36m

STRC Severely Unpegged, What Risks Is the Market Pricing In?

marsbitHá 36m

LIT Token Hits Six-Month High: How Long Can the Buyback Flywheel Keep Burning Fuel?

The LIT token of decentralized perpetual exchange Lighter surged to a six-month high above $1.90 on June 18th, with a market cap of $425 million. After a price correction earlier this year, the recent rebound is attributed to its core "buyback flywheel" mechanism. All protocol fee revenue is used for programmatic, hourly market buybacks of LIT. Since its TGE in December 2025, approximately 15 million LIT (6% of circulating supply) has been repurchased for around $21 million. Additional price support comes from the LLP (Lighter Liquidity Pool), where providers must stake LIT worth 10% of their deposited USDC, locking significant token supply. However, challenges persist. Trading volume has declined amidst a sluggish market, with total volume at $1.68 trillion, significantly lower than leading competitor Hyperliquid's $4.37 trillion. While Lighter focuses on perpetual contracts, RWA, and Pre-IPO markets, Hyperliquid has expanded into prediction markets and boasts a U.S. spot ETF, attracting institutional investment and influencer endorsements like from Arthur Hayes. In contrast, LIT currently lacks similar high-profile backing. With 75% of LIT's total 1 billion supply still locked (team and investor tokens begin a 3-year linear unlock in December 2026), there is no immediate unlock selling pressure. The token's future performance hinges on sustaining trading volume growth, successful product iteration, and executing its transparent buyback strategy against a dominant competitor.

Foresight NewsHá 55m

LIT Token Hits Six-Month High: How Long Can the Buyback Flywheel Keep Burning Fuel?

Foresight NewsHá 55m

Trading

Spot
Futuros

Artigos em Destaque

Como comprar MASK

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de Mask Network (MASK) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar Mask Network (MASK) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu Mask Network (MASK)Depois de comprar o teu Mask Network (MASK), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona Mask Network (MASK)Transaciona facilmente Mask Network (MASK) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

219 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2026.06.02

Como comprar MASK

Discussões

Bem-vindo à Comunidade HTX. Aqui, pode manter-se informado sobre os mais recentes desenvolvimentos da plataforma e obter acesso a análises profissionais de mercado. As opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o preço de MASK (MASK) são apresentadas abaixo.

活动图片