交易额破 4.1 亿,孙悟空“交易挖矿”首期战报出炉,手续费超额返还引爆市场

深潮Publicado em 2025-12-03Última atualização em 2025-12-04

目前,孙悟空第一期交易挖矿活动已进入下半场。活动将于2025年12月6日20:00(UTC+8) 正式收官。

随着链上衍生品赛道的持续扩容,Perp DEX的整体交易量在近期屡创新高,用户对于交易深度与费率敏感度的要求也随之提升。在这一背景下,孙悟空(SunX)平台上线的“第一期交易挖矿”活动,凭借创新和极具诚意的“负费率”激励机制,在竞争激烈的DEX市场中迅速突围。

数据狂飙:全网“杀”疯,用户薅羊毛首选

据官方最新披露的运营数据显示,截至12月2日17:00(UTC+8),该活动上线仅数日,总交易额已突破 4.1亿 USDT。在当前Perp DEX赛道竞争日益激烈的背景下,这一数据不仅印证了链上用户对低成本交易的强烈需求,也反映出孙悟空(SunX)在流动性捕获和活跃度提升方面的显著成效。

从收益表现来看,活动的激励力度同样备受市场关注。活动上线以来,孙悟空(SunX)已狂撒奖励3,939,056枚SUN(约合82,484 USDT),累计为用户节省手续费 76,853USDT。显然,对于以高频与策略交易为主的用户群体而言,这类“负费率”机制进一步增强了交易的成本可控性与参与意愿。

打破费率痛点:Maker与Taker的双向补贴

在传统的Perp DEX模型中,高昂的Gas费与交易手续费往往是阻碍高频交易者入场的最大门槛。孙悟空(SunX)本次活动的核心逻辑,在于通过“交易挖矿”模式,将交易成本转化为资产收益,从而通过市场行为自发构建深厚的流动性护城河。

根据规则,用户参与$BTC$ETH$SUN永续合约交易,不仅能获得手续费的100% 全额返还,更能获得额外的 $SUN 代币奖励。

● Maker 奖励比例达 110%:强化挂单激励,引导更多资金入场,提升盘口深度;

● Taker 奖励比例达 107%:鼓励主动成交,提高市场换手效率与整体交易活跃度。

此外,为确保奖励分配的公平与可持续性,活动设定单用户每小时最高500 USDT等值 SUN代币奖励上限,每日激励池规模达90,000 USDT,总奖池更高达1,350,000 USDT。这种“交易即挖矿,挖矿即盈利”的模式,直接将交易成本转化为即时利润。

经济模型闭环:手续费回购销毁

在提供高额奖励的同时,孙悟空(SunX)平台也展示了对SUN 代币经济模型的深思熟虑。

官方明确表示,活动期间报名用户产生的所有手续费收入,将全部用于SUN 代币的回购,并在每季度末进行全额销毁。

这一“回购+销毁”机制,将活动产生的庞大交易量直接转化为 $SUN 的买盘动力,在提升交易活跃度的同时,有力支撑了代币价值的稳定增长,实现了平台、代币持有者与交易用户的三方共赢。

最后冲刺:活动持续至12月6日

目前,孙悟空第一期交易挖矿活动已进入下半场。活动将于2025年12月6日20:00(UTC+8) 正式收官。

在当前Perp DEX交易量激增的市场环境下,孙悟空通过真金白银的“负费率”补贴,正在成为链上交易者对冲风险与博取收益的重要阵地。对于寻求低磨损、高深度的交易用户而言,当前仍是参与的最佳窗口期。

关于孙悟空(SunX)

孙悟空(SunX)是全球首个中文去中心化永续合约交易平台,旨在融合中心化交易所的流畅体验、安全保障与去中心化金融的资产主权,打造新一代链上衍生品基础设施。平台以中文交互体验为核心,通过全网最低费率、0 Gas交易、链上安全托管、高性能撮合、全链流动性整合与智慧型风控机制等优势,致力于为华语交易者提供友好、公平、高效、自由的DeFi衍生品交易服务。

作为首个专为符合华人交易习惯而生的去中心化交易平台,孙悟空旨在以开放的理念,推动东方文化与去中心化技术自然共生。

如需了解更多关于孙悟空的信息,请访问www.sunwukong.io;如有进一步的疑问,请联系support@sunx.io

Leituras Relacionadas

Behind Robinhood's Launch of Its Own Chain, the Beautifully Packaged "Tokenized Stocks" Still Have No Equity Rights

Robinhood has launched "Robinhood Chain," an Ethereum-based Layer 2 built with Arbitrum technology, and introduced "Stock Tokens." This article clarifies that these tokens are not actual on-chain equity. They are tokenized debt securities issued by Robinhood Assets Jersey Limited, offering economic exposure to reference stocks or ETFs but lacking direct ownership, voting rights, or other shareholder privileges. The legal structure is conservative, relying on traditional financial intermediaries, custody, KYC/AML controls, and specific jurisdiction rules, even though the tokens are transferable on-chain. The move is part of Robinhood's broader strategy to evolve from a retail brokerage into a global financial ecosystem, integrating services like banking, retirement, crypto, and DeFi. Robinhood Chain aims to provide a programmable settlement layer, making financial products more portable and accessible while masking underlying complexity. However, the "brokerage chain paradox" lies in balancing a simple user interface with the intricate, regulated reality of the wrapped assets. The success of this model depends on users and regulators accepting this structured approach without misunderstanding the tokens as direct stock ownership. Key components supporting this strategy include the Bitstamp acquisition (expanding institutional crypto capabilities), the Robinhood Wallet (bridging brokerage and self-custody), the Robinhood Earn program (integrating DeFi lending), and the Lighter perpetual contracts platform. While ambitious, the initiative is still early, facing challenges in achieving liquidity, developer adoption, and regulatory clarity across jurisdictions.

marsbitHá 38m

Behind Robinhood's Launch of Its Own Chain, the Beautifully Packaged "Tokenized Stocks" Still Have No Equity Rights

marsbitHá 38m

Strategy's Accounting Gimmick: The Cap on BTC Sales Far Exceeds $1.25 Billion

The article, originally from Bankless, discusses how MicroStrategy's (MSTR) recent Bitcoin (BTC) sales reveal a much larger potential selling capacity than the widely reported $1.25 billion "reserve-building" cap. On July 7, MicroStrategy disclosed a sale of 3,588 BTC (~$216M) to pay dividends for its STRAT (STRC) preferred shares and replenish its USD Reserve. Crucially, the company stated this sale did not count against its stated $1.25 billion "reserve-building capacity." The analysis explains that MicroStrategy's "BTC Monetization Plan," part of its broader "Digital Credit Capital Framework," actually outlines three main purposes for selling BTC, only one of which has the $1.25B cap: 1. **Building the USD Reserve** (capped at $1.25B). 2. **Covering preferred share/ debt costs** (replenishing the reserve after payments). 3. **Funding buybacks** (up to $10B for preferred shares and $10B for MSTR common stock). The key nuance is the accounting distinction between "building" the reserve (selling BTC before making payments) and "replenishing" it (selling BTC after using reserve funds for payments). While functionally the same—converting BTC to cash for obligations—only "building" counts against the publicized $1.25B limit. This means sales for "replenishing" and the $20B+ buyback pool allow for total potential sales exceeding $30B. The article frames this as part of MicroStrategy's shift from a simple "buy and hold" Bitcoin narrative to an "active capital management" model, where BTC becomes a balance-sheet tool to manage pressures between its common stock, preferred shares, dollar reserve, and Bitcoin holdings. This creates complex trade-offs and potential conflicts of interest. The conclusion warns investors that the $1.25B figure is not a total sales ceiling. Understanding terms like "build," "replenish," and "repurchase" in MicroStrategy's disclosures is now critical, as the company navigates a new, more complex role as an actively managed entity rather than a passive Bitcoin accumulator.

Odaily星球日报Há 53m

Strategy's Accounting Gimmick: The Cap on BTC Sales Far Exceeds $1.25 Billion

Odaily星球日报Há 53m

The Networking Game in Silicon Valley's Elite Circles: Those with Connections Get $50 Million, While the Truly Talented Can't Raise Money?

"Silicon Valley's Meritocracy to Relationship Game: How Networks Now Trump Talent." The article argues that Silicon Valley has shifted from a meritocracy to a "kingmaker" system where connections and background outweigh true ability. Key factors driving this change include: 1. **AI-Distorted Expectations:** Unprecedented growth curves (e.g., Anthropic) have led VCs to seek only "sure things" or pattern-match against past successes. 2. **Capital Concentration:** LP funds are concentrated in a few large, multi-stage funds, pushing VCs to overpay for hot deals to secure capital. 3. **VC Professionalization:** The industry has become a standardized career path, attracting conformist "NPCs" rather than independent thinkers. The long IPO timeline incentivizes safe, consensus bets for career advancement over risky, fund-returning outliers. This consensus capital fuels consensus founders. Startups are now a standard career option, with accelerators pressuring uniform ideas (e.g., 81% AI). Founders from elite schools (Stanford, OpenAI) easily raise millions based on pedigree, not proof. Large funds preemptively back "centrally cast" teams with $10-50M war chests to dominate categories, sidelining outsiders. The "kingmaker" strategy has downstream effects: it encourages aggressive, sometimes fraudulent, revenue reporting and allows founders to sell significant secondary shares early, attracting grifters. The author predicts a mean reversion. History shows the hottest trends rarely produce the most valuable companies. They advocate backing underestimated outsiders with "a chip on their shoulder" over anointed insiders, believing true meritocracy will ultimately win. "Those chasing the herd are set up for slaughter."

marsbitHá 1h

The Networking Game in Silicon Valley's Elite Circles: Those with Connections Get $50 Million, While the Truly Talented Can't Raise Money?

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
活动图片