Voyager Digital Under FDIC Scrutiny As It Files For Bankruptcy

cryptodailyPublicado em 2022-07-08Última atualização em 2022-07-08

Resumo

Voyager Digital could come under added scrutiny after its marketing came on the radar of the FDIC

Voyager Digital could come under added scrutiny after its marketing came on the radar of the FDIC, reportedly because come customers of the platform did not understand the scope of FDIC protection for their deposits, leading to questions around the marketing of the firm. 
Depositors In For A Surprise 
Voyager Digital account holders were in for a bit of a surprise as the crypto brokerage and lender filed for bankruptcy on Tuesday. Depositors were stunned to discover that their deposits did not have the same protection they thought they did. These developments could signal additional consequences for an embattled company. 
Voyager Digital had filed for bankruptcy under Chapter 11, stating that it had debts of up to $10 billion that it owed to around 100,000 creditors. The crisis was exasperated by the collapse of the Singaporean hedge fund, Three Arrows Capital (3AC), which had defaulted on a loan of 15,250 BTC and 350 million USD Coin (USDC) just a week prior. 
Marketing Under The Scanner 
Voyager Digital’s website stated that the customer’s USD is held by the company’s banking partner, the Metropolitan Commercial Bank, which is ensured by the FDIC. It further assured customers that because of this, the cash they hold with Voyager is protected. The Metropolitan Commercial Bank holds around $350 million in deposits from the customers of Voyager Digital. 
However, the bank issued a statement explaining that the FDIC does not provide protection against Voyager Digital’s failure or against the loss of cryptocurrency deposits. The FDIC (United States Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation) insures accounts for up to $250,000 per depositor in case of failure of the bank, the bank explained in a statement. Frances Schadenfreude Cassandra shared the bank’s statement on Twitter, tweeting out, 
“Statement from Metropolitan Commercial Bank about #FDIC insurance for #Voyager customers. Bad news, I’m afraid.”
The Wall Street Journal reported on Thursday, citing unnamed sources, that Voyager Digital depositors expected to receive all the cash from their accounts held in the Metropolitan Commercial Bank, as they were promised by Voyager Digital, prompting the FDIC to look into the claims. 
A Proposed Reorganization 
Voyager Digital, on its part, claimed in its proposed reorganization foresaw that, subject to specific contingencies, customers who hold crypto in their accounts will receive a combination of crypto, shares, and proceeds from the 3AC recovery. 
“Customers with crypto in their account(s) will receive in exchange a combination of the crypto in their account(s), proceeds from the 3AC recovery, common shares in the newly reorganized Company, and Voyager tokens.”
Ties With Sam Bankman-Fried And Alameda Research 
It also came to light that Voyager Digital had a complex financial relationship with Alameda Research, a project backed by Sam Bankman-Fried of FTX. Alameda Research is Voyager Digital’s largest shareholder while also being the organization’s largest creditor at $377 million. It also owes Voyager Digital $75 million. 
“Two most interesting things in the Voyager bankruptcy petition: (1) Voyager’s second-largest exposure is to Alameda Research. So there’s some recycled capital. Voyager loans Alameda $377M, & Alameda reloans Voyager $75M. Plus, Alameda is Voyager’s largest shareholder (9.5%).”

Leituras Relacionadas

How to Do Research Well: Deliberately Practice the Real Skills That Matter

No one truly teaches you how to do research. You're often given a desk, a pre-selected problem, and vague instructions to "create something new." Consequently, many people reverse-engineer the job based on visible outputs—papers, posts, announcements—learning only how to *appear* like a researcher rather than how to *become* one. True research capability is built from stacking small, trainable skills, nearly all of which can be developed through deliberate practice. **Pick Your Own Problem:** Most researchers absorb problems from advisors or trends, lacking the underlying reasoning. Choosing a problem you genuinely care about, as John Schulman advises, leads to original work. Develop "taste" like a muscle: predict experiment outcomes, guess paper results from methods, and track which findings remain important over time. **Upgrade Your Inputs:** Relying on shared reading lists (arXiv hot lists, filtered group chats) leads to unoriginal conclusions. Undervalued old literature often holds crucial insights (e.g., MoE, LSTM, backpropagation). Richard Sutton's "The Bitter Lesson" or Claude Shannon's 1952 talk on creative thinking are more predictive than lengthy modern surveys. Breadth matters as much as depth: draw from neuroscience, mechanism design, hardware knowledge, and honest statistics. Read papers directly, especially appendices and limitations sections. **Write Everything Down:** As Paul Graham noted, writing exposes flaws in seemingly mature ideas. Writing is the cheapest defense against self-deception. Following Feynman's principle, Darwin programmatically wrote down facts contradicting his theory to combat memory bias. Maintain a detailed log of hypotheses, setups, predictions, results, and updated understandings. Reviewing past logs fosters essential humility.

marsbitHá 12m

How to Do Research Well: Deliberately Practice the Real Skills That Matter

marsbitHá 12m

Following US Ban on Fable 5, Zhipu AI's Stock Soars 47%

On June 15th, shares of Zhipu AI surged dramatically on the Hong Kong stock market, peaking at a 47.6% gain before closing 32.82% higher. This sharp increase was directly triggered by two recent industry events. On June 12th, Anthropic announced it was suspending global access to its latest flagship models, Claude Fable 5 and Claude Mythos 5, to comply with a U.S. government export control order. The next day, Zhipu AI announced it would open access to its latest open-source flagship model, GLM-5.2, under the permissive MIT license. The Anthropic incident highlighted a critical issue beyond raw model capability: the risk of sudden, unpredictable loss of access to advanced AI models, especially for developers and enterprises deeply integrated with them. This has shifted industry and market focus toward factors like stability, sustainable access, and controllability. Zhipu's move, promoting "frontier intelligence for all," positions its openly available model as a reliable and accessible alternative. The GLM-5.2 model emphasizes "Long Horizon Task" capabilities with a 1M context window, targeting complex, multi-step coding and engineering workflows where maintaining context is crucial. Analysts note this event exposes the risk of dependency on closed-source models subject to single jurisdictional controls, potentially accelerating a shift toward domestic base models and localized deployments. The market's reaction signals a new valuation dimension in AI: providers who can offer stable, long-term, and sustainably accessible AI capabilities are gaining strategic importance.

marsbitHá 36m

Following US Ban on Fable 5, Zhipu AI's Stock Soars 47%

marsbitHá 36m

Fully Entering the AI Era: Alipay Bets on Conversation, WeChat Holds Fast to Social

In May 2026, Alipay announced over 300 million AI payment transactions. Shortly after, WeChat opened its mini-programs for AI integration, sparking controversy by requiring developer source code access. This highlights their diverging approaches to AI integration. Alipay is testing "Project Treasure," an optional AI-native interface replacing traditional app grids with a conversational window. Users can command complex tasks (e.g., "book a ride and order coffee") handled end-to-end by AI. This shift follows an abandoned standalone AI app, focusing instead on enhancing its existing user base. For unmodified mini-programs, Alipay's AI uses "screen-reading" to simulate user interactions, bypassing the need for developer overhaul. It also introduced "Token Pay" for micro-transactions and "AI Wallets" for autonomous agent spending. WeChat, prioritizing its core social function, is taking an embedded approach. Its AI agent will operate within existing contexts like group chats and official accounts, assisting without a separate interface. To enable this, WeChat offers developers two paths: granting source code access for direct AI control ("Automatic Mode") or manually encapsulating services into standardized "Skills." Both place significant burden on developers. Key differences emerge in handling legacy services: WeChat demands developer cooperation (code or labor), while Alipay's screen-reading offers immediate, if potentially less stable, compatibility. Alipay's 3 billion AI transactions demonstrate user acceptance of AI-driven commercial actions. The divergent strategies may reshape mini-program ecosystems—Alipay passively "AI-fying" services, WeChat potentially favoring resource-rich developers—and set competing technical standards. Ultimately, the competition centers on where users entrust the command to "help me get things done."

marsbitHá 36m

Fully Entering the AI Era: Alipay Bets on Conversation, WeChat Holds Fast to Social

marsbitHá 36m

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片