靠着Faker夺冠，他赚了近300万美金

marsbitPublicado em 2025-11-10Última atualização em 2025-11-11

英雄联盟 S15 全球总决赛已经落下帷幕，Faker 又一次站上了最高领奖台，拿到属于他的第 6 个冠军，继续书写着他的传奇。而在币圈，随着预测市场的兴起，玩家们一边享受着电竞赛事，一边通过预测市场参与其中。

在众多参与预测市场的币圈玩家中，一个叫做「fengdubiying（逢赌必赢）」的 ID，成为了新的传奇。在 T1 对阵 KT 的决赛预测中，他豪掷约 158 万美元押注 T1 胜出，最终收获了约 82 万美元的利润。

Polymarket

从 S15 的瑞士轮比赛开始，「fengdubiying」以 3 万美元的仓位起步。到 S15 的决赛结束时，他在 Polymarket 上的总盈利已经超过了 290 万美元。这种疯狂的战绩，让老外都为之侧目。

Polymarket

Leituras Relacionadas

‘We’re trying to defend Bitcoin’: Why BIP-110 is losing community support

Blockstream CEO Adam Back argues that Bitcoin Improvement Proposal 110 (BIP-110), a contentious soft fork, is misguided. He contends discussions are fueled by misconceptions about Bitcoin's architecture, not malicious intent, and that the proposal's proponents are often well-intentioned newcomers. BIP-110, implemented in December 2025, aims to restrict arbitrary data like Ordinals inscriptions to prevent network spam and preserve Bitcoin's primary function as peer-to-peer cash. Back acknowledges spam is an issue but believes Bitcoin's existing market-driven mechanisms—transaction fees, miner incentives, and decentralized consensus—already address it. He argues BIP-110 clashes with Bitcoin's permissionless ethos and that a fork based on it would likely fail due to a lack of community support and because it contradicts Bitcoin's foundational principles. Market dynamics show limited support for the proposal, with only 10 out of 2,016 blocks backing a temporary upgrade on July 4th. Concurrently, Ordinals activity has dropped to all-time lows, with fewer than 10,000 inscriptions daily. Bitcoin's price has also fallen 45% over the past year. Michael Saylor echoes Back's critical stance on BIP-110.

ambcryptoHá 1h

‘We’re trying to defend Bitcoin’: Why BIP-110 is losing community support

ambcryptoHá 1h

Inside Bonzo Lend’s $9M exploit – Why secure smart contracts couldn’t stop it

Bonzo Lend, a lending protocol on the Hedera network, suffered a $9.05 million exploit due to a flaw in the external Supra oracle system. The attacker manipulated SAUCE token price feeds, enabling them to borrow assets far exceeding their collateral. Audits confirmed the protocol's own smart contracts and the Hedera core network were secure; the failure originated in the trusted oracle infrastructure. This incident highlights a recurring DeFi risk where correct protocol logic can still be weaponized via compromised external data. The attack impacted market sentiment, causing a drop in HBAR's price and Hedera's DeFi TVL, underscoring the need for stronger oracle safeguards and verification standards.

ambcryptoHá 3h

Inside Bonzo Lend’s $9M exploit – Why secure smart contracts couldn’t stop it

ambcryptoHá 3h

Ethereum vs. Bitcoin: Is ETH’s 5% Q3 rally the start of a structural rotation?

The article examines whether Ethereum's (ETH) recent 5% Q3 rally against Bitcoin (BTC) signals a lasting capital rotation or is merely another short-term move. Historically, ETH has struggled to sustain outperformance; a strong 2025 Q3 rally was largely reversed, suggesting temporary rotations as capital flowed back to Bitcoin. Currently, Bitcoin dominance is testing a key resistance level, hinting at a possible shift back toward BTC. However, on-chain and institutional data present a counter-narrative. Ethereum ETFs have attracted significant net inflows this month, outperforming Bitcoin ETFs. A key catalyst is Robinhood's new Layer 2 network, which uses ETH for gas and settlement. Data shows a nearly 10x weekly surge in ETH bridged to this chain, indicating growing ecosystem activity and ETH demand. While it's premature to confirm a structural shift, the rally appears increasingly supported by fundamentals—including institutional inflows, rising Layer 2 adoption, and stronger on-chain metrics—rather than just market rotation. If these trends persist, the current ETH/BTC breakout could signal the beginning of a broader capital move into Ethereum during Q3.

ambcryptoHá 5h

Ethereum vs. Bitcoin: Is ETH’s 5% Q3 rally the start of a structural rotation?

ambcryptoHá 5h

Apple Sues OpenAI Sparking Feud, Musk Slams Altman for Fraud, Altman Retorts with 'Space Data Center' Boast

Apple Sues OpenAI as Musk-Altman Feud Escalates The public feud between Elon Musk and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman intensified, coinciding with their respective AI companies launching flagship models in the same week, highlighting fierce competition. On July 11, Musk posted on X, accusing Altman of taking "fraud to the next level" regarding OpenAI's commercial practices. Altman fired back, sarcastically suggesting Musk was the one selling "short-term space datacenter" concepts to public market investors. Musk countered with allegations that Altman "stole an open-source AI charity" and, amid Apple's recent lawsuit, "stole all of Apple's phone tech." He mockingly referenced Altman needing a "parole officer's" approval to travel. This exchange occurred against the backdrop of a significant legal development: Apple filed a lawsuit against OpenAI in a California federal court, alleging the AI company deliberately solicited Apple employees to leak confidential information on unreleased products to aid its own hardware plans. Apple demands OpenAI cease this activity, destroy proprietary materials, and redesign upcoming products. OpenAI responded, stating it has no interest in other companies' trade secrets and remains focused on innovation. This lawsuit could profoundly impact their two-year partnership where OpenAI provides key tech for Apple Intelligence and Siri. The rivalry extended to product releases. OpenAI launched GPT-5.6, while Musk's SpaceXAI unveiled Grok 4.5. Both are positioned as AI agents capable of multi-step tasks. GPT-5.6 is noted for strengths in broad reasoning, business workflows, and cybersecurity. Grok 4.5 is highlighted for higher efficiency in autonomous programming and developer workflows, with lower usage costs than GPT-5.6, though OpenAI's model reportedly still leads in areas like abstract reasoning. The differing strengths offer distinct choices for enterprises and developers based on their specific needs.

marsbitHá 5h

Apple Sues OpenAI Sparking Feud, Musk Slams Altman for Fraud, Altman Retorts with 'Space Data Center' Boast

marsbitHá 5h

Robinhood Chain's Success Proves Ethereum Is Not Dead

Robinhood Chain's success demonstrates that the L1+L2 model is the preferred infrastructure for real-world, cash-flow-focused businesses entering the crypto space. Historically, many crypto projects were built around token monetization. In contrast, companies like Robinhood and Coinbase (with Base) choose to build their businesses using Ethereum's established foundation. They leverage the decentralized security, liquidity, and neutrality of Ethereum L1 while creating custom, high-performance, and controlled environments on Ethereum L2s (like Arbitrum). This separation allows for business-specific customization without the massive overhead of launching and securing an independent L1. Their decision to use ETH for gas and to integrate deeply with Ethereum's ecosystem is a rational business choice aimed at minimizing risk and maximizing product viability, not ideological support. As more traditional entities build cash-generating services on-chain, this model will solidify Ethereum's position as the core settlement and security layer for the growing on-chain economy, benefiting ETH's network effects and monetary premium.

marsbitHá 5h

Robinhood Chain's Success Proves Ethereum Is Not Dead

marsbitHá 5h

Trading

Spot
活动图片

Categorias popularesright-arrow

Etiquetas Popularesright-arrow