[Key interpretation] 23,378 BTC were newly purchased by listed companies, and 1.87 million ETH recently flowed into the exchange

Huobi ResearchPublicado em 2022-07-05Última atualização em 2022-07-07

Resumo

BTC is brewing for short-term strength and temporarily obtains data support.

1、 BTC brewing double bottom form

In the daily K-line chart of BTC, BTC ushered in a technical rebound trend when the closing price was not continuously at a new low.

The figure shows that the rebound intensity of BTC is not high, but the closing price has risen significantly from the low level. The amplitude reached 6.72%, and BTC brewed the volume bottom shape in the low price area. This bottom can be compared with the previous rebound on June 18, which is the second rebound performance. Therefore, there is a better expectation of double bottom reversal. Operationally, investors can pay attention to further low absorption and currency holding opportunities.

In terms of indicators, the rebound of BTC continues after the short-term closing of the brin line, which is a typical rebound signal after the increase of fluctuation intensity. Although it has not effectively broken through the middle rail of the brin line, with the expansion of price increase, the possibility of further rise is enhanced.

At present, BTC only needs a small price increase to confirm the typical rebound signal, so the increase is relatively expected.

2. BTC obtains increased holdings from Listed Companies

The increase of listed companies' holdings in BTC means that the main force or has recognized the buying opportunities of BTC. The message shows that the bank for International Settlements allows banks to retain 1% of bitcoin reserves, which means that BTC's hedging function may play a greater role.

The number of currency held by listed companies increased rapidly during this period. By July 3, 2022, the number of BTC listed companies increased to 268752 BTCs, an increase of 23378 BTCs compared with 245374 BTCs on July 2. Although the trend of listed companies to increase their holdings of BTC over the past year is very significant, the scale of this increase is undoubtedly the highest. Combined with the cost advantage of BTC, the increased holdings of listed companies are around us $19300, which is also a confirmation signal for the bottom of BTC.

After listed companies increase their holdings of BTC, it is unlikely to be sold. Once BTC's buying opportunity below $20000 is recognized by more investors, the possibility of its reversal will be greatly enhanced.

3. BTC price is close to the cost price of investors

During the low-level and high-volume operation of BTC price, its cost price is rapidly approaching the cost price of investors. The cost price mentioned here includes the main cost price of holding money for 18 to 24 months, as well as the cost price of investors holding money for 1 to 1 week. Recently, in the process of low-level sideways consolidation, the latest 18 to 24 month long-term investor cost price further rebounded to $17788 on July 4. Accordingly, the main cost price of holding money for one week to one month fell back to $22251.

Review the performance of BTC accelerating its rise from the main cost price around us $10000 at the end of 2020.

This time, BTC is close to the short-term and long-term investor cost price, which also indicates a very typical buying opportunity. After different cost prices are close to the current price of BTC, the expectation of further price correction is weak, and the chance of success in bottoming is greatly improved.

From the perspective of holding time, the cost price of investors holding money for 18 to 24 months has risen to $17643, that is to say, this point has been higher than the recent BTC lowest price of $17622. In other words, if BTC is close to US $17643 in the short term, the possibility of further breaking and falling has been significantly reduced. The cost price of investors holding money for 18 to 24 months is the main price for holding money for a long time. Its currency holding cycle starts from the middle of 2020. If the main cost price is lower than this cost price, the cost may be an important buying signal.

4. Eth key position rebound

In the daily K-line chart of eth, the price performance is significantly stronger than that of BTC. Eth has broken through the medium gauge of the brin line during the rebound, thus indicating a strong signal of short-term price, creating conditions for further expansion of the increase.

In terms of trading volume, the trading volume of eth rebounded slightly on July 4, about twice that of the previous day. In terms of support, after eth received short-term support of 78.6% of Fibonacci's corresponding US $1106, the price trend was better. It is expected that the linkage between Eth and BTC will be enhanced, especially in the stage of price rise, which further verifies the trading opportunities.

5. Increase in the number of eth exchanges

Recently, the number of eth in the exchange showed signs of growth, from a low of 6.69 million to 8.56 million eth on July 4, with an increase of 1.87 million eth, an increase of 27%. From June 26 to July 4, the growth of eth means that the release space of selling pressure is increasing. In terms of absolute number, the number of eth of the exchange is still running at a low level. From the end of 2020 to the end of 2021, the number of eth in the exchange fell from 2.2 million to 8.2 million, and its downward trend has always continued. Since 2022, the number of eth in the exchange has shown signs of a low rebound. In the recent three months, ETH fell from US $3000 to below US $1000, which was synchronized with the rebound of eth in the number of exchanges.

In the short term, the number of eth in the exchange remains stable, and then we can continue to pay attention to the impact of changes in the number on the market.

Leituras Relacionadas

Why Is the World Nervous About Japan Raising Interest Rates?

In June 2026, the Bank of Japan raised its policy rate to 1%, marking its first hike to this level since 1995. While this rate remains low compared to global peers like the US and Europe, the move signals a profound shift for a nation that has been a global source of ultra-cheap funding for decades. Japan's long-standing near-zero or negative interest rates had facilitated massive "yen carry trades," where international investors borrowed low-cost yen to invest in higher-yielding assets worldwide, such as US tech stocks and emerging market bonds. This made Japan a critical, often overlooked, source of global liquidity. Japan's ultra-loose policy stemmed from structural challenges post-1990s asset bubble: aging demographics, chronic low inflation/deflation, and high public debt. Recent shifts, including sustained wage growth (exceeding 5% in recent years) and inflation consistently above the 2% target, have created a "wage-price spiral" possibility, prompting the policy normalization. The global market's concern lies not in the absolute rate but in the potential unwinding of the yen carry trade. As Japanese borrowing costs rise, the economics of these leveraged global investments change, potentially triggering deleveraging and capital outflows from risk assets. Market anxiety focuses on the end of a thirty-year consensus that Japan would perpetually provide cheap funding. Ultimately, the global impact will depend on the interplay with US monetary policy. While Japan is tightening, the significant interest rate differential with the US remains. The key future dynamic is whether simultaneous Japanese hikes and eventual US rate cuts will narrow this gap, forcing a major recalibration of global capital flows and asset pricing built on an era of abundant, cheap yen liquidity.

marsbitHá 59m

Why Is the World Nervous About Japan Raising Interest Rates?

marsbitHá 59m

Research Report Analysis: MRVL's Optical AI Booming, Why High Valuation Keeps Morgan Stanley's Star Analyst Sidelined?

Report Recap: MRVL Optical AI Boom - Why High Valuation Led Morgan Stanley's Star Analyst to Stay Neutral? Morgan Stanley analyst Joseph Moore maintained an "Equal-weight" (Neutral) rating on Marvell Technology (MRVL) on May 28, raising the price target from $172 to $195, below the trading price. This stance comes despite Marvell reporting a record quarter and significantly raising its full-year outlook (FY27 revenue ~$11.5B, up ~40%). Moore's neutral view is based on valuation. The $195 target implies ~40x CY2027 P/E. He contrasts MRVL with NVDA: both trade near ~$200, but Nvidia's forward EPS is more than double Marvell's. For MRVL's valuation to hold, it needs consistent earnings upgrades, proof of networking market share gains, or certainty on large-scale custom AI chip shipments—none of which are confirmed yet. Growth is driven by two pillars: **1) Optical Interconnect** (the faster runner): Moore raised FY27 growth expectations to >70%, with the optical module product line nearing a $1B annualized run rate. **2) Custom AI Chips** (the climber): Confidence in FY28 is growing, but a major new customer project only ramps in FY28, with no current revenue visibility. Key risks are the underperforming Storage, Enterprise, and legacy Networking segments. Moore acknowledges the real AI opportunity but believes the current price already reflects it. For the stock to work from here, investors need to see the optical business hit its targets, custom chips ramp as planned, and a recovery in the weaker business units.

marsbitHá 2h

Research Report Analysis: MRVL's Optical AI Booming, Why High Valuation Keeps Morgan Stanley's Star Analyst Sidelined?

marsbitHá 2h

qinbaFrank: Review and Outlook of the AI Computing Power Wave — From the Three Debates on NVIDIA to Optical Interconnect and SpaceX IPO, How is Capital Rotating?

**Summary: Retrospective and Outlook on the AI Computing Wave - A Framework for Capital Rotation** Based on a presentation by investor qinbaFrank, this analysis reviews the AI computing market trajectory since 2023 and outlines a forward-looking framework. **Key Phases and Market Debates:** The AI bull market progressed through three major debates: 1) The necessity of massive capital expenditure (late 2023). 2) The sustainability of tech giants' spending (early 2024-early 2025). 3) Potential overestimation of compute needs (early 2025). Consensus solidified in late 2025 as model capabilities and utility demonstrably improved. **Core Thesis: Penetration Rate Drives Commercialization.** Unlike the 2000 dot-com bubble, the current AI wave benefits from mature digital infrastructure, enabling faster adoption. The critical threshold is 10% penetration; surpassing it (with recent enterprise intent surveys showing ~18%) indicates entry into a rapid growth "golden period" where user scale and willingness to pay increase simultaneously. **AI vs. Internet: A Fundamental Difference.** While the internet enhanced connection efficiency, AI directly substitutes human cognition and labor. Once AI performance exceeds the "societal average" human level, its commercial value scales exponentially as payment shifts from human labor costs to AI service fees. **Investment Logic Evolution in the Compute Chain.** The focus has expanded from GPUs to a systemic re-rating of the entire hardware stack: storage/HBM, CPUs, interconnects, power, and advanced packaging. The framework is: **short-term "scarcity pricing," mid-term "upgrade pricing" (e.g., optical interconnects, power networks), and long-term "Physical AI" pricing** (edge computing, robotics). **Market Focus Shift and Adjustment Framework.** The market is transitioning from "hardware scarcity" to "commercialization validation." The ultimate anchor for the narrative is sustained high growth in model providers' Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR) and cloud business revenue, which justifies continued capital expenditure. Adjustments are categorized into three levels: * **L1 (Minor):** Driven by valuation compression or macro noise (e.g., single CPI print). Fundamentals intact. * **L2 (Moderate):** Triggered by significant macro events requiring risk repricing. Requires new data for confidence restoration. * **L3 (Major):** Involves a reset of the core industrial narrative or macro regime (e.g., AI commercialization growth stalling). The **crucial dividing line** is whether AI commercialization growth slows. Without a slowdown, pullbacks are likely L1/L2 "repricing" events. A genuine growth deceleration would signal an L2/L3 narrative reset. **Conclusion: A Foundational Civilizational Leap.** AI represents a foundational upgrade to "intelligence" itself—akin to humanity mastering fire—rather than a single-point industrial revolution. This底层能力跃迁 (underlying capability leap) will spawn successive waves of innovation (Agent, robotics, industry workflow重构). The journey will be波浪式的 (wavelike), driven by cycles of scarcity, technological upgrades, and远期兑现 (long-term realization).

marsbitHá 2h

qinbaFrank: Review and Outlook of the AI Computing Power Wave — From the Three Debates on NVIDIA to Optical Interconnect and SpaceX IPO, How is Capital Rotating?

marsbitHá 2h

A Country That Mined Bitcoin for 8 Years Has Built Its Own Dedicated Crypto Bank

A country that has been mining Bitcoin for eight years has established its own dedicated crypto bank. DK Bank, located in Bhutan's newly developed GMC special administrative zone, aims to fill the significant banking service gap for the cryptocurrency industry. Its CEO, Zheng YD, explained that most banks avoid crypto businesses due to a lack of risk management frameworks for decentralized and anonymous protocols. Operating under a unique "one country, two systems" governance model separate from mainland Bhutan, GMC aspires to become a financial hub for South Asia. DK Bank differentiates itself by offering integrated multi-currency accounts where users can manage both fiat currencies and stablecoins like USDT and USDC in one place, alongside services like Bitcoin-backed loans. The bank faces technical challenges in merging traditional banking systems with 24/7 crypto markets and implements rigorous on-chain and off-chain transaction monitoring for risk control. GMC's regulatory framework draws from Singaporean common law and Abu Dhabi's ADGM rules, offering a fast-track licensing process for already licensed firms while maintaining high standards. The initiative is part of Bhutan's longer-term crypto strategy, which includes Bitcoin mining since 2018. The focus, however, is on building a diversified institutional-grade crypto ecosystem—including custody and asset management—rather than retail speculative tokens. Proponents argue such sovereign crypto infrastructure is necessary, and Bhutan's early, measured approach exemplifies the thoughtful integration needed in global finance.

Foresight NewsHá 2h

A Country That Mined Bitcoin for 8 Years Has Built Its Own Dedicated Crypto Bank

Foresight NewsHá 2h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片