Ripple CTO Schwartz Revisits NSA Past And Satoshi Speculation

bitcoinistPublicado em 2025-10-24Última atualização em 2025-10-24

Resumo

Ripple chief technology officer David “JoelKatz” Schwartz has resurfaced a years-long thread of speculation around Bitcoin’s origins and his own...

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

Ripple chief technology officer David “JoelKatz” Schwartz has resurfaced a years-long thread of speculation around Bitcoin’s origins and his own pre-Ripple work with US government agencies, clarifying once again that he neither possessed “high level” intelligence nor claims special insight into Satoshi Nakamoto’s identity—while acknowledging that a US intelligence provenance for Bitcoin is “not a terrible theory.”

The renewed attention follows a fresh exchange on X on October 23, 2025, in which Schwartz responded to questions about prior employment and nondisclosure obligations—context that traces back to an October 24, 2022 thread where he weighed in on Satoshi debates and litigation risk tied to public claims about identity. “There is nothing defamatory about saying that Craig Wright is not Satoshi, just as there is nothing defamatory about saying that I am not Satoshi,” Schwartz wrote in 2022, adding, “There is nothing inherently wrong with not being Satoshi.”

In the same 2022 exchange, after community member @XRPcryptowolf joked “David Schwartz is Satoshi confirmed jk lol” and floated the notion that “Satoshi is really the CIA or NSA,” the Ripple CTO replied: “That’s not a terrible theory. If the NSA or the CIA happened to stumble on how to make bitcoin, it might make sense that they would implement and deploy it to eliminate the risk that someone hostile to the US would do it first and potentially made billions of dollars.”

Ripple CTO Shuts Down Satoshi Claims

The 2025 follow-ups drilled into Schwartz’s own past work and what, if anything, it implies. In response to a commenter’s claim—“Well, you’ve worked at the NSA, getting high level information, by your own words.” The Ripple CTO flatly rejected the characterization, indirectly doubling down that he isn’t (part of) Satoshi Nakamoto: “I never got anything even remotely resembling high level information. I had to certify that the thing I was working on would meet the NSA’s requirements without even being allowed to see most of them.”


He then shared vignettes about the compartmentalization he encountered. “One requirement that I was allowed to see was that you had to be able to stop it from processing classified data if you lost control over it. I was puzzled—if you lost control over it, by definition you can’t stop it, right? It was explained to me that that’s…” He also noted signage he wasn’t permitted to have explained: “They wouldn’t even tell me why there’s little signs all over the place (generally on entrances or containers) that can be set to ‘OPEN’ or ‘CLOSED’ and what ‘OPEN’ and ‘CLOSED’ mean on those signs.”

Schwartz further recounted how, at one point, he recognized the user interface of “one thing I worked on” not through briefings but “because late one night I happened to have the Discovery Channel on and saw our UI on a screen.” He clarified the lineage of that code: “To be precise, that was work I did (on the same core code) for NATO shortly before I adapted it for the NSA. I don’t remember how I found out what the NSA was using it for. I don’t think I should reveal the exact uses, but they’re pretty boring.”

Asked when his nondisclosure agreement would expire, he answered: “I have no idea. They didn’t let me keep a copy and I don’t remember—if I ever even knew. I just hope nobody really cares any more. Plus, I never really knew anything all that secret.”

The through-line between the 2022 and 2025 messages is clear: a willingness to treat state-origin hypotheses for Bitcoin as plausible without endorsing them. “There is nothing inherently wrong with not being Satoshi,” the Ripple CTO emphasized in 2022. By 2025, his clarifications around the nature of his NSA and NATO work add color but not conspiracy: process-driven engineering inside a tightly siloed environment, limited visibility into end use, and no privileged window into intelligence secrets.

At press time, XRP traded at $2.42.

XRP price
XRP bulls face the 0.5 Fib, 1-day chart | Source: XRPUSDT on TradingView.com
Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Jake Simmons has been a Bitcoin enthusiast since 2016. Ever since he heard about Bitcoin, he has been studying the topic every day and trying to share his knowledge with others. His goal is to contribute to Bitcoin's financial revolution, which will replace the fiat money system. Besides BTC and crypto, Jake studied Business Informatics at a university. After graduation in 2017, he has been working in the blockchain and crypto sector. You can follow Jake on Twitter at @realJakeSimmons.

Leituras Relacionadas

Interpretation of SEC's New Crypto Regulatory Rules: Fundraising Below $5 Million Exempt from Registration, Is Altcoin Season Making a Comeback?

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has proposed a new regulatory framework titled "Regulation Crypto Assets." This proposal aims to establish tailored exemptions for crypto asset fundraising and a pathway for tokens to transition out of being classified as securities. The core provisions include two exemptions from standard securities registration: 1. **Startup Exemption**: Allows early-stage projects to raise up to $5 million over four years with simplified, narrative-based disclosures, avoiding full registration. 2. **Fundraising Exemption**: Permits raising up to $75 million within any 12-month period. It requires audited financial statements and imposes ongoing reporting obligations, similar to the Regulation A+ framework. A key component is the **Investment Contract Safe Harbor**. This rule allows a token initially sold as an investment contract (a security) to lose that designation once the issuer has completed or permanently ceased the "essential managerial efforts" promised to investors. This theoretically clears regulatory hurdles for tokens where development is finished or abandoned. The proposal defines a narrow scope, applying only to crypto assets that are not securities themselves and are part of an investment contract involving no other assets. This SEC initiative is seen as a response to the stalled progress of the comprehensive *CLARITY Act* in Congress. It represents a shift from relying solely on the historical Howey test, which the SEC admits is ill-suited for dynamic crypto assets. The proposal is currently in a 60-day public comment period, with a final rule likely months away, leaving the U.S. regulatory landscape for crypto in a transitional state.

Odaily星球日报Há 32m

Interpretation of SEC's New Crypto Regulatory Rules: Fundraising Below $5 Million Exempt from Registration, Is Altcoin Season Making a Comeback?

Odaily星球日报Há 32m

Latest: Korean QFI Has Bought Changxin Technology

Latest Data Shows Korean QFI Has Purchased Changxin Technology According to data from SEIBro (under Korea Securities Depository, KSD), Korean investors, acting as Qualified Foreign Investors (QFI), have been actively purchasing shares of Changxin Technology (stock code 688825), a company recently listed on China's Sci-Tech Innovation Board (STAR Market). Over the past month until August 18, they made a net purchase of this stock worth approximately $45.32 million (around CNY 307 million), making it the top A-share by net purchase volume for Korean investors during that period. This activity has significantly boosted overall Korean net buying in A-shares. As Changxin Technology is not yet included in the Stock Connect schemes, QFI is currently the only channel for overseas investors like these Koreans to access its shares. SEIBro data indicates Korean buying began as early as July 28, the stock's second trading day. The stock appeared in Korean investor purchase lists using a temporary virtual ISIN code in settlement instructions, as its official international code had not yet been assigned. The listing has garnered significant international attention. On its first trading day (July 27), the actively managed U.S. ETF Tema Memory ETF (DISK) swiftly added Changxin Technology to its portfolio, giving it a substantial 10.56% weighting. Another active ETF, Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM), also quickly included the stock. Furthermore, global index provider MSCI has added Changxin Technology to its MSCI China All Shares Index, prompting passive fund inflows. Analysts highlight Changxin Technology's unique position to serve China's rapidly growing AI ecosystem amid a global semiconductor memory supply shortage driven by AI demand. Besides Changxin Technology, other A-shares heavily bought by Korean investors recently include Weichai Power, Demingli, Changdian Technology, and CSOP China STAR Chip ETF.

marsbitHá 1h

Latest: Korean QFI Has Bought Changxin Technology

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
活动图片