Coinbase Bets on ICO Comeback With $375 Million Echo Deal

TheCryptoTimesPublicado em 2025-10-21Última atualização em 2025-10-21

Coinbase crypto exchange, shared that it has acquired Echo, a crowdfunding platform for $375 million. 

Echo is a platform that helps communities come together to raise funds for early-stage startups and crypto projects. It was founded by well-known crypto trader Jordan Fish, also known as Cobie. A day before the deal, Coinbase sent $25 million in USDCt o Cobie’s wallet to buy and burn a digital collectible (NFT) and help restart his UpOnly podcast. 

“I certainly didn’t think Echo would be sold to Coinbase, but here we are: Today Coinbase bought Echo for about $375 million,” Cobie said on X (formerly Twitter).

From Startup Vision to Major Deal

Echo was launched in April 2024 and had since become a hub for community investing. In only eight months, it helped raise more than $51 million across 131 different deals. One of its first and biggest projects was Ethena, a crypto protocol that created the fast-growing stablecoin USDe. According to Cobie, Ethena was the first project ever to raise through Echo.

In May, Echo introduced Sonar, a software product that allows startup founders to hold public token sales on their own. These sales can be hosted on different blockchains like Base, Solana, Cardano, and Hyperliquid. 

After the deal, Cobie said Echo will stay as a “standalone platform for now,” while Coinbase will integrate Sonar into its services. He added that this could bring new ways for founders and investors to connect directly on Coinbase.

“Integrating Echo’s tools will help us enable more direct community participation, joining projects with capital, entirely onchain.” Coinbase said in its release. The company added that while it will begin with token sales via Sonar, it plans to expand support to tokenized securities and real-world assets over time using Echo’s infrastructure.

Analysts see this as part of a resurgence of ICO-style fundraising. According to a Tiger Research report, public token sales are “coming back in new forms,” led by launchpads like Sonar, Legion, and Kaito. The trend echoes the 2017 ICO boom but with stronger tools, and transparency.

Also Read: Hopes of XRP ETF Approval Surge as U.S. Shutdown Nears Resolution


Mobile Only Image

Leituras Relacionadas

Retail Investors' 'Lead Brother' Serenity vs. Newly Minted Stock God Leopold: How Are the Two Top Hunters Mining AI's 'Physical Limits'?

The article profiles two prominent figures, Serenity and Leopold Aschenbrenner, who are gaining attention for their unconventional investment strategies focused on the physical constraints of the AI boom, moving beyond mainstream software narratives. Serenity, an anonymous online trader, advocates a "shiso leaf" theory. He targets small-cap companies with monopolies on critical, overlooked components in the AI hardware supply chain, such as specific semiconductor materials. His deep, technical analysis of bottlenecks in areas like co-packaged optics (CPO) has reportedly yielded massive returns, though his anonymity and focus on illiquid micro-cap stocks pose significant risks for followers. Leopold Aschenbrenner, a former OpenAI researcher, founded a multi-billion dollar hedge fund. His macro thesis argues that physical infrastructure—power grids, land, data centers—is the true bottleneck for AI growth, lagging far behind chip production. Consequently, his fund employs an infrastructure arbitrage strategy: heavily investing in storage and compute infrastructure companies while placing massive bearish bets (put options) against major semiconductor stocks, betting their valuations will correct as physical constraints become apparent. While their methods differ—Serenity drills into microscopic supply chain details, while Leopold takes a macroscopic, infrastructure-focused view—both share a core belief: the real power and investment alpha in the AI era lie in controlling scarce physical resources, not just software. The article concludes by noting the inherent risks in both approaches, such as liquidity issues for micro-caps and timing risks for macro bets, but suggests they signal a broader market re-evaluation of AI's foundational assets.

marsbitHá 3h

Retail Investors' 'Lead Brother' Serenity vs. Newly Minted Stock God Leopold: How Are the Two Top Hunters Mining AI's 'Physical Limits'?

marsbitHá 3h

Who Will Make Money in the Age of Agents?

In the Agents era of blockchain, traditional value capture theories face challenges. The "Fat Protocol" theory, dominant since 2016, suggested protocols capture most value as their tokens are essential for network use. However, the proliferation of interchangeable L1s, L2s, and modular layers has eroded protocol scarcity and pricing power. Conversely, the "Fat App" theory posits that applications capturing user relationships (like wallets and exchanges) become the primary value layer by controlling distribution and transaction flows. This aligns with the current "Great Repricing" cycle. Agents disrupt this logic. As software users, they lack brand loyalty, prioritize cost and efficiency, and switch between platforms seamlessly. This undermines the front-end UX moats that "Fat Apps" rely on. The article explores several potential futures: 1. **Headless Applications:** Current leading apps could strip their front-ends and become backend API infrastructure for Agents, preserving their role. 2. **Protocol Resurgence:** If integration becomes trivial, Agents might bypass aggregators and interact directly with protocols, reviving "Fat Protocol" dynamics. 3. **Pricing Power Collapse:** Agents' rational, frictionless routing could commoditize the entire stack, compressing margins toward cost and leaving little profit for intermediaries. 4. **Unprecedented Activity:** Agents may enable new, high-frequency, machine-to-machine economic activities, expanding the total value pie even if margins are thin. 5. **A New, Unnamed Model:** Historically, major tech shifts (like the internet's attention economy) create unforeseen business models. The Agents era may spawn entirely new ways to capture value. The most likely outcome is a coexistence where "Fat Apps" continue to serve human users valuing UX, while a separate, Agent-driven economy emerges governed by different rules—where loyalty is based on factors like liquidity, latency, and settlement guarantees rather than brand.

marsbitHá 4h

Who Will Make Money in the Age of Agents?

marsbitHá 4h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片