Nigeria’s President Urges Judges to Learn Blockchain to Fight Crimes

TheCryptoTimesPublicado em 2025-10-21Última atualização em 2025-10-21

Nigerian President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, has asked the judges to learn about blockchain, cryptocurrency, and new digital systems so they can tackle modern financial crimes better. 

During his speech at the at the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC)–National Judicial Institute (NJI) Workshop for Justices and Judges in Abuja, Nigeria today, Tinubu, represented by Vice President Kashim Shettima, said the world of corruption is changing fast, and the justice system must keep up.

According to local reports, he explained that judges can only give fair judgment in crypto fraud cases if they understand how digital currencies work. “How does one do justice in a cryptocurrency fraud case except one is grounded in such matters?” he asked.

Judges Must Keep Learning in the Digital Age

According to a statement from Stanley Nkwocha, Senior Special Assistant to the Vice President on Media and Communications, Tinubu said judges must keep learning new things to stay relevant. 

“Learning and relearning is no longer a buzz phrase but an essential undertaking for continued relevance in this digital age,” he said. The President also told judicial officers to stay honest and independent, warning that any compromise in the justice system weakens the nation’s moral strength. He added that the government is working to improve judges’ welfare and strengthen the judiciary’s independence.

The President also talked about the delays in corruption trials. He said many Nigerians are unhappy about slow judgments in big cases while smaller cybercrime cases move faster. He said the judiciary must adopt new technology to make justice quicker and more effective. “Your vantage position on the Bench does not insulate you from the consequences of corruption,” he warned. “There are no special roads, hospitals, or communities for judges. A Nigeria free of corruption is possible if we all commit to doing what is right.”

Also Read: SpaceX Moves $268 Million in Bitcoin Amid Market Turbulence


Mobile Only Image

Leituras Relacionadas

Retail Investors' 'Lead Brother' Serenity vs. Newly Minted Stock God Leopold: How Are the Two Top Hunters Mining AI's 'Physical Limits'?

The article profiles two prominent figures, Serenity and Leopold Aschenbrenner, who are gaining attention for their unconventional investment strategies focused on the physical constraints of the AI boom, moving beyond mainstream software narratives. Serenity, an anonymous online trader, advocates a "shiso leaf" theory. He targets small-cap companies with monopolies on critical, overlooked components in the AI hardware supply chain, such as specific semiconductor materials. His deep, technical analysis of bottlenecks in areas like co-packaged optics (CPO) has reportedly yielded massive returns, though his anonymity and focus on illiquid micro-cap stocks pose significant risks for followers. Leopold Aschenbrenner, a former OpenAI researcher, founded a multi-billion dollar hedge fund. His macro thesis argues that physical infrastructure—power grids, land, data centers—is the true bottleneck for AI growth, lagging far behind chip production. Consequently, his fund employs an infrastructure arbitrage strategy: heavily investing in storage and compute infrastructure companies while placing massive bearish bets (put options) against major semiconductor stocks, betting their valuations will correct as physical constraints become apparent. While their methods differ—Serenity drills into microscopic supply chain details, while Leopold takes a macroscopic, infrastructure-focused view—both share a core belief: the real power and investment alpha in the AI era lie in controlling scarce physical resources, not just software. The article concludes by noting the inherent risks in both approaches, such as liquidity issues for micro-caps and timing risks for macro bets, but suggests they signal a broader market re-evaluation of AI's foundational assets.

marsbitHá 3h

Retail Investors' 'Lead Brother' Serenity vs. Newly Minted Stock God Leopold: How Are the Two Top Hunters Mining AI's 'Physical Limits'?

marsbitHá 3h

Who Will Make Money in the Age of Agents?

In the Agents era of blockchain, traditional value capture theories face challenges. The "Fat Protocol" theory, dominant since 2016, suggested protocols capture most value as their tokens are essential for network use. However, the proliferation of interchangeable L1s, L2s, and modular layers has eroded protocol scarcity and pricing power. Conversely, the "Fat App" theory posits that applications capturing user relationships (like wallets and exchanges) become the primary value layer by controlling distribution and transaction flows. This aligns with the current "Great Repricing" cycle. Agents disrupt this logic. As software users, they lack brand loyalty, prioritize cost and efficiency, and switch between platforms seamlessly. This undermines the front-end UX moats that "Fat Apps" rely on. The article explores several potential futures: 1. **Headless Applications:** Current leading apps could strip their front-ends and become backend API infrastructure for Agents, preserving their role. 2. **Protocol Resurgence:** If integration becomes trivial, Agents might bypass aggregators and interact directly with protocols, reviving "Fat Protocol" dynamics. 3. **Pricing Power Collapse:** Agents' rational, frictionless routing could commoditize the entire stack, compressing margins toward cost and leaving little profit for intermediaries. 4. **Unprecedented Activity:** Agents may enable new, high-frequency, machine-to-machine economic activities, expanding the total value pie even if margins are thin. 5. **A New, Unnamed Model:** Historically, major tech shifts (like the internet's attention economy) create unforeseen business models. The Agents era may spawn entirely new ways to capture value. The most likely outcome is a coexistence where "Fat Apps" continue to serve human users valuing UX, while a separate, Agent-driven economy emerges governed by different rules—where loyalty is based on factors like liquidity, latency, and settlement guarantees rather than brand.

marsbitHá 4h

Who Will Make Money in the Age of Agents?

marsbitHá 4h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片