Ripple Buys GTreasury for $1B to Enter Corporate Finance Sector

TheCryptoTimesPublicado em 2025-10-16Última atualização em 2025-10-16

Ripple just announced its $1 billion acquisition of GTreasury, a global leader in treasury management systems, marking its most ambitious move yet into traditional finance. The deal positions Ripple to offer blockchain-powered liquidity and payments solutions to the corporate treasury market, a space managing trillions in global cash flow.

According to Ripple, the integration will allow CFOs and finance teams to unlock idle capital and process instant cross-border transactions, merging GTreasury’s experience with Ripple’s digital asset infrastructure. 

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse expressed enthusiasm about the deal, stating, “Together, we’re giving treasurers the ability to activate their capital rather than let it sit idle.”

GTreasury CEO Renaat Ver Eecke called the merger “a step toward modernizing treasury management,” combining Ripple’s blockchain network with GTreasury’s compliance and forecasting tools to offer real-time liquidity and risk management under one platform. 

Ripple extends its institutional footprint

The acquisition aligns with Ripple’s broader strategy to expand institutional access to digital assets. Yesterday, Ripple partnered with Absa Bank in South Africa to introduce institutional-grade crypto custody, its first initiative of this kind on the continent. The move expands Ripple’s custody network to Europe, the Middle East, Asia-Pacific, and Latin America.

Recent developments reflect Ripple’s efforts to integrate blockchain infrastructure directly into the global financial system. While the GTreasury deal brings Ripple into corporate finance at the enterprise level, the Absa partnership focuses on regulated digital asset storage for emerging markets.

As regulators formalize digital asset frameworks around the globe, the company’s approach shows how blockchain is becoming an operational standard for global finance rather than a side system.

Also read: Bitcoin, Ethereum, XRP Has No CEO: Ripple CLO Explains


Mobile Only Image

Leituras Relacionadas

Perspective: Value Investing in U.S. Stocks Is Not the Same as Fundamental Investing

The article challenges the notion that value investing in US stocks is equivalent to fundamental investing. It uses the astronomical analogy of Henrietta Leavitt separating a star's apparent brightness from its intrinsic luminosity to illustrate a key investment framework: an observed valuation multiple (like brightness) conflates two things—the actual quality of a business and the premium the market is willing to pay for its future (its "distance" or duration). The author argues that the popular narrative of "fundamentals are dead"—fueled by momentum and concentration in mega-cap tech—is flawed. While recognizing factors like winner-take-all dynamics and AI scale advantages, the piece warns against confusing broad thematic truths (e.g., "AI is big") with justified valuations for specific companies. It introduces a 2x2 matrix categorizing stocks based on whether they *looked* cheap/expensive at a point in time versus whether they *were* actually cheap/expensive in hindsight (e.g., expensive-looking Meta in 2022 was actually cheap). The core formula presented is: Forward Return ≈ Fundamental Growth × Change in Valuation Multiple. Over short periods, multiple changes drive returns, making markets seem narrative-driven. Over the long term, fundamental growth dominates. The article concludes that markets may be becoming *less* efficient due to complex, long-duration business models, narrative cycles, and private market dynamics, creating more opportunities for investors who can disentangle real quality from market sentiment.

marsbitHá 18m

Perspective: Value Investing in U.S. Stocks Is Not the Same as Fundamental Investing

marsbitHá 18m

Wallet Connection Prompts Are a Sign of a Fake AML Check Website

Fake anti-money laundering (AML) verification sites are stealing from cryptocurrency investors. These websites trick users into connecting their wallets and signing transactions, which is unnecessary for a basic wallet check, as discovered by Malwarebytes. Legitimate wallet verification only requires a public address to analyze transaction history for links to hacks, thefts, or sanctioned entities. The fraudulent sites, some copying brands like AMLBot, mimic this process. After a user initiates a scan, they are prompted to connect their wallet, shown fake progress bars, and sometimes asked to pay a small "fee." Eventually, a false "clean, low risk" verdict is given to download a report. Connecting a wallet reveals the public address and assets, allowing scammers to craft targeted transactions for the victim to approve, which can drain funds. Malwarebytes warns that any AML checker requesting wallet connection instead of just a public address is a major red flag. The report details that the same malicious template is repackaged under different names. It also mentions a $500 scam kit advertised on cybercrime forums that creates fake token presales, scans visitor wallets for valuable assets, and attempts to steal secret recovery phrases by offering a bonus. The article advises users who connected only a wallet to revoke the site's permissions. Those who signed suspicious transactions should check activity and move funds to a new wallet if compromised. Anyone who entered a recovery phrase or private key should assume the wallet is breached.

cryptonews.ruHá 19m

Wallet Connection Prompts Are a Sign of a Fake AML Check Website

cryptonews.ruHá 19m

Trading

Spot
活动图片