Wall Street Cracks: JPMorgan Moves To Offer Crypto Trading

bitcoinistPublicado em 2025-10-14Última atualização em 2025-10-14

Resumo

Wall Street hasn’t always been friendly toward crypto. For years, big lenders treated it like a passing fad or a...

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

Wall Street hasn’t always been friendly toward crypto. For years, big lenders treated it like a passing fad or a risky playground for retail traders. But that attitude is shifting fast. JPMorgan’s plan to let clients trade digital assets marks a turning point — a signal that the most traditional corners of finance are finally warming up to crypto. What was once dismissed as speculation is now being folded into mainstream banking strategy.

JPMorgan Chase is building services that would let its clients trade cryptocurrencies directly through the bank, senior executives told journalists this week.

According to comments made on CNBC, the bank’s global head of markets and digital assets, Scott Lucas, said trading is being developed while custody — holding crypto directly for clients — is “not on the horizon near-term.”

JPMorgan’s Public Push Into Tokens And Trading

The bank has moved quietly but clearly. It ran a pilot of a deposit token called JPMD on Coinbase’s Base blockchain in June, a step that aims to make bank deposits usable on public chains for institutional clients.

Scott Lucas outlines JPMorgan’s strategy for engaging with the blockchain sector. Source: CNBC

At the same time, JPMorgan has widened cooperation with Coinbase so Chase customers can link bank accounts to Coinbase wallets, a link between big banking rails and consumer crypto platforms. Those moves were mentioned by bank executives as part of an “and” approach — keeping traditional services while adding digital options.

Risk Appetite Will Shape The Rollout

Executives say risk rules and regulatory checks will shape how far the bank goes. Lucas said the firm is looking at what “the right custodians” would look like rather than taking custody itself for now.

That suggests JPMorgan would rely on third parties if and when it offers custody services, keeping its balance sheet and compliance teams at arm’s length from the security and legal complexities of holding private keys.

Total crypto market cap currently at $3.74 trillion. Chart: TradingView

JPMorgan Also Considering Loans Backed By Crypto

Beyond trading, there are signs JPMorgan is exploring other services tied to crypto. Reports say the bank is weighing offering loans backed by cryptocurrency holdings — a move that could arrive as early as next year if approved internally and cleared by regulators.

That would mark a notable shift for a bank whose CEO long warned about crypto risks but has recently allowed client access to Bitcoin trading in statements to investors.

Image: Da-kuk/Getty Images

Timelines And Custody Partners

For customers and market watchers, the key questions remain: which clients will get access first, which coins will be tradable, and who will custody assets if custody is outsourced.

The bank’s statements point to a careful, staged approach — trading first, custody later — and regulators in the US will likely follow closely.

Expect more detail from JPMorgan as pilot programs like JPMD and partnerships with exchanges produce results and as the bank outlines compliance safeguards.

Featured image from Unsplash, chart from TradingView

Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Christian, a journalist and editor with leadership roles in Philippine and Canadian media, is fueled by his love for writing and cryptocurrency. Off-screen, he's a cook and cinephile who's constantly intrigued by the size of the universe.

Leituras Relacionadas

Grayscale: Zcash, Financial Privacy in the Age of AI

Grayscale Research suggests a third wave of public focus on financial privacy is approaching, driven by stablecoin/blockchain adoption and new AI-powered surveillance tools. In this context, Zcash emerges as a decentralized digital currency, similar to Bitcoin but with built-in, robust privacy mechanisms via its "shielded" transactions that conceal sender, receiver, and amount using zero-knowledge proofs. While privacy is often seen as a niche feature, it is argued to be a core requirement for functional money, needed by individuals and businesses alike. Zcash's optional privacy is distinct from mixers or default-private chains like Monero. After years of development (Sapling, Orchard/NU5, Ironwood upgrades) to improve usability, key metrics show growing adoption: shielded transactions comprise ~90% of network activity, and ~25% of circulating ZEC is in shielded pools—a historical high. Despite this, ZEC's market valuation remains low (~0.6% of the "digital currency" sector), implying the market prices privacy as a marginal concern. The investment thesis hinges on a potential re-rating if the value of financial privacy is recognized more broadly. Risks include regulatory challenges around shielded transactions, legacy trusted setup pools, quantum computing threats, and execution risks for upcoming upgrades like Tachyon for scaling. In summary, Zcash represents a significant, technologically mature option in the privacy currency space, with current valuation offering potential upside if privacy demand grows.

marsbitHá 36m

Grayscale: Zcash, Financial Privacy in the Age of AI

marsbitHá 36m

The Bear Market Has Ended, A New Bull Cycle Has Begun

**Title: Bear Market Over, New Bull Cycle Begins** Bitcoin surged over 20% in just three days, from a low of $64,100 on August 19th to a high of $79,500 by August 21st, marking a dramatic shift in market sentiment. This rapid rise triggered massive liquidations exceeding $4 billion, with short positions accounting for $3.7 billion—the largest short squeeze since 2021. The rally was fueled by several key factors. Macroeconomic conditions improved as the US Treasury doubled its long-term bond buyback size, easing pressure. Significant regulatory developments included a White House meeting where former President Trump urged Senate action on the CLARITY Act and hinted at potential US Bitcoin reserves, followed by the CFTC Chairman stating the agency would establish crypto market rules if the bill stalls. On-chain data revealed a fierce battle: large whales faced substantial liquidations on short positions, while others took profits or doubled down on longs. Major altcoins like ETH and XRP also saw impressive gains. Analysts are divided but increasingly bullish. Many, including CryptoQuant's founder, declare the bear market over and a new bull cycle begun. Price targets range from $100k by year-end to ambitious long-term projections of $200k. However, some caution against immediate chasing, noting overbought conditions and viewing the move as a potential "trap" ahead of the crucial September 15th Senate vote on the CLARITY Act. The market's next test is sustaining the momentum with real buying pressure, holding above key resistance near $78k-$80k, and watching ETF inflows and the upcoming regulatory vote.

marsbitHá 40m

The Bear Market Has Ended, A New Bull Cycle Has Begun

marsbitHá 40m

Xiaomi Defended Its Smartphone Gross Margin, Yet to Find a Profit Successor

Xiaomi's Q2 2026 financial report reveals a company navigating a complex transition. While smartphone gross margin held steady at 8.5% through strategic product mix and a record-high average selling price (ASP), this came at the cost of a 26.5% year-over-year decline in global shipments, pressuring its core user acquisition engine. This illustrates Xiaomi's central challenge: managing the "timing gap" between its established and emerging growth engines. Its smartphone business is pivoting from scale to premiumization, but it's unclear if high-end models can fully offset the volume loss from more price-sensitive segments, especially in markets like India and Africa. Meanwhile, the electric vehicle segment has become a significant revenue contributor, delivering 104,200 units and generating ¥23.9 billion. However, its profit contribution remains unclear as it, along with AI investments, is still in a scaling and investment phase. The AI and humanoid robot initiatives, though strategically prioritized and tested in Xiaomi's own factories, are in early-stage validation with no near-term commercialization timeline. Financially, the company remains stable, supported by a robust cash position and its high-margin internet services business, which hit a new high in monthly active users. Management emphasized continued heavy investment in AI, chips, and robotics to fuel the next growth cycle. The key question is whether these new engines—cars, AI, robotics—can achieve commercial scale and profitability before the smartphone engine's growth slows further.

marsbitHá 41m

Xiaomi Defended Its Smartphone Gross Margin, Yet to Find a Profit Successor

marsbitHá 41m

Is RWA Still Meaningful Without DeFi?

The article "Would RWA Still Matter Without DeFi?" argues that tokenizing real-world assets (RWA) alone, like putting a barcode on a container, is not transformative. True value emerges when these tokenized assets are integrated into decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystems, enabling valuation, financing, hedging, trading, and loss management in a programmable, automated manner. Tokenization provides digital representation, but DeFi provides utility through leverage, liquidity, and composability. The core challenge lies in aligning the different "time clocks" of blockchain (fast, 24/7), traditional markets (limited hours), and asset redemption (slow processes), which creates liquidation risks and gaps. Effective RWA integration requires more than a token; it needs a full stack: legally enforceable rights, reliable data oracles, clear transfer rules, executable secondary liquidity, appropriate collateral parameters, and credible loss resolution paths. Liquidity is defined not by total value locked (TVL) but by the ability to exit a position under stress within a required timeframe. Risk management for RWAs must be modeled as a dependency graph, monitoring interconnected nodes like issuers, custodians, oracles, and liquidity pools for early warning signs beyond just price data. While tokenized government bonds serve as an initial "ping test," the future lies in more complex assets like computing power and energy, which require bespoke risk models. Tokenized stocks paired with perpetual futures present a major test, combining global equity ownership with crypto-native leverage, necessitating robust architectural safeguards like isolation and dynamic collateral rules. The conclusion is that without DeFi, RWA tokenization offers limited value—improving distribution and transparency. The significant opportunity arises when tokenized assets become functional components within open, programmable capital markets, where they can be used as collateral and facilitate complex financial strategies. The token is merely the barcode; the market operating system is the real machine.

marsbitHá 1h

Is RWA Still Meaningful Without DeFi?

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
活动图片