Whale Cashes Out $11.48M After $160M Profit in Crypto Crash

TheCryptoTimesPublicado em 2025-10-13Última atualização em 2025-10-13

A mysterious whale who dominated the recent market crash of Friday has now cashed out millions. According to Lookonchain, the trader, dubbed the “BitcoinOG,” deposited another 100 Bitcoin (BTC) (worth $11.48 million) to Kraken just hours ago. The same trader had earlier shorted Bitcoin and Ethereum (ETH) before the crash, pocketing over $160 million in unrealized profits.

Earlier, Lookonchain shared that as the market started to bounce back, the same trader boosted his Bitcoin short to 1,423 BTC, worth about $161 million. This shows how confident and strategic big traders can be during market swings. It also proves that timing and smart risk management often set top traders apart from everyone else.

According to EyeOnChain, other large traders showed mixed results after the crash. One address, 0x72..AD88, now holds over $1.55 million in floating profits from Ethereum and Solana longs. “He hasn’t cashed out yet, maybe hoping to squeeze more out of the rally,” EyeOnChain noted.

Interestingly, the same trader lost $4.74 million going long on ETH during the October 11 crash. Another address, 0xe9..43a5, played it safer, closing a Bitcoin long with a $265,000 profit but taking a minor hit on an Aster trade.

Liquidations and market fallout

On Friday, most long traders were wiped out between $110,000 and $114,000 as high leverage made losses worse. On the flip side, short sellers began feeling the heat above $116,000, putting those betting on a further drop at risk. 

Additionally, data from Coinalyze shows Bitcoin tumbled from $118,000 to $105,000 on October 11 before settling around $115,400. Open interest also fell from $35 billion to $32 billion, showing that many overleveraged traders were wiped out. As a result, the shakeout helped cool things down and brought some stability back to the market. 

Btc/Usd Price Chart - Tradingview
Source: Coinalyze

The Hyperliquid whale’s sharp timing and huge profits show how wild crypto price swings can create big chances to win, but also raise doubts about what’s really happening behind the scenes.

Also Read: Marathon Digital Adds 400 BTC, Holdings Hit 52,850 BTC

Mobile Only Image

Leituras Relacionadas

Kalshi and Coinbase Receive CFTC Approval, Ushering in the Most Regulation-Friendly Era for the Crypto Industry?

The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) took two landmark actions on May 29. It approved Kalshi's application to list a Bitcoin perpetual futures contract and issued a no-action letter to Coinbase Financial Markets. This allows Coinbase to offer certain perpetual futures products to U.S. customers through a subsidiary, with digital assets permitted as collateral. These moves, coupled with a new CFTC policy statement, provide a clearer regulatory pathway for perpetual contracts in the U.S., moving them from a regulatory gray area. CFTC Chair Mike Selig stated this is a key step for U.S. crypto leadership but noted the policy is not yet permanent. The article explains that CFTC's previous reluctance stemmed from legal ambiguities, as perpetual contracts lack an expiration date. However, such contracts dominate global crypto derivatives, accounting for ~78% of centralized exchange volume in 2025, forcing U.S. regulators to adapt to competition from offshore platforms like Hyperliquid. The approvals offer two compliance paths: Kalshi's direct listing and Coinbase's model using foreign futures. This is expected to attract institutional capital back to regulated U.S. venues, stimulate the launch of more products like ETH perpetuals, and enhance U.S. competitiveness in the global crypto derivatives market. The author suggests this may signal a "regulatorily friendly" era for crypto.

marsbitHá 7m

Kalshi and Coinbase Receive CFTC Approval, Ushering in the Most Regulation-Friendly Era for the Crypto Industry?

marsbitHá 7m

Sharplink CEO: Ethereum's Future Is Playing Out Now

This article presents a perspective from Joseph Chalom, CEO of Sharplink and a former BlackRock executive. He argues that current controversies surrounding the Ethereum Foundation (EF) and ETH's price miss the bigger picture for institutional adoption. Chalom asserts that Ethereum is decisively winning in the three key attributes institutions value most: trust, security, and liquidity. He cites its dominance in stablecoin settlement, tokenized real-world assets (RWA), and high-value DeFi as evidence. This success is attributed to the EF's consistent, long-term protocol development over a decade, including major upgrades like The Merge and a robust future roadmap. He defends Ethereum's decentralization as a core strength, not a weakness, stating institutions require a neutral infrastructure not controlled by any single entity. Comparing ETH to Amazon, Chalom suggests critics focusing on short-term price are missing its potential to become the foundational settlement layer for the entire global financial system. The article encourages a contrarian "be greedy when others are fearful" investment approach, drawing parallels to Warren Buffett's strategy and BlackRock's continued investment during crypto winters. Chalom concludes that while the EF correctly focuses on core protocol attributes (CROPS: Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, Security), a leadership gap exists in market-facing narrative and institutional adoption. He calls for ecosystem participants, including his own firm Sharplink, to become more vocal advocates to support Ethereum's impending "supercycle" of institutional adoption.

链捕手Há 29m

Sharplink CEO: Ethereum's Future Is Playing Out Now

链捕手Há 29m

Deconstructing the Investment Methodology of the 'Stock God Serenity' in One Article

"Serenity's Bottleneck Investment Methodology: A Deep Dive" This article dissects the "bottleneck point investment" strategy of the pseudonymous investor Serenity, known for exceptional returns (YTD 4502.45%). The core methodology involves identifying a major technological trend (e.g., AI compute expansion), mapping its supply chain, and investing early in the most irreplaceable, supply-constrained upstream component before the market fully values it. The framework is broken down into a five-factor model: 1. **Deterministic Demand**: Anchored in a large, validated trend. 2. **Constrained Supply**: The component must be difficult to replicate or scale quickly. 3. **Low Market Attention**: Opportunities exist where coverage is sparse. 4. **Value Capture**: The company must have pricing power, high margins, and customer lock-in. 5. **Catalyst**: A near-term event to trigger price discovery (earnings, customer ramp, etc.). The article provides illustrative examples like $AXTI (InP substrates for photonics), $RPI (edge hardware for AI agents), and $AAOI/$LITE (components for cloud ASICs). To apply this method, a six-step process is outlined: identify the macro trend, map the supply chain, pinpoint the true bottleneck, gather evidence (client wins, certifications), assess risks ("anti-thesis table"), and size the position according to research depth. Crucially, the article notes significant limitations: risk of overfitting inferences from sparse data, valuation challenges for pre-revenue companies, liquidity/reflexivity risks due to Serenity's own market influence, and survivor bias amplified by a strong AI bull market. The key takeaway is to emulate the rigorous research process—finding the trend, the bottleneck, the evidence—rather than blindly copying specific stock picks, emphasizing the discipline of "walking through the narrow gate."

marsbitHá 54m

Deconstructing the Investment Methodology of the 'Stock God Serenity' in One Article

marsbitHá 54m

One Article Deconstructs the Investment Methodology of 'Stock God Serenity'

This article deconstructs the "bottleneck point" investment methodology of the renowned investor known as "Serenity" (aleabitoreddit). Characterized by a YTD return of over 4500%, the strategy involves identifying a major, confirmed trend (e.g., AI data center expansion), mapping its supply chain, and then pinpointing a critical, hard-to-replace upstream bottleneck that the market has yet to fully price in. The core framework is a five-factor model: 1) **Certain Demand** from a clear megatrend; 2) **Constrained Supply** with high barriers to entry and slow replication; 3) **Low Market Attention**, where the company is overlooked; 4) **Value Capture** potential through pricing power and market share; and 5) a near-term **Catalyst** to trigger re-evaluation. Case studies include **$AXTI** (InP substrates for photonics), **$RPI** (edge hardware for AI agents), and companies like **$AAOI** and **$LITE** tied to hyperscaler-specific ASIC demand (e.g., Microsoft Maia, Amazon Trainium). The article provides a six-step guide for applying this approach: 1) Identify a validated macro trend; 2) Map the entire supply chain; 3) Find the true bottleneck; 4) Gather concrete evidence (e.g., filings, customer contracts); 5) Perform rigorous risk assessment ("anti-thesis"); 6) Match position size to depth of research. Key limitations are also noted: the risk of narrative overfitting, difficulty in valuing early-stage companies, Serenity's own market-moving influence creating reflexivity, and potential survivorship bias due to the AI bull market. The essence of the method is not to copy picks but to adopt the research process: find the trend, locate the bottleneck, verify with evidence, assess valuation, await a catalyst, and then invest with discipline. The philosophy is summarized as "walking through the narrow gate"—seeking non-consensus, structurally vital points within booming industries before they become widely recognized.

链捕手Há 1h

One Article Deconstructs the Investment Methodology of 'Stock God Serenity'

链捕手Há 1h

Bitcoin Correction Pushes 580,000 BTC Into Loss Territory

Bitcoin's recent price correction has pushed a significant portion of its supply into loss. According to Glassnode data, the total amount of BTC held at a loss (Total Supply in Loss) has risen to 8.33 million. This marks an increase of 580,000 BTC, primarily due to the asset's decline from above $76,600 to around $73,000 in the latter half of May. This indicates that a substantial volume of coins changed hands within that price range. The analytics firm notes that these recently underwater holders could contribute to near-term sell pressure as they reassess their positions. While the network's state is still better than during February's sharper crash, the increased loss supply highlights the market's sensitivity to corrections. Bitcoin is currently trading near $73,200, down over 5% for the week.

bitcoinistHá 2h

Bitcoin Correction Pushes 580,000 BTC Into Loss Territory

bitcoinistHá 2h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片

Categorias popularesright-arrow

Etiquetas Popularesright-arrow