Hyperliquid leads $10B liquidation — Should ‘regulators look into the exchanges’?

ambcryptoPublicado em 2025-10-11Última atualização em 2025-10-12

Key Takeaways

Why did Hyperliquid record massive liquidations? 

Most positions were forcefully closed to ensure the platform remains debt-free.  

What’s next post-market crash? 

Leaders are calling for better use of insurance funds to safeguard traders’ capital. 


Hyperliquid [HYPE] faced massive criticism following its massive liquidation during the recent crash. It topped the charts with $10 billion worth of positions wiped out. 

In response, Kris Marszalek, CEO of the exchange Crypto.com, called for a probe into Hyperliquid and other top platforms. 

“Regulators should look into the exchanges that had most liquidations in the last 24h and conduct a thorough review of fairness of practices.”

Hyperliquid

Source: X

Hyperliquid slams criticism

However, Jeff Yan, CEO and Co-Founder of Hyperliquid, said the claims were “irresponsible.” He clarified that DEX’s liquidation was the highest because it was the most transparent and shared full data. 

Most CEXs only allow CoinGlass to sample a limited amount of liquidation data.

In fact, some estimated that the overall liquidation could be as high as $40 billion. That’s double the reported amount of about $20 billion

Yan added that the move was per the Hyperliquid standard procedures to ensure there is no “irresponsible gambling” and bad debt. 

“Any system that does not liquidate the necessary users is irresponsibly gambling with other users’ funds. On Hyperliquid, every order, trade, and liquidation is transparently verifiable on-chain.”

Hyperliquid

Source: X

Yan said Hyperliquid didn’t target profitable positions and used auto-liquidation to maintain the platform’s solvency.

“Contrary to misconceptions, HLP is a non-toxic liquidator that does not pick profitable liquidations.”

For the unfamiliar, perpetual trading or leveraged positions are a zero-sum game by design. For every short, there should be a corresponding long.

In this setup, winning shorts earn profits funded by losses from leveraged longs.

But if one side is wiped out (bulls) and shorts make more money as the market crashes, there’s not enough money to pay the winning short sellers. Exchanges close even profitable short positions to prevent bad debt.

Auto-deleveraging (ADL) is the liquidation of last resort. Yan said exchanges apply ADL when their insurance funds or vaults fail to absorb the crash.

Most platforms opted for it during the crash, capping gains and even wiping out other traders’ capital. 

Calls for better risk tools

For his part, Tushar Jain, Partner at Multicoin Capital, urged exchanges to use insurance funds to avoid such “value destruction” for users. 

Hyperliquid

Source: X

That said, the market slipped into an “extreme fear” level seen during the “Liberation Day” tariffs in April.

Historically, this has always been a buying signal. But only a positive update on the China-U.S. tariff wars could calm and juice the markets again. 

Share

Leituras Relacionadas

Kalshi and Coinbase Receive CFTC Approval, Ushering in the Most Regulation-Friendly Era for the Crypto Industry?

The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) took two landmark actions on May 29. It approved Kalshi's application to list a Bitcoin perpetual futures contract and issued a no-action letter to Coinbase Financial Markets. This allows Coinbase to offer certain perpetual futures products to U.S. customers through a subsidiary, with digital assets permitted as collateral. These moves, coupled with a new CFTC policy statement, provide a clearer regulatory pathway for perpetual contracts in the U.S., moving them from a regulatory gray area. CFTC Chair Mike Selig stated this is a key step for U.S. crypto leadership but noted the policy is not yet permanent. The article explains that CFTC's previous reluctance stemmed from legal ambiguities, as perpetual contracts lack an expiration date. However, such contracts dominate global crypto derivatives, accounting for ~78% of centralized exchange volume in 2025, forcing U.S. regulators to adapt to competition from offshore platforms like Hyperliquid. The approvals offer two compliance paths: Kalshi's direct listing and Coinbase's model using foreign futures. This is expected to attract institutional capital back to regulated U.S. venues, stimulate the launch of more products like ETH perpetuals, and enhance U.S. competitiveness in the global crypto derivatives market. The author suggests this may signal a "regulatorily friendly" era for crypto.

marsbitHá 2h

Kalshi and Coinbase Receive CFTC Approval, Ushering in the Most Regulation-Friendly Era for the Crypto Industry?

marsbitHá 2h

Sharplink CEO: Ethereum's Future Is Playing Out Now

This article presents a perspective from Joseph Chalom, CEO of Sharplink and a former BlackRock executive. He argues that current controversies surrounding the Ethereum Foundation (EF) and ETH's price miss the bigger picture for institutional adoption. Chalom asserts that Ethereum is decisively winning in the three key attributes institutions value most: trust, security, and liquidity. He cites its dominance in stablecoin settlement, tokenized real-world assets (RWA), and high-value DeFi as evidence. This success is attributed to the EF's consistent, long-term protocol development over a decade, including major upgrades like The Merge and a robust future roadmap. He defends Ethereum's decentralization as a core strength, not a weakness, stating institutions require a neutral infrastructure not controlled by any single entity. Comparing ETH to Amazon, Chalom suggests critics focusing on short-term price are missing its potential to become the foundational settlement layer for the entire global financial system. The article encourages a contrarian "be greedy when others are fearful" investment approach, drawing parallels to Warren Buffett's strategy and BlackRock's continued investment during crypto winters. Chalom concludes that while the EF correctly focuses on core protocol attributes (CROPS: Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, Security), a leadership gap exists in market-facing narrative and institutional adoption. He calls for ecosystem participants, including his own firm Sharplink, to become more vocal advocates to support Ethereum's impending "supercycle" of institutional adoption.

链捕手Há 3h

Sharplink CEO: Ethereum's Future Is Playing Out Now

链捕手Há 3h

Deconstructing the Investment Methodology of the 'Stock God Serenity' in One Article

"Serenity's Bottleneck Investment Methodology: A Deep Dive" This article dissects the "bottleneck point investment" strategy of the pseudonymous investor Serenity, known for exceptional returns (YTD 4502.45%). The core methodology involves identifying a major technological trend (e.g., AI compute expansion), mapping its supply chain, and investing early in the most irreplaceable, supply-constrained upstream component before the market fully values it. The framework is broken down into a five-factor model: 1. **Deterministic Demand**: Anchored in a large, validated trend. 2. **Constrained Supply**: The component must be difficult to replicate or scale quickly. 3. **Low Market Attention**: Opportunities exist where coverage is sparse. 4. **Value Capture**: The company must have pricing power, high margins, and customer lock-in. 5. **Catalyst**: A near-term event to trigger price discovery (earnings, customer ramp, etc.). The article provides illustrative examples like $AXTI (InP substrates for photonics), $RPI (edge hardware for AI agents), and $AAOI/$LITE (components for cloud ASICs). To apply this method, a six-step process is outlined: identify the macro trend, map the supply chain, pinpoint the true bottleneck, gather evidence (client wins, certifications), assess risks ("anti-thesis table"), and size the position according to research depth. Crucially, the article notes significant limitations: risk of overfitting inferences from sparse data, valuation challenges for pre-revenue companies, liquidity/reflexivity risks due to Serenity's own market influence, and survivor bias amplified by a strong AI bull market. The key takeaway is to emulate the rigorous research process—finding the trend, the bottleneck, the evidence—rather than blindly copying specific stock picks, emphasizing the discipline of "walking through the narrow gate."

marsbitHá 3h

Deconstructing the Investment Methodology of the 'Stock God Serenity' in One Article

marsbitHá 3h

One Article Deconstructs the Investment Methodology of 'Stock God Serenity'

This article deconstructs the "bottleneck point" investment methodology of the renowned investor known as "Serenity" (aleabitoreddit). Characterized by a YTD return of over 4500%, the strategy involves identifying a major, confirmed trend (e.g., AI data center expansion), mapping its supply chain, and then pinpointing a critical, hard-to-replace upstream bottleneck that the market has yet to fully price in. The core framework is a five-factor model: 1) **Certain Demand** from a clear megatrend; 2) **Constrained Supply** with high barriers to entry and slow replication; 3) **Low Market Attention**, where the company is overlooked; 4) **Value Capture** potential through pricing power and market share; and 5) a near-term **Catalyst** to trigger re-evaluation. Case studies include **$AXTI** (InP substrates for photonics), **$RPI** (edge hardware for AI agents), and companies like **$AAOI** and **$LITE** tied to hyperscaler-specific ASIC demand (e.g., Microsoft Maia, Amazon Trainium). The article provides a six-step guide for applying this approach: 1) Identify a validated macro trend; 2) Map the entire supply chain; 3) Find the true bottleneck; 4) Gather concrete evidence (e.g., filings, customer contracts); 5) Perform rigorous risk assessment ("anti-thesis"); 6) Match position size to depth of research. Key limitations are also noted: the risk of narrative overfitting, difficulty in valuing early-stage companies, Serenity's own market-moving influence creating reflexivity, and potential survivorship bias due to the AI bull market. The essence of the method is not to copy picks but to adopt the research process: find the trend, locate the bottleneck, verify with evidence, assess valuation, await a catalyst, and then invest with discipline. The philosophy is summarized as "walking through the narrow gate"—seeking non-consensus, structurally vital points within booming industries before they become widely recognized.

链捕手Há 3h

One Article Deconstructs the Investment Methodology of 'Stock God Serenity'

链捕手Há 3h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片