Norway Probes Polymarket Bets on Nobel Peace Prize Winner

TheCryptoTimesPublicado em 2025-10-10Última atualização em 2025-10-10

Norwegian officials are investigating a possible leak after unusual betting activity on the Polymarket website appeared to predict the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize winner before it was announced. 

The inquiry began when bets favoring Venezuelan opposition leader Maria Corina Machado suddenly surged hours before her name was revealed in Oslo on Friday, according to Bloomberg.

The Nobel Institute confirmed the investigation after noticing the strange spike. “We’re looking into it,” Erik Aasheim, spokesman for the Nobel Institute, which manages the Peace Prize on behalf of the Norwegian Nobel Committee said. 

According to data from Polymarket, bets on Machado began climbing just after midnight Thursday, Norwegian time. When the official announcement came at 11 a.m. Friday, the early gamblers had already made tens of thousands of dollars. Three accounts that mostly bet on Machado reportedly earned around $90,000.

One trader, known only as “6741,” allegedly opened a new account just before trading, netting about $53,500, according to crypto outlet Protos. The user also placed smaller side bets on other expected contenders, including Russian activist Yulia Navalnaya, environmentalist Greta Thunberg, and WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange.

The five-member Nobel Committee had made its final decision on October 6, according to earlier Norwegian media reports. Machado was notified shortly after the public announcement in Oslo. She received the award for her long-standing efforts to promote democracy and challenge President Nicolás Maduro’s rule in Venezuela.

Polymarket Under the Spotlight

Polymarket is a blockchain-based prediction site where users bet on real-world events using cryptocurrency. The platform recently secured a $2 billion investment from Intercontinental Exchange, the parent company of the New York Stock Exchange. 

Earlier this year, Polymarket received approval to re-enter the U.S. market after clearing issues with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. This isn’t the first time Polymarket has drawn attention for possible information leaks. Similar questions have been raised before when sudden trades appeared to mirror insider knowledge. 

The current investigation seeks to determine whether someone connected to the Nobel process shared confidential information ahead of time.

Also Read: Australia’s $4.2T Super Funds Redefining Global Investment Flows


Mobile Only Image

Leituras Relacionadas

How the CLARITY Act Reshapes the Stablecoin Yield Economy

The CLARITY Act, recently advanced by the U.S. Senate Banking Committee, fundamentally reshapes the stablecoin yield economy by closing loopholes left by the earlier GENIUS Act. Its Section 404 expands the ban on "hold-to-earn" rewards to all Digital Asset Service Providers (DASPs) and their affiliates, prohibiting any passive, interest-like yield. Crucially, it introduces a legal distinction, permitting "use-to-earn" rewards based on actual activities like spending, trading, or staking. In anticipation of this regulatory shift, major Wall Street asset managers—Morgan Stanley, BlackRock, and JPMorgan—have launched a series of tokenized money market funds (e.g., BlackRock's BRSRV, JPMorgan's JLTXX) designed explicitly for stablecoin reserve assets. These products represent a new, compliant yield layer: the stablecoin issuer earns interest from the underlying tokenized fund, which can then be passed to users through redesigned activity-based rewards. This marks a paradigm shift from a "hold-to-earn" to a "use-to-earn" market. While pathways remain for exchanges to redesign rewards (Path A) and for DeFi protocols to offer yield (Path B), the tokenized reserve asset layer (Path C) emerges as the most robust and strategically positioned infrastructure. However, this concentration—exemplified by BlackRock's BUIDL fund backing over 90% of USDtb's reserves—introduces new systemic risks. The final outcome hinges on regulatory decisions, particularly the OCC's proposed 20% cap on tokenized assets in reserves, which will determine the scalability of this new financial infrastructure layer.

marsbitHá 1h

How the CLARITY Act Reshapes the Stablecoin Yield Economy

marsbitHá 1h

Kalshi and Coinbase Receive CFTC Approval, Ushering in the Most Regulation-Friendly Era for the Crypto Industry?

The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) took two landmark actions on May 29. It approved Kalshi's application to list a Bitcoin perpetual futures contract and issued a no-action letter to Coinbase Financial Markets. This allows Coinbase to offer certain perpetual futures products to U.S. customers through a subsidiary, with digital assets permitted as collateral. These moves, coupled with a new CFTC policy statement, provide a clearer regulatory pathway for perpetual contracts in the U.S., moving them from a regulatory gray area. CFTC Chair Mike Selig stated this is a key step for U.S. crypto leadership but noted the policy is not yet permanent. The article explains that CFTC's previous reluctance stemmed from legal ambiguities, as perpetual contracts lack an expiration date. However, such contracts dominate global crypto derivatives, accounting for ~78% of centralized exchange volume in 2025, forcing U.S. regulators to adapt to competition from offshore platforms like Hyperliquid. The approvals offer two compliance paths: Kalshi's direct listing and Coinbase's model using foreign futures. This is expected to attract institutional capital back to regulated U.S. venues, stimulate the launch of more products like ETH perpetuals, and enhance U.S. competitiveness in the global crypto derivatives market. The author suggests this may signal a "regulatorily friendly" era for crypto.

marsbitHá 4h

Kalshi and Coinbase Receive CFTC Approval, Ushering in the Most Regulation-Friendly Era for the Crypto Industry?

marsbitHá 4h

Sharplink CEO: Ethereum's Future Is Playing Out Now

This article presents a perspective from Joseph Chalom, CEO of Sharplink and a former BlackRock executive. He argues that current controversies surrounding the Ethereum Foundation (EF) and ETH's price miss the bigger picture for institutional adoption. Chalom asserts that Ethereum is decisively winning in the three key attributes institutions value most: trust, security, and liquidity. He cites its dominance in stablecoin settlement, tokenized real-world assets (RWA), and high-value DeFi as evidence. This success is attributed to the EF's consistent, long-term protocol development over a decade, including major upgrades like The Merge and a robust future roadmap. He defends Ethereum's decentralization as a core strength, not a weakness, stating institutions require a neutral infrastructure not controlled by any single entity. Comparing ETH to Amazon, Chalom suggests critics focusing on short-term price are missing its potential to become the foundational settlement layer for the entire global financial system. The article encourages a contrarian "be greedy when others are fearful" investment approach, drawing parallels to Warren Buffett's strategy and BlackRock's continued investment during crypto winters. Chalom concludes that while the EF correctly focuses on core protocol attributes (CROPS: Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, Security), a leadership gap exists in market-facing narrative and institutional adoption. He calls for ecosystem participants, including his own firm Sharplink, to become more vocal advocates to support Ethereum's impending "supercycle" of institutional adoption.

链捕手Há 5h

Sharplink CEO: Ethereum's Future Is Playing Out Now

链捕手Há 5h

Deconstructing the Investment Methodology of the 'Stock God Serenity' in One Article

"Serenity's Bottleneck Investment Methodology: A Deep Dive" This article dissects the "bottleneck point investment" strategy of the pseudonymous investor Serenity, known for exceptional returns (YTD 4502.45%). The core methodology involves identifying a major technological trend (e.g., AI compute expansion), mapping its supply chain, and investing early in the most irreplaceable, supply-constrained upstream component before the market fully values it. The framework is broken down into a five-factor model: 1. **Deterministic Demand**: Anchored in a large, validated trend. 2. **Constrained Supply**: The component must be difficult to replicate or scale quickly. 3. **Low Market Attention**: Opportunities exist where coverage is sparse. 4. **Value Capture**: The company must have pricing power, high margins, and customer lock-in. 5. **Catalyst**: A near-term event to trigger price discovery (earnings, customer ramp, etc.). The article provides illustrative examples like $AXTI (InP substrates for photonics), $RPI (edge hardware for AI agents), and $AAOI/$LITE (components for cloud ASICs). To apply this method, a six-step process is outlined: identify the macro trend, map the supply chain, pinpoint the true bottleneck, gather evidence (client wins, certifications), assess risks ("anti-thesis table"), and size the position according to research depth. Crucially, the article notes significant limitations: risk of overfitting inferences from sparse data, valuation challenges for pre-revenue companies, liquidity/reflexivity risks due to Serenity's own market influence, and survivor bias amplified by a strong AI bull market. The key takeaway is to emulate the rigorous research process—finding the trend, the bottleneck, the evidence—rather than blindly copying specific stock picks, emphasizing the discipline of "walking through the narrow gate."

marsbitHá 5h

Deconstructing the Investment Methodology of the 'Stock God Serenity' in One Article

marsbitHá 5h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片