Bank Of England Eyes Exemptions To Controversial Stablecoin Cap Proposal – Details

bitcoinistPublicado em 2025-10-08Última atualização em 2025-10-08

Resumo

The Bank of England (BOE) is reportedly softening its stance toward digital assets with a potential exemption to a controversial...

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

The Bank of England (BOE) is reportedly softening its stance toward digital assets with a potential exemption to a controversial policy that would establish stricter stablecoin rules for the UK market.

BOE Plans Stablecoin Cap Exemption

On Tuesday, Bloomberg reported that the Bank of England is planning to grant exemptions to businesses in the UK from its proposed limit on stablecoin ownership, according to people familiar with the matter.

The central bank aims to grant waivers to certain digital asset firms that need to hold large amounts of stablecoins, like crypto exchanges. Additionally, the BOE intends to allow firms to use stablecoins as a settlement asset in its experimental Digital Securities Sandbox.

The changes to the sandbox will initially permit firms to adopt regulated stablecoins tied to non-sterling currencies for settlement purposes. This would allow the BOE to observe use cases for these digital assets while it evaluates its approach in more detail, said Bloomberg sources.

As reported by Bitcoinist, the central bank is exploring the restriction of stablecoin ownership in the country, imposing a limit of £10,000 to £20,000 for individuals and £10 million for businesses on all systemic stablecoins.

Notably, the BOE’s plan would reassemble its proposed approach to the digital pound, which aimed to address financial stability risks that deposits could flow out of the banking system.

BOE executive director for financial market infrastructure, Sasha Mills, previously stated that the limits would “mitigate financial stability risks stemming from large and rapid outflows of deposits from the banking sector (…) and risks posed by newly recognised systemic payment systems as they are scaling up.”

Some crypto industry and payment groups heavily criticized the central bank’s plan, arguing that it would be detrimental to the pound and put the UK at a disadvantage against the US and the European Union (EU).

Simon Jennings, executive director of the UK Cryptoasset Business Council trade body, considers that “limits simply don’t work in practice.” He explained that “stablecoin issuers don’t have sight of who holds their tokens at any given time, so enforcing caps would require a costly, complex new system, such as digital IDs or constant co-ordination between wallets.”

A Softer Crypto Stance?

According to Bloomberg’s sources, the restrictions are expected to be included in a consultation paper that will be published by the end of the year. The BoE previously said its proposed cap could be “transitional” while the financial system adjusts to the growth of digital money.

The report also noted that the potential exemptions could be seen as a shift from Governor Andrew Bailey’s skeptical perspective. Bailey has previously warned that stablecoins threaten to destabilize the public’s trust in money.

In August, former Chancellor and member of Coinbase’s advisory council, George Osborne, criticized the Bailey and the government’s approach to the crypto industry, arguing that it risks being “left behind” during the second wave of digital assets if it doesn’t “catch up.”

Osborne stated that authorities cannot continue to wait and evaluate the development of a digital revolution “reminiscent of Nigel Lawson’s Big Bang in the 1980s” while other financial capitals adopt comprehensive legislative frameworks for crypto asset platforms.

Nonetheless, the BOE Governor has recently shared a softer approach, affirming that it would be “wrong to be against stablecoins as a matter of principle” and noting that they have the potential to drive “innovation in payments systems both at home and across borders.”

stablecoin, bitcoin, btc, btcusdt

Bitcoin (BTC) trades at $121,511 in the one-week chart. Source: BTCUSDT on TradingView
Featured Image from Unsplash.com, Chart from TradingView.com
Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Rubmar is a crypto enthusiast who likes learning and improving constantly. She enjoys reporting on the latest news and developments in the crypto industry. Rubmar also enjoys scrapbooking, crafting, simulation games, and watching football.

Leituras Relacionadas

Three Years Later: Looking Back at My Predictions About ChatGPT in 2023

Three Years Later: Revisiting My 2023 Predictions on ChatGPT In March 2023, shortly after ChatGPT's launch, I made 20 predictions about its future. Now, in mid-2026, I've used AI agents to fact-check each one against the latest data. Overall, most major directional forecasts were correct, with only one outright error (incorrectly stating GPT-4 had 100 trillion parameters). Key successes included predicting that RAG and retrieval architectures would become the standard for handling knowledge and hallucinations, that natural language interfaces (LUI) would create a massive new industry layer beyond the models themselves, and that China would develop viable large language models, significantly closing the performance gap with Western counterparts within about three years. Predictions about the absence of mass unemployment, the rise of a new "robot network" for agent communication, and ChatGPT not possessing consciousness also held true in their core arguments. However, the "devil was in the details." Errors frequently involved specific numbers, timelines, or overlooking distributional effects. I tended to overestimate the speed of adoption (e.g., for agent networks) while underestimating the ultimate scale of capabilities or costs (e.g., AI winning IMO gold without tools, or the extreme capital required for frontier models). Other misjudgments included: underestimating how AI would reinforce, not dissolve, information filter bubbles; incorrectly assuming AI-generated content would easily circumvent copyright (it has instead triggered record-breaking settlements); and misidentifying where value would be captured (it accrued overwhelmingly to the compute layer, like Nvidia, not just the application or model layers). Key lessons from reviewing these predictions are: 1) Directional and mechanistic insights are far more reliable than precise numbers or absolute statements. 2) There's a consistent bias to overestimate short-term speed but underestimate long-term magnitude. 3) Errors often lie in missing distributional impacts within a generally correct aggregate trend. 4) Predictions phrased with nuance and caveats aged the best. 5) Some fundamental debates (e.g., on machine consciousness or the ultimate value chain) remain unresolved even after three years. This exercise is less about scoring the past and more about establishing rules for clearer thinking about the next three years of AI.

marsbitHá 1h

Three Years Later: Looking Back at My Predictions About ChatGPT in 2023

marsbitHá 1h

Three Years Later: Looking Back on My 2023 Predictions for ChatGPT

Looking Back After Three Years: Revisiting My 2023 Predictions on ChatGPT In March 2023, shortly after ChatGPT's debut and before GPT-4's release, I made over twenty predictions about AI's future based on limited information and intuition. Now, in May 2026, I revisited those forecasts using an AI-driven analysis with 41 Opus 4.8 agents to cross-reference them with the latest data. The assessment used symbols: ✅ Correct, 🟢 Mostly Correct, 🟡 Partially Correct, ❌ Incorrect. Overall, the directional judgments held up well, with only one major factual error regarding GPT-4's rumored parameter size (incorrectly cited as 100T). However, nuances and degrees of accuracy revealed more. **What Was Largely Correct:** Predictions about mechanisms and directions proved accurate. The rise of RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) as the standard architecture for combating AI hallucination was confirmed, as was the transformative potential of LUI (Language User Interface) in creating a new industry layer atop GUIs. The emergence of "robot networks" (agent-to-agent communication protocols) and China's rapid catch-up in developing capable large models (closing the performance gap with top models to ~2.7%) were also on point. The analysis affirmed that LLMs lack consciousness and that the Turing Test merely measures perceived intelligence. **What Was Off Target:** Errors often involved specific numbers, over-optimistic timelines, or misjudged distributions. The prediction that value would primarily accrue to the application layer was half-right but missed NVIDIA's dominance as the profitable infrastructure layer. Forecasts about AI circumventing copyright issues and fostering a "global common ground" by averaging human viewpoints were incorrect; instead, major copyright settlements occurred and AI personalization is increasing. Estimates for model training costs ("$5-10 billion cap") were significantly off, underestimating frontier costs and overestimating replication costs. The notion that LLMs could never do complex math without tools was disproven by later models winning IMO gold. **Key Patterns from the Review:** 1. **Direction over precision:** Judgments about mechanisms and trends were more reliable than specific numbers or definitive statements. 2. **Timing bias:** There was a tendency to overestimate short-term speed but underestimate long-term magnitude and transformation. 3. **The distribution blind spot:** Aggregate-level correctness often masked uneven impacts (e.g., on young professionals' employment). 4. **The value of qualifiers:** Predictions framed with caution (e.g., "reportedly," "for now," "prototype in 2-3 years") aged better. 5. **Some debates continue:** Issues like the nature of "emergent abilities" or machine consciousness remain unresolved. This three-year review highlights that while seeing the big picture is crucial, humility regarding specifics, timelines, and disparate impacts is essential for future forecasting.

链捕手Há 3h

Three Years Later: Looking Back on My 2023 Predictions for ChatGPT

链捕手Há 3h

AI Bubble Warning: AI Investments Are Negative Returns for Most Tech Giants

The article issues a stark warning about a potential AI investment bubble. It notes that while the AI boom shares similarities with the TMT bubble of the late 1990s, its scale is vastly larger, currently driving 93% of U.S. GDP growth. Major hyperscale cloud providers like Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, and Oracle are planning to invest trillions in AI data centers over the coming years. However, calculations based on analyst projections for 2025-2030 reveal a concerning math problem: expected capital expenditure growth far outpaces projected revenue growth. Even under an extremely optimistic scenario of zero costs, the implied return on investment for most of these tech giants (except Amazon) is deeply negative. This suggests that the current trajectory could lead to one of history's largest shareholder value destruction events. The piece outlines two potential escapes: AI generating vastly more revenue than currently anticipated—a near-impossible task—or a significant cutback in the planned investment splurge. The latter scenario could trigger a domino effect, severely impacting the entire tech supply chain (from Nvidia to TSMC), potentially pushing the U.S. economy into recession, and causing a major stock market downturn. The author suggests upcoming high-profile IPOs by companies like OpenAI and Anthropic might represent a transfer of risk from early investors to public market participants. While the peak of the hype cycle might sustain investment through 2026, the fundamental financial dilemma remains unresolved, setting the stage for a potential market correction in 2027 or 2028, similar to the years following Alan Greenspan's "irrational exuberance" warning.

marsbitHá 4h

AI Bubble Warning: AI Investments Are Negative Returns for Most Tech Giants

marsbitHá 4h

From Tokens to Machine Labor: AI is Shifting from Tool to "Worker"

The article "From Token to Machine Labor: AI is Evolving from Tool to 'Worker'" argues that the business model for AI is shifting beyond simply selling computational resources (tokens, GPU hours) or model access. Instead, a new "machine labor market" is emerging, where the core economic transaction is the purchase of economically useful work directly performed by software. The central thesis is that AI pricing will evolve through four stages: 1) raw tokens, 2) standardized LLM capabilities (e.g., text generation), 3) industry-specific labor markets (e.g., legal review, radiology), and finally 4) a programmable results market where tasks like resolving a support ticket are bid on and priced based on outcome. In this future, buyers will care less about *which* model or GPU completes a task and more about whether the work meets specified standards for accuracy, latency, and cost. This transition reframes the impact of AI on human labor. Rather than simple replacement, it suggests a re-coordination where machines handle standardized, verifiable work, freeing humans for roles involving oversight, context management, responsibility, and final judgment. In some cases, this "last 1%" of human input becomes more valuable as it enables the other 99% to be automated. Furthermore, as AI reduces the cost of work, demand may expand, creating larger markets (e.g., 24/7 customer service) rather than just cheaper versions of existing ones. The article concludes that while infrastructure (GPUs, models, tokens) remains crucial upstream, the market is converging on a simpler, tradeable unit: machine labor that can be defined, measured, priced, and procured based on contractible specifications.

marsbitHá 4h

From Tokens to Machine Labor: AI is Shifting from Tool to "Worker"

marsbitHá 4h

Xiaomi MiMo's 99% Price Cut is Not Marketing! Luo Fuli Posts on X to Refute Critics

The price of Xiaomi's MiMo-V2.5 series API has been permanently reduced by up to 99%, specifically for the "Input (Cache Hit)" cost, which covers users re-reading historical context in long conversations. MiMo's head, Luo Fuli, published a detailed technical blog to clarify that this drastic price cut stems from genuine engineering breakthroughs, not a marketing stunt or a simple price war. The core of the achievement lies in six key engineering optimizations. First, the model architecture adopts a Hybrid Sliding Window Attention (SWA), reducing the memory footprint (KVCache) to 1/7th of a traditional model. Second, a dual-pool memory management system actually utilizes these savings, allowing a single GPU to handle over 5 times more concurrent users. Third, an upgraded prefix caching mechanism achieves a cache hit rate of 93-95% for repeated reads, meaning most such requests bypass GPU computation entirely. Fourth, a self-developed distributed cache (GCache) utilizes idle SSD space on existing GPU servers, eliminating additional storage costs. Fifth, an intelligent scheduling system (LLM-Router) efficiently routes requests to maximize cache reuse and performance. Sixth, Multi-Token Prediction (MTP) accelerates the model's text generation ("output") side. Together, these systemic optimizations dramatically lower the real computational cost per request, enabling the 99% price reduction for cached inputs while reportedly maintaining positive gross margins. Luo Fuli's disclosure aims to shift the narrative from "price war" to a demonstration of substantive AI engineering progress.

marsbitHá 6h

Xiaomi MiMo's 99% Price Cut is Not Marketing! Luo Fuli Posts on X to Refute Critics

marsbitHá 6h

Trading

Spot
Futuros

Artigos em Destaque

O que é $BANK

Bank AI: Um Passo Revolucionário no Futuro da Banca Introdução Em uma era marcada por avanços rápidos na tecnologia, o Bank AI está na interseção da inteligência artificial (IA) e dos serviços bancários. Este projeto inovador visa redefinir o panorama financeiro, melhorando a eficiência operacional, as medidas de segurança e as experiências dos clientes através do poder da IA. Ao embarcarmos nesta exploração do Bank AI, iremos aprofundar no que o projeto implica, suas dinâmicas operacionais, seu contexto histórico e marcos significativos. O que é o Bank AI? No seu cerne, o Bank AI representa uma iniciativa transformadora com o objetivo de integrar a inteligência artificial em várias operações bancárias. Este projeto aproveita as capacidades da IA para automatizar processos, melhorar os protocolos de gestão de risco e melhorar a interação com os clientes através de serviços personalizados. Os principais objetivos do Bank AI incluem: Automatização das Funções Bancárias: Ao aproveitar as tecnologias de IA, o Bank AI visa automatizar tarefas rotineiras, reduzindo o peso sobre os recursos humanos e aumentando a eficiência. Gestão de Risco Melhorada: O projeto utiliza algoritmos de IA para prever e identificar riscos, fortalecendo assim as medidas de segurança contra fraudes e outras ameaças. Personalização dos Serviços Bancários: O Bank AI foca em oferecer produtos e serviços financeiros ajustados, analisando dados e comportamentos dos clientes. Melhoria da Experiência do Cliente: A implementação de soluções impulsionadas por IA, como chatbots e assistentes virtuais, visa proporcionar aos usuários interações mais humanizadas, revolucionando a forma como os clientes se envolvem com os bancos. Com esses objetivos, o Bank AI posiciona-se como um ator crucial para tornar a banca mais eficiente, segura e centrada no usuário. Quem é o Criador do Bank AI? Os detalhes sobre o criador do Bank AI permanecem desconhecidos. Assim, nenhuma pessoa ou organização específica foi identificada nas informações disponíveis. O anonimato que cerca a origem do projeto levanta questões, mas não diminui a sua ambiciosa visão e objetivos. Quem são os Investidores do Bank AI? Semelhante ao criador do projeto, informações específicas sobre os investidores ou organizações que apoiam o Bank AI não foram divulgadas. Sem essas informações, é difícil delinear o apoio financeiro e institucional que pode estar impulsionando o projeto para frente. No entanto, a importância de ter uma sólida base de investimento é fundamental para sustentar o desenvolvimento em um campo tão inovador. Como Funciona o Bank AI? O Bank AI opera em várias frentes inovadoras, focando em fatores únicos que o diferenciam das estruturas bancárias tradicionais. Abaixo estão as principais características operacionais: Automatização: Ao aplicar algoritmos de aprendizado de máquina, o Bank AI automatiza vários processos manuais dentro dos bancos. Isso resulta na redução dos custos operacionais e permite que os trabalhadores humanos redirecionem os seus esforços para atividades mais estratégicas. Gestão de Risco Avançada: A integração da IA nas práticas de gestão de risco equipa os bancos com ferramentas para prever com precisão potenciais ameaças, como fraudes, garantindo que as informações e ativos dos clientes permaneçam seguros. Recomendações Financeiras Personalizadas: Através do aprendizado contínuo a partir das interações com os clientes, os sistemas de IA desenvolvem uma compreensão sutil das necessidades dos usuários, permitindo oferecer conselhos adaptados sobre decisões financeiras. Interações Melhoradas com os Clientes: Utilizando chatbots e assistentes virtuais alimentados por IA, o Bank AI permite uma experiência de cliente mais envolvente, permitindo que os usuários tenham suas dúvidas resolvidas rapidamente, reduzindo assim os tempos de espera e melhorando os níveis de satisfação. Juntas, estas características operacionais posicionam o Bank AI como um pioneiro no setor bancário, estabelecendo novos padrões para a prestação de serviços e a excelência operacional. Cronologia do Bank AI Compreender a trajetória do Bank AI requer uma análise do seu contexto histórico. Abaixo está uma cronologia que destaca marcos e desenvolvimentos importantes: Início de 2010: A conceituação da integração da IA nos serviços bancários começou a ganhar atenção à medida que instituições bancárias reconheciam os potenciais benefícios. 2018: Ocorreu um aumento significativo na implementação de tecnologias de IA, quando os bancos começaram a usar ferramentas de IA como chatbots para atendimento ao cliente básico e sistemas de gestão de risco para melhorar o tratamento de segurança. 2023: A sofisticação da IA continuou a avançar, com a introdução de IA generativa para tarefas mais complexas, como processamento de documentos e análise de investimentos em tempo real. Este ano marcou um salto significativo nas capacidades proporcionadas aos bancos pela tecnologia de IA. 2024-Estado Atual: Neste ano, o Bank AI está em uma trajetória ascendente, com pesquisas e desenvolvimentos em andamento prontos para aprimorar ainda mais as capacidades nas operações bancárias. A exploração contínua das aplicações de IA sugere desenvolvimentos emocionantes por vir. Pontos Chave Sobre o Bank AI Integração da IA na Banca: O Bank AI foca na adoção da inteligência artificial para simplificar os processos bancários e melhorar as experiências dos usuários. Automatização e Foco em Gestão de Risco: O projeto enfatiza fortemente essas áreas, visando transferir o peso das tarefas rotineiras enquanto melhora as estruturas de segurança através de análises preditivas. Soluções Bancárias Personalizadas: Ao aproveitar os dados dos clientes, o Bank AI possibilita serviços bancários ajustados que atendem às necessidades individuais dos usuários. Compromisso com o Desenvolvimento: O Bank AI permanece comprometido com contínuas pesquisas e esforços de desenvolvimento, garantindo a sua adaptabilidade e relevância contínua à medida que a tecnologia continua a evoluir. Conclusão Em resumo, o Bank AI exemplifica um passo crucial em frente na indústria bancária, aproveitando a inteligência artificial para remodelar paradigmas operacionais, melhorar a segurança e promover a satisfação do cliente. Apesar das lacunas de informação em torno do criador e dos investidores, os objetivos claros e os mecanismos funcionais do Bank AI fornecem uma base sólida para sua evolução contínua. À medida que a tecnologia de IA continua a avançar e se fundir com o setor bancário, o Bank AI está bem posicionado para impactar significativamente o futuro dos serviços financeiros, aprimorando a maneira como entendemos e interagimos com a banca.

40 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2024.12.03

O que é $BANK

Como comprar BANK

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de Lorenzo Protocol (BANK) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar Lorenzo Protocol (BANK) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu Lorenzo Protocol (BANK)Depois de comprar o teu Lorenzo Protocol (BANK), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona Lorenzo Protocol (BANK)Transaciona facilmente Lorenzo Protocol (BANK) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

391 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2026.05.19

Como comprar BANK

Discussões

Bem-vindo à Comunidade HTX. Aqui, pode manter-se informado sobre os mais recentes desenvolvimentos da plataforma e obter acesso a análises profissionais de mercado. As opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o preço de BANK (BANK) são apresentadas abaixo.

活动图片