Ripple выделяет трансатлантическую инициативу как образец для глобального регулирования криптовалют.

cryptonews.ruPublicado em 2025-09-25Última atualização em 2025-09-28

Новаторская трансатлантическая инициатива стимулирует институциональное принятие технологии блокчейн, подчеркивая стабильные монеты, токенизированные активы, регуляторное выравнивание и трансграничные финансы, с Ripple, стремящимся сформировать глобальные стандарты и ускорить цифровой рост.

Ripple продвигает двустороннюю рабочую группу как катализатор для институционального принятия блокчейн

Ripple поделилась инсайтами 25 сентября о новой двусторонней инициативе между Великобританией и США, подчеркивая ее потенциальное влияние на цифровые активы и трансграничные финансы. Авторство анализа принадлежит Мэттью Осборну, директору по политике в Европе и Великобритании в Ripple, и Лорен Белив, руководителю политики в США в Ripple, и он посвящен заявлению обеих правительств о Трансатлантической рабочей группе для рынков будущего. Инициатива направлена на координацию подходов к стабильным монетам, токенизированным активам и доступу к рынкам.

[bn_top_ad]

Ripple заявила в своем анализе:

Это значительный этап.

Компания объяснила, что рабочая группа может служить первым глобальным шаблоном для международного сотрудничества на крипторынках. Ripple подчеркнула приоритеты, такие как стабильные монеты для трансграничных расчетов, признание токенизированного обеспечения и регуляторное равенство между Великобританией и США для снижения дублирующей нагрузки по соблюдению требований. «Ожидается, что Рабочая группа представит рекомендации в течение 180 дней посредством Финансовой регулирующей рабочей группы Великобритании и США, предоставляя четкий временной график для прогресса,» отметила Ripple.

Компания также подчеркнула более широкое воздействие:

Увеличение международного сотрудничества между Великобританией и США поможет раскрыть весь экономический потенциал блокчейн-технологий в обеих странах.

Кэсси Крэддок, управляющий директор по Великобритании и Европе в Ripple, сказала на платформе социальных медиа X, что она приняла участие в круглом столе на Даунинг-стрит во время государственного визита Дональда Трампа в Великобританию, описывая его как предшественника объявления о Трансатлантической рабочей группе для рынков будущего между Великобританией и США. Она назвала инициативу усилием по укреплению давнего партнерства в сфере финансовых услуг между двумя странами.

Более широкие последствия инициативы распространяются на институциональное принятие и инвестиции. Крэддок отметила, что «новая рабочая группа приведет к более тесному сотрудничеству между США и Великобританией в отношении цифровых активов, создавая возможность для согласования по вопросам стабильных монет, токенизации и доступа к трансграничным рынкам, а также задавая шаблон для международного сотрудничества в нашей индустрии». Она добавила, что Ripple хорошо позиционирован для того, чтобы использовать свой трансатлантический охват для поддержки работы рабочей группы. Ripple аналогично подчеркнула, что четкие и совместимые стандарты снизят барьеры для трансграничной активности, укрепят институциональную уверенность и поддержат амбиции Великобритании стать мировым центром цифровых активов. В то время как критики утверждают, что быстрое регулирование может помешать инновациям, сторонники считают, что гармонизированный надзор жизненно важен для рыночной уверенности и долгосрочного роста.

Leituras Relacionadas

Claude Accused of Becoming Dumber by the Entire Internet, Anthropic Steps In to Reveal: It’s Not the Model That’s Tricking You

When users complained that Claude was "getting dumber," the root cause wasn't the AI model itself. In an official blog post, Anthropic clarified the critical difference between two key settings in Claude Code: Model and Effort. Model refers to the core "brain"—the fixed, trained weights of a specific AI (like Sonnet, Opus, or Fable). Changing the Model addresses *capability* ("can it do this?"), but its knowledge is static post-training. Effort, however, controls the AI's *approach and thoroughness* for a specific task. A higher Effort level instructs Claude to read more files, run tests, perform verification, and complete multi-step reasoning before responding, significantly increasing its "work output" for that job. Conversely, low Effort leads to quicker, less thorough replies. This distinction explains the March 2024 uproar where users experienced a sudden drop in Claude's performance. The cause was not a model change but Anthropic quietly lowering the *default* Effort setting from "high" to "medium" to reduce latency, which was later reverted. The key insight is that a smaller, capable model (like Sonnet) on high Effort can often outperform a larger, more powerful model (like Opus) on low Effort for many tasks. The article provides a practical troubleshooting framework: if Claude makes an error, first check the context and instructions. If it seems to skip necessary steps or validations, increase Effort. If it diligently attempts the task but fails conceptually or makes consistent factual errors despite good context, then consider switching to a more capable Model. The takeaway is a shift in focus: effective AI programming is less about always choosing the "strongest" model and more about intelligently *orchestrating* models and effort levels—acting like a project manager to assign the right "brain" with the right level of diligence for each job, optimizing both results and cost.

marsbitHá 1h

Claude Accused of Becoming Dumber by the Entire Internet, Anthropic Steps In to Reveal: It’s Not the Model That’s Tricking You

marsbitHá 1h

Will the Ethereum Foundation Evolve into a 'Mascot'? Diversified Organizations Are Fragmenting Its Functions

The Ethereum Foundation (EF) is undergoing significant internal turmoil and functional erosion. Following its largest-ever layoff of 54 staff (20% of its workforce) and a major organizational restructuring announced in June, its Protocol Support Team has been officially dissolved. This comes alongside the high-profile resignation of key figures like co-executive director Xiaowei Wang, bringing senior departures this year to at least eight. Criticism of EF's rigid structure, opaque decision-making, and perceived lack of a clear value narrative for ETH has intensified within the community. The layoffs have catalyzed the emergence of independent, non-profit organizations like Ethlabs and Ethereum Institutional, founded by former EF researchers and members. These entities are now taking on core functions such as protocol research/development and institutional adoption, effectively fragmenting the EF's traditional leadership role. Concurrently, EF's security team is adapting to technological change, deploying specialized AI agents to audit Ethereum's codebase, which successfully discovered a critical vulnerability (CVE-2026-34219). While EF states AI complements rather than replaces researchers, it signals a potential future shift in its operational model. Faced with these challenges—internal restructuring, talent drain, the rise of competing organizations, and AI integration—the Ethereum Foundation appears to be stepping back from a central commanding role. Analysts and community observers speculate it may increasingly transition towards a symbolic "ecosystem mascot" function, while decentralized initiatives drive Ethereum's future growth and institutional adoption.

marsbitHá 1h

Will the Ethereum Foundation Evolve into a 'Mascot'? Diversified Organizations Are Fragmenting Its Functions

marsbitHá 1h

Nearly a Hundred Players Rush into Embodied Data: With 4.47 Billion Yuan in Financing in One Year, Who Can Really Make Money by 'Selling Data'?

The domestic embodied AI data industry has attracted nearly 100 players, with 70 focused on data collection and 27 on data infrastructure. In the past year, 15 independent embodied data service providers raised approximately 4.47 billion yuan. Despite this growth, the sector remains early-stage, fragmented, and faces significant challenges. Data collection methods are diverse, categorized into four main routes: teleoperation of real robots, human demonstration without a robot (using motion capture, exoskeletons, etc.), simulation synthesis, and distillation from internet videos. Most companies (43%) adopt hybrid approaches, combining multiple routes, as no single method can meet all training needs. Teleoperation alone is pursued by 31% of players, often by state-owned platforms and robot companies, while newer firms favor asset-light, no-hardware human demonstration. Independent data service providers now form the largest player group (40%), indicating the emergence of a distinct industry segment rather than just a subsidiary function for robot makers. Two-thirds of all players are "embodied-native" startups, while one-third are companies that pivoted from fields like AI data annotation, which are more prevalent in the data infrastructure layer. Current annual industry capacity is estimated at 1.6-1.8 million hours plus 70-80 million data points, with a short-term goal to increase this 15-20 fold within 1-3 years. Data collection factories are spread across 20 provinces in China, concentrated in the Yangtze River Delta, Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, and Pearl River Delta regions. Financially, the 4.47 billion yuan raised in the past year pales compared to the 43.8 billion yuan raised by the broader embodied intelligence sector in just the first half of 2026, highlighting that data remains a less "sexy" bet for investors. The 15 funded independent providers show clear stratification: a top tier led by a unicorn (Lightwheel Intelligence, 3.1 billion yuan), a middle tier of 11 firms raising tens to hundreds of millions, and an early-stage tier of 3 companies. Sixty-nine investment institutions have participated, but none have made concentrated bets, reflecting uncertainty about viable business models. Over half of these funded companies are less than a year old, most are at pre-A or A rounds, and profitability remains largely unproven. In summary, the embodied data industry has become an independent track creating jobs and local economic activity. However, it is still nascent, with unformed consensus, unsolved problems, and unproven business models. The coming 1-2 years will be a critical validation window to see if companies can build sustainable, profitable businesses purely by "selling data."

marsbitHá 4h

Nearly a Hundred Players Rush into Embodied Data: With 4.47 Billion Yuan in Financing in One Year, Who Can Really Make Money by 'Selling Data'?

marsbitHá 4h

Trading

Spot
活动图片