Dogecoin breaks KEY level – Will DOGE hit $1 in 2025?

ambcryptoPublicado em 2025-09-14Última atualização em 2025-09-14

Key Takeaways

Despite the delay in the launch of the DOGE ETF (DOJE), Dogecoin prices rallied past the $0.287 resistance. Further gains are expected, but the OBV has not made a new high, which was a slight concern.


The Dogecoin [DOGE] ETF rumors have come true, with the official launch of the Rex-Osprey DOGE ETF, with the ticker symbol DOJE. They will be going live next week, and not on the 12th of September as revealed earlier.

Despite the delay, DOGE continued to rally higher. At the time of writing, it was close to the $0.3 round number resistance, and possessed strong bullish momentum and buying pressure.

This impetus should send the leading memecoin toward the next key resistance at $0.4.

Can Dogecoin achieve the $1 target in 2025?

Dogecoin 1-day ChartDogecoin 1-day Chart

Source: DOGE/USDT on TradingView

On the 1-day chart, a daily session close above $0.287 would represent a bullish structure break and continued gains for DOGE. The breakout past the range, which has been in play since March, was an encouraging sight.

A failed breakout in July raised concerns that the current move could be a liquidity grab before the price descends back into the range.

However, with Bitcoin [BTC] climbing in recent days and targeting the $117.5k short-term resistance, the bullish outlook for Dogecoin was justified.

The ETF was accompanied by above-average trading volumes in recent days. Yet, the OBV was unable to move past the local high set in July. This hinted at a lack of accumulation over the past two months, but it was only a minor concern for investors.

Overhead, the next significant resistance level was at $0.434. The $0.4-$0.45 area can be considered a supply zone, as it was close to the highs made in November-December 2024.

A retest of the $0.26-$0.285 area would likely see a bullish reaction and offer swing traders a buying opportunity.

Disclaimer: The information presented does not constitute financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice and is solely the writer’s opinion

Share

Leituras Relacionadas

EIP-8363 Quantitative Review: Cutting Staking 'Subsidies' – What Does Ethereum Hope to Gain?

**EIP-8363 Quantitative Review: Reducing Staking "Subsidies" – What Does Ethereum Want in Return?** EIP-8363 proposes burning an increasing portion of validator rewards as the staking rate rises, reaching 100% burn when 50% of ETH is staked. This analysis models its impact on issuance, yield, and staking equilibrium, examines whether ETH's yield explains its price, quantifies the chain economy's reliance on this yield, and presents conclusions. Key findings: 1. **EIP-1559 Burns Are Ineffective:** Post-merge, burning (via base fees) has collapsed by 98% and now offsets only 2.4% of new ETH issuance, making issuance policy Ethereum's sole remaining supply lever. 2. **EIP-8363's Real Impact:** At the current ~42.2M ETH staked, the proposal would cut issuance by ~58.6% and staking APR by ~56.4%, removing ~633k ETH ($1.55B) in annual dilution (0.53% of market cap). It's not zero issuance; that would require 43% more ETH staked. 3. **Self-Limiting Mechanism:** The design has a built-in equilibrium. At reasonable required returns (e.g., 2%), the system stabilizes at ~26% staking rate and ~0.48% annual inflation. 4. **Yield vs. Price:** No detectable statistical relationship exists between changes in staking yield and ETH price returns over 43 months. The natural 37% yield decline since 2023 did not drive price action. 5. **Chain Economy Dependence:** While LSTs like wstETH form ~34% of collateral in major lending markets, their utility as collateral remains if yield is positive. The direct revenue hit to protocols like Lido is significant (~50% of fee income) but not systemic. Staking-focused ETFs represent only 0.19% of ETH supply. 6. **Core Conflict:** The debate masks a zero-sum redistribution: cutting ~$1.55B in annual issuance transfers value from concentrated staking intermediaries (LST/LRT protocols, leverage players) to the dispersed majority of non-staking ETH holders. 7. **Outlook:** The proposal is economically sound for ETH's scarcity but politically difficult due to concentrated opposition. It is unlikely to pass in its current form.

marsbitHá 15m

EIP-8363 Quantitative Review: Cutting Staking 'Subsidies' – What Does Ethereum Hope to Gain?

marsbitHá 15m

Trading

Spot
活动图片