上市首日涨超 24%,“RWA 第一股” Figure 成功登陆纳斯达克

深潮Publicado em 2025-09-11Última atualização em 2025-09-12

作为基于区块链技术的贷款机构,Figure的上市标志着传统金融与加密经济融合的进一步深化。

综合 | 招股书 智通财经 公司官网

编辑 | Echo

9月11日,区块链借贷平台Figure(FIGR.US)成功登陆纳斯达克,这是继稳定币第一股Circle、合规交易所第一股Bullish之后,又一家加密货币行业的公司上市。高盛集团、杰富瑞金融集团和美国银行担任此次IPO的主承销商。

由于市场需求旺盛,Figure的首次公开募股(IPO)定价25美元,将高于上调后的20至22美元发行价区间。此前Figure已经将发行规模调整为20至22美元的价格发行3150万股股票,而最早的目标是发行2630万股股票,发行价区间为18至20美元。

据报道,在美东时间周二下午4点时,此次IPO就获得了数倍超额认购。新投资者杜肯家族办公室(Duquesne Family Office)计划在此次发行中认购价值5000万美元的股票,占总募资额的8%。

上市首日,Figure收涨24.44%,报31.11美元,市值65.85亿美元。

值得注意的是,加密货币行业近期IPO表现活跃。此前,加密货币交易所Bullish(BLSH.US)和稳定币发行商Circle Internet Group(CRCL.US)已成功完成上市。

Figure选择此时IPO,既受益于监管环境改善,也反映出投资者对加密货币相关金融科技企业的持续关注。

Figure由Mike Cagney于2018年联合创立,他曾是SoFi Technologies Inc.创始团队的一员,并于2018年辞去首席执行官职务。该公司开发区块链技术以促进贷款业务,并于2024年任命Michael Tannenbaum为CEO。

文件显示,该公司最初提供房屋净值信贷额度产品,随后还推出了加密资产抵押贷款和数字资产交易所等产品。其基于区块链的贷款发放规模已超过160亿美元。

根据官网信息,Figure在人工智能领域应用了OpenAI Inc.的技术来评估贷款申请,并采用Alphabet Inc.旗下谷歌Gemini驱动的聊天机器人。

公司投资者包括阿波罗全球管理公司、10T Holdings LLC和Ribbit Capital。文件显示,IPO完成后,Cagney预计将继续掌握Figure的多数投票权。

Figure构建了一套垂直整合的区块链解决方案体系,为其旗下各类市场业务提供技术支撑,涵盖消费信贷、数字资产等领域的借贷、交易及投资活动。其差异化基础设施的核心根基建立在房屋净值信贷额度(HELOC)市场。

该公司既直接向借款人发放贷款,也打造了“合作品牌战略”——抵押贷款发放机构、贷款服务商、银行、批发经纪商及信用合作社等合作方,可借助Figure的技术平台开展自有贷款的发放与分销业务。

2024年,Figure促成的房屋净值信贷额度交易规模达50亿美元,同比增长51%,并宣称在当年非银行机构房屋净值信贷额度借贷市场中占据了市场份额第一的位置。

招股书显示,Figure在2023年、2024年营收分别为2.1亿美元、3.41亿美元;运营利润分别为-4944万美元、924万美元;净利分别为-5244万美元、1992万美元。

Figure在2025年上半年营收为1.91亿美元,较上年同期的1.56亿美元增长22.4%;主要收入来自出售贷款收益,2025年上半年来自放贷收益为6834万美元,上年同期为5864万美元;

Figure在2025年上半年来自生态系统和技术费用为4375万美元,上年同期为1251万美元;利息收入为3264万美元,上年同期为1970万美元。Figure在2025年上半年净利为2938万美元,上年同期的净亏损为1340万美元;经调整EBITDA为8344万美元,上年同期为3654万美元。

作为基于区块链技术的贷款机构,Figure的上市标志着传统金融与加密经济融合的进一步深化。其业务模式结合了区块链技术的高效性与传统信贷服务的合规性,在特朗普政府推动金融创新政策背景下,此类企业的市场表现值得持续关注。

Leituras Relacionadas

DeFi Has Reached Its Most Dangerous Moment: The Real Vulnerabilities Are Not in the Code

DeFi in Peril: The Real Vulnerability Isn't in the Code April 2026 marked a paradigm shift in DeFi security, with over $625 million lost across 30 incidents—the worst month in crypto history by event count. Crucially, none of the major exploits (Drift Protocol: $285M, KelpDAO: $292M, Wasabi Protocol: $4.5M) resulted from smart contract vulnerabilities. Instead, failures occurred in the operational "plumbing": social engineering to compromise multi-signature councils, a single-point-of-failure 1-of-1 bridge validator, and stolen admin private keys. These events expose a fundamental misalignment: the industry's security model has long focused on code audits, while the actual attack surface has shifted to privileged access points and off-chain infrastructure. The article introduces the term "OpenFi" to describe this reality: permissionless, on-chain, yet operationally dependent on trusted third parties (admins, validators, oracles) at key junctures. The KelpDAO exploit vividly demonstrated asymmetric "contagion risk." A configuration error in a smaller protocol triggered a panic, causing approximately $13.2 billion in outflows from larger, unaffected protocols like Aave within 48 hours, as users fled uncertain collateral. The core dilemma is the double-edged sword of centralization. Operational levers like emergency councils (e.g., Arbitrum freezing stolen funds post-KelpDAO) enable crisis response but also create catastrophic attack surfaces if compromised (e.g., Drift). The path forward demands radical honesty: protocols must clearly disclose their trust assumptions, operational levers, and failure modes. The industry must treat operational security (key management, configurations, incident response) with the same rigor as code security. Survival depends on building systems whose risks can be understood, priced, and insured, moving beyond the outdated "code is law" mantra to a mature model of disclosed and managed trust.

链捕手Há 1h

DeFi Has Reached Its Most Dangerous Moment: The Real Vulnerabilities Are Not in the Code

链捕手Há 1h

Vitalik's Article Emphasizes Ethereum Must Be 'Amazing', But Foundation Is Not the Center

Vitalik Buterin has published a lengthy response to recent community criticism directed at the Ethereum Foundation (EF). Acknowledging a sense of "unease," he addresses concerns about the EF's strategic direction, its perceived disconnect from ETH's price performance, and calls for its reduced central role. Vitalik rejects the notion that the EF should be the central governing body of Ethereum, framing it instead as one "node with a clear mandate" among many within the ecosystem. He highlights the EF's limited ETH holdings (≈0.16% of supply) compared to other blockchain foundations and states it will no longer sell significant amounts of ETH. Its future focus will be on long-term, critical projects that align with Ethereum's core values of censorship-resistance and decentralization, which might not otherwise happen. A core argument is that Ethereum must be "amazing," but not by merely chasing higher transaction speeds at the cost of decentralization. He proposes focusing on the "CROPS" dimensions: creating a Cryptographically provable, Reliable, Open, Private, and Secure network. This includes pursuing goals like a formally verifiable, bug-free Ethereum client and minimizing protocol-level reliance on intermediaries. The article concludes by noting that while Vitalik clarifies the EF's refocused role, he does not directly address community suggestions for creating a new organization explicitly aligned with ETH's economic interests. This "alignment gap" is presented as a key challenge for Ethereum's future.

链捕手Há 1h

Vitalik's Article Emphasizes Ethereum Must Be 'Amazing', But Foundation Is Not the Center

链捕手Há 1h

Galxe: How a Quest Platform Evolved into Web3's Growth Infrastructure

Galxe, once perceived as a simple Web3 quest platform, has evolved into a core growth infrastructure within the Web3 ecosystem. It addresses a fundamental Web3 growth dilemma: the lack of a mature, systematic user acquisition and retention system akin to Web2's advertising and analytics platforms. While users complete quests (social tasks, on-chain interactions) for rewards, Galxe's true innovation lies in transforming these fragmented, one-off actions into lasting, verifiable identity credentials. This process of *behavioral assetization* creates a persistent record of a user's activities across projects and chains. For users, their wallet accumulates a valuable history that can unlock future access and rewards, fostering a "profile-building" mentality. For projects, Galxe provides a pre-screened user pool with rich behavioral data, enabling targeted outreach to users based on their specific on-chain history and community engagement. Galxe employs a gamefied growth path, guiding users from low-friction social tasks into deeper, valuable on-chain interactions through a structured progression of quests. This solves the incentive-behavior mismatch common in Web3, filtering users by their willingness to engage. Beyond quests, products like Passport (identity verification) and Starboard (community analytics) position Galxe as a comprehensive growth operating system. The platform's defensible advantage is its self-reinforcing data and network flywheel: more projects attract more users, enriching behavioral data; richer data enables better user targeting, attracting more projects. Ultimately, Galxe is shifting Web3's growth logic from short-term "reward-driven" traffic towards a long-term "identity-driven" relationship model, where a user's accumulated on-chain履历 becomes a core asset.

marsbitHá 1h

Galxe: How a Quest Platform Evolved into Web3's Growth Infrastructure

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片