蓝港互动加密资产持仓远超股票市值,一览王峰的“港股微策略”实验

marsbitPublicado em 2025-09-09Última atualização em 2025-09-10

一家港股上市的游戏公司,其持有的加密资产市值竟比公司总市值还高出约15%,王峰领导的蓝港互动正通过一系列激进但透明的加密资产布局重塑自身价值。

加密资产

9月9日晚,蓝港互动集团有限公司(8267.HK)发布自愿公告,披露了其最新的加密货币持仓情况:集团直接持有116枚比特币,通过参股公司间接持有96枚比特币,合计达212枚比特币;直接持有663枚以太坊。

通过参股公司间接持有1377枚以太坊,总计2040枚;Solana的合计持有量更是达到18205枚。

与此同时,公司宣布了三项关键战略决策:对比特币进行战略性增持、启动以太坊与Solana的质押计划,以及通过旗下LK Crypto部门深入参与两大公链生态系统建设。

加密资产持仓,已成蓝港核心资产

这并不是蓝港互动首次披露其加密资产持有情况。早在8月13日,公司就曾发布公告,披露了其加密资产持仓,当时集团合计持有193.08枚比特币、1,707.63枚以太坊和14,057枚SOL。

对比两次数据可以发现,在不到一个月的时间内,蓝港互动明显增持了加密货币。

在Solana方面,持有量从14,057枚增加至18,205枚,增幅近30%,这充分体现了公司对加密资产,尤其是Solana的看好程度。

更值得关注的是,蓝港互动还罕见地公布了其持仓平均成本:比特币约为73,015美元,以太坊约为3,155美元,Solana约为165美元。

这种透明度在上市公司中颇为难得,也为投资者提供了评估公司加密资产投资能力的重要参考。


战略方向调整,质押与生态建设成重点

蓝港互动此次不仅仅是简单披露持仓,更重要的是公布了其未来的加密资产战略方向。公司宣布了三项关键举措。

首先是​​战略性增持比特币​​。公司明确表示持续视比特币为加密货币市场的主要储备资产,并将视市场情况择机进行战略性增持。这一策略与微策略公司(MicroStrategy)颇为相似,后者已成为上市公司持有比特币的典范。

其次是启动​​以太坊与SOL质押计划​​。集团计划将这两种资产投入各生态主网的质押机制,以提升资产使用效率、获取链上收益。这不仅能够带来额外的收益来源,更能进一步提升资产收益潜力和链上参与度。

第三是​​深入参与生态系统建设​​。通过旗下特定加密货币业务部门LK Crypto启动专项研究,参与以太坊与SOL生态系统中关键基础设施发展与业务协作。公司特别看好这两大公链在“成熟可编程性、安全性与稳定性”方面的优势。

蓝港互动还首次创立了Ondo Finance (ONDO)的持仓,探索其在RWA(现实世界资产上链)赛道的战略潜力,这显示公司正在不断拓展其加密资产投资边界。


LK Crypto部门,专业管理加密资产

蓝港互动的加密资产由专门的加密货币事业部“LK Crypto”统一管理。该部门拥有一支由资深投资人、技术专家、链上数据分析师及合规顾问等组成的多元化专业团队。

核心成员平均具有逾八年加密货币及区块链行业经验,熟悉去中心化交易平台(DEX)、去中心化金融(DeFi)及链上数据分析等领域,使LK Crypto在加密资产配置、风险管理及长期价值挖掘方面具备成熟的管理体系。

为确保在波动性较高的加密市场中保持稳健且具灵活性的资产管理能力,LK Crypto严格执行多重签名托管、实时链上监控等安全及风险控制措施。

这种专业化的管理团队和风险控制措施,为上市公司投资加密资产提供了重要的制度保障。


盈利贡献显著,加密资产带来转亏为盈

加密资产投资不仅为蓝港互动带来了资产结构的改变,更直接贡献了实实在在的盈利。

8月26日,蓝港互动发布盈利预告,预期2025年上半年转亏为盈。

公司预计将取得经调整净溢利约为人民币1110万元至人民币1350万元,而2024年上半年则取得经调整亏损净额约人民币1300万元。

董事会明确表示,业绩改善“​​主要由于本集团持有加密货币所带来的回报​​”。这一陈述直接肯定了加密资产投资对公司财务表现的积极影响。

在传统业务表现平平的背景下,加密资产带来的回报成为公司扭转业绩的关键因素,这也部分解释了为什么蓝港互动会如此积极地布局加密资产领域。


1亿美元资管计划,向外部投资者开放

加密资产

蓝港互动并不满足于仅仅自身持有加密资产。

8月13日的公告中还透露,集团拟通过LK Crypto启动总规模为1亿美元的资产管理及募资计划。

此计划将包含集团现有资金及持有的加密资产,并向市场开放,引入外部投资者共同参与。集团及其参股公司当前持有的比特币、以太坊及SOL等资产,为该计划提供坚实基础与透明背书。

根据规划,资金将重点配置于:具备长期增长潜力的优质加密货币资产、Web3生态基础设施项目,以及与集团战略发展方向相关的全球优质权益类资产。

此项措施旨在进一步扩大集团在全球加密资产与Web3领域的战略布局。


王峰的加密信仰,创始人引领战略转型

加密资产

蓝港互动如此All in Web3和加密资产,与创始人​​王峰​​的理念密切相关。

9月4日,王峰在推文中表达了对微策略公司的看法:“我今天和一位朋友说,不要把微策略和今天跟风的各种NEXT微策略当成一种类型的公司,或者说不要那么轻易地相信他们有人必然会成为NEXT微策略。”

他强调:“人家可是经过比特币多轮牛熊,创始人不是临时拉来的演员,真正的人旗合一,坚持做自己想做的事情、才到今天的位置。”

这番话既表达了对微策略的尊重,也暗示了蓝港互动想要成为真正意义上的“下一个微策略”需要具备的条件和坚持。


股价与资产价值,显著低估的MNAV比率

加密资产

截至9月9日,蓝港互动(HK:08267) 股票价格为0.66港元,总市值为2.44亿港元。然而,公司当前加密资产市值约为3600万美元(约2.8亿港币),这一数字甚至比公司总市值还高出约15%。

MNAV比率(市值/净资产比率)为0.87,这一数字表明其股价严重低估。通常情况下,上市公司的市值应该高于其净资产价值,但蓝港互动的情况却相反。

这种低估可能反映了市场几个方面的担忧:一是加密资产的高波动性可能带来的价值波动;二是公司传统业务(游戏和影视)的表现不佳;三是市场对上市公司大量持有加密资产的认可度尚不足。

从另一角度观察,这种低估也可能为投资者提供了机会,这种罕见的“市值倒挂”现象,暗示着市场可能尚未充分认识到蓝港互动加密资产的价值。

特别是对于那些看好加密资产长期价值但又不想直接持有加密资产的传统投资者来说,通过投资蓝港互动股票间接持有加密资产可能是一个值得考虑的选择。


差异化策略,港股的独特存在

蓝港互动的持仓结构折射出港股上市公司配置加密资产的差异化策略。在港股一众加密概念的上市公司中,蓝港互动也是独具一格的。

不同于一些公司仅仅简单持有比特币,蓝港互动选择了​​比特币、以太坊和Solana​​三种核心资产组合,同时还探索RWA等新兴赛道。

这种组合既包含了比特币作为“数字黄金”的价值存储功能,也包含了以太坊和Solana作为智能合约平台的发展潜力,同时还通过ONDO等资产探索RWA这一新兴领域。

公司不仅单纯持有资产,还通过质押计划提升资产效率,通过专项研究深入参与生态系统建设,通过资管计划引入外部投资者共同参与。这种全方位、多层次的参与方式,在上市公司中颇为罕见。

蓝港互动在港股市场上的这种独特定位,使其成为研究上市公司参与加密资产的重要案例,也为其他上市公司提供了可参考的模式。


结语

随着比特币和以太坊机构化趋势不可逆转,像蓝港互动这样早期且透明布局加密资产的上市公司,可能会吸引更多寻求加密资产暴露而又不想直接持有加密货币的传统投资者。

而蓝港互动能否成为港股市场的“微策略”,不仅取决于加密市场本身的发展,更取决于公司能否将其加密资产优势转化为持续的盈利能力和股东价值。



Leituras Relacionadas

China's AI Fronts: From Yan'an to Midway

This article analyzes the competitive landscape of China's AI industry through a dual-front war analogy: the "Eastern Front" of business model competition and the "Western Front" of global strategic positioning. **The Eastern Front: The Scramble for Supply Lines and Monetization** The "Eastern Front" examines the contrasting strategies of three Chinese tech giants—Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance—in the face of AI's high marginal costs. Tencent integrates AI as a catalyst within its existing ecosystems (advertising, gaming, cloud) for monetization, prioritizing high-value scenarios over user growth. Alibaba bets on a full-stack, self-developed approach from chips to applications, aiming to control costs and ecosystem, though this requires immense patience and resources. ByteDance, with Doubao as its flagship, pursues a traditional traffic-driven, "super app" strategy but faces severe monetization challenges as its massive user base incurs unsustainable operational costs. The central challenge for all is building a reliable "supply line" (sustainable funding/profit) and achieving efficient monetization, moving beyond being mere "token factories." **The Western Front: "Preserving Land" vs. "Preserving People"** The "Western Front" frames a global strategic divergence. The U.S. model ("preserving land") focuses on closed-source, high-premium models (e.g., Anthropic) targeting lucrative enterprise markets. China's strategy ("preserving people") leverages open-source models (e.g., Alibaba's Qwen, DeepSeek) and extremely low pricing to attract global developers and capture long-tail markets, akin to a "surround the cities from the countryside" approach. The goal is to make Chinese models the default infrastructure, locking in future ecosystem value. However, the critical test is whether this open-source ecosystem can achieve a commercial闭环, converting developer adoption into tangible revenue (e.g., via cloud services), and bridging the monetization gap with Western models that charge for value, not just tokens. **Conclusion: The Long March from Factory to Brand** The article concludes that China's AI industry possesses technology, users, and scenarios but must integrate them to create and capture value. Its ultimate success depends on navigating both fronts: companies must establish sustainable monetization on the Eastern Front, while the industry's Western strategy must evolve from simply "preserving people" (developer adoption) to truly "preserving both people and land" — transforming open-source ecosystem dominance into commercial success and premium brand value. This journey from being a "token factory" to a "value highland" will require strategic patience and the ability to outlast competitors in a prolonged contest.

marsbitHá 27m

China's AI Fronts: From Yan'an to Midway

marsbitHá 27m

A History of Technological Evolution Powered by Electricity: Aluminum, Bitcoin, and AI

The journey from the Rockdale aluminum smelter in Texas to space-based data centers illustrates a core economic principle: whoever controls the cheapest electricity dictates the use of computing power. The evolution is clear. Old industrial sites with pre-existing, high-capacity power grids are being repurposed. In Rockdale, a former Alcoa plant now houses vast Bitcoin mining rigs, which are increasingly being replaced by AMD chips for AI training. The logic is purely financial: while smelting aluminum yields $0.17–0.27 per kWh and Bitcoin mining $0.05–0.11, AI inference on H100 GPUs generates $1.27–3.67 per kWh. Recent deals confirm the rush for power infrastructure. Riot Platforms leases space to AMD; TeraWulf bought an old Kentucky aluminum plant for its grid; NYDIG secured a New York site for its cheap hydropower to mine Bitcoin. As AI giants like Anthropic, Microsoft, Google, and Amazon aggressively expand, they now directly compete with crypto miners for the same industrial power resources, often outbidding them. This has led to a decline in Bitcoin's global hash rate and a wave of miner conversions to AI data centers. This "digital resource curse" extends globally. Gulf nations, long offering subsidized power to attract heavy industry like aluminum, are now pivoting to become AI and cloud computing hubs—exporting computational power instead of physical commodities. Similarly, Bhutan halted its sovereign Bitcoin mining to sell hydropower directly to India for a steadier return. The frontier is space. Projects like Starcloud plan orbital solar-powered data centers, leveraging constant sunlight and natural cooling, with Bitcoin mining as a secondary use for surplus power. Even consumer brands are transforming; Allbirds shifted from footwear to AI infrastructure, causing its stock to surge. Meanwhile, crypto projects like Bittensor, Render, and Akash propose a decentralized alternative, creating markets to aggregate distributed, idle computing resources from individual hardware. The underlying infrastructure—the power grid—remains constant. As profit margins shift, the facilities built upon it will continue to evolve, from aluminum to Bitcoin to AI and beyond, always chasing the highest yield per kilowatt-hour, whether in Texas, Abu Dhabi, or low Earth orbit.

marsbitHá 36m

A History of Technological Evolution Powered by Electricity: Aluminum, Bitcoin, and AI

marsbitHá 36m

Conquering is easy, governing is hard: Polymarket must bow to regulations to plant its flag globally

Polymarket, a decentralized prediction market platform, faces significant regulatory hurdles in its global expansion. Its "permissionless" model, which bypasses traditional identity and financial controls, has led to widespread crackdowns. India recently blocked the site, categorizing it as illegal online gambling under new 2025 laws. Brazil also banned it and similar platforms, though it simultaneously authorized a regulated, investor-only version on its national exchange. Across Europe, countries like France, Portugal, and the Netherlands are enforcing bans based on existing gambling and financial regulations. To enter key markets, Polymarket is adopting a pragmatic, compliant approach. In the U.S., it paid a $1.12 million fine, acquired a CFTC-licensed exchange, and now operates a regulated, KYC-mandatory platform for American users. It also secured a major investment from Intercontinental Exchange (ICE), which will distribute its prediction data to institutional investors. In Japan, where gambling laws are strict, Polymarket has begun a long-term lobbying effort, aiming for legalization by 2030 through building institutional partnerships and community presence. Despite these challenges, the prediction market industry is booming, with global volume projected to surge from $51 billion to potentially $1 trillion by 2030. Polymarket's core dilemma remains: adapting its decentralized, anonymous model to fit within sovereign regulatory frameworks focused on licensing, consumer protection, and anti-money laundering rules. Its survival in each market depends on navigating this complex political and legal landscape.

marsbitHá 39m

Conquering is easy, governing is hard: Polymarket must bow to regulations to plant its flag globally

marsbitHá 39m

It's Easier to Conquer than to Govern: Polymarket Must Bend to Every Rule to Plant Its Flag Globally

Polymarket, a decentralized prediction market platform, is facing significant regulatory hurdles as it expands globally, illustrating the tension between permissionless, crypto-native platforms and national legal frameworks. The platform, which allows users to bet on event outcomes, was recently blocked in India under new online gambling laws and faces similar outright bans in Brazil and Ukraine, the latter citing moral objections to wagering on active war events. In Europe, countries like France, the Netherlands, and the UK are restricting access by enforcing existing gambling and financial derivatives regulations, forcing Polymarket to geo-block users or operate in view-only modes. To navigate this complex landscape, Polymarket is adopting a market-by-market, compliant strategy. In the U.S., it paid a $1.4 million CFTC fine, acquired a licensed exchange (QCEX) for $112 million, and now operates a regulated U.S. entity with strict KYC, abandoning anonymity. It also secured a major investment from Intercontinental Exchange (ICE), which will distribute its prediction data to institutional investors. In Japan, a high-potential market, it has begun a long-term lobbying effort aiming for legalization by 2030, acknowledging the country's strict anti-gambling laws and slow regulatory processes. The article concludes that while the global prediction market is growing rapidly—projected to reach $2.4 trillion by 2030—Polymarket's core challenge is transforming its decentralized model to fit sovereign regulatory systems built on licensing, consumer protection, and anti-money laundering rules. Its survival depends on proving its legitimacy in each jurisdiction.

链捕手Há 44m

It's Easier to Conquer than to Govern: Polymarket Must Bend to Every Rule to Plant Its Flag Globally

链捕手Há 44m

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片