Hyperliquid Enters India: Hype or Real?

TheCryptoTimesPublicado em 2025-09-03Última atualização em 2025-09-03

The recent emergence of an X account named ‘Hyperliquid India’ has raised significant concerns within the crypto community. In a post shared today, it claimed that, “Hyperliquid has entered the (Indian flag) chat.”.

The post gained significant reach as multiple blue tick accounts, such as India Blockchain month and Transak welcomed hyperliquid through it, providing an inappropriate narrative of its authenticity.

Hyperliquid India Post: Source: XHyperliquid India Post: Source: X
Hyperliquid India Post: Source: X

Community Initiative Claims Lack Official Verification

The account description includes an invitation to founders, developers, traders, and creators by providing a link to join its channel on Telegram although it labels itself community driven. 

However, investigation conducted by The Crypto Times, found no public confirmation from official Hyperliquid channels supporting this group. None of Hyperliquid’s verified social media accounts follow or endorse the group, and official Telegram channels including Hyperliquid Announcements and Hyperliquid News do not recognize the initiative. Further, despite official accounts reacting to it positively, the account handle does mention that it is a “community initiative.” 

Hyperliquid is a decentralized exchange, so having a country-specific version does not make much sense. The Telegram link shared by this group is also an informal chat group, and not an official announcement channel.

Mixed Response 

Users like India Blockchain Month also welcomed Hyperliquid India on X, calling it a good time since India Blockchain Month has only started this September. Others flagged it as a possible fraud and asked Hyperliquid to verify its legitimacy. Despite the account’s bio stating it is community-led and several users raising scam concerns, many still believed it was legitimate as verified and reputable profiles appeared to welcome it. 

Meanwhile, inside the telegram group, multiple members are still claiming the group to be official, despite the clear community driven description.

Hyperliquid India Telegram Channel | Source: TelegramHyperliquid India Telegram Channel | Source: Telegram
Hyperliquid India Telegram Channel | Source: Telegram

Safety Recommendations for Users

Amidst the fake profile concerns and overall crypto scams being on the rise, crypto security experts have recommended the following precautions:

  • Verify Official Channels: Only follow Hyperliquid’s confirmed social media accounts and official Telegram channels
  • Avoid Personal Information Sharing: Do not provide private keys, personal details, or financial information to unverified groups
  • Report Suspicious Activity: Flag potential fraud attempts to platform administrators and community moderators
  • Exercise Caution: Wait for official confirmation before engaging with country-specific crypto groups

The Hyperliquid India profile has not yet attempted to provide trading signals or investment promises, though security experts warn these are common tactics used by cryptocurrency scammers and engagement farmers.

The Hyperliquid India Telegram group is unverified and could be risky. Users should exercise caution, avoid revealing personal information, and stick to official Hyperliquid channels for accurate updates.

Also Read: 21Shares Launches First Etp Tracking Hyperliquid On Six Swiss Exchange


Mobile Only ImageMobile Only Image

Leituras Relacionadas

A Group of Suzhou Engineers Unexpectedly Attain Financial Freedom

In Suzhou, a group of engineers from Lianxun Instruments, a leader in optical communication testing equipment, have achieved remarkable wealth after the company's IPO. Listed just two months ago on the STAR Market, the company's stock price surged approximately 30 times, making it the only A-share stock priced above 2,000 yuan. This surge created substantial fortunes for nearly 100 technical employees who held a collective 15.91% stake through employee stock ownership platforms, valued at over 36 billion yuan at the current market cap. Among them, nearly 40 became billionaires, while even the smallest holdings exceeded 5 million yuan in value. Founded in 2017 by Hu Haiyang, Yang Jian, and Huang Jianjun, Lianxun Instruments was established to address China's reliance on foreign high-end testing instruments. The company grew rapidly with a strong focus on R&D, where technical staff make up nearly 80% of its workforce. Early implementation of employee stock plans helped retain this core talent. The company's explosive growth is fueled by booming AI computing demand, with clients including major global optical module leaders. Its revenue skyrocketed from 276 million yuan in 2023 to 1.194 billion yuan in 2025, turning a profit in 2024. The IPO has also generated massive returns for early investors, including Suzhou's state-owned capital, which saw a hundredfold return. This story reflects a broader trend in China's markets, where technology firms in AI, semiconductors, and optics are creating new wealth, rewarding engineers and technical teams who are now central to modern capital-driven success stories, marking a shift from previous eras dominated by internet and real estate tycoons.

marsbitHá 2h

A Group of Suzhou Engineers Unexpectedly Attain Financial Freedom

marsbitHá 2h

NVIDIA's Annual 'Most Dangerous' Paper: AI Self-Replicating Code, Unlimited Leveling and Evolution

NVIDIA's "Red Queen Gödel Machine" (RQGM) paper proposes a potentially groundbreaking AI self-evolution framework. It breaks from the long-stalled concept of the "Gödel Machine," which required mathematically proven beneficial self-modifications, by adopting an evolutionary approach. The core, and most striking, innovation is that the AI does not just evolve its own code in a static environment. Instead, it co-evolves both the "student" (the task-performing agent) and the "examiner" (the evaluation system that judges it). This creates a dynamic, recursive self-improvement loop inspired by the biological "Red Queen Hypothesis"—where continuous adaptation is needed just to maintain relative fitness. The mechanism operates in epochs. Within an epoch, a fixed examiner evaluates all candidate code variants. At epoch boundaries, a new, potentially more rigorous examiner can replace the old one, but only if it proves statistically superior on a held-out "ground truth" dataset. This "controlled utility evolution" aims to ensure progress is measurable and grounded. The paper demonstrates RQGM's effectiveness across three domains: 1. **Code Generation:** It achieved a 71.7% test-set pass rate (improving over a 69.9% SOTA) while using 1.35-1.72x fewer computational tokens. 2. **Paper Writing:** In a subjective task, the co-evolved writer and reviewer achieved a 40.5% acceptance rate by a fixed human panel, up from 21.8%. 3. **Math Proofs:** It evolved more accurate graders (at 3x lower cost) and higher-scoring provers. Notably, RQGM also mitigated a known LLM bias where AI reviewers favor AI-generated content. By specifically rewarding reviewers that correctly rejected AI-written papers from a historical pool, the evolved system achieved impartiality while maintaining 80% accuracy. The research has sparked significant discussion about the acceleration of Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI). Some, like Anthropic's Jack Clark, have predicted a high probability of highly autonomous, self-evolving AI emerging by 2028. The paper suggests that when an AI begins to design its own evaluators and push itself toward ever-higher standards in a recursive loop, it may be taking a fundamental step toward redefining intelligence and autonomy.

marsbitHá 2h

NVIDIA's Annual 'Most Dangerous' Paper: AI Self-Replicating Code, Unlimited Leveling and Evolution

marsbitHá 2h

Apple and the Power Rebalancing with 'The Microns': Dissecting the Profit Ledger Behind the iPhone

The article analyzes the shifting profit dynamics and power balance between Apple and memory suppliers like Micron within the iPhone supply chain. It highlights a social media post criticizing Apple for raising iPhone prices while blaming memory chip cost increases, despite historically paying suppliers like Micron very little. An estimated iPhone 18 cost breakdown is referenced. Historically, memory was a minor cost component. In 2017's iPhone X, memory accounted for only about 1.6-2.3% of the price, with Apple capturing nearly 50% net profit. Over time, memory's share of the Bill-of-Materials (BOM) cost has grown significantly, reaching an estimated 12-15% for the iPhone 17 series. The core driver of this change is soaring demand for memory from the AI industry, particularly for High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) and AI servers, which is diverting production capacity and squeezing supply for consumer electronics. Memory manufacturers, after enduring periods of low profits, now hold greater pricing power. This is reflected in their recent strong financials, like Micron's 84.6% gross margin. Apple CEO Tim Cook initially described the memory price pressure as unprecedented in his 40-year career, later calling it a "once-in-a-century flood," before Apple announced price hikes across several product lines, causing a significant stock drop. Elon Musk echoed Cook's sentiment about the dramatic cost surge. The article concludes that the era of memory suppliers being at the mercy of Apple's pricing power has temporarily reversed, thanks to AI-driven demand. It notes Apple is reportedly seeking to diversify its supply chain, including exploring chips from China's CXMT.

Odaily星球日报Há 4h

Apple and the Power Rebalancing with 'The Microns': Dissecting the Profit Ledger Behind the iPhone

Odaily星球日报Há 4h

Trading

Spot
活动图片