BCCI Bans Crypto Firms from Team India Sponsorship Bidding

TheCryptoTimesPublicado em 2025-09-02Última atualização em 2025-09-02

The Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) has announced the release of an Invitation for Expression of Interest (IEOI) for acquiring the National Team Lead Sponsor Rights. The board has effectively banned cryptocurrency-related companies from participating. 

According to the press release by BCCI, the IEOI outlines the bidding process for reputed entities seeking to sponsor Team India’s national cricket team. BCCI Honorary Secretary Devajit Saikia stated that the documents detail terms for bid submission and evaluation.

To access the IEOI, interested parties must pay a non-refundable fee of INR 5,00,000 plus applicable Goods and Services Tax (GST). Indian entities are required to pay a total of INR 5,90,000 into BCCI’s INR account at Bank of Maharashtra, while foreign entities must remit USD 5,675 to the USD account via the specified correspondent bank. 

BCCI Sets Strict Rules for National Team Sponsor Bidding

To bid for Team India’s sponsorship, companies need an average turnover or net worth of INR 300 crore over the past three audited years. They must also be deemed a ‘Fit and Proper Person’ by the BCCI, meaning no criminal convictions, no conflicts of interest, and not listed as a willful defaulter by the Reserve Bank of India. 

Companies involved in crypto trading, exchanges, tokens, or similar activities are banned from bidding, as are those in alcohol, betting, online gaming (per the 2025 Gaming Act), tobacco, or anything offensive like pornography. The Board has taken a similar initiative to the one it took during IPL 2025.

Blocked Brand Categories due to existing sponsors include athleisure, sportswear, financial services, non-alcoholic beverages, and insurance; bids in these categories are restricted to current sponsors. Surrogate branding through proxies is forbidden. Merely purchasing the IEOI does not guarantee bidding rights. 

BCCI Prohibits Crypto, Surrogate Ads in WPL and IPL

Additionally, this is not the first time that the BCCI has taken action against surrogate and cryptocurrency firms. On February 18, 2023, the BCCI prohibited cryptocurrency advertisements in the Women’s Premier League (WPL) 2023. The BCCI sent a 68-page advisory to the WPL teams, specifying the activities that could not be advertised.

Furthermore, on March 19, 2025, the BCCI banned cryptocurrency and tobacco advertisements during the Indian Premier League (IPL) 2025. This initiative was taken in response to an order from India’s health ministry, which instructed the BCCI to prohibit all forms of promotional advertisements.

Also Read: Crypto Under Fire in Indian Parliament Panel’s Cybercrime Report

Mobile Only ImageMobile Only Image

Leituras Relacionadas

SKYAI hits monthly lows after 36% drop – Yet THIS group isn’t backing off

SKYAI plummeted 36.2% in 24 hours, hitting monthly lows, with its market cap falling to $238.26M. Despite a 70.85% surge in daily trading volume to $43.16M, the activity was driven by aggressive selling, not buying. Open Interest in derivatives dropped 36.65% to ~$69.66M, indicating traders closed leveraged positions. A modest positive exchange netflow of ~$340.75K signaled some holders moved tokens to exchanges, potentially for future sales. Buyers defended a key support zone around $0.168, preventing an immediate breakdown. However, technical indicators like MACD and Parabolic SAR remained bearish. The token's near-term direction depends on whether this support holds, allowing a potential recovery toward $0.335, or breaks, leading to further declines.

ambcryptoHá 1h

SKYAI hits monthly lows after 36% drop – Yet THIS group isn’t backing off

ambcryptoHá 1h

Humanity Protocol, Kelp DAO stolen funds commingle – Same attacker?

Investigations into the 2026 exploits of Kelp DAO and Humanity Protocol have revealed that stolen funds from both attacks were recently commingled, suggesting a connection between the attackers. Blockchain analyst ZachXBT identified the activity, where 15,403 ETH ($23.6 million) from the Humanity Protocol hack was moved to a new Ethereum address and then to the Bitcoin network, merging with proceeds from the Kelp DAO exploit. Over $8 million of these funds has been laundered using methods associated with groups like the Lazarus Group. The Kelp DAO attack drained about $292 million in April 2026, while Humanity Protocol lost around $32 million in June due to a compromised developer device. This commingling points to a shared external threat actor and highlights ongoing security risks in DeFi.

ambcryptoHá 4h

Humanity Protocol, Kelp DAO stolen funds commingle – Same attacker?

ambcryptoHá 4h

Ethereum ETFs see $12.85M outflows – Why ETH bulls face an uphill battle

Institutional demand for Ethereum (ETH) is weakening as investors reduce exposure to risk assets amid uncertain market conditions. U.S. spot ETH ETFs recently recorded $12.85 million in net outflows, extending a broader slowdown in fund demand despite cumulative net inflows remaining near $11 billion. This reduces institutional capital available to support ETH prices. Consequently, Ethereum now relies more on staking demand, layer-2 activity, and organic spot buying to stabilize prices. An increase in network demand could help absorb excess supply. However, if institutional demand does not recover, ETH faces prolonged consolidation and increased vulnerability to sentiment-driven price swings. On-chain analysis shows significant holdings moving to a new wallet. While not a direct sell signal, similar past movements have preceded liquidity events. If these funds are deposited to exchanges, it could reinforce bearish sentiment and selling pressure. In summary, ETH remains vulnerable due to weak institutional demand and a bearish market structure. Stronger spot demand is needed to offset selling pressure and restore sustained bullish momentum.

ambcryptoHá 5h

Ethereum ETFs see $12.85M outflows – Why ETH bulls face an uphill battle

ambcryptoHá 5h

2028: The Arrival of Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI)

**AI Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI): The Countdown to 2028 Begins** AI is no longer just a trained tool but is starting to rewrite its own evolutionary pace. According to Anthropic co-founder Jack Clark, there is a 60% probability that by the end of 2028, Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI) will become a reality. This means AI could autonomously design and build a more capable next-generation version of itself without any human researcher involvement—Claude 10 creating Claude 11, for instance. Supporting this timeline, Google DeepMind's CEO Demis Hassabis confirms that all leading AI labs are intensely focused on RSI, making it an industry-wide priority. He expresses profound concern, stating this potential is what keeps him awake at night. Concrete data underscores this acceleration: - METR evaluations show current top models like Claude are solving tasks up to the 16-hour limit of existing test frameworks. - In Epoch AI's challenging MirrorCode benchmark, Claude Opus 4.7 recreated complex software in hours for a fraction of the human cost. In one extreme test, AI autonomously coded for 19 days straight. - Anthropic reports over 80% of its codebase is now written by Claude, and researcher productivity has increased up to 8-fold since 2024. - OpenAI's policy blueprint highlights RSI as a major upcoming governance challenge. CEO Sam Altman reportedly hinted RSI might arrive within six months, potentially delaying OpenAI's massive IPO. The implication is an impending "intelligence explosion," where AI-driven progress outpaces human control. The central question is no longer if it will happen, but whether humanity is ready.

marsbitHá 5h

2028: The Arrival of Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI)

marsbitHá 5h

World Models, Metaverse, Digital Twins, Physical AI: Are They the Same Thing?

Title: World Models, the Metaverse, Digital Twins, Physical AI: Are They the Same Thing? The article clarifies that concepts like the metaverse, Web3, simulation platforms, digital twins, and Physical AI are not the same thing but are all part of the broader trend of blurring the lines between the digital and physical worlds. It positions "world models" as the foundational "cognitive layer" or "operating system" that enables AI to understand and simulate the world. Key distinctions are made: - The **Metaverse** is a destination for immersive social and economic experiences. World models could act as its "engine," generating interactive 3D content efficiently. - **Web3** focuses on decentralized ownership and economics (rules layer), operating on a different technical level than world models. - **Simulation Data Platforms** (e.g., for autonomous vehicles) are a 1.0 version, relying on manual design. World models represent a 2.0 version, using AI to generate realistic, varied scenarios autonomously. - **Digital Twins** create high-fidelity, real-time mirrors of physical systems (e.g., a factory). World models go a step further by enabling predictive simulation of future states. - **Physical AI** (robots, AVs) refers to AI that acts in the physical world. World models are a core component, providing the understanding and prediction needed for planning. A proposed hierarchy places world models at the cognitive layer, supported by infrastructure (compute, data) and supporting application tools (simulation, digital twins), action systems (Physical AI), user experiences (metaverse), and rules (Web3). In conclusion, while distinct, many of these previously hyped concepts may ultimately rely on advances in world model technology to fulfill their promises, as world models provide the essential cognitive foundation for simulating and interacting with complex environments.

marsbitHá 5h

World Models, Metaverse, Digital Twins, Physical AI: Are They the Same Thing?

marsbitHá 5h

Trading

Spot
活动图片

Categorias popularesright-arrow

Etiquetas Popularesright-arrow