Crypto Exchange Gemini Aims $2.2B Valuation for Its U.S. IPO

TheCryptoTimesPublicado em 2025-09-02Última atualização em 2025-09-02

Gemini, the U.S.-based cryptocurrency exchange, is planning to launch its initial public offering (IPO) at a $2.2 billion valuation, marking an estimated price of $17-19 per share for its 16,666,667 Class A common stock. 

As per the official release, Gemini will list its stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the ticker symbol “GEMI.” The exchange will have Goldman Sachs & and Citigroup acting as lead bookrunners while Morgan Stanley and Cantor will act as lead bookrunners. 

Other participants include Evercore ISI, Mizuho, Truist Securities, Cohen & Company Capital Markets, Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, A Stifel Company, Needham & Company, and Rosenblatt. Meanwhile Academy Securities, AmeriVet Securities, and Roberts & Ryan will be co-managers for the offering. 

Besides the initial offering, existing stockholders intend to grant the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up to an additional 2,396,348 and 103,652 shares of Class A common stock, respectively, to cover over-allotments. 

Gemini’s Much Anticipated IPO

Gemini is currently positioned 24th most popular crypto exchange, as per CoinMarketCap data, with an average liquidity score of 711 and 142 trading pairs. It has 78 cryptocurrency listed and support for seven leading fiat currencies like USD, AUD, CAD, EUR, GBP, SGD and HKD. 

The exchange first filed for the IPO to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in June this year, following the success of Circle. However, the $2.2 billion IPO valuation for Gemini is significantly lower than Coinbase’s $85 billion launch in 2021, which ignited the trend for crypto IPOs. 

A most recent crypto IPO was for Bullish exchange in August, which raised $1.15 billion at a valuation of $5.4 billion. 

Also read: Underdog, Crypto.com Launch Sports Prediction Markets Nationwide


Mobile Only ImageMobile Only Image

Leituras Relacionadas

2028: The Arrival of Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI)

**AI Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI): The Countdown to 2028 Begins** AI is no longer just a trained tool but is starting to rewrite its own evolutionary pace. According to Anthropic co-founder Jack Clark, there is a 60% probability that by the end of 2028, Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI) will become a reality. This means AI could autonomously design and build a more capable next-generation version of itself without any human researcher involvement—Claude 10 creating Claude 11, for instance. Supporting this timeline, Google DeepMind's CEO Demis Hassabis confirms that all leading AI labs are intensely focused on RSI, making it an industry-wide priority. He expresses profound concern, stating this potential is what keeps him awake at night. Concrete data underscores this acceleration: - METR evaluations show current top models like Claude are solving tasks up to the 16-hour limit of existing test frameworks. - In Epoch AI's challenging MirrorCode benchmark, Claude Opus 4.7 recreated complex software in hours for a fraction of the human cost. In one extreme test, AI autonomously coded for 19 days straight. - Anthropic reports over 80% of its codebase is now written by Claude, and researcher productivity has increased up to 8-fold since 2024. - OpenAI's policy blueprint highlights RSI as a major upcoming governance challenge. CEO Sam Altman reportedly hinted RSI might arrive within six months, potentially delaying OpenAI's massive IPO. The implication is an impending "intelligence explosion," where AI-driven progress outpaces human control. The central question is no longer if it will happen, but whether humanity is ready.

marsbitHá 5h

2028: The Arrival of Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI)

marsbitHá 5h

World Models, Metaverse, Digital Twins, Physical AI: Are They the Same Thing?

Title: World Models, the Metaverse, Digital Twins, Physical AI: Are They the Same Thing? The article clarifies that concepts like the metaverse, Web3, simulation platforms, digital twins, and Physical AI are not the same thing but are all part of the broader trend of blurring the lines between the digital and physical worlds. It positions "world models" as the foundational "cognitive layer" or "operating system" that enables AI to understand and simulate the world. Key distinctions are made: - The **Metaverse** is a destination for immersive social and economic experiences. World models could act as its "engine," generating interactive 3D content efficiently. - **Web3** focuses on decentralized ownership and economics (rules layer), operating on a different technical level than world models. - **Simulation Data Platforms** (e.g., for autonomous vehicles) are a 1.0 version, relying on manual design. World models represent a 2.0 version, using AI to generate realistic, varied scenarios autonomously. - **Digital Twins** create high-fidelity, real-time mirrors of physical systems (e.g., a factory). World models go a step further by enabling predictive simulation of future states. - **Physical AI** (robots, AVs) refers to AI that acts in the physical world. World models are a core component, providing the understanding and prediction needed for planning. A proposed hierarchy places world models at the cognitive layer, supported by infrastructure (compute, data) and supporting application tools (simulation, digital twins), action systems (Physical AI), user experiences (metaverse), and rules (Web3). In conclusion, while distinct, many of these previously hyped concepts may ultimately rely on advances in world model technology to fulfill their promises, as world models provide the essential cognitive foundation for simulating and interacting with complex environments.

marsbitHá 5h

World Models, Metaverse, Digital Twins, Physical AI: Are They the Same Thing?

marsbitHá 5h

Trading

Spot
活动图片