WLFI 与 AAVE 分币引冲突,结局又将不了了之?

Foresight NewsPublicado em 2025-08-25Última atualização em 2025-08-25

Resumo

Aave 创始人回应称提案仍有效,或许只是一厢情愿。

撰文:1912212.eth,Foresight News

Crypto 领域「合作」是常态,「冲突」也不例外,近日 World Liberty Financial(WLFI)与 Aave 的提案纷争引市场关注。这一事件源于一个看似互利的 DeFi 合作提案,却因信息不对称和否认声明引发轩然大波,导致 AAVE 代币价格短期跌 8% 以上。

WLFI 作为特朗普家族背书的开放金融项目,本意是借 Aave 的 DeFi 基础设施扩展影响力,但纷争暴露了加密生态中治理透明度的痛点。

代币分成提案成泡影?

WLFI 项目于 2024 年推出,由特朗普家族成员推动。其代币总供应量为 1000 亿枚,作为新兴项目,WLFI 此前寻求与成熟 DeFi 协议合作,以提升流动性。

此前,Aave DAO(去中心化自治组织)通过一项提案:WLFI 将在 Aave V3 上部署其平台。作为回报,Aave DAO 将获得 WLFI 协议产生的 20% 费用分成,并分配约 7% 的 WLFI 总供应量(即 70 亿枚代币)。

这一条款初时被视为利好——Aave 作为领先的借贷协议,能借此注入新资产提升 TVL,而 WLFI 则借助 Aave 的用户基盘加速采用。

时间来到 8 月 23 日,Aave 创始人 Stani.eth 回应有关「WLFI 与 AAVE 协议还有效吗?他们真的在 Aave 上构建吗?外界有很多不同的传言」疑问时表示,协议仍然有效,并高调转发「按当前价格计算,Aave 国库将获得价值 25 亿美元的 WLFI,使其成为本轮周期中最大的赢家之一」观点,称此为交易的艺术,随后 AAVE 拉升触及 385 美元。

不过,很快疑似 WLFI Wallet 团队成员 Dylan_0x(@0xDylan_)发文否认「Aave 将获得 WLFI 总量 7% 代币」的提案关联消息,AAVE 短时下跌 5%。

8 月 24 日,WLFI 团队对吴说区块链称否认「7% 代币分配」的真实性,称其为「假新闻」。WLFI 官方表示,提案虽存在,但分配条款并非事实,并强调项目重点在于代币化创新而非外部分成。

Aave 创始人 Stani.eth 在其推文下方回应表示,WLFI 团队创建的提案已在 Aave DAO 上投票并通过,得到了 WLFI 的批准,并附上了提案链接。

截止目前,WLFI 官方账号并未对此事进行正式回应,也导致其市场众说纷纭。

WLFI 即将于 9 月 1 日在以太坊上线,并开放领取和交易。早期支持者(0.015 和 0.05 美元轮次)将解锁 20%,剩余 80% 将由社区投票决定。创始团队、顾问,以及合作伙伴的代币不会解锁。

9 月 25 日,据 Bitget 行情显示,其盘前价格一度为 0.45 美元,使其 FDV(完全稀释估值)高达数百亿美元,目前回落至 0.25 美元。AAVE 则回落至 350 美元下方。

治理算数吗?

DAO 治理难题从上个周期延续至今。

Aave 创始人 Stani.eth 回应称提案仍有效,或许只是单方面一厢情愿。

dForce 创始人 Mindao 对此事评论表示,该提案「像是 WLFI 实习生写的,完全不像川普家族会签的 deal。Aave 和 Spark 的合作只给了 10% 收入分成。WLFI 有川普品牌加持,合理来说 Aave 还得倒贴点对价才说得过去。即便 WLFI 当时为了公募,也不至于搞出这么差的条款。 再后来,加密新政起飞,WLFI 发行 USD1, 叙事直接从「加密银行」跃迁到 「Aave + Circle」,估值 10x,毕竟川普写过 Art of the Deal,这种 deal 绝对是耻辱性的。」

此外,Mindao 猜测后续剧本「WLFI 完全弃用 aave,这样之前的合约就自然作废。大规模缩减代币分发份额。把分配用在激励 USD1 的借贷铸币,左手右手,也不吃亏,就当定向稳定币铸币运营补贴了。」

推特 KOL Laolu 则表示,若 WLFI 不打算给 AAVE 7% 的代币也不必惊讶,「SPK 违约过 10% 收益最后只给 1%,最后不了了之。WLFI 公募时候说得好听全解锁,现在改成部分解锁」。

Polygon 与 Aave 曾上演类似剧情

2024 年 12 月,Polygon 与 Aave 爆发冲突,起因是 Polygon 社区提案:将桥接资金(约 1.1 亿美元)用于收益策略,如质押收益。

Aave 贡献者 Marc Zeller 反对,称此为「风险策略」,并提议 Aave 放弃 Polygon 支持,以防资金滥用。Aave 甚至调整了 Polygon 借贷平台的参数,LTV 设为 0,意味着存款再多也无法借款。

Polygon 创始人 Sandeep Nailwal 指责 Aave「垄断行为」和「酸葡萄心态」,认为 Aave 试图压制竞争,维护其在借贷市场的霸权。

冲突升级至私信威胁和公开指责,Polygon CEO Marc Boiron 与 Zeller 甚至打赌:若 Aave 退出 Polygon,后者将证明其独立性。

最终,提案调整,Aave 未完全退出,但关系紧张。

值得一提的是,2021 年 4 月,Polygon(市值约 40 亿)拿出价值 4000 万美元的 1% MATIC 激励 Aave(当时市值约 65 亿)。

Leituras Relacionadas

Why Is It Difficult for Retail Investors to Break Free from the Loss Cycle of High-Frequency Trading?

Why Retail Traders Struggle to Escape the High-Frequency Trading Loss Cycle Retail investors often fall into a trap of continuous losses in cryptocurrency markets due to high-frequency day trading, which is structurally skewed against them. The author, sharing from personal experience, explains that frequent trading without informational advantages—such as access to real order flow, liquidity maps, or market maker positions—inevitably leads to financial ruin over time. The key insight is that winning isn’t just about making profits but about preserving them. Most successful retail traders actually succeed by trading less: catching major market moves, then stepping back to avoid giving back gains. In contrast, constant trading—often driven by overconfidence and the false belief that discipline and risk management alone can beat the market—results in consistent losses. The article compares modern day trading to a "casino disguised as a café," where inexperienced traders, especially young ones, mistake gambling for a learnable skill. They rely on superficial tools like TradingView charts without understanding that institutional traders use advanced systems like Bloomberg terminals with exclusive data. Ultimately, the author advises retail traders to reduce trading frequency, avoid day trading, and focus on long-term strategies instead of chasing quick wins. The real tragedy is not losing money but believing that high-frequency trading is a sustainable strategy rather than a form of gambling.

比推Há 21m

Why Is It Difficult for Retail Investors to Break Free from the Loss Cycle of High-Frequency Trading?

比推Há 21m

Bull vs. Bear Debate: Is Stablecoin Leader CRCL Worth Buying? Why Can't High-Growth Earnings Drive the Stock Price?

"Circle (NYSE: CRCL), the issuer of USDC, has sparked intense debate in the crypto community following its Q3 2025 earnings report. Despite reporting strong growth—revenue up 66% YoY to $740 million and net income of $214 million, driven by a 108% increase in USDC circulation—its stock price fell significantly post-earnings and remains near its IPO price of $64. The core disagreement revolves around Circle’s business model and sustainability. Critics, including Jiang Zhuorer, argue that Circle operates like a bank, earning primarily through interest on reserve assets (mainly U.S. Treasuries), but is highly vulnerable to interest rate cuts. They highlight that ~60% of revenue is paid to distributors like Coinbase, leaving thin margins that could turn negative in a low-rate environment. They also warn of competition from traditional financial giants like JPMorgan and potential policy changes. Proponents, such as BTCdayu and qinbafrank, counter that Circle is building a long-term, network-driven infrastructure play. They compare it to Amazon or JD.com, arguing that current profit-sharing is a strategic cost to achieve scale, compliance advantage, and eventual market dominance in a winner-take-all industry. They believe USDC’s合规 (compliance) edge and institutional trust will drive adoption to multi-trillion dollars, outweighing interest rate risks. Short-term concerns include significant post-IPO lockup expirations adding selling pressure, and structural barriers like U.S. tax treatment of USDC as a property (not cash), hindering retail payment adoption. The debate encapsulates a clash between cyclical concerns (rates, costs, competition) and structural optimism (scale, compliance, network effects)."

Odaily星球日报Há 1h

Bull vs. Bear Debate: Is Stablecoin Leader CRCL Worth Buying? Why Can't High-Growth Earnings Drive the Stock Price?

Odaily星球日报Há 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片