Мемкоин Канье Уэста взлетел до $3 млрд, затем рухнул из-за инсайдерских продаж

cryptonews.ruPublicado em 2025-10-20Última atualização em 2025-10-20

Рэпер Канье Уэст (Kanye West) решил покорить криптовалютное пространство с помощью собственного токена YZY — и уже через 40 минут после запуска его капитализация подскочила до $3 млрд. Правда, радость была недолгой: подозрения в инсайдерской торговле быстро охладили пыл инвесторов.

От нуля до миллиардов за полчаса

Музыкант, официально сменивший имя на Ye, поделился адресом контракта токена в соцсети X вместе со ссылкой на сайт Yeezy Money. Проект позиционируется как «новая экономика, построенная на блокчейне» — финансовая система, работающая на криптовалютных рельсах.

Токен YZY, запущенный в сети Solana, действительно показал впечатляющий старт. За 40 минут его рыночная капитализация достигла $3 млрд, но затем стремительно упала до $1,05 млрд — такие качели стали результатом опасений по поводу продаж инсайдеров.

Интересная деталь: на сайте Yeezy Money указано, что разработчики создали 25 адресов контрактов для токена YZY, а затем случайным образом выбрали один из них в качестве официального. Цель — помешать снайперам токенов, которые пытаются скупить активы в момент запуска.

Инсайдеры взяли под контроль 94% токенов

Аналитическая платформа Lookonchain обратила внимание на странную особенность пула ликвидности: в него добавили только токены YZY. Это означает, что разработчики могут продавать токены в любой момент, просто изменив ликвидность пула.

Конор Гроган (Conor Grogan), директор Coinbase, подсчитал: как минимум 94% общего предложения токенов контролируют инсайдеры. Один мультиподписной кошелек держал 87% токенов, прежде чем распределить их между несколькими другими кошельками.

Активность игроков

Показательный случай: один пользователь, якобы владевший инсайдерской информацией, по ошибке купил не тот токен и потерял $710 000. Впрочем, позже он исправил ошибку, приобрел правильный токен и восстановил убытки.

Другому инвестору повезло больше — он заработал $3,4 млн, заплатив $24 000 комиссии сети Solana за приоритетную обработку транзакции. Платформа Onchain Lens сообщила о трейдере, который на пике стоимости токена находился в плюсе на $6 млн.

Соучредитель BitMEX Артур Хейс (Arthur Hayes) тоже, судя по всему, приобрел токены YZY.

Звездная лихорадка

Мемкоины знаменитостей в этом году привлекли немало внимания — и далеко не всегда позитивного. Один из самых скандальных случаев связан с президентом Аргентины Хавьером Милеи (Javier Milei) и токеном LIBRA.

В феврале Милеи поделился информацией о токене LIBRA в соцсети X, что привело к росту его капитализации до $4 млрд. Однако уже через несколько часов президент удалил пост из-за негативной реакции сообщества, что обрушило цену токена.

Инцидент вызвал возмущение, многие призывали ввести строгие ограничения на мемкоины, продвигаемые политиками.

История с YZY показывает, что звездный статус может мгновенно создать миллиардную капитализацию, но столь же быстро ее разрушить. Forbes оценивает состояние Канье Уэста в $400 млн — сумма внушительная, но далеко не рекордная для создателей успешных мемкоинов.

Leituras Relacionadas

After Aave's Exit and TVL's Sharp Fluctuation, Where Does MegaETH's Valuation Anchor Lie?

Following the withdrawal of Aave and a sharp drop in its Total Value Locked (TVL), the valuation of the high-performance DeFi blockchain MegaETH faces scrutiny. Once a highly anticipated project with a fully diluted valuation (FDV) reaching around $2 billion, MegaETH saw its TVL plummet from a May peak of $245 million to just over $30 million in July, a roughly 70% decline. Its native token, MEGA, currently trades around $0.048 with a market cap of approximately $54 million and an FDV of about $480 million. The report identifies a core vulnerability: MegaETH's TVL was heavily dependent on a single protocol, Aave V3, which at its peak contributed around 90% of the chain's TVL. A significant portion of this capital is attributed to leveraged yield-farming strategies involving stablecoins like USDe. When the profitability of these strategies diminished, capital rapidly exited, exposing the lack of diversified, sustainable activity. Three key mismatches between MegaETH's valuation and its fundamentals are highlighted: 1. **Valuation vs. Real Usage:** With an FDV of ~$4.8B but only ~$1M in annualized protocol revenue and ~2,600 daily active addresses, the valuation appears disconnected from current economic activity. 2. **Token Narrative vs. Ecosystem Reality:** Despite its DeFi narrative, nearly 80% of the chain's recent protocol revenue comes from a trading card game, Monster, not from core DeFi applications like Aave. The chain's native stablecoin, USDM, also shows low trading volume and a declining market cap. 3. **Short-Term Hype vs. Long-Term Delivery:** Initial hype from token generation, blue-chip integrations, and influencer support has faded. Major protocols like Uniswap now hold minimal TVL on the chain, indicating that early capital was largely transient and driven by incentives rather than organic demand. The situation reflects a broader market trend where investors are becoming less tolerant of valuations based on inflated TVL and narrative, demanding clearer evidence of sustainable transactions, revenue, and ecosystem development. While MEGA's price may experience short-term rebounds from market sentiment, a fundamental re-rating likely depends on the team's ability to convert its remaining resources into tangible, user-retaining applications and genuine ecosystem growth.

链捕手Há 19m

After Aave's Exit and TVL's Sharp Fluctuation, Where Does MegaETH's Valuation Anchor Lie?

链捕手Há 19m

Goldman Sachs In-Depth Report: Who Will Be the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

Goldman Sachs Report: China's AI Models at an Inflection Point China's open-source/open-weight large language models (LLMs) have reached performance parity with top global proprietary models, according to a Goldman Sachs report. This is driven by architectural innovations and higher parameter efficiency, allowing Chinese models to achieve comparable capabilities at 2%-10% the parameter size and significantly lower cost. The market is evolving into a two-tiered structure: a high-end segment (e.g., GLM5.2, Qwen3.7 Max) with premium pricing and a low-end, price-sensitive segment for global SMEs and individual users. Key points: * **Cost & Performance:** Innovations like Mixture of Experts (MoE) enable high performance with smaller models. Projects like Meituan's LongCat 2.0, trained on domestic hardware, highlight progress in tech self-sufficiency. * **Open-Source Strategy:** Most Chinese players use open-source/open-weight models for flexibility and ecosystem growth. However, Goldman notes this may underreport actual deployment and revenue. A shift toward "open-weight + community license" models with revenue sharing (e.g., MiniMax) could improve monetization. * **Market Shift & Global Expansion:** Enterprise AI adoption is shifting from "token maximization" to "ROI-first." International expansion, especially in non-US markets, is a major growth driver. Chinese models are increasingly available on global platforms like AWS Bedrock and Microsoft Copilot. * **Competitive Landscape:** Using a framework based on pricing power, cost advantage, and financial strength, Goldman identifies **Zhipu AI and DeepSeek** as the strongest in foundational text models, and **ByteDance** as the leader in multimodal/video generation. The report maintains Buy ratings on MiniMax and Kuaishou. * **Market Growth:** China's AI model API and subscription revenue is projected to grow from an estimated ¥35 billion in 2026 to ¥879 billion by 2030.

marsbitHá 38m

Goldman Sachs In-Depth Report: Who Will Be the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

marsbitHá 38m

Goldman Sachs Deep Dive Report: Who Will Become the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

Goldman Sachs Report: Who Will Be the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry? China's AI large model sector is at a historic inflection point. Goldman Sachs argues that the intelligence of Chinese open-source/open-weight models is approaching top global proprietary models. Rapid adoption by domestic enterprises and global SMEs is creating a data flywheel effect that will further drive model iteration. The evolution is summarized as moving from "DeepSeek's cost-efficiency moment last year to GLM's model-intelligence moment this year." Chinese models achieve near-state-of-the-art performance at significantly lower cost, primarily due to architectural innovations like Mixture of Experts (MoE) and higher parameter efficiency. Models like DeepSeek V4 Pro (1.6T params), GLM5.2 (0.7T), and MiniMax M3 (0.4T) are much smaller than global leaders. Recent advancements in coding capability are attributed to better data curation and RLHF. Landmarks like Meituan's LongCat 2.0, trained fully on domestic AI chips, demonstrate progress in hardware stack independence. The market is forming a "two-tiered structure." The high-end tier (e.g., GLM5.2, Alibaba's Qwen3.7 Max) prices around $1 per million tokens, about 10-25% of US top models, with estimated inference gross margins of 10-20%. The low-end tier (priced as low as $0.06-$0.2 per million tokens) targets price-sensitive global SMEs and individuals. MiniMax derives 60-70% of revenue overseas. Goldman forecasts China's AI model API/subscription revenue to grow from an estimated RMB 35bn in 2026 to RMB 879bn by 2030. Most Chinese players adopt open-source/open-weight strategies for deployment flexibility and community feedback, though this limits monetization as deployments on third-party platforms (e.g., Alibaba Cloud) may not generate direct revenue. A shift towards "open-weight + community license" models with revenue-sharing agreements (like MiniMax's approach) could improve unit economics. International expansion, particularly in non-US markets, is the key growth driver. The global enterprise AI paradigm is shifting from "token maximization" to "ROI prioritization." Chinese models are already hosted on major global platforms like AWS Bedrock and are under consideration for integration into Microsoft Copilot. Using a competitive framework based on pricing power, cost advantage, and financial strength, Goldman identifies the strongest players: In foundational text models, Zhipu AI (initiated coverage) and DeepSeek lead. In multimodal/video generation, ByteDance's Seed is the frontrunner, with Kuaishou's Kling and MiniMax's Hailuo also well-positioned. Goldman maintains a Buy rating on MiniMax, citing its attractive valuation.

链捕手Há 42m

Goldman Sachs Deep Dive Report: Who Will Become the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

链捕手Há 42m

Trading

Spot
活动图片