ZachXBT Slams Circle for Slow Action Against Illicit Addresses

TheCryptoTimesPublicado em 2025-08-19Última atualização em 2025-08-19

Blockchain investigator ZachXBT has criticized Circle, the issuer of the USDC stablecoin, for not acting quickly enough to blacklist accounts belonging to the infamous North Korean Lazarus Group. 

In a recent X post, Circle emphasized the need for collaborating with governments and crafting stablecoin legislation in order to have a safe, open financial system. The company shared that 12 years ago, it set out to create the “internet of money,” aiming to make digital payments as seamless and secure as sending information online.

Replying to this, ZachXBT noted certain moves from the Circle team and criticized them for being slow to block certain addresses linked to illegal activity. ZachXBT pointed out that the company fought government orders to freeze Lazarus Group addresses for six months, while other major stablecoin issuers acted immediately.

All major stablecoin platforms, including Circle, Tether, Paxos, and Techteryx, did eventually blacklist addresses holding millions of dollars from the Lazarus Group. For example, more than $4.9 million in USDT, USDC, BUSD, and TUSD was blocked in 2024.

Garantex Case

ZachXBT also highlighted the OFAC-sanctioned Garantex platform, which the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) shut down in March 2025. Authorities from the U.S., Germany, Finland, Europol, and other law enforcement agencies collaborated in the operation. 

Garantex allegedly funded ransomware groups such as Conti, Black Basta, and Play, and engaged in drug trafficking, child exploitation, and robbing a U.S. blockchain platform of $22 million. Between 2019 and 2022, it processed around $96 billion in crypto for criminal organizations and had ties to cyber gangs like Lazarus Group and Mega Dark Market.

Over $22.8 million in USDT linked to Garantex was already blacklisted by other platforms, but some USDC addresses are still active. The delayed response by Circle has raised concerns about the speed at which major stablecoin issuers act against illicit activity. 

Also Read: ZachXBT Reveals North Korean Crypto Hackers’ Modus Operandi



Leituras Relacionadas

Opinion: AI Bubble Bursts, Bitcoin and Other Risky Assets Are the First to Be Impacted

BIS Warns AI Investment Boom Could Trigger Market Stress, Impacting Bitcoin First The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) warns that a potential bursting of the "AI bubble" could tighten liquidity and severely impact risk assets like Bitcoin in the near term. Major tech firms are projected to spend over $1 trillion on AI infrastructure in 2025-2026. The BIS cautions that if returns fail to meet expectations, a sudden withdrawal of financing could turn this investment boom into a prolonged bust, creating ripple effects across financial markets. While AI holds long-term economic promise, the current scale and speed of investment, coupled with intense competition and physical bottlenecks (e.g., semiconductors, power grids), mirror historical bubbles. The report highlights that the AI funding web—spanning corporate debt, private credit, and complex vendor agreements—makes systemic risks harder to see. A disappointment in AI adoption could transmit stress through this chain, widening credit spreads and pressuring weaker borrowers. For Bitcoin, the initial reaction to such a market shock would likely be defensive. As liquidity tightens, investors typically sell liquid assets first, and Bitcoin often trades in line with other risk assets during portfolio de-risking. Recent correlations, like Bitcoin's drop following a sharp decline in South Korea's stock market, support this view. However, the longer-term outcome for Bitcoin depends on the policy response. If an AI-driven credit crunch forces central banks to inject liquidity and ease policy eventually, it could reignite Bitcoin's narrative as a hedge against monetary debasement. Yet, traders betting on this outcome may first have to endure significant market volatility and potential price declines.

marsbitHá 40m

Opinion: AI Bubble Bursts, Bitcoin and Other Risky Assets Are the First to Be Impacted

marsbitHá 40m

South Korea Reaps Riches, America Turns Hostile

The US has filed a collective antitrust lawsuit in California against Samsung, SK Hynix, and US-based Micron, alleging they colluded to create a "RAMpocalypse" by slashing traditional DRAM production and raising prices 700% over four years amid the AI boom. This lawsuit targets the heart of the AI supply chain: High Bandwidth Memory (HBM), critical for Nvidia's GPUs. Currently, SK Hynix (57%), Samsung (22%), and Micron (21%) dominate global HBM production. The case highlights a deeper US concern: in the AI era, South Korea, through its HBM dominance, is capturing an estimated 35% of global AI profits, second only to the US (49%). SK Hynix's operating profit margin recently hit a record 72%. In response to the lawsuit, South Korea announced a massive $800 trillion won investment to build four new chip plants, doubling down on its strategic position. Analysts see the lawsuit not merely as a consumer price issue but as strategic pressure. It aims to support Micron's US manufacturing expansion (subsidized by the CHIPS Act) and secure America's share of AI profits by bringing more HBM production onshore. However, South Korea's rapid execution and massive cash flow from current HBM sales give it a significant speed advantage over US build-out timelines. The conflict underscores a fundamental shift: AI infrastructure like GPUs and HBM is becoming a new form of strategic national resource, akin to oil. While Nvidia and Korean memory giants are interdependent, the struggle over profit distribution and industrial sovereignty in this new landscape is just beginning. This lawsuit may be the first major skirmish in the AI resource wars.

marsbitHá 52m

South Korea Reaps Riches, America Turns Hostile

marsbitHá 52m

Trading

Spot
活动图片