How Blockchain Could Have Saved the Fed and US Agencies From Job Numbers Fiasco

ccn.comPublicado em 2025-08-07Última atualização em 2025-08-10

Key Takeaways
  • Following the recent jobs market drama, Chamath Palihapitiya suggested using blockchain for jobs data via payroll uploads, error checks, and a live feed.
  • The BLS initially reported strong job growth in June, but cut gains by 258,000, the steepest two-month drop since 1979.
  • Mark Cuban questioned the practicality and cost of a blockchain-based system, while Biden administration officials defended the integrity of the BLS.

When the U.S. government revealed that June’s strong jobs report had been revised into the red, wiping out hundreds of thousands of positions from the official tally, financial markets reeled.

The fallout led to President Trump dramatically firing the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) commissioner last week, accusing Erika McEntarfer of “rigging” the data.

Meanwhile, billionaire Chamath Palihapitiya entered the conversation with an idea that he felt could have prevented all of the drama: putting America’s jobs data on the blockchain.

Job Number Crisis

The BLS initially reported that the U.S. added approximately 147,000 non-farm jobs in June, massively surpassing expectations.

However, just two months later, that figure was slashed to a mere 14,000 after unprecedented downward revisions totaling approximately 258,000 jobs across May and June, the steepest two-month drop since the non-pandemic era began in 1979.

The revised data revealed only 73,000 new jobs in July, signaling that the labor market’s resilience was perhaps an illusion.

These seismic corrections caught economists and experts off guard and triggered a new feud between Trump and yet another government agency.

“We need accurate Jobs Numbers,” Trump said in a Truth Social post.

“I have directed my Team to fire this Biden Political Appointee, IMMEDIATELY. She will be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified.”

“Important numbers like this must be fair and accurate; they can’t be manipulated for political purposes.”

Jobs on the Blockchain

As the jobs-data controversy swirled, billionaire venture capitalist Chamath Palihapitiya argued that the U.S. needed a wholesale rebuild of how employment numbers are collected and reported.

Palihapitiya took to X, claiming that the BLS system was “brittle” and “sloppy,” and called for a new “oracle-like data provider” for this critical information.

“Bottom line is that BLS isn’t so much conspiratorial as it is inadequate in its approach,” he wrote on X. “They are all over the place and add little directional signal. They constantly revise and in both directions.”

“The sampling techniques they use are brittle and don’t work for a large and dynamic economy like the U.S.,” he added.

Palihapitiya said Trump was right to fire the head of the BLS because “she ran a critical aspect of the U.S. economic machinery in an unpredictable, haphazard, and sloppy way.”

“There needs to be a new, oracle-like data provider for this critical information,” he added.

However, not everyone was convinced this was the answer. Famed investor and Shark Tank star Mark Cuban fired back at the idea:

“Did you even read what you wrote? Are you suggesting a crypto-like oracle that outputs employment data, every month, on the same day, be required for every business?

“Who is gonna pay for the implementations? And of course there are gov agencies that have to respond as well. What do you have in mind for them?

“Do you really think the implementation, maintenance, and response timing and rates will be better than the current survey?”

Chamath countered Cuban with a three-tier proposal on how he believed taking the jobs market to the blockchain could succeed:

  • Require all payroll providers (known through tax withholding records) to upload a flat file to an endpoint.
  • Run a model against uploads to look for any potential errors.
  • Publish a real-time feed — with the total annual cost split among licensees.

The idea was met with a fairly negative response, with many commenters siding with Cuban and claiming Chamath was “cozying up to Trump.”

Economists also agree on at least part of Cuban’s critique, the biggest problem in the recent debacle wasn’t tampering, it was the shrinking survey response rates and outdated collection methods.

Chamath’s Potential For Blockchain

Under Chamath Palihapitiya’s proposal, payroll providers would automatically upload anonymized employment data in real time, allowing for instant verification and reducing reliance on delayed, sample-based surveys that are prone to large revisions.

Because blockchain records are immutable, any changes to the data would be traceable and would eliminate any suspicion of political manipulation.

A real-time feed could also provide policymakers and the public with up-to-date labor market information, reducing the shock of dramatic revisions seen recently.

Critics, however, warn that implementing this at scale would be expensive and too complex from a system which already works.

One X user wrote: “The entire methodology is publicly available on the BLS website.

“Estimation, Revisions, everything. All you have to do is read. Suddenly it’s garbage because you wanna be cozied up with the President. Vacuous shill behavior.”

White House Defends BLS

The jobs report sent Trump on a tirade of accusations, claiming the commissioner faked jobs numbers “before the Election to try and boost Kamala’s chances of Victory.”

All of Trump’s accusations were presented without any evidence.

Members of the federal government rushed to defend McEntarfer, who has worked in the White House for the past two decades.

Speaking to NBC, Labor Secretary during the Biden administration Julie Su said :

“The work is done largely by expert career staff who do their jobs with care and pride.”

Meanwhile, Labor Department Chief of Staff Daniel Koh took to X to claim:

“Nobody is faking numbers.”

“Downward revisions aren’t scandal — they’re science,” he added.

Koh said the agency worked closely with a Trump-appointed commissioner and “never doubted the data, even with bad news.”

“Respecting the truth isn’t optional. It’s the job,” he said.

Was this Article helpful? Yes No

Leituras Relacionadas

Bitwise Chief Investment Officer: STRC Plunge is a Bottom Signal, Bull Market to Start in Autumn

Bitwise CIO: STRC's Plunge Signals Market Bottom, Bull Run Likely This Fall Bitwise CIO Matt Hougan analyzes the recent sharp decline of Strategy's perpetual preferred shares (STRC) and its implications for the bitcoin market. STRC, a product designed for stable, high-yield income, fell dramatically from its $100 target to $75 amid concerns about Strategy's ability to maintain dividends as bitcoin prices dropped. While Strategy's overall balance sheet remains strong, with ample assets to cover liabilities, market panic stemmed from its right to suspend STRC dividends. In response, Strategy introduced a new framework, committing to sell bitcoin as needed to fund dividends and allowing STRC to float freely, abandoning the $100 peg mechanism. This shift marks a change in Strategy's role from a consistent net buyer to a more dynamic participant in the bitcoin market. Hougan views the STRC volatility and related sell-off in MicroStrategy (MSTR) stock as classic late-cycle behavior, where mismatched leverage is being purged from the system. He draws parallels to the GBTC premium unwind after the 2021 bull market. This necessary deleveraging, he argues, is a precursor to finding a market bottom. Key bottoming signals to watch include MSTR trading at a discount to its net asset value (NAV), crypto fear & greed indices hitting extreme lows, and sustained negative bitcoin funding rates. Hougan concludes that as excess leverage is cleared, the market is nearing its bottom, setting the stage for a new bull cycle to begin in the autumn. The next major wave of buyers, he believes, will be institutional investors like banks, asset managers, and pension funds.

marsbitHá 23m

Bitwise Chief Investment Officer: STRC Plunge is a Bottom Signal, Bull Market to Start in Autumn

marsbitHá 23m

The Largest Upgrade Since The Merge? How Glamsterdam Will Affect Ethereum?

Ethereum's next major upgrade, Glamsterdam (combining consensus layer "Gloas" and execution layer "Amsterdam"), is scheduled for late 2026 and considered the most significant overhaul since The Merge. It aims to fundamentally enhance L1 performance and architecture to prepare for substantial capacity increases. The upgrade centers on three core changes: 1. **Enshrined PBS (ePBS - EIP-7732):** Integrates the Proposer-Builder Separation directly into the protocol, eliminating reliance on external relays. This extends the window for processing execution payloads, allowing nodes more time to handle larger blocks and more data, paving the way for a higher Gas Limit. 2. **Block-Level Access Lists (BALs - EIP-7928):** Provides a pre-declared "map" in the block header of all state data (accounts, storage) that transactions will access and modify. This enables potential parallel transaction processing and faster state synchronization for nodes. 3. **Gas Repricing (EIP-8037):** Overhauls the gas model to more accurately reflect the real resource costs for nodes. It separates computation costs from state storage costs, making operations that create permanent state data (like new accounts) more expensive, while computation-heavy operations become relatively cheaper. These changes work together to solve the trilemma of scaling: giving nodes more time to process larger blocks (ePBS), reducing execution bottlenecks (BALs), and controlling unsustainable state growth (Gas Repricing). The goal is a credible path to a higher Gas Limit (e.g., 200M gas) without compromising decentralization by overburdening node hardware. For users: * Transaction fees for simple transfers may decrease and become more stable due to increased block space, but state-intensive operations (contract deployment) may cost more. * Gas estimation by wallets will improve in accuracy. * L2 data posting costs could become more stable long-term due to increased Blob capacity. * EIP-7708 will standardize logs for ETH transfers, improving tracking for wallets and exchanges. Node operators must upgrade clients, but ETH holders need take no action. In essence, Glamsterdam doesn't just raise the block size limit; it re-engineers Ethereum's core block production, execution, and economic models to enable sustainable, decentralized scaling.

marsbitHá 1h

The Largest Upgrade Since The Merge? How Glamsterdam Will Affect Ethereum?

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
活动图片