Conflux surges 10%, but CFX price stalls at THIS crucial level

ambcryptoPublicado em 2025-08-07Última atualização em 2025-08-07

Key Takeaways

Conflux has surged about 10% in the last 24 hours. The long maximum pain was at $0.20 while the short max pain was at $0.23. Bulls or bears, who wins this round?


The price action of Conflux [CFX] has maintained a clear trend since the 19th of July, when it climbed above $0.10. Since the previous day’s close, Conflux has been up by about 10% as per CoinMarketCap.

This surge could be attributed to two factors, that is, a selective altcoin season and Conflux’s offshore yuan stablecoin plans.

The narratives have been fueling this unusual trend at a time when only Bitcoin [BTC] and Ethereum [ETH] have sustained their strengths.

Max pain levels for CFX 

According to CoinGlass, the maximum pain levels for longs and shorts were at $0.20 and $0.23 respectively. More than $258K worth of orders were placed by sellers, while that of buyers was about $280K.

CFXCFX

Source: CoinGlass

The max pain levels defined the levels the bulls and bears were ready to protect. Failure to do so would lead to liquidations from either of them.

Meanwhile, CryptoQuant analysis showed that the taker CVD was sell-dominant on both spot and Futures market. Also, retail activity was heating up amid this bull-bear battle.

That in mind, Conflux crypto was experiencing a clash between the market participants.

Bulls and bears face off

CFX on a technical perceptive showed the bulls were holding the ground, but bears were pushing back each time. Since the start of August, the two battling sides had confined CFX in a range between max pain levels.

Since the 19th of July, CFX had moved by 3x but at the time of press, the gains had been reduced to 2x, with price at $0.22.

However, Conflux’s price had formed an inverted heads and shoulders pattern, with the neckline coinciding with max pain for shorts. Naturally, the pattern is bullish.

cfx confluxcfx conflux

Source: TradingView

The momentum was also pointing toward a bullish control with a value of 0.0223. Also, a value of 4 from the Advance/Decline indicator reiterated this outlook.

From the look, CFX bulls were appearing to outpace bears. A breach and hold above the $0.23 pain level could see bulls take price to $0.27. Alternatively, failure to defend $0.20 meant a revisit of $0.18 or $0.16 levels.

Network activity heating up

Worth noting was the network activity. The number of monthly active addresses reached a high of 15.2K for the period since August 2024. The number of unique addresses on a weekly scale were at 4.7K.

CFX confluxCFX conflux

Source: Token Terminal

The token’s trading volume also hit an ATH of $2.62 billion in earlier this month. However, th3 value had dropped to $434 Million.

In conclusion, the bulls were giving a spirited fight, but the bears push back could be ignored.

Share

Leituras Relacionadas

Solana Expands Validator Power With Launch of On-Chain Governance

Solana has formally launched its on-chain governance system, empowering token holders and validators with a more open and decentralized way to influence major protocol decisions. Governance debates and voting are now conducted entirely on-chain using the new Solana Governance Proposals (SGP) framework, supported by stake-weighted voting and cryptographic verification. Validators with at least 100,000 SOL in delegated stake can submit an SGP. To proceed to a formal vote, a proposal must first gain support from at least 15% of the network's total staked SOL, ensuring only ideas with significant backing move forward. SGPs serve a distinct purpose from the technical Solana Improvement Documents (SIMDs). While SIMDs focus on *how* to implement protocol upgrades, SGPs determine *whether* the broader ecosystem believes a proposal should proceed, via an on-chain, stake-weighted vote. This separation allows core developers to continue building effectively while reserving community-wide votes for impactful decisions. A key feature grants delegators greater control: they can now override their validator's governance vote. If a validator votes against a delegator's preference or abstains, the delegator can cast a vote directly using their own stake weight through Solana's governance portal. The voting process is secured using Merkle proofs to verify participant stakes against an on-chain consensus snapshot. With this implementation, Solana aims to broaden community participation in governance without hindering development, combining decentralized decision-making with efficient protocol evolution.

TheNewsCryptoHá 20m

Solana Expands Validator Power With Launch of On-Chain Governance

TheNewsCryptoHá 20m

Trillion-Won Bet on Semiconductors: Is South Korea Really Panicking This Time?

**Summary:** South Korea, traditionally adept at "counter-cyclical" investments during industry downturns, has launched an unprecedented trillion-dollar (approximately 6.4 trillion RMB) semiconductor investment plan during a current AI-driven boom. This shift signals deep strategic anxiety, driven by the rapid rise of China's memory chip challengers. The article traces this dynamic through the history of East Asian semiconductor competition. In the 1980s, Japan used a "national system + industrial capital" model to surpass the US in DRAM, only to be overtaken in the 1990s by South Korea employing the same aggressive, efficiency-focused tactics—most notably massive, loss-tolerant investments during downturns to crush competitors like Japan's Elpida. Now, China's memory giants, Yangtze Memory (YMTC) and ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT), are employing a strikingly similar playbook. Starting from near-zero a decade ago, they've used a combination of government-backed capital, strategic technology acquisition (e.g., CXMT leveraging Qimonda's legacy), and innovative architectural leaps (e.g., YMTC's Xtacking) to achieve rapid technological catch-up. Crucially, during the severe industry downturn of 2023, while Korean and US giants cut production, the Chinese firms expanded capacity and competed on price, rapidly gaining global market share (reaching ~11% in NAND and ~7.67% in DRAM by 2025). South Korea's current massive investment, therefore, is a defensive move born of fear. The historical pattern suggests that once a technological gap closes, scale and integrated supply chain advantages—areas where China holds significant potential—can determine the leader. Having used counter-cyclical strategies to become the incumbent, South Korea now faces the prospect of a formidable challenger using those very same tactics. This investment marks not just a bet on the AI cycle, but the opening chapter in a new battle for dominance in the memory industry.

marsbitHá 30m

Trillion-Won Bet on Semiconductors: Is South Korea Really Panicking This Time?

marsbitHá 30m

Trading

Spot
活动图片