Perpetual DEX Volume Hit Record High $898 Billion in Q2 2025: CoinGecko

TheCryptoTimesPublicado em 2025-07-17Última atualização em 2025-07-17

In the second quarter of 2025, perpetual trading on decentralized exchanges (DEX) soared to an $898 billion in volume, according to CoinGecko. Hyperliquid was at the forefront of this trend, taking 72.7% of the market share. It recorded $653.2 billion in trading volume and ranked eighth among all perpetual trading platforms, including centralized exchanges.

The report states that decentralized exchanges saw record growth in both spot and perp volumes. Most of it was driven during the Hyperliquid wave, where the exchange saw significant traction.

Besides Hyperliquid, only three other perp DEXs saw volume growth: Aster, RabbitX, and EdgeX. Aster, formerly APX Finance, saw volume double after launching its Pro mode. Meanwhile, dYdX continued to slide. Its average monthly volume dropped to $5.3 billion—half of January’s figure.

Crypto Market Recovers, But Centralized Volumes Fall

The crypto market made a comeback in Q2, with total market capitalization soaring by 24.0% to reach $3.5 trillion. Bitcoin was at the forefront of this resurgence, breaking through $100,000 and hitting a new all-time high. Its market dominance climbed to 62.1%, drawing in the majority of the capital inflow. However, spot volumes on centralized exchanges fell again, down 27.7% QoQ to $3.9 trillion.

In contrast, spot volumes on decentralized exchanges rose 25.3% QoQ. This spike pushed the DEX:CEX volume ratio to an all-time high. PancakeSwap led the spot DEX sector, benefiting from the wider shift.

Also Read: Solana DEX Raydium’s RAY Token Buybacks Cross $190 Million



Leituras Relacionadas

Li Fei-Fei's Latest Long-Form Article: When Video Generation, Robotics, and NVIDIA All Call Themselves World Models, We Need a Taxonomy

In a new article, Dr. Fei-Fei Li addresses the widespread and often inconsistent use of the term "world model" in AI. She proposes a clear, functional taxonomy rooted in the classic Partially Observable Markov Decision Process (POMDP) loop (agent → action → state → observation → agent). According to this framework, current systems called "world models" are different projections of this loop, categorized by their primary output: 1. **Renderers**: Output observations (pixels). Their goal is visual fidelity for human consumption (e.g., video generation models like Sora). They are the most commercially mature but are limited by a focus on appearance over physical accuracy. 2. **Simulators**: Output states (geometric, physical, dynamic representations). They provide a structurally accurate world for both human professionals (e.g., architects) and computational agents (e.g., robots for training). Li argues simulators are the crucial, underappreciated bridge, as they can underpin both rendering and planning. 3. **Planners**: Output actions. Given an observation and a goal, they decide what an agent should do next (e.g., robotic action models). This area is highly promising but remains the least mature for real-world deployment. Li highlights a key trend: the boundaries between these three categories are beginning to blur, as they all rely on a shared underlying understanding of geometry, physics, and dynamics. The logical endpoint is a unified world foundation model capable of switching between rendering, simulation, and planning based on downstream needs. This convergence, she concludes, is central to advancing spatial intelligence—enabling machines not just to talk about the world, but to truly understand, imagine, and interact with it.

marsbitHá 6h

Li Fei-Fei's Latest Long-Form Article: When Video Generation, Robotics, and NVIDIA All Call Themselves World Models, We Need a Taxonomy

marsbitHá 6h

Trading

Spot
活动图片