Grayscale Responds To SEC Decision To Delay GDLC ETF Debut

bitcoinistPublicado em 2025-07-13Última atualização em 2025-07-13

Resumo

The legal team of asset management firm Grayscale called out the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on its...

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

The legal team of asset management firm Grayscale called out the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on its decision to delay the listing of the firm’s Digital Large Cap Fund (GDLC) on the New York Stock Exchange. 

As Bitcoinist reported earlier, the conversion of GDLC, which contains Bitcoin, Ether, XRP, Solana, and Cardano, into an exchange-traded fund (ETF) was “stayed” indefinitely 24 hours after the SEC’s Division of Trading & Markets approved the fund’s listing.

Grayscale To Petition SEC On Multi-Asset ETF

In a July 8 letter, the Grayscale attorneys expressed their displeasure at the decision of the Office of the Secretary to delay the conversion of the GDLC to an ETF. According to the commission, the purpose of this “stay” decision is to review the delegated action of listing Grayscale’s Digital Large Cap Fund on the New York Stock Exchange.

Bloomberg Intelligence ETF analyst James Seyffart posited, at the time the news of the delay broke out, that the SEC could be holding out on all multi-coin ETF launches till it completes a comprehensive digital-asset ETP framework. “The 2nd theory is that there’s something the SEC wants to work on in relation to a specific aspect of $GDLC itself (like its structure?) The 19b-4 approval order comes from the division of Trading & Markets. Perhaps another division isn’t ready to let this convert just yet,” Seyffart added at the time.

However, the messaging of Grayscale’s letter suggested that the asset manager’s patience is running thin with the commission. The attorneys of Grayscale hinted that the parties involved in the conversion are considering submitting a petition requesting that the stay on the GDLC listing be lifted temporarily.

The letter read: 

The consequences of a failure to meet the statutory approval or disapproval deadline, regardless of the reason, are clear: under Section 19(b)(2)(D), the rule proposal is deemed approved. Grayscale, the Exchange and the Fund’s current investors are suffering harm as a result of the delay in public launch of the Fund, and Grayscale and the Exchange are therefore considering whether to file a petition requesting the Commission to lift the stay imposed by Rule 431(e) while the Commission reviews the action taken by delegated authority, so that the Fund may promptly launch while that review proceeds.

Grayscale concluded the letter by acknowledging the progress made by the Commission regarding regulatory clarity in the digital asset industry. “Grayscale appreciates the Commission’s efforts to provide regulatory clarity and intends to continue to engage cooperatively with the Commission in furtherance of the shared goal of regulatory clarity and to serve as a resource to the Commission on crypto-related matters,” the asset manager added.

GDLC ETF Launch Just A Matter Of Time: Expert

Scott Johnsson, an expert in finance law, shared their opinion on the developments between Grayscale and the US SEC regarding the Digital Large Cap Fund’s conversion. Despite the somewhat technical complexities, the finance expert expects the GDLC to launch as an exchange-traded fund in due time.

Johnsson said on X:

Given Grayscale was suggesting they had productive talks with the SEC prior to approval, and they had made extensive amendments to the rule proposal in line with those discussions, my guess is the Rule 431 application was a parting gift from Crenshaw acting unilaterally. SEC then had to deal with the mess. This is going to launch, its just a matter of when imo.

While the Bitcoin and Ethereum spot exchange-traded funds started trading in 2024, the US SEC is still sitting on a group of ETF applications for other crypto assets, including Solana, XRP, DOGE — to name a few.

Grayscale

The total cryptocurrency market capitalization on the daily timeframe | Source: TOTAL chart on TradingView
Featured image from Business Wire, chart from TradingView
Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Opeyemi Sule is a passionate crypto enthusiast, a proficient content writer, and a journalist at Bitcoinist. Opeyemi creates unique pieces unraveling the complexities of blockchain technology and sharing insights on the latest trends in the world of cryptocurrencies. Opeyemi enjoys reading poetry, chatting about politics, and listening to music, in addition to his strong interest in cryptocurrency.

Leituras Relacionadas

A Decade of Change: The Demise of Crypto Startups

"The Decade-Long Transformation: The Demise of Crypto Startups" The article traces the dramatic evolution of the cryptocurrency industry from its anarchic beginnings to its current highly regulated and institutionalized state. In the early days (circa 2017), launching a crypto startup was remarkably simple: a whitepaper, a GitHub repository, and a Telegram group could attract thousands of retail investors via an Initial Coin Offering (ICO). Founders operated anonymously with near-zero regulatory and financial barriers, enabling rapid, global innovation but also widespread fraud. By 2026, the landscape is fundamentally different. To operate in major markets like the US, EU, and Asia, crypto businesses must now navigate a complex web of regulations akin to traditional finance. Compliance costs are prohibitive: estimates for a US multi-state operation range from $750,000 to $1.2 million in the first three years, with annual costs exceeding $2 million thereafter. Regulations like MiCA in the EU and New York's BitLicense have created high capital and operational hurdles that act as barriers to entry. Simultaneously, venture capital investment has shifted dramatically. Following the collapses of Terra and FTX, funding has concentrated in later-stage, established companies, creating a "barbell market." Early-stage and seed funding has shrunk significantly, while mega-funds like Andreessen Horowitz's $15 billion pool dominate. Most capital now flows to trading platforms, lending infrastructure, and B2B services. This environment favors mergers and acquisitions as the primary path for growth. Companies like Coinbase and Ripple are acquiring firms like Deribit and Hidden Road not for their technology, but for their licenses, banking relationships, and institutional trust—assets far more valuable than code. Distribution channels, compliance, and brand reputation have become the new moats, overshadowing pure technical innovation. The industry's maturation brings benefits: reduced scams, increased institutional participation, and clearer regulatory frameworks. However, it comes at a cost. The low-barrier, experimental ethos that defined crypto's first decade is fading. Entrepreneurs without substantial capital, pre-existing licenses, or institutional connections face immense challenges. Funding for exploratory fields like decentralized social media or novel governance models is drying up. Ultimately, the crypto industry is replicating the consolidation pattern seen in banking and tech after the 2008 financial crisis. While this brings stability and legitimacy, it raises a critical question: in this new, resource-intensive reality, is there still room for the disruptive, from-scratch innovation that gave birth to the sector?

Foresight NewsHá 34m

A Decade of Change: The Demise of Crypto Startups

Foresight NewsHá 34m

Trading

Spot
活动图片