How ivault Uses Crypto to Break the Cycle of Overconsumption

bitcoinistPublicado em 2025-07-11Última atualização em 2025-07-11

Resumo

Overconsumption has become routine and dangerous. Most of what we buy ends up sitting idle or tossed aside, contributing to...

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

Overconsumption has become routine and dangerous. Most of what we buy ends up sitting idle or tossed aside, contributing to rising waste and environmental damage. Arman Sarhaddar, founder and CEO of ivault, believes the way out is simple: we need to stop buying things we don’t use and start sharing the things we already own.

ivault is an app designed to make that easy. During a recent AMA with Jack Niewold, the host and founder of Decypher Podcast, Sarhaddar explained how blockchain and crypto fit into that vision.

A Marketplace Where Less Is More

The idea behind ivault is clear: give people a secure and simple way to rent, sell, or donate items they aren’t using. A neighbor wants to borrow your lawnmower? List it for $10. Someone needs a drill just once? Rent it instead of buying one. Users earn eco-points for these actions, points that can be exchanged for $iVAULT tokens or used to cover listing fees.

“It’s an app made for the community, with the community, and for the community,” Sarhaddar said during the podcast. “We tell people how much they can earn from lending, and they get rewarded for sustainable behavior”.

Unlike typical marketplaces, ivault charges a flat $1 fee to list an item and takes no commission. There’s no middleman eating into your earnings.

Why Blockchain?

For Sarhaddar, using blockchain wasn’t about hype; it was about solving specific problems: trust, privacy, and cost. “Imagine any blockchain being hacked and someone walking away with data,” he said. “Never happened.”

The blockchain infrastructure gives users ownership of their data and transactions. Smart contracts handle payments behind the scenes. The app itself doesn’t feel like a crypto product; it feels like a normal marketplace.

“If the consumer doesn’t even notice a smart contract is behind it, then it’s built right,” Sarhaddar said.

A System Born from Personal Loss

The project has roots in Sarhaddar’s own experience. Years ago, while moving from Miami to Switzerland, he discovered his storage unit had been emptied. “It was a production studio. Everything was gone,” he recalled. “That’s when I thought, why didn’t I record all of it, take photos, serial numbers, something?”

That idea led to the patented system behind ivault, where users register items as digital twins on-chain for proof of ownership.

Making Sustainability Rewarding

While most people agree that we need to cut back, habits are hard to break. Sarhaddar knows financial incentives matter. “Crypto is money-driven,” he said. “If you tell someone, rent out your stuff and make $10, they’ll do it. If you also reward them for it, they’ll keep doing it.”

That reward loop is central to the app’s tokenomics. 25% of token supply is reserved for user rewards. And unlike legacy companies with billions in reserves to fund loyalty programs, ivault uses token design to build its own.

Built for the Real World

As of today, ivault has over 100,000 installs and thousands of active users. The app is especially popular in Southeast Asia, parts of Africa, and South America, places where inflation, poverty, and rising costs have made borrowing more practical than buying.

Sarhaddar sees growth potential in university cities, where Gen Z users are already used to sharing and value-conscious living. “They’re more emotionally warm, more open,” he said. “They help their neighbors. That’s where we start.”

A Fairer System

ivault’s approach is deliberately unflashy. No complicated crypto jargon. No promises to change the world. Just a better way to access what we need securely, affordably, and with lower impact.

“You don’t need to buy an electric drill if you use it once in your life,” Sarhaddar said. “Rent it. Save money. Avoid waste. Feel good about it.”

That’s the offer: simple transactions, full control over your data, and real-world rewards for doing the right thing. Nothing more. Nothing less.

Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Leituras Relacionadas

Ethereum Sheds Its Load? What Ethereum Supporters Think About the Lean Ethereum Upgrade and the Future Market

Ethereum is back in focus with the announcement of the "Lean Ethereum" upgrade roadmap, described by Vitalik Buterin as Ethereum's third major update. This proposal aims to fundamentally redesign the consensus, data, and execution layers from first principles, striving to make Ethereum **simpler, more secure (quantum-resistant), more verifiable, and more scalable.** The announcement comes amidst a broader restructuring within the ecosystem, including a 20% staff reduction at the Ethereum Foundation and the emergence of new organizations like EthLabs. This has sparked a debate among Ethereum supporters ("E-bizens"). **Optimists** view Lean Ethereum as a critical refocusing on core protocol fundamentals: * **sassal.eth** calls it the ultimate bullish catalyst, envisioning a future where running a node is so lightweight it could be done on a smartwatch, greatly enhancing decentralization. * **Ryan Sean Adams** sees it as Ethereum moving from "narrative expansion" to "protocol hardening," addressing long-term foundational issues like security and scalability. * Analysts like **BITWU** and **蓝狐 (Blue Fox)** frame it as a third-phase evolution towards a "minimal, durable, and credible base layer" designed for the next decade. * **gigi发财猪** interprets the organizational changes as Ethereum "shedding old baggage and forming new teams" for a lighter, more agile approach. * **Xiyu** notes that the roadmap itself provides a much-needed new narrative for market sentiment recovery. **Cautious voices** acknowledge the vision but emphasize execution and market timing: * **Ignas** warns that while the roadmap addresses key community requests, it overlooks tokenomics, and competitors are gaining ground in areas like RWA. Timely delivery is crucial; delays could be bearish. * **Dankrad Feist**, a former Ethereum Foundation researcher, agrees on direction but criticizes the proposed 3-4 year timeline as too slow for the current market pace, especially with AI-aided development available. **In summary,** optimists believe Lean Ethereum reaffirms Ethereum's long-term value proposition as a decentralized world computer, while the cautious argue that its success hinges on faster delivery and tangible results to maintain market relevance. Despite ongoing criticism, the move signals Ethereum's effort to regroup and reclaim initiative at the protocol level.

marsbitHá 27m

Ethereum Sheds Its Load? What Ethereum Supporters Think About the Lean Ethereum Upgrade and the Future Market

marsbitHá 27m

AI Folding: Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Are Becoming the Privilege of a Few

【AI Accessibility Gap Widens: Elite Tools Like Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Are Becoming Privileged】 We are witnessing a growing "AI divide." A stark reality is emerging: a tiny fraction of elites, primarily in tech, are using powerful next-generation models like Fable 5 or the upcoming GPT-5.6, while the vast majority of the public only has access to "toys" - free, limited models equivalent to ChatGPT's basic versions (8B to 30B parameters). This creates a massive experiential chasm and cognitive dissonance. Industry outsiders see AI as overhyped and ineffective, unable to grasp its transformative potential, while insiders leverage these advanced models for a decisive competitive edge. The gap isn't just about model quality but product functionality. Free users get a simple chatbot. Paying elites get integrated workflow systems—capable of creating specialized agents, processing complex data, and handling real-world tasks like management, coding, and planning. Demos showcasing AI planning weddings or building apps feel disconnected from everyday needs like managing bills, groceries, or health. The cost barrier is immense, with reports of engineers spending $1000 daily on Fable 5 inference. Elite users employ sophisticated multi-model workflows, combining different AIs for ideation, architecture, execution, and review, completing complex projects in minutes instead of weeks. This divide extends to critical areas like healthcare, where free models are dangerously unreliable for medical queries. However, some argue that for 90% of common business tasks, mid-tier models like GPT-5.5 are sufficient; the perceived limitation often stems from poor integration and lack of context, not model intelligence. Ultimately, unequal access to cutting-edge AI is creating a new form of social stratification, where the most powerful tools are becoming the exclusive privilege of a few.

marsbitHá 1h

AI Folding: Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Are Becoming the Privilege of a Few

marsbitHá 1h

Cathie Wood's June $77M Investment: Are Crypto Stocks a True 'Substitute' for Bitcoin?

In June, Cathie Wood's ARK Invest purchased $77 million worth of publicly traded crypto-related stocks, including Coinbase, Circle, and Bullish, during Bitcoin's worst monthly performance in four years. This aligns with the investment thesis that such stocks offer a compliant way to gain exposure to the crypto cycle without directly holding Bitcoin. However, data analysis reveals significant drawbacks. A group of nine U.S.-listed crypto companies showed 30-day annualized realized volatility between 68% and 90%, nearly double Bitcoin's 37.6%. Over 90 days, Circle's volatility reached 103.6% versus Bitcoin's 37.8%. Drawdowns were also more severe for stocks like Circle (-51.4%) and MicroStrategy (-48.6%) compared to Bitcoin's -36.4% from its January high. Correlation analysis shows most stocks share only a moderate link to Bitcoin. For example, Circle, Robinhood, and Bullish have a 90-day correlation coefficient of just 0.55–0.58 with BTC, meaning only about one-third of their price movement is explained by Bitcoin's action. The rest stems from company-specific risks: earnings, competition, fundraising, and equity dilution. MicroStrategy (MSTR) is the notable exception, acting as a leveraged Bitcoin proxy with a beta of 1.59 and 0.85 correlation. Coinbase offers relatively balanced exposure. Circle exemplifies "crypto-wrapped" corporate risk, with its recent crash tied to stablecoin competition, not Bitcoin. Robinhood's diversified business insulates it from crypto downturns but also limits upside. Bitcoin miners like RIOT and MARA have posted significant gains year-to-date, driven primarily by their pivot to AI compute services, not Bitcoin's price. The article highlights that investing in crypto stocks often means accepting amplified volatility or layering on business-specific risks absent from direct Bitcoin ownership. For instance, MicroStrategy's recent challenges—its market value falling below its Bitcoin holdings (mNAV <1) and facing potential Bitcoin sales for liquidity—demonstrate equity-specific hazards like dilution and financing pressures not faced by a direct Bitcoin holder. ARK's buying spree represents a bet on a basket of different business models with varying crypto exposure, not a simple, lower-risk substitute for holding Bitcoin.

marsbitHá 1h

Cathie Wood's June $77M Investment: Are Crypto Stocks a True 'Substitute' for Bitcoin?

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
活动图片