Nigerian Politicians Laundering Public Funds With Crypto, EFCC Boss Urges Stronger Digital Defences

ccn.comPublicado em 2025-07-11Última atualização em 2025-07-11

Key Takeaways
  • EFCC Chairman Ola Olukoyede revealed that some Nigerian politicians are using crypto wallets to store illicit wealth.
  • Olukoyede has urged a united front among regulators, law enforcement, financial institutions, and civil society.
  • With over $56 billion crypto transactions recorded in one year, the country has also seen a sharp increase in fraud cases.

Some Nigerian politicians are hiding stolen public funds in crypto to avoid scrutiny, the Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), Ola Olukoyede, has warned.

As crypto booms across Nigeria, Olukoyede has called for stronger cyber resilience across the country’s financial ecosystem to combat money laundering and related fraud.

Nigerian Politicians Hiding Stolen Funds in Crypto

Speaking on Thursday, July 10, at the Africa Anti-Corruption Day event, Olukoyede revealed that the EFCC had uncovered a concerning trend: some public officials are using crypto wallets to conceal stolen funds and avoid detection.

“Virtual asset fraud is on the rise,” Olukoyede said during his address.

“Stolen funds and unexplained wealth are being warehoused in wallets and payment for services are being done through this window,” he added.

Olukoyede noted that while virtual assets have revolutionized global finance, they have also opened new avenues for financial crimes.

“The advent of virtual assets is a response to one of the qualities of money as a store of value like it is known in our elementary economies,” he explained.

“However, as with every progressive innovation, fraud starts to usually evolve, evolve ways of perverting their genuine purposes,” he added.

EFCC Calls for Stronger Measures

The EFCC chairman emphasized that effective cyber resilience cannot be achieved in isolation.

He proposed three core strategies to bolster digital defences:

  • Stronger collaboration between regulators, law enforcement, financial institutions, and civil society.
  • Increased investment in cybersecurity infrastructure and skilled personnel.
  • A coordinated national framework that brings all stakeholders together under a unified vision.

Muhammad Abdullahi, Deputy Governor of Economic Policy at the Central Bank of Nigeria, highlighted the massive growth in crypto transactions across the country.

“In Nigeria, over $56 billion in crypto-related transactions were recorded between July 2022 and June 2023, making the country Africa’s digital transaction leader,” Abdullahi said .

However, he noted this boom has been accompanied by a surge in financial fraud.

According to the Central Bank’s 2024 Financial Stability Report , there has been a 45% increase in fraud cases, with over 70% of those losses linked to unregulated digital asset services.

“Furthermore, over 30 Ponzi-style investment schemes exploiting digital currency narratives have been flagged by the SEC and other agencies,” Abdullahi added.

Crypto Scams Rise Globally

As the global appetite for crypto grows, with Bitcoin reaching a new all-time high on Wednesday, July 9, so does the sophistication of the scams that unfortunately surround it.

From eerily convincing deepfake videos to Bitcoin ATM cons targeting the elderly, cybercriminals are weaponizing technologies and emotional exploits to get a piece of the boom.

According to blockchain analytics firm Chainalysis, the increase of AI and “pig butchering” scams helped lift crypto scams to record heights in 2024.

Revenue from crypto scams in 2024 was at least $9.9 billion, the firm reported, although this could increase to $12.4 billion as more data becomes avaliable.

The blockchain firm reported that pig butchering scams also increased up to 40% from the year prior.

Was this Article helpful? Yes No

Leituras Relacionadas

Ethereum Sheds Its Load? What Ethereum Supporters Think About the Lean Ethereum Upgrade and the Future Market

Ethereum is back in focus with the announcement of the "Lean Ethereum" upgrade roadmap, described by Vitalik Buterin as Ethereum's third major update. This proposal aims to fundamentally redesign the consensus, data, and execution layers from first principles, striving to make Ethereum **simpler, more secure (quantum-resistant), more verifiable, and more scalable.** The announcement comes amidst a broader restructuring within the ecosystem, including a 20% staff reduction at the Ethereum Foundation and the emergence of new organizations like EthLabs. This has sparked a debate among Ethereum supporters ("E-bizens"). **Optimists** view Lean Ethereum as a critical refocusing on core protocol fundamentals: * **sassal.eth** calls it the ultimate bullish catalyst, envisioning a future where running a node is so lightweight it could be done on a smartwatch, greatly enhancing decentralization. * **Ryan Sean Adams** sees it as Ethereum moving from "narrative expansion" to "protocol hardening," addressing long-term foundational issues like security and scalability. * Analysts like **BITWU** and **蓝狐 (Blue Fox)** frame it as a third-phase evolution towards a "minimal, durable, and credible base layer" designed for the next decade. * **gigi发财猪** interprets the organizational changes as Ethereum "shedding old baggage and forming new teams" for a lighter, more agile approach. * **Xiyu** notes that the roadmap itself provides a much-needed new narrative for market sentiment recovery. **Cautious voices** acknowledge the vision but emphasize execution and market timing: * **Ignas** warns that while the roadmap addresses key community requests, it overlooks tokenomics, and competitors are gaining ground in areas like RWA. Timely delivery is crucial; delays could be bearish. * **Dankrad Feist**, a former Ethereum Foundation researcher, agrees on direction but criticizes the proposed 3-4 year timeline as too slow for the current market pace, especially with AI-aided development available. **In summary,** optimists believe Lean Ethereum reaffirms Ethereum's long-term value proposition as a decentralized world computer, while the cautious argue that its success hinges on faster delivery and tangible results to maintain market relevance. Despite ongoing criticism, the move signals Ethereum's effort to regroup and reclaim initiative at the protocol level.

marsbitHá 27m

Ethereum Sheds Its Load? What Ethereum Supporters Think About the Lean Ethereum Upgrade and the Future Market

marsbitHá 27m

AI Folding: Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Are Becoming the Privilege of a Few

【AI Accessibility Gap Widens: Elite Tools Like Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Are Becoming Privileged】 We are witnessing a growing "AI divide." A stark reality is emerging: a tiny fraction of elites, primarily in tech, are using powerful next-generation models like Fable 5 or the upcoming GPT-5.6, while the vast majority of the public only has access to "toys" - free, limited models equivalent to ChatGPT's basic versions (8B to 30B parameters). This creates a massive experiential chasm and cognitive dissonance. Industry outsiders see AI as overhyped and ineffective, unable to grasp its transformative potential, while insiders leverage these advanced models for a decisive competitive edge. The gap isn't just about model quality but product functionality. Free users get a simple chatbot. Paying elites get integrated workflow systems—capable of creating specialized agents, processing complex data, and handling real-world tasks like management, coding, and planning. Demos showcasing AI planning weddings or building apps feel disconnected from everyday needs like managing bills, groceries, or health. The cost barrier is immense, with reports of engineers spending $1000 daily on Fable 5 inference. Elite users employ sophisticated multi-model workflows, combining different AIs for ideation, architecture, execution, and review, completing complex projects in minutes instead of weeks. This divide extends to critical areas like healthcare, where free models are dangerously unreliable for medical queries. However, some argue that for 90% of common business tasks, mid-tier models like GPT-5.5 are sufficient; the perceived limitation often stems from poor integration and lack of context, not model intelligence. Ultimately, unequal access to cutting-edge AI is creating a new form of social stratification, where the most powerful tools are becoming the exclusive privilege of a few.

marsbitHá 1h

AI Folding: Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Are Becoming the Privilege of a Few

marsbitHá 1h

Cathie Wood's June $77M Investment: Are Crypto Stocks a True 'Substitute' for Bitcoin?

In June, Cathie Wood's ARK Invest purchased $77 million worth of publicly traded crypto-related stocks, including Coinbase, Circle, and Bullish, during Bitcoin's worst monthly performance in four years. This aligns with the investment thesis that such stocks offer a compliant way to gain exposure to the crypto cycle without directly holding Bitcoin. However, data analysis reveals significant drawbacks. A group of nine U.S.-listed crypto companies showed 30-day annualized realized volatility between 68% and 90%, nearly double Bitcoin's 37.6%. Over 90 days, Circle's volatility reached 103.6% versus Bitcoin's 37.8%. Drawdowns were also more severe for stocks like Circle (-51.4%) and MicroStrategy (-48.6%) compared to Bitcoin's -36.4% from its January high. Correlation analysis shows most stocks share only a moderate link to Bitcoin. For example, Circle, Robinhood, and Bullish have a 90-day correlation coefficient of just 0.55–0.58 with BTC, meaning only about one-third of their price movement is explained by Bitcoin's action. The rest stems from company-specific risks: earnings, competition, fundraising, and equity dilution. MicroStrategy (MSTR) is the notable exception, acting as a leveraged Bitcoin proxy with a beta of 1.59 and 0.85 correlation. Coinbase offers relatively balanced exposure. Circle exemplifies "crypto-wrapped" corporate risk, with its recent crash tied to stablecoin competition, not Bitcoin. Robinhood's diversified business insulates it from crypto downturns but also limits upside. Bitcoin miners like RIOT and MARA have posted significant gains year-to-date, driven primarily by their pivot to AI compute services, not Bitcoin's price. The article highlights that investing in crypto stocks often means accepting amplified volatility or layering on business-specific risks absent from direct Bitcoin ownership. For instance, MicroStrategy's recent challenges—its market value falling below its Bitcoin holdings (mNAV <1) and facing potential Bitcoin sales for liquidity—demonstrate equity-specific hazards like dilution and financing pressures not faced by a direct Bitcoin holder. ARK's buying spree represents a bet on a basket of different business models with varying crypto exposure, not a simple, lower-risk substitute for holding Bitcoin.

marsbitHá 1h

Cathie Wood's June $77M Investment: Are Crypto Stocks a True 'Substitute' for Bitcoin?

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
活动图片