Ripple To Replace SWIFT? XRP Analyst Breaks Down Recent Developments

bitcoinistPublicado em 2025-07-04Última atualização em 2025-07-05

Resumo

The long-standing and controversial question of whether Ripple payments could one day replace the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication...

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

The long-standing and controversial question of whether Ripple payments could one day replace the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication (SWIFT) is gaining renewed attention in the crypto market. A prominent XRP analyst has highlighted a significant shift in the Ripple payment infrastructure that could represent a potential turning point in the crypto company’s bid to challenge SWIFT’s decades-long dominance in global cross-border settlements

XRP Analyst Unveils Ripple’s Latest Moves

In his latest X social media thread, crypto market analyst Pumpius explains how Ripple could eventually supersede SWIFT as a cross-border payment infrastructure and settlement layer for banks. The analyst highlights recent developments that continue to fuel Ripple’s growth and position it as a prime candidate for transforming global financial messaging. 

According to Pumpius’s report, Ripple has taken a significant step forward in its bid to transform the global financial system, as recent developments show deepening infrastructure integration. The XRP analyst disclosed that Ripple payments have officially integrated with EUR and GBP International Bank Account Numbers (IBANs), marking a critical evolution in its offering. This suggests that Ripple is no longer just processing payments, but enabling institutional-grade banking functionality within its ecosystem.

Through partnerships with OpenPayd, Ripple is granting financial institutions access to programmable dollar liquidity. OpenPayd clients can now mint and burn the Ripple on-chain stablecoin, RLUSD, in real-time. The XRP analyst has called this new development a faster and potentially more efficient programmable USD liquidity on demand. He highlights that this capability also unlocks automated FX, compliance solutions, and seamless cross-border fund movement. 

Pumpius describes Ripple’s latest developments as a game-changing moment for blockchain-based finance. Rather than acting as a parallel system, the crypto company is now positioning itself as a new banking layer, built entirely outside the legacy infrastructure, but fully equipped to serve its institutional clientele.  

How Ripple Could Replace SWIFT’s Legacy

Pumpius’s X report suggests that Ripple’s evolution isn’t limited to just speed or low-cost payments. The core technology behind XRP and Ripple’s APIs aims to replace key functions of the SWIFT network, which currently facilitates interbank financial messaging and settlements globally. 

The analyst notes that Ripple’s model delivers what SWIFT does not, including real-time foreign exchange, end-to-end automated banking APIs, instant stablecoin-to-fiat conversion, and settlements via XRP. What makes the potential transition from SWIFT to Ripple even more tangible is the live infrastructure now running behind the crypto payment company’s system. 

According to Pumpius, liquidity corridors are no longer theoretical for Ripple, but operational. The company’s stablecoin rails are also highly active, while XRP has evolved from its status as a speculative asset into being used for final settlements in real financial flows. Overall, the integration of IBANs and the launch of RLUSD make Ripple a direct competitor to SWIFT. And as the analyst notes, these developments are more than incremental signs of growth—they mark a potential turning point in Ripple’s goal to replace SWIFT.

Ripple
XRP trading at $2.23 on the 1D chart | Source: XRPUSDT on Tradingview.com
Featured image from Getty Images, chart from Tradingview.com
Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Scott Matherson is a leading crypto writer at Bitcoinist, who possesses a sharp analytical mind and a deep understanding of the digital currency landscape. Scott has earned a reputation for delivering thought-provoking and well-researched articles that resonate with both newcomers and seasoned crypto enthusiasts. Outside of his writing, Scott is passionate about promoting crypto literacy and often works to educate the public on the potential of blockchain.

Leituras Relacionadas

Goldman Sachs Research Report Analysis: Circle and USDC Are Moving Beyond the Crypto World, Cross-Border Payments and AI Agents Become New Battlegrounds

Goldman Sachs published a summary of its meeting with Circle Internet Group (issuer of USDC) on July 5th. The core takeaway is that stablecoins, led by USDC, are evolving from a crypto-native tool into foundational infrastructure for traditional finance and the AI economy. USDC's use cases are rapidly expanding beyond crypto trading into cross-border payments, e-commerce, capital market settlements, and notably, payments for AI agents. Circle's management emphasized that stablecoin growth is now decoupled from crypto market cycles, driven by this diversification. They outlined five key application layers and highlighted USDC's network effects, global liquidity depth, and regulatory compliance as competitive moats. Circle distinguishes USDC from bank-issued tokenized deposits, arguing the former is an open, internet-native system without bank credit risk. Strategically, Circle is building a broader fintech platform with its Arc Layer 1 blockchain, the Circle Payments Network for cross-border transfers, and an "Agentic Stack" to serve AI agent economies, where USDC already dominates. Regarding regulation, Circle views potential U.S. legislation like the CLARITY Act as a catalyst for growth rather than a constraint, expecting it to encourage broader institutional adoption and active usage. Goldman Sachs maintains a Neutral rating on Circle with a $96 price target, noting the company's shift from a pure stablecoin issuer to a financial infrastructure provider. Key risks include competition from USDT and potential earnings pressure from declining interest rates on its reserve assets.

marsbitHá 19m

Goldman Sachs Research Report Analysis: Circle and USDC Are Moving Beyond the Crypto World, Cross-Border Payments and AI Agents Become New Battlegrounds

marsbitHá 19m

The Robinhood Stock Tokens You Bought Are Just Debts from Jersey Island

The Robinhood stock tokens you buy are essentially debt securities issued by a shell company in Jersey, not real equity. These tokens merely track stock prices like NVIDIA or Apple but grant no shareholder rights like voting or dividends. If the underlying company fails, you have no claim on its assets. Instead, you hold a debt instrument from Robinhood Assets (Jersey) Limited, which promises returns based on stock performance. If this Jersey entity goes bankrupt, you become an unsecured creditor. This complex structure stems from Robinhood's past crisis during the 2021 GameStop short squeeze, where T+2 settlement caused liquidity issues. The blockchain-based tokens enable instant settlement, theoretically preventing such trading halts. The product is classified by the SEC as a "linked security" or structured note, carrying counterparty risk not borne by actual shareholders. It is available globally but excluded from the US, UK, and other major markets, while Robinhood offers a fully compliant, asset-backed token model in Europe under MiFID II. The system relies on oracles for pricing, which poses risks like manipulation and faulty liquidations seen in DeFi exploits. Robinhood profits from spreads and aims to become a full-chain settlement layer. Meanwhile, competitors like Ondo have launched SEC-registered, fully compliant equity tokens in the US with actual voting rights and dividends. Robinhood’s Jersey debt model appears as a transitional, regulatory-arbitrage product, aiming to capture market share ahead of future regulatory clarity.

Foresight NewsHá 52m

The Robinhood Stock Tokens You Bought Are Just Debts from Jersey Island

Foresight NewsHá 52m

Trading

Spot
活动图片