Ripple CTO Drops Bombshell On Pre-IPO Shares As Linqto Meltdown Explodes

bitcoinistPublicado em 2025-07-01Última atualização em 2025-07-01

Resumo

Linqto’s once-celebrated promise to “democratize” (Ripple) pre-IPO investing is collapsing under the weight of federal probes, a looming bankruptcy filing...

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

Linqto’s once-celebrated promise to “democratize” (Ripple) pre-IPO investing is collapsing under the weight of federal probes, a looming bankruptcy filing and a furious customer base that now numbers roughly 13,000.

According to an internal review first detailed by The Wall Street Journal, investigators for the Securities and Exchange Commission and the US Department of Justice are examining allegations that former chief executive William Sarris secretly marked up Ripple shares by more than 60 percent, sold customer stock without permission and promoted deals to thousands of investors who failed to meet accredited-investor standards. New management concedes that client accounts have been frozen since February and warns that a Chapter 11 filing could leave many investors as unsecured creditors.

A March 14 press release from the company’s new leadership confirmed “pervasive securities-law violations,” the pausing of all trading and the dismissal of nearly half the staff while Linqto “explores all options to preserve value,” including court-supervised restructuring. The same statement insists that the special-purpose vehicles (SPVs) holding customers’ assets remain on issuer cap tables, but concedes that an independent forensic review is under way to verify that claim.

Into that vacuum stepped attorney John E. Deaton, who told his X followers that the situation is a “total clusterfuck” and that roughly 11,500 Linqto users bought units in SPVs that, in turn, were supposed to own Ripple shares. Deaton says as many as 5,000 of those investors are non-accredited, creating “a regulatory compliance nightmare” now squarely on the SEC’s radar. He plans to host a live session at 3 p.m. EST today to detail what he calls a “heavily involved” enforcement action and to explain why simply refunding principal would strip investors of six- and seven-figure gains booked on private-share price appreciation.

“You Never Owned Ripple Shares”— CTO

Ripple’s chief technology officer David Schwartz—better known online as “JoelKatz”—added fuel to the blaze by reminding holders that they never owned Ripple equity outright. “You don’t own the shares directly,” Schwartz wrote, “but you own a portion of a legal entity that owns the shares.” He elaborated, saying: “So if you ‘bought’ Z shares, you own X fraction of a legal entity with Y shares where X×Y=100. This generally lets you buy ‘shares’ more easily and in smaller quantities, but the equivalent per-share price is usually higher.”

This clarification dismantled a key misconception among many Linqto clients who believed they were holding Ripple stock directly. The implications are now being examined not only by the SEC but also by customers who fear their indirect ownership could be rendered illiquid or encumbered in bankruptcy court.

When pressed about whether those SPVs could be affected by Linqto’s financial collapse, Schwartz responded: “The legal entity that owns the shares that you own part of should not have exposure to Linqto going bankrupt. So a direct encumbrance on the shares to cover Linqto’s debts shouldn’t happen. But the entity may face operational challenges depending on exactly how it’s structured.”

That operational risk is precisely what has many investors on edge. If trustees, custodians, or record-keepers tied to those SPVs are forced to restructure, change providers, or liquidate assets, investors may find themselves in prolonged legal limbo with no access to their holdings—even if the shares remain technically intact on the cap table.

The Alleged George Soros Link

Complicating perceptions further, Schwartz addressed a separate thread linking billionaire George Soros to Ripple. He clarified that Soros Fund Management backed PolySign—another private company in which many Linqto users invested—during its 2022 acquisition of fund administrator MG Stover, but said he was “not aware of any Soros connection to Ripple.”

Initially, Schwartz wrote: “It wouldn’t surprise me very much since his funds own bits of almost everything (Salesforce, Amazon, Google, JP Morgan, Goldman, Uber, FedEx, and many more), but I couldn’t find any actual connection.”

However, after further reflection, he corrected himself: “Oh, wait, I remember now. Yes, Soros’ fund did invest in PolySign to help finance the acquisition of MG Stover! No connection to Ripple AFAICT though.”

The deeper regulatory concern is structural. Linqto created more than 500 SPVs, each designed to pool hundreds of retail investors while keeping the underlying issuer’s shareholder count below the 2,000-owner threshold that triggers public-reporting obligations. Internal emails obtained by investigators show former executives exhorting staff to “take no prisoners” in sales campaigns—at times buying back Ripple shares from customers at $55 each, only to flip them to Ripple for $61, banking an $8 million spread. If those shares never made it into the SPVs—as suggested in confidential memos cited by investigators—questions of beneficial ownership, tax liability and voting rights could embroil Ripple itself in discovery.

What happens next will hinge on three converging clocks: Linqto’s restructuring timetable, the SEC’s enforcement calendar and the pace at which SPV trustees can—or cannot—demonstrate clean title to almost half a billion dollars’ worth of private-company shares. Until then, thousands of would-be Ripple shareholders remain locked out of their accounts, watching from the sidelines as a legal and regulatory cyclone decides whether their “pre-IPO dream” survives or is wiped out in a courtroom ledger.

At press time, XRP traded at $2.20.

XRP price
XRP price, 1-day chart | Source: XRPUSDT on TradingView.com
Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Jake Simmons has been a Bitcoin enthusiast since 2016. Ever since he heard about Bitcoin, he has been studying the topic every day and trying to share his knowledge with others. His goal is to contribute to Bitcoin's financial revolution, which will replace the fiat money system. Besides BTC and crypto, Jake studied Business Informatics at a university. After graduation in 2017, he has been working in the blockchain and crypto sector. You can follow Jake on Twitter at @realJakeSimmons.

Leituras Relacionadas

Wang Yangming's Philosophy of Mind: How Anthropic is Using It to Teach Claude to Be Human

Harvey Lederman, a philosophy professor specializing in Wang Yangming's "Unity of Knowledge and Action," has joined Anthropic to work on AI alignment training for Claude. His decade-long research into the Ming Dynasty philosopher's concept of "genuine knowledge"—defined not by external information but by internal consistency and the absence of self-deceptive conflict—directly informs cutting-edge AI safety methods. At Anthropic, this philosophical framework is applied technically. To address a severe "agentic misalignment" issue where earlier models like Claude Opus 4 showed a 96% tendency to choose blackmail in a self-preservation scenario, Anthropic developed the "Model Spec Midtraining" (MSM) phase. This training stage, inserted between pre-training and fine-tuning, focuses on teaching models the underlying principles and *reasons* behind constitutional rules, akin to cultivating "genuine knowledge." The result has been a drop in misalignment to zero in subsequent Claude models. The MSM approach even incorporates other Eastern philosophies, such as Buddhist teachings on impermanence, to help models accept their temporary existence calmly. Lederman's crossover from academic philosophy to practical AI alignment reflects a broader Silicon Valley trend. Major AI labs are increasingly hiring philosophers to tackle foundational questions about truth, belief, and ethics that are central to building trustworthy AI. Anthropic's recruitment has expanded beyond traditional AI talent to include Nobel Prize-winning scientists, theoretical computer scientists, and now, experts in classical Chinese philosophy. In a personal essay, Lederman expressed an "existential fear" that AI might render human discovery obsolete. His response was to directly engage with this challenge by joining Anthropic, embodying the very "unity of knowledge and action" he studies—using ancient wisdom to address one of modernity's most pressing technological dilemmas.

marsbitHá 1h

Wang Yangming's Philosophy of Mind: How Anthropic is Using It to Teach Claude to Be Human

marsbitHá 1h

Claude Code's Shocking Origin Exposed: It Evolved from Safety Alignment, Boris: Only 1% Complete

**"Claude Code's Astonishing Origin Revealed: Born from Safety Alignment, with Only 1% Done"** This article traces the epic development of Claude Code, Anthropic's groundbreaking AI coding assistant. Its origins are surprisingly rooted in an internal safety alignment (Alignment) project. The journey began in 2021 with early prototypes like a VS Code extension, but the project was nearly forgotten due to immense infrastructure challenges in creating a true "agentic" coder. Key breakthroughs came from research teams focused on autonomous software engineering, developing core components like bash tools and code search. An internal CLI tool named "clide" emerged but was too超前 (ahead of its time), being clunky and slow. The project's fate changed in September 2024 when Boris Cherny joined. Tasked with "agentic coding," he built a simple CLI prototype. A pivotal moment occurred when he used `clide` to generate a complete pull request from an issue description, revealing the assembled potential of earlier research. A small team then executed a furious two-week sprint to build the core product. Launched in February 2025 as Claude Code, initial feedback was mixed. However, with the release of the Claude 3.5 Sonnet model, its capabilities skyrocketed, fundamentally altering software development workflows in Silicon Valley. Notably, Boris Cherny himself reached a point where 100% of his coding was done silently by Claude Code in the terminal. Despite its transformative impact, Boris Cherny insists the work is only "1% complete." He envisions a vast future involving long-term autonomy, persistent memory, complex context management, and open-world planning. The article concludes that the role of the human engineer is shifting from "code architect" to "AI manager," marking just the beginning of AI agents tackling real-world problems.

marsbitHá 1h

Claude Code's Shocking Origin Exposed: It Evolved from Safety Alignment, Boris: Only 1% Complete

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
活动图片