Мексиканский миллиардер Рикардо Салинас: Биткоин будет ценнее золота

cryptonews.ruPublicado em 2025-04-20Última atualização em 2025-06-20

Основатель мексиканского конгломерата Grupo Salinas Рикардо Салинас Плиего (Ricardo Salinas Pliego) сделал смелый прогноз в отношении биткоина, заявив, что рано или поздно биткоин будет считаться более ценным активом, чем золото.

В недавнем интервью, посвященном фиатным деньгам, Салинас предположил, что рыночная капитализация биткоина скоро может сравняться с золотом, капитализация которого сейчас насчитывает около $22 трлн. По мнению миллиардера, у биткоина есть огромный потенциал для роста, и с текущей отметки $105 000 он способен вырасти как минимум в восемь раз, чтобы сравняться с показателями золота. Тогда курс биткоина достиг бы примерно $1,1 млн за монету.

Салинас отметил, что в 2023 году прирост биткоина составил 156%, а в 2024 году — 121%. В отличие от первой криптовалюты, золото показало скромный рост: в 2023 году он составил 14%, а в прошлом году — 26,59%. У биткоина более сильная ценовая динамика в сравнении с драгоценным металлом, подчеркнул Салинас. Он верит, что в будущем биткоин станет новым резервным активом, который сможет заменить традиционные фиатные валюты и драгоценные металлы.

Состояние Салинаса оценивается в $5,8 млрд, и миллиардер все чаще инвестирует средства в биткоин. В одном из интервью Салинас рассказал, что на биткоин он выделил около 70% своего ликвидного портфеля. Остальные 30% средств миллиардер распределил на золото и золотодобывающие компании. У него нет акций или облигаций, кроме собственных предприятий.

Ранее Салинас назвал несколько причин для покупки биткоина: возможность мгновенной покупки и продажи криптовалюты, а также защита от растущей инфляции и падения стоимости государственных валют.

Leituras Relacionadas

OpenAI Partners with PE Firms, Investing $4 Billion. Let's Talk About Silicon Valley's Hottest New Role: FDE.

The hottest new role in Silicon Valley is the Forward Deployment Engineer (FDE), a hybrid of engineer and business consultant whose core mission is to transform AI demos into native, practical workflows within client organizations. The recent surge in demand is driven by a strategic shift from leading AI companies. OpenAI, partnering with 19 private equity firms in a $4 billion investment, formed a Deployment Company and acquired Tomoro along with its 150 FDEs. Anthropic also announced a $1.5 billion joint venture with financial institutions like Blackstone. The article, based on interviews with industry experts Jove (FDE lead at Cresta) and Oliver (VP at Invisible Technologies, ex-McKinsey), explores the FDE role and the rise of deployment-focused companies. Key insights include: **The FDE Role:** Jove describes an FDE as a "Forward Deployed CTO"—a technically strong engineer who works intimately with clients to implement AI solutions, learn from the process, and feed those insights back to improve the core product. They require expertise in AI agents, client-facing experience, resilience, and the ability to handle complex, imperfect systems. While AI tools enhance their efficiency, the role's complexity makes full automation a distant prospect. **Industry Shift:** Model companies are moving beyond selling tools to ensuring real-world adoption. This blurs the line between model and application companies. Collaborations with private equity (PE) firms are key, providing access to large portfolios of traditional businesses needing AI transformation. For PE firms, these partnerships offer signal value to LPs, create tangible value in portfolio companies, and provide exposure to high-growth AI assets. **Consulting & Transformation:** AI deployment involves deep, customized workflow redesign, moving beyond simple tool augmentation. Companies like Invisible Technologies build modular platforms to create bespoke, AI-native workflows for clients. While traditional consulting will see growth in helping businesses rethink their models for AI, the real value is captured by firms that leave behind transformed, operational systems. Critical success factors include building robust data foundations and strategically deciding which workflow steps should be deterministic versus AI-driven. The ultimate goal shifts from pure cost-cutting to unlocking new revenue opportunities previously impossible without AI-scale capabilities.

marsbitHá 8m

OpenAI Partners with PE Firms, Investing $4 Billion. Let's Talk About Silicon Valley's Hottest New Role: FDE.

marsbitHá 8m

Why Is DeFi Insurance Unpopular?

The article explores the core reasons why DeFi insurance remains largely unutilized despite its potential to eliminate traditional insurance inefficiencies and malicious claim denials through automated smart contracts. Key points include: 1. **Low Adoption & Minimal Payouts:** Leading provider Nexus Mutual has paid only ~$18M in claims since 2019, dwarfed by single hack losses (e.g., Kelp DAO's $292M loss). 2. **High Correlation Risk:** Unlike traditional insurance (e.g., house fires), DeFi risks (oracle failures, bridge hacks) are systemic and can simultaneously impact multiple protocols, threatening to drain entire insurance pools. 3. **Prohibitive Cost vs. Reward:** For many protocols (Aave, Morpho, Compound), insurance premiums (1.5%-6%) consume a significant portion or even all of the native yield (3%-4%), leaving investors with meager returns. In some cases (Maple Finance, Ethena), premiums can even result in net-negative yields. 4. **Inadequate Capacity:** The total DeFi insurance pool (e.g., Nexus Mutual's $81.56M) is minuscule compared to the hundreds of billions in total value locked (TVL), creating a massive supply-demand gap. 5. **Structural Flaws:** The claims assessment model (e.g., Nexus Mutual's member voting) creates a conflict of interest, as voters bear the loss if a claim is paid. There is also no regulatory mandate forcing DeFi protocols to obtain insurance. The industry is adapting by focusing on preventative measures (e.g., bug bounty coverage) and seeking external capital via reinsurance. However, the fundamental issues of small pool size, correlated risk, and misaligned economic incentives persist. The article concludes that DeFi insurance, like a public lighthouse, provides shared security benefits, but if everyone relies on others to pay for it, no one will, leaving the ecosystem vulnerable.

Foresight NewsHá 22m

Why Is DeFi Insurance Unpopular?

Foresight NewsHá 22m

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片