Huma推出第二期质押活动,还值得存吗?

Odaily星球日报Publicado em 2025-06-12Última atualização em 2025-06-12

Resumo

锁仓6个月Maxi模式预期APR可达100%以上。

原创 | Odaily星球日报(@OdailyChina

作者|南枳(@Assassin_Malvo

Huma推出第二期质押活动,还值得存吗?

6 月 10 日,Huma Finance发布 Huma Staking 奖励提案,该提案对 Season 1 (第二期质押活动)的 Feather 积分系数计算规则进行了详细解释。第一期质押与 TGE 活动中,参与 Huma USDC 质押的年化收益率达 100% 以上,在撸毛式微的当下已属于少有的“大毛”,那么第二期活动是否值得参与?

本文,Odaily星球日报将进行数据收集与测算,尝试明确 Season 1 的回报预期。

提案详情

该提案原链接为:https://www.notion.so/huma-fi/Huma-Staking-Rewards-Proposal- 20 eefc 699 c 5 a 80 f 5 bcc 1 e 6 f 010 ccd 135 ,意见征询期将于 6 月 17 日结束,本文将以当前版本为基准进行测算,其中分数计算的重点规则包括:

  • LP 锁仓期限与模式倍数: 根据 LP 的锁仓时长(如 3 个月、 6 个月)及模式(Classic 或 Maxi),提供不同的基础倍数。最少的为不锁仓、Classic 模式的 1 倍,最多为锁仓 6 个月 Maxi 模式的 15 倍。(注:本处的 LP 指的是存入 USDC,非传统意义上的 AMM 的 LP)

  • 质押倍数: 根据用户质押的 HUMA 代币数量与 LP 代币总数的比率,决定其 LP 奖励的额外加成。当质押的 HUMA 达到 LP 代币数量的三倍时,该倍数达到上限 2 。官方计算公式如下:

Huma推出第二期质押活动,还值得存吗?

  • OG LP 身份: 曾参与 Huma Season 0 的用户,并且目前在 Huma 中存款金额达 100 美元以上的,将获得 1.2 倍的固定加成。对于已进行资产转移的用户,在 7 月 1 日前将资产冲回可恢复 OG 身份

  • Vanguard 身份: 在 6 月 15 日前质押其全部空投代币的用户,以及未有空投但质押 10 万枚以上的 HUMA 的用户,质押达 6 个月及以上时,可 1.2 倍的 Vanguard 身份奖励加成。

收益测算

根据官方此前公告,Season 1 将分配 2.1% 的代币,但目前尚不明确其中分配给 LP 的比例。从最简单的情况出发,假设所有用户都采用了同一种质押方法,并且 2.1% 全部分配给 LP,则我们有以下数据:

当前的 TVL 为 5665 万美元,FDV 为 4.62 亿美元, 2.1% 代币价值为 970 万美元,Season 1 共持续 3 个月,则绝对收益率为 970/5665 = 17.1% ,等效年化收益率 68.4% 

进一步区分,质押模式有 Maxi 和 Classic 两种,质押时长又有 3 种,因此有六种情况,当前各用户的选择情况如下图所示。

根据积分获取系数的不同,APR 也不尽相同,其中选择人数最多的锁仓 6 个月 Maxi 模式,换算 APR 为 127.06% ;而选择第二多的不锁仓 Classic 模式则为 8.47%  。

Huma推出第二期质押活动,还值得存吗?

此外,还有 OG、Vanguard、质押 HUMA 等增加积分获取效率的方式,最高可放大 1.2 × 1.2 × 2 = 2.88 倍,但具体取决于各用户的方案博弈,在该维度下无法计算精确解。

综上,在当前的 TVL、币价不变的基准上,Huma Finance第二期空投活动中选择锁仓 6 个月 Maxi 模式,预期能达到 100% 以上的 APR,尤其对于第一期参与质押的用户,不对资产进行任何操作,继续参与第二期活动将十分有利。

Leituras Relacionadas

BIT Research: The 2028 Halving Is Not the End, the Real Shake-Up of the Bitcoin Mining Industry Is Just Beginning

The Bitcoin mining industry is undergoing its most complex structural adjustment since inception. Despite Bitcoin's price holding near $61,000 and the network hash rate approaching a record 1 ZH/s, miner profitability is deteriorating. The industry is operating close to its breakeven point, with the 2028 halving expected to accelerate consolidation. The challenges extend beyond the halving's subsidy reduction; the industry's revenue model has yet to successfully transition towards a fee-driven structure. Increasingly, mining companies are evolving from simple Bitcoin producers into infrastructure and energy operators, including providers of AI/HPC computing power. Competition is shifting from pure hash rate expansion to business model upgrades. Economic pressure is evident. The theoretical daily mining revenue at current prices is around $78 million, yet the actual figure is only about $33 million—a 136% gap. Transaction fees remain low at roughly $220k daily, far below historical implied levels. With a current estimated industry-wide breakeven price near $65,000, mining alone is struggling to generate ideal profits. The 2028 halving is projected to push the fundamental production cost floor to approximately $93,289. This will likely accelerate a shift towards consolidation among larger, well-capitalized miners with diversified revenue streams. Competitive advantage will belong to institutionalized players with access to low-cost energy, AI/HPC hosting operations, and stronger balance sheets. In essence, Bitcoin mining is transitioning from a "mining business" to an "infrastructure business." Future profitability and resilience will depend less on block rewards and more on diversified income sources like energy management and computational infrastructure services. For investors, the key question is not the halving itself, but which miners can successfully navigate this business model transformation.

marsbitHá 13m

BIT Research: The 2028 Halving Is Not the End, the Real Shake-Up of the Bitcoin Mining Industry Is Just Beginning

marsbitHá 13m

This is How God Karpathy Uses Claude?

Andrej Karpathy, a prominent figure in AI, has reportedly joined Anthropic, leading to a noticeable decrease in his open-source contributions and social media activity. A document claiming to be his personal "CLAUDE.md" file—a set of instructions for the Claude AI to follow within a specific codebase—has been circulating online. While its authenticity is unverified, the content aligns closely with Karpathy's publicly shared principles on effective AI-assisted programming. The document outlines key rules for AI coding assistants, emphasizing the importance of reading existing code thoroughly before writing new code to maintain consistency. It advises against over-engineering, advocating for simple, surgical modifications that match the project's existing style. Other guidelines include clarifying assumptions upfront, writing meaningful tests, thoughtful debugging, and carefully considering dependencies. The core message is that these principles help prevent common AI coding failures, such as introducing unnecessary abstractions, style drift, or making invisible architectural decisions. The community has noted that even experts like Karpathy require detailed instructions to guide AI effectively, akin to managing a junior developer. A related GitHub repository, "andrej-karpathy-skills," which encapsulates these ideas, is reported to significantly reduce Claude's code error rate. Ultimately, the advice stresses that the best CLAUDE.md is tailored to one's own tech stack and coding practices.

marsbitHá 14m

This is How God Karpathy Uses Claude?

marsbitHá 14m

Trading

Spot
活动图片