Crypto Industry Leaders Raise Concerns Over CLARITY Act’s ‘Gensler-Era’ Amendment Ahead Of Markup

bitcoinistPublicado em 2025-06-11Última atualização em 2025-06-11

Resumo

Crypto industry players are reportedly concerned about a new section added to the Digital Asset Market Clarity (CLARITY) Act of...

Trusted Editorial content, reviewed by leading industry experts and seasoned editors. Ad Disclosure

Crypto industry players are reportedly concerned about a new section added to the Digital Asset Market Clarity (CLARITY) Act of 2025 ahead of today’s legislative process, which seems to resemble the regulatory approach of the previous administration.

Crypto Industry Players Raise The Alarm

On Tuesday, crypto industry players were reportedly concerned over a new section in the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025 ahead of today’s markup. Journalist Eleanor Terret revealed that some industry leaders raised the alarm over the legislation’s amended text, which has been allegedly described as a “Gensler-era provision.”

The legislation, introduced on May 29 by Chairman of the House Financial Services Committee French Hill, seeks to establish a regulatory framework for crypto assets in the US and provide the long-awaited clarity and protection for the industry.

The bipartisan bill aims to protect consumers by requiring developers and customer-facing firms to provide crucial disclosures to their clients and keep the companies’ funds separate from those of their customers.

Moreover, the CLARITY Act also seeks to facilitate the growth of crypto projects by providing developers with a clear pathway to secure funding under the oversight of the US watchdog.

“Our bill brings long-overdue clarity to the digital asset ecosystem, prioritizes consumer protection and American innovation, and builds off our work in the 118th Congress,” Hill stated last month.

However, Terret reported that the new amendment would “eliminate exemptions for previously issued tokens,” giving the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) “weeping authority to determine, on a case-by-case basis, whether each token qualifies as a security.”

According to the post, critics consider that the change would reintroduce the “uncertainty the bill is meant to resolve.” Meanwhile, some crypto community investors also expressed concern about the provision news, suggesting that the change could allow a game of “winners and losers again.”

It’s worth noting that the CLARITY Act has been heavily criticized by Democrats, with some suggesting that the bill could allow US President Donald Trump to “cash in” on its crypto ventures.

Democratic Representative Maxine Waters expressed her concerns last week, affirming that “this rushed, overly complicated bill will increase investor harm, which already runs rampant in today’s crypto market.”

She argued that “Some of the riskiest activities are broadly exempted from the bill, leaving our constituents with no one to turn to when their money vanishes. The bill puts our national security at risk and contains no penalties for crypto criminals.”

CLARITY Act Momentum Continues

Notably, crypto industry players and US lawmakers pushed for the inclusion of the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act (BRCA) in the market structure legislation, seeking to offer a safe harbor for software developers and infrastructure providers.

As reported by Bitcoinist, eight crypto policy organizations urged US Congress leaders to include the BRCA, first introduced in 2023, in the CLARITY Act in a joint statement last week. The bill was reintroduced by Republican Representative Tom Emmer on May 21, 2025, with Democratic Representative Ritchie Torres as a co-sponsor.

On June 8, the amended version of the Clarity Act included clarity for non-custodial developers by adding the BRCA to the bill. In a joint statement on Monday, the crypto groups advocating for the inclusion stated:

This is a meaningful step toward protecting developers of non-custodial, peer-to-peer technologies while maintaining strong oversight of custodial financial institutions.

The updated bill reflects a careful balance–building on FinCEN’s 2019 guidance to clarify that when developers and infrastructure providers don’t control customer funds, they shouldn’t be regulated like money transmitters.

Despite concerns about the “Gensler-era” amendment, industry players like crypto exchange Coinbase affirmed that “Bipartisan momentum is building. Lawmakers from both sides agree: it’s time to protect consumers and unlock American innovation with clear crypto legislation. As Congress prepares for a key vote to advance the CLARITY Act, the message is clear: vote YES.”

At the time of writing, the legislation passed the House Committee on Agriculture markup with a 47-6 vote after a nearly 3-hour debate. Now, the bill awaits the House Financial Services Committee markup, Terret reported.

crypto, bitcoin, btc, btcusdt

Bitcoin (BTC) trades at $108,959 in the one-week chart. Source: BTCUSDT on TradingView
Featured Image from Unsplash.com, Chart from TradingView.com
Editorial Process for bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly researched, accurate, and unbiased content. We uphold strict sourcing standards, and each page undergoes diligent review by our team of top technology experts and seasoned editors. This process ensures the integrity, relevance, and value of our content for our readers.

Rubmar is a crypto enthusiast who likes learning and improving constantly. She enjoys reporting on the latest news and developments in the crypto industry. Rubmar also enjoys scrapbooking, crafting, simulation games, and watching football.

Leituras Relacionadas

Tiger Research: Zuckerberg Begins Betting on Prediction Markets, While Asian Nations Still View Them as Gambling

This article examines the rise of prediction markets, contrasting their growing institutional acceptance in the West with their restrictive regulation in Asia. It details how prediction markets, which originated from informal political betting and academic experiments like the Iowa Electronic Market, aggregate crowd wisdom into probabilistic prices through binary contracts. Their growth accelerated around 2020, reaching over $14 billion in monthly volume. A key driver is the "skin in the game" principle, where users risk their own capital, leading to high accuracy in predicting events like Fed rate decisions and elections, as demonstrated by platforms like Polymarket. Meta's entry, with Mark Zuckerberg reportedly leading the development of the Arena app, signals the market's maturation. In the U.S., court rulings have distinguished prediction markets from gambling, facilitating entry by traditional financial institutions. However, most Asian jurisdictions still classify them as gambling, focusing on social control rather than financial innovation. The article argues this stance creates three problems for Asia: 1) regulatory arbitrage pushes users to riskier offshore platforms, 2) loss of sovereign information infrastructure as valuable social sentiment data accumulates abroad, and 3) abandonment of user protection. It concludes that Asia needs a policy shift from prohibition to constructive regulation, integrating these markets into the formal system to harness their data as a national asset, as initiatives like Limitless Research are beginning to do.

marsbitHá 1h

Tiger Research: Zuckerberg Begins Betting on Prediction Markets, While Asian Nations Still View Them as Gambling

marsbitHá 1h

Ethereum's Next Decade in the Eyes of Vitalik

"Lean Ethereum" Long-Term Roadmap Unveiled by Vitalik Buterin On July 5, 2026, Vitalik Buterin published the "Lean Ethereum" roadmap, positioning it as Ethereum's third major evolution following the Merge. This multi-year, multi-phase upgrade aims to fundamentally transform Ethereum's core protocol through staged network upgrades extending to 2029. Key goals include achieving 1 gigagas per second L1 throughput (a massive increase from the current ~32 TPS), near-instant finality, and quantum-resistant cryptography. The plan involves transitioning Ethereum's security model from full transaction re-execution by all nodes to native verification via recursive STARK proofs. A major proposed change is replacing the EVM with a proof-friendly architecture like RISC-V or leanISA, though this remains a point of contention, especially with L2s like Arbitrum favoring alternatives like WASM. Other planned upgrades include a restructured state model with a large, cheap "warehouse" storage layer to drastically reduce fees for migrated applications, multi-dimensional gas pricing, and a new focus on making privacy a first-class, native protocol feature. While the roadmap significantly raises Ethereum's long-term technical ceiling, analysts note it does not directly address ETH's mid-term token economics or value capture. The plan's multi-year timeline means near-term price impact will likely depend on observable progress milestones, such as the successful deployment of the upcoming Glamsterdam gas limit increase, growth in L2 activity and blob usage, and trends in L1 fee revenue and ETH burn.

链捕手Há 3h

Ethereum's Next Decade in the Eyes of Vitalik

链捕手Há 3h

In Just 11 Days, Claude Rewrote Millions of Lines of Code, an Epic AI Engineering Feat Sparks Fury

In just 11 days, Bun's founder Jarred Sumner used Anthropic's Claude AI models to rewrite its million lines of code from Zig to Rust. This move sparked significant controversy, particularly from Zig's creator, Andrew Kelley, who publicly criticized Sumner's engineering practices and the decision to use AI for such a massive rewrite. Bun, a high-performance JavaScript/TypeScript runtime and rival to Node.js, was originally written in Zig. After Anthropic acquired Bun, the team encountered persistent stability and memory safety bugs in the Zig codebase. These issues, combined with Zig's strict policy against LLM-generated code, led to the decision to rewrite in Rust. The rewrite was executed using Claude AI tools at an estimated API cost of $165,000, dramatically reducing the expected time and financial cost. Andrew Kelley's response was scathing. He blamed the original bugs on poor engineering habits, calling Bun's Zig code a collection of "hacks on top of hacks." He expressed relief that Bun was no longer associated with Zig, fearing it would misrepresent the language and attract low-quality, AI-generated contributions. The tech community is divided; some view Kelley's critique as unprofessional, while others see it as a defense of engineering integrity. A major concern about the AI-driven rewrite is the resulting code quality. The translation from Zig left approximately 27,000 lines of unsafe Rust code, raising fears about long-term maintainability and technical debt. The debate centers on whether this project is a milestone in AI-assisted development or a future maintenance nightmare.

marsbitHá 4h

In Just 11 Days, Claude Rewrote Millions of Lines of Code, an Epic AI Engineering Feat Sparks Fury

marsbitHá 4h

Trading

Spot
活动图片