Crypto Investors Lost $2.6 Million to Phishing Scam

TheCryptoTimesPublicado em 2025-05-26Última atualização em 2025-05-26

A crypto investor recently fell victim to a Phishing scam, losing a total of $2.6 million in stablecoins through two separate attacks that occurred within a span of just three hours. 

According to the analysis by a blockchain compliance firm, Cyvers, on May 26, the victim unknowingly transferred $843,000 in Tether (USDT) to the scammers address. Approximately three hours later, a second transfer of $1.75 million in USDT was made to the same scammer. 

In both transactions, coins were sent to fraudulent addresses using a phishing strategy known as the “zero-value transfer” technique. This kind of targeted approach is an evolved form of address poisoning.

In this attack, fraudsters use the “From” option in token contracts to make an empty transaction from the victim’s wallet to an attacker’s address. No actual money goes across, so the victim’s signing key isn’t necessary for the scam to work.

Even so, the transaction records in the user’s wallet lay the foundation for this address to appear consistently as one they have used before. Sometimes, users view their transaction history and reinvest only to learn that their crypto coins have been sent to the attacker due to sabotage within their address history.

Because many users often check only the first and last parts of a wallet address or use the copy/paste feature, these frauds are likely to work.

Zero-value transfer now makes the address poisoning harder to spot, as before, when attackers used small amounts of crypto from similar addresses to confuse the victim. Fake wallet addresses and transaction records together makes it more likely that users will be fooled.

Also Read: U.S. Tourist Loses $123K in Crypto to Fake Uber Scam in London



Leituras Relacionadas

IP Token Plunges 98%, Is DATA Rebranding the Last-Ditch Effort? Analyzing Story Protocol's Transformation

IP Token Plummets 98%, Is DATA Rebranding a Last Gamble? Analyzing Story Protocol's Pivot **Summary** Story Protocol, having seen its IP token fall approximately 98% from its all-time high, announced a major pivot on June 25, rebranding as the DATA Foundation. The project will shift its focus from IP to AI training data infrastructure, with a corresponding token change from IP to DATA. While the announcement triggered a brief price bounce, the token soon fell back near its lows. This analysis argues that such a fundamental rebrand is not typically a bullish signal, but rather an admission that the original strategy failed. Historically, rebrands fail when not backed by genuine improvements in product, user adoption, or liquidity, as seen in cases like MultiversX (Elrond) and Golem. Merely chasing a new narrative without execution is insufficient. Conversely, successful pivots are defined by on-chain evidence of growth. The transformation of ETHLend into Aave is the prime example, where a surge in Total Value Locked (TVL) and users preceded and drove long-term value. Projects like Polygon and Kaia, despite price declines, show underlying operational strength. Story’s pivot, announced just two weeks after its token hit a record low, risks being perceived as a last-ditch marketing effort. Leadership changes—with founder Seung Yoon Lee moving to an advisory role—further close the chapter on the original vision. For the DATA rebrand to succeed, it must demonstrably improve the token's relative strength against the market, boost on-chain liquidity/volume, and generate real user growth and settlement revenue from its new AI data narrative. Without such tangible results, Story will likely join the list of failed rebrands.

Foresight NewsHá 31m

IP Token Plunges 98%, Is DATA Rebranding the Last-Ditch Effort? Analyzing Story Protocol's Transformation

Foresight NewsHá 31m

Trading

Spot
活动图片