是谁又赚麻了?Fuel 创世空投资格揭晓

链捕手Publicado em 2024-12-17Última atualização em 2024-12-18

Resumo

10 亿 FUEL将在12月19日启动时开放认领。

作者:KarenZ,Foresight News

在胖企鹅空投之后,Fuel 也随即开放了其空投查询窗口。Fuel 总供应量的 20% 将分配给 Fuel 社区,其中,10% 用于 Genesis Drop;5% 分给社区合作平台;5% 用于尚未宣布的激励、计划、活动和激活。


Fuel 创世空投(Genesis Drop)为超过 20 万个独立地址分配了 10 亿 FUEL(总供应量的 10%),并且将在 2024 年 12 月 19 日启动时开放认领,直到 2025 年 1 月 19 日。


空投具体分配信息如下:

  • 第一阶段预存款用户:287,000,000 FUEL
  • 测试网用户:64,200,000 FUEL
  • NFT 持有者和交易用户:125,000,000 FUEL
  • Fuel 跨链用户:200,000,000 FUEL
  • Ecosystem Glass Eaters:138,800,000 FUEL
  • 开源社区 :175,000,000 FUEL
  • Fuelet Magisters:10,000,000 FUEL


根据社区反馈,第一阶段预存款用户空投比较给力,有用户存款 1 枚 ETH 拿到 1 万枚代币空投。但针对测试网的空投资格非常严苛,需要在 Fuel Sepolia 测试网上至少完成了 16 次交易,并且活跃时间至少 16 天。具体规则如下:


第一阶段预存款用户:287,000,000 FUEL


资格标准:

  • 参与了 Fuel 积分计划第一阶段。
  • 在 2024 年 11 月 22 日之前将所有符合资格的资产桥接到 Fuel Ignition。
  • 存款合格资产至少 7 天,并拥有至少 3 个积分。
  • 符合第一阶段积分计划资格且不是来自限制国家或地区的用户。

第二阶段仍在进行中。
测试网用户:64,200,000 FUEL


资格标准:

  • 在 Fuel Sepolia 测试网上至少完成了 16 次交易,并且活跃时间至少 16 天。
  • 快照日期为 2024 年 7 月 15 日。资格开始日期:2024 年 5 月 30 日。

如果参与了 Fuel Sepolia 测试网但不符合上述标准,Fuel 提醒用户在 2024 年 12 月 18 日 22:00 前填写此表格


排除标准:

  • 分析资产流动以识别钱包集群。在每个集群内,显示出相同或几乎相同模式的钱包被归类为 Sybil。对最终结果应用异常值检测以确保准确性并识别任何异常。

NFT 持有者和交易用户 :125,000,000 FUEL
总共有 5,944 个 NFT 持有者地址符合以下标准。Fuel 还引入了调整,旨在为非大户提供更有意义的奖励。


资格标准:
在 2024 年 12 月 13 日 21:00 时持有 Fuel Ignition 上的 NFT。


资格类别(等级):

  • 等级 1(OG 系列):Executors、Pumps、Monkees、Pengus
  • 等级 2(早期系列):Rocks、Fuel Dudes
  • 等级 3:遵循正确的 NFT 标准
  • 等级 4:未遵循正确的 NFT 标准

Fuel 跨链用户:200,000,000 FUEL
针对 Fuel 跨链用户的快照于 2024 年 12 月 13 日 21:00 拍摄。


资格标准:

  • 在 2024 年 12 月 13 日 21:00 之前将符合资格的资产跨链到 Fuel Ignition。
  • 网络中资产的美元价值乘以该价值在网络中的天数大于 300。

资格类别:

  • 轻度参与用户:跨链了一个或多个合格资产到 Fuel Ignition,但没有以任何链上可检测的方式与应用互动。
  • 深度参与用户:跨链了一个或多个合格资产到 Fuel Ignition,并花了一些时间使用 Fuel 及其生态系统应用。
  • 高级用户:跨链了一个或多个合格资产到 Fuel Ignition,并在以下生态系统项目中承担了一些流动性风险:Mira、SwayLend、Griffy。

Ecosystem Glass Eaters:138,800,000 FUEL


资格类别:

  • 生态系统构建者:为构建和推动 Fuel 生态系统做出非凡贡献的个人。
  • 生态系统项目:在 Fuel 积分计划时间框架内,最迟到 2024 年 12 月 10 日,交付了完全功能应用的个人或团队。
  • 生态系统审计员:在 Fuel 生态系统内对项目做出重大审计贡献的贡献者。
  • Fuel 研究人员:做出对 Fuel 及其生态系统的架构或理解有意义研究的个人或团队。
  • Fuel Discord 版主:在促进和维护 Fuel Discord 社区中发挥持续作用的活跃管理员。
  • 区域社区:管理或领导外部或区域 Fuel 社区的个人或团体,帮助扩大和支持 Fuel 的全球影响力。
  • 早期 Fuel 大使:参与 Fuel 大使计划的个人,在 Fuel 早期阶段提供支持。


开源社区:175,000,000 FUEL


资格标准:

  • 对 Fuel 使用以显著推动项目进展的关键开源库有 5+ 提交。
  • 对与 Fuel 相关的生态系统项目或对更广泛区块链社区有重大贡献的项目有 5+ 提交。
  • 作为外部开发者,将一个具有意义的 PR 合并到 Fuel 的一个存储库中。

此处列出了符合条件的 Github 存储库。
Fuelet Magisters:10,000,000 FUEL
资格标准:

  • 完成了由 Fuelet 团队主导的为期八周的「Early On Fuel」教育活动。
  • 在 2024 年 12 月 12 日之前在 Fuel Guild 上验证了角色。

Criptomoedas em alta

Leituras Relacionadas

After Aave's Exit and TVL's Sharp Fluctuation, Where Does MegaETH's Valuation Anchor Lie?

Following the withdrawal of Aave and a sharp drop in its Total Value Locked (TVL), the valuation of the high-performance DeFi blockchain MegaETH faces scrutiny. Once a highly anticipated project with a fully diluted valuation (FDV) reaching around $2 billion, MegaETH saw its TVL plummet from a May peak of $245 million to just over $30 million in July, a roughly 70% decline. Its native token, MEGA, currently trades around $0.048 with a market cap of approximately $54 million and an FDV of about $480 million. The report identifies a core vulnerability: MegaETH's TVL was heavily dependent on a single protocol, Aave V3, which at its peak contributed around 90% of the chain's TVL. A significant portion of this capital is attributed to leveraged yield-farming strategies involving stablecoins like USDe. When the profitability of these strategies diminished, capital rapidly exited, exposing the lack of diversified, sustainable activity. Three key mismatches between MegaETH's valuation and its fundamentals are highlighted: 1. **Valuation vs. Real Usage:** With an FDV of ~$4.8B but only ~$1M in annualized protocol revenue and ~2,600 daily active addresses, the valuation appears disconnected from current economic activity. 2. **Token Narrative vs. Ecosystem Reality:** Despite its DeFi narrative, nearly 80% of the chain's recent protocol revenue comes from a trading card game, Monster, not from core DeFi applications like Aave. The chain's native stablecoin, USDM, also shows low trading volume and a declining market cap. 3. **Short-Term Hype vs. Long-Term Delivery:** Initial hype from token generation, blue-chip integrations, and influencer support has faded. Major protocols like Uniswap now hold minimal TVL on the chain, indicating that early capital was largely transient and driven by incentives rather than organic demand. The situation reflects a broader market trend where investors are becoming less tolerant of valuations based on inflated TVL and narrative, demanding clearer evidence of sustainable transactions, revenue, and ecosystem development. While MEGA's price may experience short-term rebounds from market sentiment, a fundamental re-rating likely depends on the team's ability to convert its remaining resources into tangible, user-retaining applications and genuine ecosystem growth.

链捕手Há 1h

After Aave's Exit and TVL's Sharp Fluctuation, Where Does MegaETH's Valuation Anchor Lie?

链捕手Há 1h

Goldman Sachs In-Depth Report: Who Will Be the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

Goldman Sachs Report: China's AI Models at an Inflection Point China's open-source/open-weight large language models (LLMs) have reached performance parity with top global proprietary models, according to a Goldman Sachs report. This is driven by architectural innovations and higher parameter efficiency, allowing Chinese models to achieve comparable capabilities at 2%-10% the parameter size and significantly lower cost. The market is evolving into a two-tiered structure: a high-end segment (e.g., GLM5.2, Qwen3.7 Max) with premium pricing and a low-end, price-sensitive segment for global SMEs and individual users. Key points: * **Cost & Performance:** Innovations like Mixture of Experts (MoE) enable high performance with smaller models. Projects like Meituan's LongCat 2.0, trained on domestic hardware, highlight progress in tech self-sufficiency. * **Open-Source Strategy:** Most Chinese players use open-source/open-weight models for flexibility and ecosystem growth. However, Goldman notes this may underreport actual deployment and revenue. A shift toward "open-weight + community license" models with revenue sharing (e.g., MiniMax) could improve monetization. * **Market Shift & Global Expansion:** Enterprise AI adoption is shifting from "token maximization" to "ROI-first." International expansion, especially in non-US markets, is a major growth driver. Chinese models are increasingly available on global platforms like AWS Bedrock and Microsoft Copilot. * **Competitive Landscape:** Using a framework based on pricing power, cost advantage, and financial strength, Goldman identifies **Zhipu AI and DeepSeek** as the strongest in foundational text models, and **ByteDance** as the leader in multimodal/video generation. The report maintains Buy ratings on MiniMax and Kuaishou. * **Market Growth:** China's AI model API and subscription revenue is projected to grow from an estimated ¥35 billion in 2026 to ¥879 billion by 2030.

marsbitHá 1h

Goldman Sachs In-Depth Report: Who Will Be the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

marsbitHá 1h

Goldman Sachs Deep Dive Report: Who Will Become the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

Goldman Sachs Report: Who Will Be the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry? China's AI large model sector is at a historic inflection point. Goldman Sachs argues that the intelligence of Chinese open-source/open-weight models is approaching top global proprietary models. Rapid adoption by domestic enterprises and global SMEs is creating a data flywheel effect that will further drive model iteration. The evolution is summarized as moving from "DeepSeek's cost-efficiency moment last year to GLM's model-intelligence moment this year." Chinese models achieve near-state-of-the-art performance at significantly lower cost, primarily due to architectural innovations like Mixture of Experts (MoE) and higher parameter efficiency. Models like DeepSeek V4 Pro (1.6T params), GLM5.2 (0.7T), and MiniMax M3 (0.4T) are much smaller than global leaders. Recent advancements in coding capability are attributed to better data curation and RLHF. Landmarks like Meituan's LongCat 2.0, trained fully on domestic AI chips, demonstrate progress in hardware stack independence. The market is forming a "two-tiered structure." The high-end tier (e.g., GLM5.2, Alibaba's Qwen3.7 Max) prices around $1 per million tokens, about 10-25% of US top models, with estimated inference gross margins of 10-20%. The low-end tier (priced as low as $0.06-$0.2 per million tokens) targets price-sensitive global SMEs and individuals. MiniMax derives 60-70% of revenue overseas. Goldman forecasts China's AI model API/subscription revenue to grow from an estimated RMB 35bn in 2026 to RMB 879bn by 2030. Most Chinese players adopt open-source/open-weight strategies for deployment flexibility and community feedback, though this limits monetization as deployments on third-party platforms (e.g., Alibaba Cloud) may not generate direct revenue. A shift towards "open-weight + community license" models with revenue-sharing agreements (like MiniMax's approach) could improve unit economics. International expansion, particularly in non-US markets, is the key growth driver. The global enterprise AI paradigm is shifting from "token maximization" to "ROI prioritization." Chinese models are already hosted on major global platforms like AWS Bedrock and are under consideration for integration into Microsoft Copilot. Using a competitive framework based on pricing power, cost advantage, and financial strength, Goldman identifies the strongest players: In foundational text models, Zhipu AI (initiated coverage) and DeepSeek lead. In multimodal/video generation, ByteDance's Seed is the frontrunner, with Kuaishou's Kling and MiniMax's Hailuo also well-positioned. Goldman maintains a Buy rating on MiniMax, citing its attractive valuation.

链捕手Há 1h

Goldman Sachs Deep Dive Report: Who Will Become the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

链捕手Há 1h

Trading

Spot

Artigos em Destaque

Como comprar PYTH

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de PYTH (Pyth) (PYTH) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar PYTH (Pyth) (PYTH) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu PYTH (Pyth) (PYTH)Depois de comprar o teu PYTH (Pyth) (PYTH), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona PYTH (Pyth) (PYTH)Transaciona facilmente PYTH (Pyth) (PYTH) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

169 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2026.06.02

Como comprar PYTH

Discussões

Bem-vindo à Comunidade HTX. Aqui, pode manter-se informado sobre os mais recentes desenvolvimentos da plataforma e obter acesso a análises profissionais de mercado. As opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o preço de PYTH (PYTH) são apresentadas abaixo.

活动图片