为何牛市中要学会卖币改善生活?

链捕手Publicado em 2024-12-17Última atualização em 2024-12-17

作者:Route 2 FI

编译:Luffy,Foresight News

 

如果你拥有了可以改变生活的未实现利润,请听我一句:你需要卖掉它。这不仅仅是一个建议,也是我从惨痛经历中学到的教训。在我职业生涯的早期,我一直犹豫是否要了结获利,我为每一次犹豫不决感到后悔。名义财富可能会随着我们交易旅程而不断变化,但基本原则保持不变。

我逐渐明白的一件事是,在足以改变生活时卖出,你会获得一个无法用金钱衡量的好处:永久改善你和身边人的生活。想象一下,点击「卖出」就能够立即改善你的生活处境。这很美妙!如果你有这样的机会,我强烈建议你抓住它。

我知道等待最佳卖出时机是多么诱人:相信只要再坚持一段时间,你就能获得更多利润。但事实是:最佳时机只是幻想。我认识的最成功的交易员并不是通过完美把握每个高峰时机而达到今天的成就的;他们是通过持续获利和保持流动性而获得成功。他们很早就明白,卖成现金是这场游戏中生存的必要条件。

我最看得开的认知之一是,机会永远都有。这种心态有助于缓解交易者在考虑卖出时经常会感到的错失恐惧。是的,放弃表现良好的头寸可能会让人感到不安,但请记住:出于 FOMO 而持有它从长远来看会让你付出更多代价。

我经常思考达到「逃逸速度」意味着什么:即你的财务状况允许你承担有计划的风险而不会危及你的生活稳定性。一旦你达到了那个水平,那时你才能开始真正玩游戏并全力以赴。

多少钱才够退休?

作为一个一直在考虑退休的人,我经常想:多少钱才算足够?虽然媒体经常吹嘘这需要一个天文数字,但我相信,对于我们许多人来说,100 万到 200 万美元可能才是最佳选择。原因如下,让我们首先从 TradFi 的角度来看待这个问题。

2022 年,65 岁或以上人士的平均退休账户余额仅为 232,710 美元。所以,突然拥有 100-200 万美元并不少,不是吗?事实上,只有约 3.2% 的退休人员储蓄超过 100 万美元。

好的,我知道了,读这篇文章的你年过 65 岁的可能性不大,你想在 65 岁之前就退休。当第一次听说美国人认为他们需要 146 万美元才能舒适地退休时,我感到震惊。但后来我意识到一件至关重要的事情:这个数字是一个平均值。每个人的需求可能大不相同。

让我们考虑一下 4% 规则,这是一条常见的退休计划准则。如果存了 200 万美元,你每年可以提取 8 万美元。对许多人来说,这足以过上舒适的生活。你的退休需求在很大程度上取决于你想要的生活方式。你打算环游世界,还是满足于更简单的乐趣?劳工统计局报告称,2021 年 65 岁及以上人士的平均年支出为 52,141 美元。100-200 万美元的储蓄可以轻松支付这笔费用。

选择退休后居住地会极大地影响你的财富使用。100 万美元的退休金在纽约市可能感觉很紧张,但在小城镇或国外却能提供奢华的生活。

心理因素

知道自己有 100-200 万美元的存款可以减轻很多财务压力,让你真正享受退休生活。

归根结底,100-200 万美元是否足以退休取决于你的个人情况。对我们许多人来说,这不仅仅是足够的钱,这比我们梦想的还要多。关键是要尽早开始储蓄,量入为出,专注于真正能给你的生活带来快乐的事情。请记住,退休不仅仅关于钱,也关于创造你喜欢的生活,无论银行里有没有数百万美元。

我理解 Fiskantes 上面说的话。一旦你已经将改变生活的钱存入银行或投资于房地产等,你就可以轻松地参与市场。

我所说的轻松是什么意思?好吧,我并不是说更容易赚钱,我是说你的心态更放松。你可以从容地做出更好的决定,只让交易来找你。而且,即便你输了,你至少不会失去一切,因为你已经有了保障。

正如 Fiskantes 所说:「真正的乐趣就从这里开始」。从这个意义上说,这个周期对我来说更有趣。如果一切都归零,那么至少我还有一个安全的依靠。话虽如此,有些人在压力更大的情况下工作效率更高,但我认为对大多数人来说并非如此。

Leituras Relacionadas

After Aave's Exit and TVL's Sharp Fluctuation, Where Does MegaETH's Valuation Anchor Lie?

Following the withdrawal of Aave and a sharp drop in its Total Value Locked (TVL), the valuation of the high-performance DeFi blockchain MegaETH faces scrutiny. Once a highly anticipated project with a fully diluted valuation (FDV) reaching around $2 billion, MegaETH saw its TVL plummet from a May peak of $245 million to just over $30 million in July, a roughly 70% decline. Its native token, MEGA, currently trades around $0.048 with a market cap of approximately $54 million and an FDV of about $480 million. The report identifies a core vulnerability: MegaETH's TVL was heavily dependent on a single protocol, Aave V3, which at its peak contributed around 90% of the chain's TVL. A significant portion of this capital is attributed to leveraged yield-farming strategies involving stablecoins like USDe. When the profitability of these strategies diminished, capital rapidly exited, exposing the lack of diversified, sustainable activity. Three key mismatches between MegaETH's valuation and its fundamentals are highlighted: 1. **Valuation vs. Real Usage:** With an FDV of ~$4.8B but only ~$1M in annualized protocol revenue and ~2,600 daily active addresses, the valuation appears disconnected from current economic activity. 2. **Token Narrative vs. Ecosystem Reality:** Despite its DeFi narrative, nearly 80% of the chain's recent protocol revenue comes from a trading card game, Monster, not from core DeFi applications like Aave. The chain's native stablecoin, USDM, also shows low trading volume and a declining market cap. 3. **Short-Term Hype vs. Long-Term Delivery:** Initial hype from token generation, blue-chip integrations, and influencer support has faded. Major protocols like Uniswap now hold minimal TVL on the chain, indicating that early capital was largely transient and driven by incentives rather than organic demand. The situation reflects a broader market trend where investors are becoming less tolerant of valuations based on inflated TVL and narrative, demanding clearer evidence of sustainable transactions, revenue, and ecosystem development. While MEGA's price may experience short-term rebounds from market sentiment, a fundamental re-rating likely depends on the team's ability to convert its remaining resources into tangible, user-retaining applications and genuine ecosystem growth.

链捕手Há 1h

After Aave's Exit and TVL's Sharp Fluctuation, Where Does MegaETH's Valuation Anchor Lie?

链捕手Há 1h

Goldman Sachs In-Depth Report: Who Will Be the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

Goldman Sachs Report: China's AI Models at an Inflection Point China's open-source/open-weight large language models (LLMs) have reached performance parity with top global proprietary models, according to a Goldman Sachs report. This is driven by architectural innovations and higher parameter efficiency, allowing Chinese models to achieve comparable capabilities at 2%-10% the parameter size and significantly lower cost. The market is evolving into a two-tiered structure: a high-end segment (e.g., GLM5.2, Qwen3.7 Max) with premium pricing and a low-end, price-sensitive segment for global SMEs and individual users. Key points: * **Cost & Performance:** Innovations like Mixture of Experts (MoE) enable high performance with smaller models. Projects like Meituan's LongCat 2.0, trained on domestic hardware, highlight progress in tech self-sufficiency. * **Open-Source Strategy:** Most Chinese players use open-source/open-weight models for flexibility and ecosystem growth. However, Goldman notes this may underreport actual deployment and revenue. A shift toward "open-weight + community license" models with revenue sharing (e.g., MiniMax) could improve monetization. * **Market Shift & Global Expansion:** Enterprise AI adoption is shifting from "token maximization" to "ROI-first." International expansion, especially in non-US markets, is a major growth driver. Chinese models are increasingly available on global platforms like AWS Bedrock and Microsoft Copilot. * **Competitive Landscape:** Using a framework based on pricing power, cost advantage, and financial strength, Goldman identifies **Zhipu AI and DeepSeek** as the strongest in foundational text models, and **ByteDance** as the leader in multimodal/video generation. The report maintains Buy ratings on MiniMax and Kuaishou. * **Market Growth:** China's AI model API and subscription revenue is projected to grow from an estimated ¥35 billion in 2026 to ¥879 billion by 2030.

marsbitHá 1h

Goldman Sachs In-Depth Report: Who Will Be the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

marsbitHá 1h

Goldman Sachs Deep Dive Report: Who Will Become the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

Goldman Sachs Report: Who Will Be the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry? China's AI large model sector is at a historic inflection point. Goldman Sachs argues that the intelligence of Chinese open-source/open-weight models is approaching top global proprietary models. Rapid adoption by domestic enterprises and global SMEs is creating a data flywheel effect that will further drive model iteration. The evolution is summarized as moving from "DeepSeek's cost-efficiency moment last year to GLM's model-intelligence moment this year." Chinese models achieve near-state-of-the-art performance at significantly lower cost, primarily due to architectural innovations like Mixture of Experts (MoE) and higher parameter efficiency. Models like DeepSeek V4 Pro (1.6T params), GLM5.2 (0.7T), and MiniMax M3 (0.4T) are much smaller than global leaders. Recent advancements in coding capability are attributed to better data curation and RLHF. Landmarks like Meituan's LongCat 2.0, trained fully on domestic AI chips, demonstrate progress in hardware stack independence. The market is forming a "two-tiered structure." The high-end tier (e.g., GLM5.2, Alibaba's Qwen3.7 Max) prices around $1 per million tokens, about 10-25% of US top models, with estimated inference gross margins of 10-20%. The low-end tier (priced as low as $0.06-$0.2 per million tokens) targets price-sensitive global SMEs and individuals. MiniMax derives 60-70% of revenue overseas. Goldman forecasts China's AI model API/subscription revenue to grow from an estimated RMB 35bn in 2026 to RMB 879bn by 2030. Most Chinese players adopt open-source/open-weight strategies for deployment flexibility and community feedback, though this limits monetization as deployments on third-party platforms (e.g., Alibaba Cloud) may not generate direct revenue. A shift towards "open-weight + community license" models with revenue-sharing agreements (like MiniMax's approach) could improve unit economics. International expansion, particularly in non-US markets, is the key growth driver. The global enterprise AI paradigm is shifting from "token maximization" to "ROI prioritization." Chinese models are already hosted on major global platforms like AWS Bedrock and are under consideration for integration into Microsoft Copilot. Using a competitive framework based on pricing power, cost advantage, and financial strength, Goldman identifies the strongest players: In foundational text models, Zhipu AI (initiated coverage) and DeepSeek lead. In multimodal/video generation, ByteDance's Seed is the frontrunner, with Kuaishou's Kling and MiniMax's Hailuo also well-positioned. Goldman maintains a Buy rating on MiniMax, citing its attractive valuation.

链捕手Há 1h

Goldman Sachs Deep Dive Report: Who Will Become the Long-Term Winners in China's AI Large Model Industry?

链捕手Há 1h

Trading

Spot
活动图片