Инвесторы ждут от этих альткоинов взрывного роста

cryptonews.ruPublicado em 2024-06-11Última atualização em 2024-12-11

Многие участники криптосообщества считают, что на фоне удачного штурма уровня $100 000 биткоином и следующего за ним отката на рынке началась подготовка к альтсезону. Предположения о том, что в ближайшее время альткоины порадуют инвесторов активным ростом, стали поводом для споров о том, какие именно монеты могут принести больше прибыли

Редакция BeInCrypto собрала в одном обзоре несколько подборок перспективных альткоинов от популярных участников криптосообщества. Рассказываем, на какие монеты обратили внимание криптаны.

Ончейн-аналитик и охотник за аирдропами @DeFiTracer считает, что инвесторам стоит обратить внимание на альткоины с низкой капитализацией. Такие монеты, по его мнению, в отличие от уже популярных криптовалют, могут продемонстрировать лучший результат роста. К группе перспективных альткоинов, которые соответствуют требованиям его выборки, ончейн-аналитик отнес $POPCAT, $HEART, $ME, $TRAC, $TURBO и $0x0.

Другой ончейн-аналитик, @0xNonceSense, считает, что инвесторам не стоит зацикливаться на поиске монет с низкой капитализацией и надеяться на то, что эффект низкой базы даст им больше иксов. В его список перспективных альткоинов вошли уже популярные криптовалюты: $ETH, $SOL, $GRT, $MATIC, $LINK, $AVAX, $ATOM, $ARB и $ZK.

С @0xNonceSense во многом согласен популярный криптоблогер @JakeGagain. Он также считает, что инвесторам стоит делать ставку на уже популярные альткоины. В список его любимых альтов, от которых криптоблогер ждет роста, вошли $ETH, $SUI, $XRP, $ADA и $SOL.

Инвестор и член правления криптопроекта Oracle @oroogle в свою очередь выделил только 3 перспективных, по его мнению, альткоина: $HBAR, $AR и $ALGO. По его наблюдениям, альты в этом сезоне могут значительно обогнать биткоин по темпам роста.

К обсуждению перспективных альткоинов присоединился популярный в криптосообществе блогер @cryptosymbiiote. Он, как и его коллеги, выделил несколько монет, в которых, по его мнению, есть потенциал: $GLQ, $STRX, $PRQ, $TOKEN, $VRA, $LTO, $CLORE, $DNX и $OCTA. Криптоблогер считает, что в этом сезоне инвесторам стоит делать ставку на альткоины криптопроектов, связанных с разработками в области искусственного интеллекта (ИИ). Также он видит перспективы роста монет, связанных с RWA и DePIN.

Напоминаем, что инвестиции в криптовалюту всегда сопряжены с риском. Перед принятием решения о покупке монеты нужно тщательно проанализировать проект. Ранее редакция BeInCrypto писала о том, как использовать чат-бот ChatGPT для поиска перспективных криптовалют и исследования их потенциала роста.

Leituras Relacionadas

Countdown to Q-Day: Will Quantum Computing End Cryptocurrencies?

The article explores the existential threat quantum computing poses to cryptocurrencies and the urgent need for "post-quantum" migration. It outlines that quantum computers, through Shor's algorithm, could break the elliptic-curve cryptography (ECC) underlying blockchain security, potentially allowing private keys to be derived from public keys. The core challenge is not a lack of post-quantum cryptography (PQC) standards—like NIST's ML-KEM and ML-DSA—but the immense complexity of upgrading entire ecosystems before "Q-Day" (when quantum computers become capable of such attacks, estimated around 2035-2045). Key points include: * **Bitcoin's** risk is concentrated in legacy UTXOs with exposed public keys (e.g., early P2PK outputs). Migration faces massive hurdles: PQC signatures are much larger, increasing transaction size and cost, and the governance dilemma of handling un-migrated assets threatens its "code is law" ethos. * **Ethereum's** strategy focuses on "cryptographic agility," using Account Abstraction for user accounts and developing compressed hash-based signatures (like leanXMSS with SNARK aggregation) for consensus. Its migration is a complex, full-stack overhaul of execution, consensus, and data layers. * The "security debt" is enormous. The comfortable engineering window for a coordinated, ecosystem-wide upgrade is only 5-8 years. High-value infrastructure (exchanges, bridges) may face pressure before mainnet protocols. In conclusion, quantum computing is not an instant "doomsday" event but a forcing function for systemic change. Bitcoin's ultimate test is social consensus and property rights governance, while Ethereum's is technical complexity. Failure to migrate in time could lead to a fundamental re-pricing of crypto assets.

链捕手Há 1m

Countdown to Q-Day: Will Quantum Computing End Cryptocurrencies?

链捕手Há 1m

Losing $55 Million to Sell Bitcoin, MicroStrategy's Faith Reaches Its Interest Payment Day

On July 6th, Michael Saylor's MicroStrategy announced the sale of 3,588 BTC for approximately $216 million, incurring a realized loss of around $55.45 million compared to its average cost basis. This move, contradicting Saylor's long-standing "never sell" Bitcoin philosophy, was executed to pay dividends on its digital credit securities. The article traces this shift from a small "desensitization test" sale of 32 BTC in late May to the board's authorization on June 30th to sell up to $1.25 billion in Bitcoin for corporate purposes like dividends and buybacks. Analysis reveals that MicroStrategy's previous growth "flywheel"—using stock premiums to fund more Bitcoin purchases—has stalled. With its stock trading near a critical threshold (1.22x its Bitcoin NAV), issuing new shares would dilute value. Simultaneously, its financing channels (preferred stock, common stock ATM, convertible notes) are constrained while facing rigid annual dividend/interest obligations of roughly $1.76 billion. Consequently, selling Bitcoin became the calculated "optimal solution" under its own financial model. This transforms MicroStrategy from crypto's most prominent steady buyer into a predictable seller, creating a potential overhead of ~2,400 BTC in monthly selling pressure if obligations are fully covered by sales. This shift challenges the valuation models of the entire Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) sector that emulated MicroStrategy. The company's path forward now hinges on Bitcoin's price recovery, which would allow its preferred stock to trade at par and reopen its financing flywheel, creating a cyclical dependency between the firm's financial model and the asset it holds.

链捕手Há 30m

Losing $55 Million to Sell Bitcoin, MicroStrategy's Faith Reaches Its Interest Payment Day

链捕手Há 30m

OUSD Fake Partnership Controversy? Stablecoins and the Credit Game of Giant Endorsements

Author: Chloe, ChainCatcher Last week, Open Standard launched the dollar stablecoin OpenUSD (OUSD) with a list of over 140 supposedly supporting companies, including major names like Visa, Mastercard, Stripe, American Express, BlackRock, BNY, Standard Chartered, Google, Shopify, Samsung, Coinbase, Solana, and Ripple. The announcement initially impacted Circle's stock price, but doubts about the list quickly emerged. Several Korean firms named, including Samsung Electronics, Shinhan Financial Group, Dunamu (Upbit's parent), and K Bank, clarified they had not formally agreed to join the alliance. Some stated they were only approached for potential interest or learned of their inclusion from news reports, expressing surprise. Similar concerns were raised by U.S. entities, suggesting the list may be misleading. OUSD, led by Zach Abrams of Bridge (acquired by Stripe in 2024), promotes zero-fee minting/redemption, no transaction limits, and sharing reserve asset yields with partners instead of keeping profits. However, this model makes listed partnership imply economic benefits, turning it into a serious credibility issue. This incident reflects a common crypto marketing tactic of leveraging big names. A Chainstory analysis found over 62% of crypto press releases in late 2025 were high-risk or scams. The situation recalls Facebook's Libra (later Diem), which collapsed in 2022 after initial heavyweight backers like Visa and PayPal withdrew under regulatory pressure. Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire welcomed the competition but highlighted the challenges. He argued stablecoin success relies on network effects and real usage, not just alliances. He criticized OUSD's "free" model and full revenue sharing as potentially starving infrastructure development. Noting the dominance of USDT (~$1.84T) and USDC (~$730B) in the ~$2.91T stablecoin market, he suggested many new entrants lack real utility despite inflated circulation from incentives. In conclusion, while OUSD has genuine backing and a distinct model, its future depends on actual adoption in B2B payments, settlements, and cross-border transactions, not just a prestigious partner list. The market will determine if it is a credible challenger or merely another marketing promise.

链捕手Há 32m

OUSD Fake Partnership Controversy? Stablecoins and the Credit Game of Giant Endorsements

链捕手Há 32m

Trading

Spot
活动图片