How the Celsius Liquidity Crunch Is Linked to Lido's Staked Ethereum

DecryptPublicado em 2022-06-14Última atualização em 2022-06-14

Resumo

A core piece of Celsius's Earn strategy relies on Staked ETH not losing parity with Ethereum. But it has, and now customers want their money back.

It’s only been a month since the collapse of Terra, and the chaos that it created in the crypto market, and now Lido Finance and its Staked Ethereum (stETH) are at the center of another potential liquidity crisis.

Crypto lending company Celsius is one of Lido’s principal clients and, as such, one of the largest holders of stETH. The problem? Staked ETH is always supposed to be worth 1 ETH—and it hasn’t been for some time now.

Staked ETH represents Ethereum that’s been locked up on the Ethereum 2.0 beacon chain—a network that will soon be merged with the Ethereum mainnet in a highly anticipated upgrade that transitions the blockchain to proof of stake. Normally, users would need a minimum of 32 ETH (worth roughly $40,000) to participate in ETH 2.0 staking and earn rewards. But Lido Finance makes it possible for users to stake any amount of ETH. And because it’s “liquid staking,” it gives users stETH tokens in return.

That stETH can then be lent, staked, and traded for other tokens.

Celsius does precisely that with its own clients' funds. But now, a day after Celsius paused customer withdrawals, swaps, and transfers—”to put Celsius in a better position to honor, over time, its withdrawal obligations,” the company said—there’s growing concern over the lending company’s exposure to stETH.

The company has at least $475 million worth of stETH in a public wallet, according to blockchain research firm Nansen Research.

Celsius works by staking customer deposits, in this case Ethereum, in yield generating decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols like Lido. In return, Celsius receives stETH, which increases in value as the deposits earn rewards. Celsius makes money by paying its customers their promised rate of return, recently that’s been between 6% to 8% on ETH deposits, and keeps the rest.

The value proposition for Celsius depositors is that they are promised a fixed rate of return on their ETH and leave it to the company to figure out how to reliably generate that return.

But that strategy starts to come apart if stETH loses parity with ETH (it has) at the same time that there are a lot of Celsius depositors looking to withdraw their ETH (they are) because Celsius doesn’t appear to have enough liquid ETH to meet all of its obligations.

By Monday afternoon, stETH had yet to pull even with Ethereum. At the time of this writing, stETH was trading at 0.94 ETH. stETH has been trading below 1 ETH since last month, when stETH was impacted by the TerraUSD and Luna collapse.

A large public Celsius wallet shows $475 million worth of stETH being used as collateral for hundreds of millions in stablecoin loans.

“They have also sent thousands of stETH to FTX in recent days, presumably to sell,” Andrew Thurman, content lead at Nansen, told Decrypt, “though we can't verify that because it's off-chain. They have likely been especially hard-hit by stETH losing its peg to ETH.”

But selling large quantities of stETH to get more liquid ETH would cause its price to drop even more, which would further compound the liquidity crunch that Celsius is already facing.

There have been efforts to find the other public wallets, and therefore account for the rest of Celsius’s $10 billion in customer assets, but so far only about $1.5 billion appear to have been accounted for, according to research from The Block. That doesn’t mean Celsius doesn’t have that ETH, but it has still caused a panic.

“Celsius has likely failed to isolate risk: they might have taken USDC and held it in UST (Luna's stablecoin), or taken ETH and held it in stETH,” Jack Niewold, founder of crypto newsletter Crypto Pragmatist, wrote in a Twitter thread. “So, when ALL of crypto drops and ALL users want their funds back, ALL Celsius users feel the pinch.”

Celsius did not immediately respond to Decrypt’s requests for comment.

If all the hand wringing over stETH feels familiar, it’s because it also played a role in the collapse of Terra’s UST and LUNA tokens. At the time, the stETH to ETH imbalance was the opposite of what it is today.

Last month, there was a run on stETH because users were rushing to pull their funds out of the Anchor lending protocol on the Terra blockchain, which back then offered users up to 20% returns on their UST deposits. After Terraform Labs shut down the Terra network twice, users cashed out their stETH, pushing the price up.

One ETH could be exchanged for 1.0248 stETH through the Curve protocol, meaning it was trading at a 3% discount relative to Ethereum.

When that happened, it created an opportunity for arbitrage trades. Investors were able to sell stETH for more ETH than had been deposited to create it, which created a big drawdown on Lido’s ETH pool.

Each time there’s a big liquidity crunch, Brian Norton, COO of My Ethereum Wallet, told Decrypt, it makes DeFi feel a lot like traditional finance because it leaves a centralized platform in control of people’s ability to access their funds.

“Every time you see this, every time this just reinforces the point that if you're relying exclusively on these sort of centralized platforms,” he said, referring to Celsius, “even when the yields are great, I think you're still giving up a good deal of control.”

Last week, the Celsius team went to great lengths to assure customers that it could meet its obligations.

“Celsius has the reserves (and more than enough ETH) to meet obligations, as dictated by our comprehensive liquidity risk management framework” the company wrote in a blog post, following rumors that it had been heavily impacted by the Terra crash.

The post ended with a somewhat chilling quote from U.S. Navy Admiral David Farragut, who led an attack on New Orleans during the Civil War: “Damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead.”

Leituras Relacionadas

$9.4 Billion: The Largest Robotics Funding This Year Has Emerged

Munich-based humanoid robotics company Neura has completed a $1.4 billion (approximately RMB 94.9 billion) Series C funding round, valuing the company at around $7 billion and positioning it among the global leaders in the sector. The investment round is notable not just for its size—reportedly the largest in robotics this year—but also for its strategic backers, which include tech giants like NVIDIA and Amazon, alongside established industrial players such as German engineering firms Bosch and Schaeffler. This mix of investors signals a significant shift in the industry's focus from technological demonstrations and general-purpose narratives toward practical, industrial deployment and commercialization. Neura's approach centers on developing humanoid robots for defined, high-value industrial tasks rather than pursuing a general-purpose model. Its early validation comes from a partnership with BMW, where its robots are being tested on actual production lines. The involvement of Bosch and Schaeffler, companies deeply embedded in global manufacturing, underscores a growing belief that humanoid robots are transitioning from labs to viable factory-floor solutions. The article highlights two converging trends driving investment: advancements in AI and large language models, which enhance robots' perception and decision-making in unstructured environments, and mounting pressure from labor shortages and rising costs in major manufacturing regions. The funding landscape is now bifurcating between companies like Figure AI, focusing on versatile general-purpose robots, and firms like Neura, targeting specific vertical industrial applications with clearer, shorter paths to ROI. While technical hurdles remain, the core challenges for widespread adoption are increasingly seen as engineering and commercial in nature: managing the high integration and customization costs for different factory environments and establishing robust, localized maintenance and service networks. The record investment in Neura, particularly from industrial capital, indicates the industry's growing confidence in moving from proving feasibility to solving the practical problems of scalability, reliability, and building sustainable business models around humanoid robots in real-world settings like automotive manufacturing and hazardous labor environments.

marsbitHá 4h

$9.4 Billion: The Largest Robotics Funding This Year Has Emerged

marsbitHá 4h

"119 to 176 Dollars": Behind SpaceX's Listing, MSX Once Again Successfully Executes the Pre-IPO Closed Loop

Following May's 300% gain on Cerebras, MSX delivered another outstanding performance during SpaceX's listing night. On June 12, SpaceX (SPCX) launched on Nasdaq, reaching a high of $176. This marked the successful culmination of MSX's Pre-IPO project launched in March, where users subscribed at $119, achieving gains of approximately 40-48%. This event validated MSX's complete Pre-IPO mechanism, a crucial advantage in a market where access to top-tier private company equity is typically limited to institutions. MSX's model provides a full cycle for users: subscription (at $119 for SpaceX), real-time on-chain portfolio tracking, optional early redemption, seamless conversion to tradable spot assets (SPCX.M) upon IPO, and final settlement in stablecoins. This end-to-end process distinguishes MSX from platforms that faced settlement issues during the SpaceX IPO, highlighting that the core challenge of Pre-IPO is not just access, but a clear exit and conversion path post-listing. This success with SpaceX is MSX's second major Pre-IPO verification, following the Cerebras listing in May, which yielded ~300% returns for early participants. These back-to-back achievements demonstrate MSX's capability to source, structure, and deliver real assets through a replicable on-chain model. The true barrier for Pre-IPO products lies not in providing an entry point, but in ensuring reliable fulfillment from subscription through to post-IPO liquidity. MSX's proven闭环 (closed-loop) process addresses this, offering Web3 users a structured way to access high-growth, pre-public companies in sectors like AI and frontier tech. MSX plans to continue expanding its Pre-IPO portfolio with this focus on authenticity, transparency, and post-listing execution.

Odaily星球日报Há 16h

"119 to 176 Dollars": Behind SpaceX's Listing, MSX Once Again Successfully Executes the Pre-IPO Closed Loop

Odaily星球日报Há 16h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片