Пользователь перевел $129 млн на фишинговый адрес, но их просто вернули

cryptonews.ruPublicado em 2023-07-20Última atualização em 2024-11-20

Неназванный пользователь перевел $129 млн в USDT мошенникам, скопировав неправильный адрес из истории транзакций. В отличие от большинства подобных случаев, в течение 6 часов владельцы адреса-получателя сами вернули деньги.

🤯不知道哪位遭遇了首尾号相似钱包地址的钓鱼攻击,误转了 1.29 亿 USDT 给钓鱼地址:

THcTxQi3N8wQ13fwntF7a3M88BEi6q1bu8https://t.co/vhPxMpewc8

不过,钓鱼团伙不到 1 小时归还了其中 90%,然后又过了 4 个多小时把剩余的 10% 也归还了…

情报来自 InMist 成员。 https://t.co/cFhK3sM8Go

— Cos(余弦)😶‍🌫️ (@evilcos) November 20, 2024

По наблюдениям аналитиков Scam Sniffer со ссылкой на данные SlowMist, в историю транзакций пострадавшего попал подозрительный адрес, последние символы которого совпадают с одним из знакомых пользователю кошельков. Тот не проверил и отправил деньги на кошелек-самозванец.

По такому принципу работает схема «address poisoning». Мошенники создают адрес, похожий на какой-то из привычных потенциальной жертве. С него присылают незначительную транзакцию, которая сохраняется в истории пользователя.

Злоумышленники рассчитывают, что жертва не будет проверять полный идентификатор и скопирует подставной адрес при создании транзакции.

В мае в результате подобной атаки неназванный трейдер потерял $68 млн. В июле от «отравления адреса» пострадала хакерская группа Pink Drainer, тогда добыча составила 10 ETH.

Удивленные быстрым возвратом средств, некоторые пользователи X предположили, что мошенники испугались такой крупной добычи. Тот, кто пересылает $129 млн, вполне мог бы нанять команду аналитиков и хакеров для поиска виновных, потому может представлять угрозу.

Другие допустили, что на другом конце транзакции оказался не злоумышленник, а порядочный человек, который по собственной воле вернул средства владельцу.

Напомним, 10 ноября трейдер, потерявший около $26 млн из-за ошибки копирования, попросил сообщество помочь с возвратом средств и пообещал 10% в награду.

Leituras Relacionadas

SpaceX, OpenAI, Anthropic: The Three AI Giants Racing for IPO, Which One Is Worth Betting On?

SpaceX, OpenAI, and Anthropic are poised for historic IPOs within weeks, potentially raising a combined $180 billion—a sum exceeding the entire internet bubble's fundraising. The hosts of the Limitless Podcast argue this isn't just individual company financing but an unprecedented capital concentration for AI infrastructure, driven by an insatiable need for compute, data centers, power, and chips. SpaceX's IPO is notable for reportedly changing market index rules to allow faster inclusion, potentially funneling trillions in passive retirement funds into its stock, despite its unproven space-based data center business model. In contrast, Anthropic demonstrates explosive growth, with ARR reportedly hitting $45 billion and approaching profitability, fueled by strong enterprise adoption of products like Claude Code. Google's separate $80 billion raise highlights the immense capital pressure, even for giants. The discussion acknowledges bubble risks but leans optimistic. The hosts contend the massive spending is building essential physical infrastructure for the next technological era. A key bottleneck isn't capital but the real-world limits of chip manufacturing and construction speed. As long as demand for AI compute outstrips supply, this investment cycle represents a foundational build-out rather than a purely financial bubble. All three companies are seen as foundational bets on the future, with Anthropic often cited as the most immediately compelling due to its proven revenue trajectory.

marsbitHá 1h

SpaceX, OpenAI, Anthropic: The Three AI Giants Racing for IPO, Which One Is Worth Betting On?

marsbitHá 1h

From 'Old Guys' to 'New Favorites': How AI Is Revaluing Old Infrastructure from Dell to Nokia?

From "Vintage Tech" to "New AI Darlings": How AI Revalues Old Infrastructure One year ago, tech giants like Dell, Nokia, Cisco, and Western Data were seen as slow-growth, low-valuation stories, far from the AI spotlight dominated by players like Nvidia. Now, these legacy tech stocks are gaining market attention, sparking debate on whether this is genuine industry revaluation or a temporary narrative. As AI moves from model parameters to real-world data centers, the market is recognizing companies with proven delivery and infrastructure capabilities. This shift marks a change in the AI investment thesis: from pure model and GPU focus to the complex systems engineering required for deployment. Companies like Dell, HPE, and Corning are being revalued not for being "sexy" AI innovators, but for their decades of accumulated expertise in supply chains, enterprise delivery, and infrastructure—assets that have become critical in the AI buildout phase. The revaluation is unfolding across three key infrastructure lines: 1. **Servers & System Integration:** Dell and HPE are emerging as crucial system integrators or "general contractors" for AI data centers, translating GPU orders into complete, deployable server racks integrated with power, cooling, and networking. 2. **Networking & Connectivity:** AI's scale demands robust high-speed connections. Corning (fiber optics), Nokia (AI-RAN, 6G), and Cisco (data center switches) are gaining importance for enabling efficient data transfer within and between AI clusters. 3. **Storage:** Beyond high-speed memory (HBM/DRAM), the AI data explosion is driving demand for high-capacity hard drives (HDDs) from companies like Western Digital and Seagate to handle training data, logs, and cold storage cost-effectively. For this revaluation to be substantive and not just a narrative, three criteria are key: 1) Concrete AI-related order and revenue growth (e.g., Dell's AI server sales), 2) Upward revisions to company financial guidance, and 3) Sustainable improvements in profit quality, not just top-line revenue spikes. In essence, AI's transition to a real construction phase is re-pricing "old assets" against "new demand." The opportunity, however, is selective. Only those legacy firms that are demonstrably integrated into the capital expenditure chains of data center and enterprise AI deployment are likely to experience a true "logic re-rating" rather than just a temporary valuation bounce.

marsbitHá 1h

From 'Old Guys' to 'New Favorites': How AI Is Revaluing Old Infrastructure from Dell to Nokia?

marsbitHá 1h

The Merger of Codex and ChatGPT Marks the Beginning of a Major Reshuffle in Programming Tools

OpenAI is shifting its strategic focus from ChatGPT to Codex, merging them along with the browser tool Atlas into a unified desktop super-app. This move signals an internal belief that Codex, originally a programming tool, represents the next evolution of AI more than conversational models like ChatGPT. Over the past year, Codex's weekly active users have surged past 5 million. The key distinction is that while ChatGPT answers questions, Codex executes tasks. Enterprises increasingly value this ability to get work done over simply receiving advice. Consequently, Codex is attracting professionals beyond developers, including analysts, bankers, marketers, and product managers. OpenAI's reorganization and increased investment in Codex stem from recognizing that the future of AI competition lies in execution capabilities, not just conversation. The company is launching role-specific plugins (e.g., for data analysis, sales, design) to transform Codex into a broad knowledge work platform that automates and redefines white-collar workflows. Beyond being a tool, Codex reflects OpenAI's ambition to redefine software. New features like "Sites"—which generates interactive websites from documents—and collaborative "Annotations" aim to create a paradigm where the AI understands the goal and handles the tools and steps, functioning more like a digital colleague than traditional software. The ultimate goal is a unified experience where the user cares only about the completed task.

marsbitHá 2h

The Merger of Codex and ChatGPT Marks the Beginning of a Major Reshuffle in Programming Tools

marsbitHá 2h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片