市场状态分析:我们正处于牛市的哪个阶段?

链捕手Publicado em 2024-09-27Última atualização em 2024-09-27

原标题:《Where are we in the cycle?》

作者:The DeFi Investor

编译:深潮TechFlow

 

在今天的文章中我们将讨论:

  • 我们目前处于周期的哪个阶段?

  • 链上数据分析

我们在周期的哪个阶段?

如果你看过我最近的 X 帖子,你已经知道我对第四季度的加密市场持乐观态度。

但在本期中,我将详细说明我认为我们在这个加密周期中的确切位置,并解释我为何对近期的未来保持乐观。

总结:有很多理由让人感到兴奋。

让我们先从一些我认为相关的加密图表开始。

BTC 周期 ROI(Cycle ROI)正好处于这个周期阶段通常的位置。

来源: @intocryptoverse

这个市场周期的 BTC 表现与 2016 年和 2020 年的牛市非常相似。

金融市场往往是周期性的,因为人性是恒定的。这就是为什么 BTC 已经达到顶峰的可能性似乎不大。

过去的两个牛市有两个共同点:

  • 真正的 BTC 上涨趋势大约在比特币减半(Bitcoin Halving)后 170-180 天开始

  • BTC 周期顶部大约在比特币减半后 480 天达到

cryptoquant.com

自 2024 年比特币减半(BTC Halving)事件以来,仅仅过去了 160 天。

根据过去的情况,我们现在很可能距离 BTC 恢复上涨趋势的时刻只有几周。

显然,这假设历史会重演,但我看不出这次会有什么重大原因导致情况有所不同。

BTC 交易所储备(Exchange Reserve)以极快的速度下降。

自 2024 年 1 月以来,已有超过 50 万 BTC 被提取出交易所。

当大户从交易所提取他们的 Token 时,通常意味着他们计划将其持有一段时间,而不是在近期出售。

上面的图表似乎显示大户在过去几个月中大量积累了 BTC。

如果这种积累继续下去,供应紧缩将是不可避免的。

比特币季节(Bitcoin Season)历史上是每个新周期的第一阶段。

上面图片中的信息图是在多年前制作的,但很好地总结了 2016 年和 2020 年周期所发生的事情。

  1. 首先,BTC 开始上涨,其市场主导地位也随之提升。

  2. 然后,注意力开始转向大盘币(如 ETH、SOL 等)。

  3. 最后,几乎每个山寨币都开始上涨,无论其市值或基本面如何都开始上涨。

最近,BTC 的市场主导地位达到了新的多年高点。

这可能表明我们现在仍处于第一阶段。历史上,山寨季(altseason)通常在 BTC 市场主导地位开始下降后才会开始。我认为我们正接近第二阶段。

上述所有图表和之前牛市周期的历史数据让我认为 BTC 很可能会在第四季度创下新的历史高点。

那么,有没有出错的可能呢?

让我们简要讨论一下熊市的可能性。

目前仍然存在许多宏观不确定性(macro uncertainty)。

如果全球经济衰退开始,数字货币将受到很大影响。

然而,我认为近期发生衰退的可能性不大,原因是 2024 年是美国的选举年。

为了让卡马拉·哈里斯有机会赢得美国总统大选,民主党将竭尽所能地推迟选举。

虽然我认为美国经济衰退(recession)可能在未来 3-4 年的某个时候开始,但我认为它在 2024 年发生的可能性非常小。

因此,我对第四季度的加密货币持乐观态度。

希望我们的信念和耐心很快会得到回报。

链上动态

Sui 的总锁仓价值(Total Value Locked,TVL)首次超过了 Polygon。

Sui 是增长速度最快的区块链之一,它是一种 L1 区块链(Layer 1 blockchain),利用并行交易执行来实现高交易吞吐量。

最近在大多数指标上激增的原因似乎有两个关键因素:其非常强大的社区和在 X 上日益增长的流行度。

除此之外,它的团队还与多家 Web2 和 Web3 巨头达成了一些重要合作,包括 Circle 和 TikTok 的母公司。

Leituras Relacionadas

MSTR Discloses Sale of 3,588 Bitcoins, Stock Price Drops Over 5% at One Point During Trading

MicroStrategy, the world's largest corporate holder of Bitcoin, has significantly shifted its business model. Between June 29 and July 5, the company sold 3,588 bitcoins for approximately $216 million to fund quarterly dividends for its preferred stock. This marks its largest-ever Bitcoin sale and signals a strategic pivot: Bitcoin is transitioning from a "buy-and-hold" reserve asset to a liquidity management tool for the company. This move follows a recent authorization allowing Bitcoin sales when equity fundraising is less attractive. The announcement contributed to a more than 5% intraday drop in MicroStrategy's stock price, while Bitcoin fell to around $61,800—below the company's average holding cost of roughly $75,700. The sale represents a major departure from MicroStrategy's long-standing "never sell" commitment, which saw its first minor breach in May with a $2.5 million sale. The latest, hundred-times-larger transaction underscores growing financial pressures. Analysts note the company faces about $1.5 billion in annual preferred dividend obligations, far exceeding cash flow from its software business. As of July 5, MicroStrategy holds 843,775 bitcoins. Its current operational logic involves buying Bitcoin during favorable financing conditions and selling portions to cover dividends when needed, creating a flexible capital management cycle amidst a challenging market environment.

华尔街日报Há 4h

MSTR Discloses Sale of 3,588 Bitcoins, Stock Price Drops Over 5% at One Point During Trading

华尔街日报Há 4h

Q-Day Countdown: Will Quantum Computing End Cryptocurrencies?

Quantum Computing's Threat to Cryptocurrency: A Countdown to Q-Day Quantum computing, specifically Shor's algorithm, poses a fundamental threat to the public-key cryptography (e.g., ECDSA, RSA) that secures blockchain networks like Bitcoin and Ethereum. This critical juncture, known as Q-Day, is estimated to occur potentially within the next 5-15 years. The core vulnerability stems from the public and immutable nature of blockchains. Assets in addresses where the public key is already exposed on-chain (e.g., spent outputs) are at direct risk, as a sufficiently powerful quantum computer could derive the private key. This threatens the very trust model of cryptocurrencies. The response lies in Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC)—algorithms like lattice-based ML-DSA and hash-based SLH-DSA, which are resistant to quantum attacks. NIST has standardized key PQC algorithms (FIPS 203, 204, 205), providing a migration path. However, the primary challenge is not technical but socio-economic and involves complex governance: * **Bitcoin's** path is constrained by its conservative ethos. Migrating requires a soft-fork to new address types, facing hurdles like significantly larger signature sizes and, most critically, the divisive governance question of how to handle at-risk legacy UTXOs without violating core principles. * **Ethereum** is pursuing a "cryptographic agility" strategy, with a multi-layered roadmap. It leverages account abstraction for user accounts and is developing compressed hash-based signatures (e.g., leanXMSS) for its consensus layer, aiming for a full-stack upgrade over time. In conclusion, quantum computing does not spell an instant end for cryptocurrency but initiates a critical countdown. The industry has a limited "engineering comfort window" to orchestrate a coordinated, ecosystem-wide migration to PQC. The ultimate bottlenecks are the immense coordination efforts and governance decisions required for this foundational transition.

marsbitHá 5h

Q-Day Countdown: Will Quantum Computing End Cryptocurrencies?

marsbitHá 5h

Trump, the President Who Knows Best How to 'Trade Stocks'

Former US President Donald Trump reported a record-breaking $2.2 billion in personal income for 2025, the highest annual income ever disclosed by a sitting president. This figure, from a 927-page government ethics filing, represented a 3.5-fold increase from his $600 million income in 2024 and boosted his net worth to $6.5 billion. The primary drivers were cryptocurrency (64% of income, approximately $1.4 billion) and real estate (26%, approximately $575 million). His crypto earnings stemmed largely from the launch of his personal meme coin, $TRUMP, generating over $600 million in licensing fees, and substantial profits from the WLFI token and its parent company. Despite a sluggish property market, his Mar-a-Lago resort and associated golf clubs saw revenue surges of 50% and 27%, respectively, attributed to their use as venues for presidential events. Trump's financial disclosure also revealed an unprecedented level of stock market activity, with over 22,000 trades executed in 2025, averaging 87 trades per market day. Media analyses noted several instances where significant trading coincided with major policy announcements, such as proposed tariffs, raising questions about potential conflicts of interest. While the White House stated these trades were handled by a family-managed trust fund and not Trump directly, critics highlighted this as a departure from the blind trusts traditionally used by presidents post-Watergate. The report has intensified debate over the commercialization of the presidency. Supporters view it as a success story of a businessman-president, while critics argue it demonstrates an unprecedented conversion of public influence into private wealth, with policy decisions potentially linked to personal financial gains. The controversy centers on whether Trump's earnings represent innovative entrepreneurship or a fundamental conflict of interest, sparking renewed calls for stricter ethics reforms in US governance.

marsbitHá 5h

Trump, the President Who Knows Best How to 'Trade Stocks'

marsbitHá 5h

Countdown to Q-Day: Will Quantum Computing End Cryptocurrencies?

The article explores the existential threat quantum computing poses to cryptocurrencies and the urgent need for "post-quantum" migration. It outlines that quantum computers, through Shor's algorithm, could break the elliptic-curve cryptography (ECC) underlying blockchain security, potentially allowing private keys to be derived from public keys. The core challenge is not a lack of post-quantum cryptography (PQC) standards—like NIST's ML-KEM and ML-DSA—but the immense complexity of upgrading entire ecosystems before "Q-Day" (when quantum computers become capable of such attacks, estimated around 2035-2045). Key points include: * **Bitcoin's** risk is concentrated in legacy UTXOs with exposed public keys (e.g., early P2PK outputs). Migration faces massive hurdles: PQC signatures are much larger, increasing transaction size and cost, and the governance dilemma of handling un-migrated assets threatens its "code is law" ethos. * **Ethereum's** strategy focuses on "cryptographic agility," using Account Abstraction for user accounts and developing compressed hash-based signatures (like leanXMSS with SNARK aggregation) for consensus. Its migration is a complex, full-stack overhaul of execution, consensus, and data layers. * The "security debt" is enormous. The comfortable engineering window for a coordinated, ecosystem-wide upgrade is only 5-8 years. High-value infrastructure (exchanges, bridges) may face pressure before mainnet protocols. In conclusion, quantum computing is not an instant "doomsday" event but a forcing function for systemic change. Bitcoin's ultimate test is social consensus and property rights governance, while Ethereum's is technical complexity. Failure to migrate in time could lead to a fundamental re-pricing of crypto assets.

链捕手Há 5h

Countdown to Q-Day: Will Quantum Computing End Cryptocurrencies?

链捕手Há 5h

Trading

Spot
活动图片