哈里斯80页经济政策再提「数字资产」,加密选民仍更青睐特朗普?

Odaily星球日报Publicado em 2024-09-26Última atualização em 2024-09-26

Resumo

加密社区对哈里斯首次打破沉默提及“数字资产”这一举动褒贬不一,部分认为其立场缺乏具体细节。

原文作者:Weilin,PANews

哈里斯80页经济政策再提「数字资产」,加密选民仍更青睐特朗普?

当地时间 9 月 25 日,美国副总统哈里斯在匹兹堡经济俱乐部发表演讲时表示,美国将“重新致力于”在决定下个世纪的技术领域的全球领导地位,“在人工智能和量子计算、区块链和其他新兴技术领域保持主导地位”。此外,她在官网发表的长达 80 页的经济计划中再提“数字资产”。

3 天前,哈里斯在纽约市的华尔街筹款活动上发表讲话,打破一贯的沉默,称她将“鼓励人工智能和数字资产等创新技术,同时保护消费者和投资者”。

加密社区对哈里斯首次打破沉默提及“数字资产”这一举动褒贬不一,部分认为其立场缺乏具体细节。尽管如此,在纽约的这场筹款活动上,哈里斯筹得资金 2700 万美元,突破了个人总统竞选筹款纪录。但民调显示,她在加密货币持有者中支持率仍明显落后于特朗普。

打破沉默,哈里斯 80 页经济政策再提“数字资产”

9 月 25 日,哈里斯在匹兹堡经济俱乐部发表演讲后,她的团队在官方网站上公布了这份经济计划。在这份长达 80 页的计划的第 56 页,她再次提到“数字资产”,并将其与人工智能并列——这一表述与她在上周末(当地时间 9 月 22 日)纽约筹款活动中的声明一致。

哈里斯80页经济政策再提「数字资产」,加密选民仍更青睐特朗普?

哈里斯与沃尔兹的经济计划名为《为中产阶级开辟新道路:降低成本与创造机会经济的计划》(A New Way Forward for the Middle Class: A Plan to Lower Costs and Create an Opportunity Economy)。在这份计划的中段,民主党搭档概述了他们将如何“增强美国在对经济和国家安全至关重要的领域的竞争优势”。

二人在计划中提出了一项“美国前进战略”(America Forward strategy),旨在通过促进制造业增长及新技术应用,开启美国工业发展的新纪元。该战略不仅聚焦于“清洁铁和钢”,还关注他们认为对保持美国全球技术竞争力至关重要的“新兴技术”。

“该战略包括对新兴技术的投资以及对传统产业的现代化改造。它还将鼓励人工智能和数字资产等创新技术的发展,同时保护我们的消费者和投资者,”该计划提到。

在上周末之前,哈里斯在竞选过程中一直对加密货币保持沉默。9 月 22 日,她在曼哈顿的华尔街筹款活动上首次谈及数字资产,她表示:“我们将鼓励人工智能和数字资产等创新技术的发展,同时保护消费者和投资者。我们将创造一个安全的商业环境,并制定一致、透明的规则。”

加密社区反应不一,特朗普抢占先机?

细数哈里斯的对手、前总统特朗普的近期“加密行动”,他高调宣布支持加密货币和比特币。7 月,他参加了比特币大会,提出了美国比特币战略储备计划,并随后推出了第三系列的 NFT。此外,他还现身比特币酒吧购买汉堡,并为其儿子的 DeFi 项目 World Liberty Financial 宣传造势。这一系列举动进一步加深了他在加密社区中的影响力。

对于一些加密社区成员来说,这种对比十分明显。加密社区对哈里斯的立场给出了不同的反馈。“现实是,我们没有听到任何关于(哈里斯)如何提供具体支持的细节,”去中心化电信网络 Chirp 的首席执行官 Tim Kravchunovsky 表示。他指出,特朗普已经明确列出了自己的加密政策,例如创建战略比特币储备,尽管一些分析师认为这一设想为时已晚。“我希望能够听到哈里斯竞选团队更多具体的政策信息,”Kravchunovsky 补充道。

Ripple 支付部门的高级软件工程师 Neil Hartner 也有类似看法,他认为哈里斯-沃尔兹经济计划中对数字资产的描述“过于模糊”。

哈里斯80页经济政策再提「数字资产」,加密选民仍更青睐特朗普?

另一方面,部分加密货币倡导者认为,哈里斯在新兴技术方面的立场已经取得了进展。分析师 Adam Cochran 表示,尽管反对者对哈里斯的沉默和“模糊态度”感到不满,但目前的情况仍然代表着一种进步。

哈里斯80页经济政策再提「数字资产」,加密选民仍更青睐特朗普?

民调结果显示加密选民更青睐特朗普

根据费尔利迪金森大学在 8 月 17 日至 20 日进行的全国民调结果,整体上支持哈里斯的选民占比 50% ,支持特朗普的为 43% 。但是,在拥有加密货币的潜在选民中,特朗普领先 12 个百分点(50% 对 38% ),而在声称不拥有加密货币的选民中,哈里斯则领先 12 个百分点(53% 对 41% )。

哈里斯80页经济政策再提「数字资产」,加密选民仍更青睐特朗普?

此次民调中, 15% 的受访者表示他们拥有或曾经拥有加密货币、NFT 或类似的数字产品。80% 的选民表示他们没有拥有过任何此类资产, 4% 表示对这些东西一无所知。在加密货币持有者中,男性的比例显著高于女性(22% 对 9% ),并且这些男性往往是年轻选民,属于种族少数群体。

目前来看,哈里斯和沃尔兹是否会在接下来的竞选活动中更详细地阐述他们在区块链、数字资产,尤其是加密货币方面的政策还有待观察。但距离选举仅剩不到两个月时间,大多数加密选民都希望能听到明确且有针对性的立场。

根据哈里斯竞选团队的说法,上周日下午在纽约市的这场筹款活动为哈里斯筹集了 2700 万美元,创下了她自成为民主党总统候选人以来最高的筹款记录。而在筹款方面,特朗普则大幅落后于哈里斯。据邀请函显示,他最近安排了几场高额筹款活动,包括 10 月 2 日在得克萨斯州的两场活动,以及 10 月 16 日在佛罗里达州棕榈滩海湖庄园的活动。

原文链接

Leituras Relacionadas

A Trillion-Dollar Frenzy for Memory Sellers, Halved Profits for Memory Buyers

Summary: A stark divide has emerged in the tech industry. While memory chipmaker Micron's stock soared 19% in a single day, pushing its market cap over $1 trillion, smartphone manufacturer Xiaomi reported a 43% plunge in adjusted net profit. The core driver is a severe supply crunch in memory chips, particularly for AI applications. Wall Street analysts, led by UBS and its unprecedented 204% target price hike for Micron, argue that long-term agreements (LTAs) from AI cloud giants are fundamentally ending the sector's notorious boom-and-bust cycles, justifying a re-rating from cyclical to infrastructure-like valuations. However, the "storage" market is now fragmented into three tiers. The first, AI-grade memory like HBM and server DDR5, faces extreme shortages and soaring prices driven by massive cloud capex. The second, mobile memory for smartphones, is also seeing sharp price hikes as manufacturers like Xiaomi are forced to pay more for remaining capacity, severely squeezing their margins. The third, PC retail channels, shows price declines due to existing inventory. The article questions the sustainability of the "supercycle" narrative. It highlights that Micron's revenue surge is driven almost entirely by price increases, not shipment volumes, making it vulnerable to a potential demand slowdown. While LTAs may dampen volatility, history suggests they are often tested during downturns. The current peak earnings, used to justify high valuations, represent a classic cyclical top. The piece concludes with a note of caution: when the entire Street chants "this time is different," it's wise to remember past bubbles, even as it acknowledges AI demand may indeed be structural.

marsbitHá 1h

A Trillion-Dollar Frenzy for Memory Sellers, Halved Profits for Memory Buyers

marsbitHá 1h

This New Generation of US Stock Trading Gods No Longer Read Financial Reports

The new generation of "stock gods" in the 2026 US AI bull market are not analyzing traditional financial reports. Instead of focusing on giants like NVIDIA, figures like the 22-year-old Leopold Aschenbrenner (who reportedly turned $200M into $14B) and influencers like Serenity on platforms like Reddit's WallStreetBets, X, and Substack are gaining fame and returns by targeting obscure, low-cap "micro-cap" stocks. Their strategy, dubbed "supply chain sniping," involves identifying critical, often monopolistic, bottlenecks in the AI hardware supply chain—such as specific materials or components essential for giants like Google and NVIDIA—that are missed by mainstream Wall Street analysts. Serenity's call on AXTI, a $700M company supplying indium phosphide substrates crucial for photonics and optical interconnects, saw the stock soar from ~$12 to nearly $150. Similarly, accounts like KawzInvests and PhotonCap focus on thematic, supply-chain-driven research in areas like AI infrastructure, optics, and cloud services for SMEs, bypassing traditional valuation metrics. This shift represents a cultural move away from Warren Buffett-style value investing based on deep financial statement analysis. The new approach thrives on low liquidity, early narratives, and strong community propagation on social media, similar to meme stocks or crypto. However, this "attention economy" strategy carries risks: it depends on sustained information gaps, the underlying companies' ability to deliver fundamental results, and the potential for crowded, volatile exits as narratives shift. The trend also shows crypto traders applying their narrative-sensing skills to US micro-caps, marking a significant evolution in trading culture.

marsbitHá 1h

This New Generation of US Stock Trading Gods No Longer Read Financial Reports

marsbitHá 1h

Trillion-Dollar Euphoria for Memory Sellers, Halved Profits for Memory Buyers

Title: The Trillion-Dollar Memory Seller's Carnival vs. The Buyer's Halved Profits On May 26, a stark contrast unfolded. While memory chipmaker Micron's market cap surged past $1 trillion, smartphone maker Xiaomi reported plummeting profits. Xiaomi's Q1 2026 profits fell 43% year-on-year. Executive Lu Weibing cited memory prices quadrupling from last year, adding roughly $210 to a phone's cost. To survive, Xiaomi is cutting entry-level models, sacrificing volume. Micron's stock, however, skyrocketed over 19% in a day, capping an 8x gain in a year. Major banks like UBS and JPMorgan issued bullish reports, raising price targets drastically. Their core thesis: Long-Term Agreements (LTAs) with AI cloud giants (Microsoft, Google, etc.) are eliminating the memory industry's notorious boom-bust cycle. By locking in fixed-price, multi-year contracts for AI-grade memory (HBM, server DDR5), these deals promise stable, utility-like earnings, justifying a higher valuation (20-30x P/E vs. the historical 8-15x). The article reveals a three-tiered memory market in 2026: 1) **AI Storage (HBM/DDR5/Enterprise SSD)**: Extreme shortage, soaring prices, LTAs. This is Micron's story. 2) **Mobile/Embedded Memory**: Also facing sharp price hikes as AI production crowds out capacity, severely pressuring phone makers like Xiaomi. 3) **PC Retail**: Some spot prices are falling due to channel inventory liquidation, creating a divergence from contract markets. The author questions if LTAs truly end the cycle. It hinges on sustained, hyper-growth AI demand. Micron's current profits are at a cycle peak, driven mostly by price hikes, not volume. If AI capital expenditure growth slows, the massive industry capacity expansion (e.g., Micron's $250B+ CapEx plan) could lead to a glut. Historically, using peak-cycle earnings for valuation is a classic trap. While the AI-driven structural shift might be real, the unanimous Wall Street euphoria warrants caution, echoing past bubbles like Cisco's in 2000. The memory seller's trillion-dollar狂欢 (carnival) continues, but the cycle's shadow remains.

链捕手Há 1h

Trillion-Dollar Euphoria for Memory Sellers, Halved Profits for Memory Buyers

链捕手Há 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片