Crypto Market In Jeopardy? Rising Stablecoins Dominance Signals Instability

bitcoinistPublicado em 2024-09-13Última atualização em 2024-09-13

Resumo

The general cryptocurrency market has been quite unpleasant as major crypto assets have seen extended negative trends, fueling uncertainty within...

The general cryptocurrency market has been quite unpleasant as major crypto assets have seen extended negative trends, fueling uncertainty within the sector. With the recent upsurge in the stablecoins dominance, which is considered a negative sign for cryptocurrencies, the broader ecosystem could be poised for additional pessimistic behavior.

Stablecoin Dominance Growth Poses Risk To Cryptocurrencies

Recent reports from Alphractal, an advanced platform for investment data analysis, show that the dominance of stablecoins is increasing rapidly amidst price fluctuations. Historically, a drop in stablecoin dominance is a bullish indication for cryptocurrencies, as observed from late 2022 to early 2024, while an increase in dominance is a definite signal of a bearish trend.

As market volatility persists, investors appear to be turning to stablecoins in greater numbers, hoping to elude the uncertainty that is affecting larger assets like Ethereum and Bitcoin. This change implies that institutional and retail investors are losing confidence in the current market condition.

According to the platform, the overall market cap of stablecoins is currently over $170 million, indicating 8.62% of the entire cryptocurrency market with Tether (USDT) leading the charge with $118 billion, which represents about 69.6% of all stablecoins market.

In the absence of the USDT and USDC coins, Alphractal noted that the total market cap of stablecoins will decrease significantly. The decline shows that the constant issuance of these two major coins, especially USDT on the TRON blockchain, has been the main driver of the stablecoin market’s growth in the last two years.

Crypto
Rising stablecoin dominance sparks bearish trend for cryptocurrencies | Source: Alphractal on X

Furthermore, the platform highlighted that the stablecoins’ 30-day market cao is another notable factor to watch out for. While an increase in this aspect frequently indicates bullishness in the long term, a decline has historically had a negative impact on the crypto market, drawing attention to a previous incident in 2021.

Alphractal mentioned that in 2021, stablecoins saw a substantial spike, followed by a decline, signaling the start of the crypto bear market. Meanwhile, in 2024, two similar but lesser peaks occurred, which could account for Bitcoin’s lengthy sideways trend since the start of the year.

With the market waning, the platform believes since stablecoins directly affect liquidity and prices they are worth exploring, and understanding their fluctuations can aid in risk management and provide clear trend indications.

Social Media Market Sentiment Is Bearish

Alphractal also revealed in another research a worrying trend about the market on social media platforms and the news. According to the platform, traders’ and technical indicators’ sentiment about the crypto market at present is neutral, indicating a balance or uncertainty.

However, the average sentiment in the news and on the X (formerly Twitter) platform is still bearish. This decline implies a growing pessimism among enthusiasts as conversations regarding the market are constantly dropping on social media platforms.

Crypto
Overall crypto market cap at $1.995 trillion | Source: TOTAL on Tradingview.com
Featured image from Unsplash, chart from Tradingview.com
Godspower Owie

Godspower Owie

Godspower Owie is my name, and I work for the news platforms NewsBTC and Bitcoinist. I sometimes like to think of myself as an explorer since I enjoy exploring new places, learning new things, especially valuable ones, and meeting new people who have an impact on my life, no matter how small. I value my family, friends, career, and time. Really, those are most likely the most significant aspects of every person's existence. Not illusions, but dreams are what I pursue.

Leituras Relacionadas

Continuous Net Outflows from ETFs, Are Institutions Exiting?

US spot Bitcoin ETFs have experienced approximately $6 billion in net outflows over the past six weeks, marking the longest consecutive weekly withdrawal streak since their launch in 2024. The iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) from BlackRock has been particularly affected, accounting for over 70% of recent outflows. On-chain analysis indicates that long-term Bitcoin holders (holding for over 155 days), who control about 83% of the circulating supply, remain steadfast. The selling pressure is primarily coming from allocators who entered through ETF brokerage accounts. This represents the first major collective capitulation since Bitcoin gained mainstream Wall Street recognition, driven more by risk-off portfolio adjustments than a fundamental rejection of the asset. Factors such as rising inflation, a hawkish shift in Federal Reserve policy, massive capital inflows into AI infrastructure, and attractive IPO opportunities have redirected speculative funds. Bitcoin, treated as a high-beta risk asset, was among the first to be sold. While the pace of outflows has slowed significantly—from $1.72 billion in early June to $226.8 million mid-month—the structural issue remains. IBIT's large size means its outflows alone exert substantial market pressure. With spot market volume thin, new capital inflows absent, and ETF buying muted, the market lacks sufficient buying support to absorb this selling. The coming sessions are critical. If IBIT outflows decelerate and Bitcoin reclaims $60,000, this phase could be seen as a healthy reset. However, if heavy IBIT redemptions resume and the price falls below $58,000, it would signal a more sustained institutional exit, requiring non-ETF buyers to shoulder the entire selling pressure alone. The ETF, while lowering entry barriers, has not removed Bitcoin's inherent volatility.

marsbitHá 8m

Continuous Net Outflows from ETFs, Are Institutions Exiting?

marsbitHá 8m

Introduction to the Concept of World Models: A Story from Psychology to the Main Battlefield of AI

**World Models: From Psychology to AI's Core Concept** "World model" is a trending but often confusing term in AI, describing a system that allows machines to internally simulate, predict, and rehearse potential outcomes before taking real-world action—like a mental "sandbox." While definitions vary—Yann LeCun emphasizes physical understanding, OpenAI's Sora is a video-based "world simulator," Google DeepMind's Genie 3 creates interactive 3D environments, and companies like Alibaba and Tesla focus on practical applications—the core goal is consistent: reduce reliance on vast real-world data by creating an internal, predictive model for safer and more efficient AI. The concept has deep roots, tracing back to psychologist Kenneth Craik (1943). In AI, it was revitalized by researchers like David Ha and Jürgen Schmidhuber (2018). Major technical approaches include: 1) generative video models (e.g., Sora) for visual realism; 2) abstract predictive models (e.g., LeCun's JEPA) for efficiency and physical reasoning; and 3) explicit 3D simulators (e.g., NVIDIA Omniverse) for precision. Fei-Fei Li proposes a classification based on the AI action loop: renderers (output observations), simulators (output world states), and planners (output actions). The emerging "World Action Model" (WAM) paradigm aims to unify future prediction and action generation. An industry framework is forming: upstream (data, compute, sensors), midstream (general and vertical platforms), and downstream applications (autonomous driving, robotics, gaming, etc.). Autonomous driving is currently the most mature use case. The current lack of a unified definition reflects the field's early, dynamic stage, similar to past tech revolutions. Different approaches—focusing on pixels, physics, or behavior—represent parallel explorations of how best to compress and understand the world. This diversity, while seemingly chaotic, signals that world models have moved from an academic idea to a critical industrial battleground, ultimately aiming to give machines the ability to understand, imagine, and reason about the world.

marsbitHá 33m

Introduction to the Concept of World Models: A Story from Psychology to the Main Battlefield of AI

marsbitHá 33m

Building the Bright Path While Secretly Crossing Chencang: Is Walsh Paving the Way for a September "Rate Cut"?

The title "Building the Plank Road Openly While Secretly Crossing at Chencang: Is Walsh Paving the Way for a September 'Rate Cut'?" suggests Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Walsh's hawkish stance may be a deliberate smokescreen. Academy Securities analyst Peter Tchir argues in a report that markets, currently pricing a 75% chance of a September hike, are missing a potential path to a September rate cut that Walsh himself might be quietly preparing. Tchir posits that Walsh's hawkish rhetoric aims to suppress long-term yield risks (with the 10-year Treasury yield falling recently) while creating room for a narrative shift based on upcoming data. The potential political endgame, according to this view, could be rate cuts in September and October, ahead of the midterm elections. This hinges on a political logic where the Trump administration's preference for lower rates remains unchanged. A core part of Tchir's argument involves redefining inflation metrics. He contends the Fed under Walsh may deprioritize the PCE index, criticizing its lagging components like Owners' Equivalent Rent (OER). Instead, he points to alternative, more real-time indicators like the New Tenant Repeat Rent Index (NTRR) and the Truflation daily index, which shows core inflation around 1.45%. He suggests the Fed could shift its data narrative to justify policy easing. Furthermore, Tchir downplays AI-driven inflation fears. He argues that consumer price sensitivity, evidenced by negative market reactions to price hikes (e.g., Apple), contradicts persistent inflation narratives. He also separates AI/data center spending—which he sees as relatively rate-insensitive—from broader consumer affordability issues, implying rate hikes are misdirected. Based on this analysis, Tchir sees a re-pricing of rate cut expectations as likely, creating opportunities in short-duration Treasuries. He maintains a neutral-to-slightly-bullish view on the long end of the yield curve. For equities, he recommends a significant overweight in energy (especially global nuclear assets) and, within defense/security themes, an overweight in biotech/pharma versus an underweight in semiconductors, expressing caution on AI/data center valuations.

marsbitHá 59m

Building the Bright Path While Secretly Crossing Chencang: Is Walsh Paving the Way for a September "Rate Cut"?

marsbitHá 59m

Trading

Spot
活动图片