Ripple’s Legal Battle With SEC Continues – Here Are The Facts

bitcoinistPublicado em 2024-09-08Última atualização em 2024-09-08

Resumo

The long-running legal battle between Ripple and the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has yet to be concluded despite...

The long-running legal battle between Ripple and the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has yet to be concluded despite Judge Analisa Torres’ August 7 ruling, which appeared to have ended the case. This follows a recent development showing that the SEC is still considering appealing the court’s ruling. 

Ripple Requests Stay On Monetary Judgement

Ripple recently filed a letter requesting a stay on the court’s monetary judgment awarded against the crypto firm in favor of the Commission. In her judgment delivered on August 7, Torres ruled that Ripple should pay the SEC a fine of $125 million for violating securities laws. 

Ripple was meant to have paid the SEC by September 6. However, the stay request, which Judge Torres granted, showed Ripple would no longer have to pay the $125 million to the SEC until 30 days after the expiration of the time allowed for an appeal with no appeal filed or after a decision by the Court of Appeals resolving any potential appeal.

This suggests that the SEC, which consented to the stay request even before Judge Torres granted it, is still considering appealing the case. As explained by legal expert Fred Rispoli, the Commission likely agreed to this request as they could pay Ripple an interest on the monetary judgment if the crypto firm were to pay now, and the SEC ended up appealing and losing the appeal. 

XRP is currently trading at $0.52. Chart: TradingView

As such, the Commission is content for Ripple to keep the funds in trust while they weigh their options on whether to appeal Judge Torres’ ruling, especially the one in which she declared that XRP wasn’t a security in itself. Rispoli also increased the likelihood of an SEC appeal to 60% following the stay request put forward by Ripple. 

The Commission will have until October 6 to decide on whether to file an appeal. Ripple, on its part, has long made it clear through its CEO, Brad Garlinghouse, and Chief Legal Officer (CLO) Stuart Alderoty that it has no intention to file an appeal as they see the court’s ruling as a victory in their search for legal clarity.  

Ripple Looks To Lobby For More Favorable Conditions For Crypto

Ripple’s legal battle against the SEC seems to have pushed the crypto firm to lobby for more favorable conditions for the crypto industry as it seeks to end the Commission’s enforcement actions against crypto firms. Bitcoinist recently reported that Ripple’s co-founder Chris Larsen was one of 88 corporate leaders who signed a letter endorsing Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris. 

Meanwhile, Alderoty had earlier shown support for Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump, donating $300,000 to the former US president’s campaign. Alderoty is believed to have donated because Trump has adopted a pro-crypto stance. Interestingly, Trump has also promised to fire SEC Chair Gary Gensler on his first day in office if elected. Gensler has overseen the Commission’s legal battle against Ripple and is known for his anti-crypto stance. 

Featured image from The New York Times, chart from TradingView

Scott Matherson

Scott Matherson

Scott Matherson is a leading crypto writer at Bitcoinist, who possesses a sharp analytical mind and a deep understanding of the digital currency landscape. Scott has earned a reputation for delivering thought-provoking and well-researched articles that resonate with both newcomers and seasoned crypto enthusiasts. Outside of his writing, Scott is passionate about promoting crypto literacy and often works to educate the public on the potential of blockchain.

Leituras Relacionadas

2028: The Arrival of Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI)

**AI Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI): The Countdown to 2028 Begins** AI is no longer just a trained tool but is starting to rewrite its own evolutionary pace. According to Anthropic co-founder Jack Clark, there is a 60% probability that by the end of 2028, Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI) will become a reality. This means AI could autonomously design and build a more capable next-generation version of itself without any human researcher involvement—Claude 10 creating Claude 11, for instance. Supporting this timeline, Google DeepMind's CEO Demis Hassabis confirms that all leading AI labs are intensely focused on RSI, making it an industry-wide priority. He expresses profound concern, stating this potential is what keeps him awake at night. Concrete data underscores this acceleration: - METR evaluations show current top models like Claude are solving tasks up to the 16-hour limit of existing test frameworks. - In Epoch AI's challenging MirrorCode benchmark, Claude Opus 4.7 recreated complex software in hours for a fraction of the human cost. In one extreme test, AI autonomously coded for 19 days straight. - Anthropic reports over 80% of its codebase is now written by Claude, and researcher productivity has increased up to 8-fold since 2024. - OpenAI's policy blueprint highlights RSI as a major upcoming governance challenge. CEO Sam Altman reportedly hinted RSI might arrive within six months, potentially delaying OpenAI's massive IPO. The implication is an impending "intelligence explosion," where AI-driven progress outpaces human control. The central question is no longer if it will happen, but whether humanity is ready.

marsbitHá 1h

2028: The Arrival of Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI)

marsbitHá 1h

World Models, Metaverse, Digital Twins, Physical AI: Are They the Same Thing?

Title: World Models, the Metaverse, Digital Twins, Physical AI: Are They the Same Thing? The article clarifies that concepts like the metaverse, Web3, simulation platforms, digital twins, and Physical AI are not the same thing but are all part of the broader trend of blurring the lines between the digital and physical worlds. It positions "world models" as the foundational "cognitive layer" or "operating system" that enables AI to understand and simulate the world. Key distinctions are made: - The **Metaverse** is a destination for immersive social and economic experiences. World models could act as its "engine," generating interactive 3D content efficiently. - **Web3** focuses on decentralized ownership and economics (rules layer), operating on a different technical level than world models. - **Simulation Data Platforms** (e.g., for autonomous vehicles) are a 1.0 version, relying on manual design. World models represent a 2.0 version, using AI to generate realistic, varied scenarios autonomously. - **Digital Twins** create high-fidelity, real-time mirrors of physical systems (e.g., a factory). World models go a step further by enabling predictive simulation of future states. - **Physical AI** (robots, AVs) refers to AI that acts in the physical world. World models are a core component, providing the understanding and prediction needed for planning. A proposed hierarchy places world models at the cognitive layer, supported by infrastructure (compute, data) and supporting application tools (simulation, digital twins), action systems (Physical AI), user experiences (metaverse), and rules (Web3). In conclusion, while distinct, many of these previously hyped concepts may ultimately rely on advances in world model technology to fulfill their promises, as world models provide the essential cognitive foundation for simulating and interacting with complex environments.

marsbitHá 1h

World Models, Metaverse, Digital Twins, Physical AI: Are They the Same Thing?

marsbitHá 1h

"Shocking" CPO: How Does the Glass Bridge Actually Work? Detailed Explanation from Corning

Chinese CPO stocks plunged over 6% following Corning's announcement of its Glass Bridge platform at a Seoul tech conference. The new technology utilizes wafer-level glass ion-exchange waveguides for passive alignment between fibers and photonic chips, potentially simplifying traditional CPO architectures that rely on complex Fiber Array Units and active alignment equipment. This raised market concerns about reduced long-term demand for mid-stream CPO components. Corning's official documentation details Glass Bridge as a platform for fiber-to-PIC connectivity in NPO, CPO, and high-density modules. Its key features include wafer-level manufacturing for consistent, cost-effective production; a standardized, removable MT ferrule interface for ecosystem integration; and a separable high-density connector design supporting over 24 channels for assembly flexibility. Corning positions the technology as complementary to FAUs, addressing limitations in ultra-high-fiber-count scenarios. The market reaction reflects a broader reassessment of the AI optical interconnect value chain. Funds shifted from CPO and PCB manufacturing stocks towards glass substrate concept stocks like Kaisheng Technology and Dyer Laser. Analysts note glass substrates are seen as a next-gen advanced packaging material, offering a potential path for domestic industry differentiation amid AI-driven demand for high-performance, large-scale packaging, marking a structural migration in value towards upstream specialty materials.

marsbitHá 1h

"Shocking" CPO: How Does the Glass Bridge Actually Work? Detailed Explanation from Corning

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
活动图片