Ripple Seeks To Pause Fines As Legal Battle With The US SEC Continues

bitcoinistPublicado em 2024-09-06Última atualização em 2024-09-06

Resumo

In a significant turn of events, a stay of the monetary penalties has been requested by the behemoth payment firm...

In a significant turn of events, a stay of the monetary penalties has been requested by the behemoth payment firm Ripple Labs as its lengthy legal dispute with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) continues to unfold. 

Ripple Takes Bold Step With Stay Request

On Wednesday, the Ripple team in a letter filed a demand for a stay of the monetary portion, particularly the $125 million fine of the court’s previous judgment. The plea was made in an effort by the company to postpone the financial penalties that the court had imposed pending the outcome of the case over whether or not its XRP token is considered a security on August 7, 2024.

Ripple humbly demands that the Southern District Court of New York take action on the stay motion prior to September 6, which is when the monetary portion of the judgment is now due to be paid. Meanwhile, the US SEC has already greenlighted the delay request.

The letter read:

Plaintiff, the US SEC has consented to this request and to the terms of the Proposed Order that Ripple is submitting today. The monetary portion of the judgment is currently due to be paid this coming Friday, September 6, and Ripple respectfully asks that this court act on this stay request before that date.

Specifically, this move implies that the payment company is putting the $125 million fine into an escrow account. Should the regulatory watchdog choose not to appeal the motion, the funds will be released once the deadline has been surpassed.

However, if the agency decides not to file an appeal, the funds will go to Ripple Labs. Since the SEC approved these terms, the company has insurance under this agreement.

According to the filing, the stay will be in effect under the proposed order for 30 days following the appeal period’s expiration or any appeal decision. As specified in the judgment, the SEC will receive post-judgment interest during this period.

Furthermore, the fund and any interest that arises from its deposit in the escrow account registered under the name Kellogg Hansen will be owned beneficially by Ripple, with no control over it.

Industry Response To The Motion

Ripple’s motion for stay has triggered quite a frenzy within the community regarding whether the regulatory watchdog will file for an appeal. As a result, popular lawyer James A. Murphy, also known as the MetaLawMan, has delved into the case, offering insights into the potential outcome.

According to the lawyer, the only two options at this time are either the SEC is still unsure or has decided to appeal. However, considering the development, the attorney is confident that the SEC will appeal the motion because Ripple would have been forced to pay the $125 million fine if the Commission opted not to do so.

As the legal battle intensifies, this development represents another turning point in the case that might have long-term effects on the crypto industry.

Ripple
XRP trading at $0.55 on the 1D chart | Source: XRPUSDT on Tradingview.com
Featured image from iStock, chart from Tradingview.com
Godspower Owie

Godspower Owie

Godspower Owie is my name, and I work for the news platforms NewsBTC and Bitcoinist. I sometimes like to think of myself as an explorer since I enjoy exploring new places, learning new things, especially valuable ones, and meeting new people who have an impact on my life, no matter how small. I value my family, friends, career, and time. Really, those are most likely the most significant aspects of every person's existence. Not illusions, but dreams are what I pursue.

Leituras Relacionadas

A Group of Suzhou Engineers Unexpectedly Attain Financial Freedom

In Suzhou, a group of engineers from Lianxun Instruments, a leader in optical communication testing equipment, have achieved remarkable wealth after the company's IPO. Listed just two months ago on the STAR Market, the company's stock price surged approximately 30 times, making it the only A-share stock priced above 2,000 yuan. This surge created substantial fortunes for nearly 100 technical employees who held a collective 15.91% stake through employee stock ownership platforms, valued at over 36 billion yuan at the current market cap. Among them, nearly 40 became billionaires, while even the smallest holdings exceeded 5 million yuan in value. Founded in 2017 by Hu Haiyang, Yang Jian, and Huang Jianjun, Lianxun Instruments was established to address China's reliance on foreign high-end testing instruments. The company grew rapidly with a strong focus on R&D, where technical staff make up nearly 80% of its workforce. Early implementation of employee stock plans helped retain this core talent. The company's explosive growth is fueled by booming AI computing demand, with clients including major global optical module leaders. Its revenue skyrocketed from 276 million yuan in 2023 to 1.194 billion yuan in 2025, turning a profit in 2024. The IPO has also generated massive returns for early investors, including Suzhou's state-owned capital, which saw a hundredfold return. This story reflects a broader trend in China's markets, where technology firms in AI, semiconductors, and optics are creating new wealth, rewarding engineers and technical teams who are now central to modern capital-driven success stories, marking a shift from previous eras dominated by internet and real estate tycoons.

marsbitHá 2h

A Group of Suzhou Engineers Unexpectedly Attain Financial Freedom

marsbitHá 2h

NVIDIA's Annual 'Most Dangerous' Paper: AI Self-Replicating Code, Unlimited Leveling and Evolution

NVIDIA's "Red Queen Gödel Machine" (RQGM) paper proposes a potentially groundbreaking AI self-evolution framework. It breaks from the long-stalled concept of the "Gödel Machine," which required mathematically proven beneficial self-modifications, by adopting an evolutionary approach. The core, and most striking, innovation is that the AI does not just evolve its own code in a static environment. Instead, it co-evolves both the "student" (the task-performing agent) and the "examiner" (the evaluation system that judges it). This creates a dynamic, recursive self-improvement loop inspired by the biological "Red Queen Hypothesis"—where continuous adaptation is needed just to maintain relative fitness. The mechanism operates in epochs. Within an epoch, a fixed examiner evaluates all candidate code variants. At epoch boundaries, a new, potentially more rigorous examiner can replace the old one, but only if it proves statistically superior on a held-out "ground truth" dataset. This "controlled utility evolution" aims to ensure progress is measurable and grounded. The paper demonstrates RQGM's effectiveness across three domains: 1. **Code Generation:** It achieved a 71.7% test-set pass rate (improving over a 69.9% SOTA) while using 1.35-1.72x fewer computational tokens. 2. **Paper Writing:** In a subjective task, the co-evolved writer and reviewer achieved a 40.5% acceptance rate by a fixed human panel, up from 21.8%. 3. **Math Proofs:** It evolved more accurate graders (at 3x lower cost) and higher-scoring provers. Notably, RQGM also mitigated a known LLM bias where AI reviewers favor AI-generated content. By specifically rewarding reviewers that correctly rejected AI-written papers from a historical pool, the evolved system achieved impartiality while maintaining 80% accuracy. The research has sparked significant discussion about the acceleration of Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI). Some, like Anthropic's Jack Clark, have predicted a high probability of highly autonomous, self-evolving AI emerging by 2028. The paper suggests that when an AI begins to design its own evaluators and push itself toward ever-higher standards in a recursive loop, it may be taking a fundamental step toward redefining intelligence and autonomy.

marsbitHá 2h

NVIDIA's Annual 'Most Dangerous' Paper: AI Self-Replicating Code, Unlimited Leveling and Evolution

marsbitHá 2h

Apple and the Power Rebalancing with 'The Microns': Dissecting the Profit Ledger Behind the iPhone

The article analyzes the shifting profit dynamics and power balance between Apple and memory suppliers like Micron within the iPhone supply chain. It highlights a social media post criticizing Apple for raising iPhone prices while blaming memory chip cost increases, despite historically paying suppliers like Micron very little. An estimated iPhone 18 cost breakdown is referenced. Historically, memory was a minor cost component. In 2017's iPhone X, memory accounted for only about 1.6-2.3% of the price, with Apple capturing nearly 50% net profit. Over time, memory's share of the Bill-of-Materials (BOM) cost has grown significantly, reaching an estimated 12-15% for the iPhone 17 series. The core driver of this change is soaring demand for memory from the AI industry, particularly for High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) and AI servers, which is diverting production capacity and squeezing supply for consumer electronics. Memory manufacturers, after enduring periods of low profits, now hold greater pricing power. This is reflected in their recent strong financials, like Micron's 84.6% gross margin. Apple CEO Tim Cook initially described the memory price pressure as unprecedented in his 40-year career, later calling it a "once-in-a-century flood," before Apple announced price hikes across several product lines, causing a significant stock drop. Elon Musk echoed Cook's sentiment about the dramatic cost surge. The article concludes that the era of memory suppliers being at the mercy of Apple's pricing power has temporarily reversed, thanks to AI-driven demand. It notes Apple is reportedly seeking to diversify its supply chain, including exploring chips from China's CXMT.

Odaily星球日报Há 4h

Apple and the Power Rebalancing with 'The Microns': Dissecting the Profit Ledger Behind the iPhone

Odaily星球日报Há 4h

Trading

Spot
活动图片