Leaked copy of US draft bill shows DeFi and DAOs under regulatory lens

CointelegraphPublicado em 2022-06-07Última atualização em 2022-06-07

Resumo

A leaked copy of a United States draft bill concerning cryptocurrency started doing the rounds on Twitter earlier today.

A leaked copy of a United States draft bill concerning cryptocurrency started doing the rounds on Twitter earlier today. The 600-page copy of the leaked bill highlighted some of the key areas of concern for regulators including decentralized finance (DeFi), stablecoins, decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) and crypto exchanges.
here you go
(plz RT) pic.twitter.com/UOVhIUiUBu
— slam (@bot_slam) June 7, 2022
User protection seems to be the primary focus of regulators, with policies intended to require any crypto platform or service provider to legally register in the U.S,, be it a DAO or DeFi protocol.
This could highly curtail chances for anonymous crypto projects to progress in the U.S. Any crypto platform not registered in the U.S would be liable for taxes. The definition of DeFi still seems vague.
The leaked draft bill also tries to offer more clarity on securities laws as they relate to digital assets, a demand that has been persistent from the crypto community and lawmakers alike. According to the definition of a commodity under the Commodity and Futures Trading Commission, if there is any debt, equity, profit revenue, or dividend of any variety, then it is expressly not a digital asset commodity.
The new draft bill proposes to increase exchange compliance costs which in turn could lead to an increase in the exchange fees. Any protocol or platform that trades even one digital asset would be categorized as an exchange, this means automated market makers would fall under the same category.
The bill further ensures that exchanges cannot liquidate users' funds in cases of bankruptcy. Exchanges must also issue terms of services that consumers will agree to before using their services.
The leaked draft bill proposes clear policies to bring the nascent crypto market under the purview of the law. Many experts believe that even though the listed policies seem to encourage strict oversight, it is important to note that it’s only the draft bill.
13/12

PS- Since this is just the first form of a bill, this is when lobby groups will start to get involved and help try and shape it and iron out some of the clunky language that would be problematic, so it isn't all hope lost. There is good intent here.
— Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth) (@adamscochran) June 7, 2022
Dogecoin co-founder Billy Markus also commented on the leaked bill and suggested that the new policies would be tough on DeFi, DAOs and anonymous projects. 
all they really gotta do is go hard after exchanges and the party is over
— Shibetoshi Nakamoto (@BillyM2k) June 7, 2022

Leituras Relacionadas

Bitcoin Trading Strategy Breakdown: Celebrity Predictions and Classic Models All Fail, Only These Four Indicators Remain

Analysis of Bitcoin Trading Strategies: Why Celebrity Forecasts and Classic Models Fail, Leaving Only These Four Reliable Indicators This analysis examines the failure of common Bitcoin prediction methods and identifies four reliable indicators for constructing a trading strategy. The author reviewed all major BTC prediction approaches from 2017-2025, categorizing them into three groups: celebrity price targets (consistently over-optimistic), analytical models like Stock-to-Flow (broken post-2022), and on-chain signals. The key finding is that more data often creates confusion, not clarity. The strategy discards unreliable elements: celebrity predictions (incentivized to be extreme), pure models (invalidated by post-ETF market changes), and the Fear & Greed Index used alone (too many false signals). Four reliable indicators were selected: 1. **MVRV Z-Score:** Accurately identifies cycle bottoms when entering its green zone (e.g., 2018, 2020, 2022). Note: Its ability to call tops is now ineffective post-2024. 2. **SOPR (28-day MA):** Consistently signals bottoms when below 1.0, indicating holders are selling at a loss. 3. **ETF Net Flow:** A crucial post-2024 metric showing institutional momentum (e.g., sustained inflows = buying). 4. **Macro Liquidity (Fed policy & M2):** Sets the overall directional bias (e.g., bullish during easing cycles). The core strategy involves waiting for a multi-signal共振 (resonance). For example, a bottom signal requires MVRV in the green zone + SOPR < 1.0. A top signal requires overheated on-chain data + sustained ETF outflows. Macro policy sets the overall direction. The Fear & Greed Index is only used as a weighted confirmatory signal, never alone. Action is only taken when three or more indicators align. The author automated this into a monitoring system that sends Telegram alerts only when signals trigger. As of the article's date (April 15, 2026), the system showed a strong bottom signal: extreme fear (F&G=12), MVRV in the buy zone, and SOPR < 1.0. The only contrary signal was weak ETF flows. Historically, such triple on-chain共振 has preceded 100%+ returns. The conclusion emphasizes building a personal framework over relying on external predictions, allowing for iterative improvement and customization based on individual risk tolerance.

marsbitHá 1h

Bitcoin Trading Strategy Breakdown: Celebrity Predictions and Classic Models All Fail, Only These Four Indicators Remain

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片