Cosmos 站在发展的岔路口

比推Publicado em 2024-08-26Última atualização em 2024-08-26

Cosmos 必须优先重建信心，制定清晰的愿景，从用户角度出发并为开发者赋能。

撰文：Arjun | LI.FI, Bankless

编译：Felix, PANews

Cosmos 正处于发展的十字路口，这条开拓性的区块链正在失去社区支持。

原因如下：

治理问题的旧账

负责监督 Cosmos 生态系统的 Interchain Foundation (ICF) 因管理不善、利益冲突和缺乏透明度的指控，导致社区对其信任度下降。

这些不仅仅是传言。最近对 ICF 的不信任声明，以及要求进行全面审计和领导层改革的呼吁，都凸显了这些问题的严重性。

这种缺乏透明度可能表明生态系统中存在更深层次的问题。运营和组织僵化导致开发人员和用户士气低落，用户对日常开发中无休止的拖延和官僚障碍表示担忧。

此外，生态系统的建设者和用户之间越来越脱节。建设者痴迷于突破技术界限，这在理论上是一项崇高的追求，但许多人觉得，他们在某种程度上忘记了真正使用这些东西的人（用户）。

核心问题是 Cosmos 的无形性，这使得它很难与用户产生共鸣。这种缺乏明确性导致用户对生态系统提出了更多要求。

先发优势变劣势

在塑造加密货币和区块链发展的未来方面，Cosmos 一直走在前列。它开创了「应用链」愿景，这一概念现在是模块化区块链理论和区块链主权理念的核心。

然而，如今 Cosmos 的领先优势已不复存在。以太坊和 Celestia 上 Rollups 的兴起为开发人员提供了与 Cosmos 应用链类似的选择。重要的是，这些解决方案还具有成熟的社区和更深的流动性池的额外优势。

从本质上讲，Cosmos 在曾经领先的竞争中落后了。

开发人员是务实的。他们想要 Cosmos 提供的灵活性，但也渴望以太坊和 Celestia 提供的蓬勃发展的生态网络效应。

归根结底，Cosmos 的成功取决于能否为用户创造有形价值并培育蓬勃发展的应用生态系统。如果 Cosmos 未能有效应对当前面临的挑战，社区可能会将这段时期视为错失的良机。

凭借领先优势和富有远见的路线图，Cosmos 有可能主宰多链领域。然而，如果没有必要的执行，这种潜力无法实现。

岔路口

「摆脱历史的束缚，迎接未来」。

Cosmos 生态系统无疑正处于十字路口。内部纷争、代币下跌和社区士气低落，这些都描绘了一幅黯淡的画面。人们不自觉的将 Cosmos 视为一次失败的实验。

但请不要重演历史。Cosmos 的核心技术和愿景具有开创性。它们激发了无数项目，为行业未来的发展奠定了基础。

当下对 Cosmos 来说不是死胡同，而是一个岔路口。这些并不是无法克服的挑战。如果 Cosmos 能够解决这些问题，就能从这场危机中走出来，变得比以往任何时候都更加强大。

前进的道路需要修正。研究以太坊、Solana 和 Celestia 等生态系统可以提供有价值的参考。这些生态系统证明了以下几点的十分重要：

治理和信任：透明和负责任的基础至关重要。ICF 必须优先重建信心。信任需要一点一点地重建。
关注用户：一切都从用户出发。如果没有无缝的用户体验，Cosmos 就是一座美丽的「鬼城」。各个团队应该优先构建直接造福用户的产品。
赋能开发者：为开发者提供创建杀手级应用的工具和自由。伟大的技术值得拥有杀手级应用。积极向开发者介绍 Cosmos 堆栈，吸引更广泛的项目。
愿景清晰：引人注目的叙事至关重要。Cosmos 必须阐明其独特的价值主张：你正在解决什么问题？人们为什么要关心？

Cosmos 还有机会迎头赶上，但现在是采取行动的时候了。

原文链接:https://foresightnews.pro/article/detail/67048

说明: 比推所有文章只代表作者观点，不构成投资建议

CelestiaCosmosSolana以太坊

Criptomoedas em alta

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

Velodrome FinanceVELODROME

BrevisBREV

ZRX（0X）ZRX

PancakeSwapCAKE

Leituras Relacionadas

Opinion: The AI Bubble in Stocks Has Arrived. Why I'm Turning to Bet on Bitcoin?

This article argues that the AI-driven stock market surge shows clear signs of a bubble. The author, citing Howard Marks' cycle theory, presents a checklist of behaviors signaling a market top—excessive optimism, easy capital, and the belief "no price is too high"—and finds the current AI stock mania matches most criteria. Consequently, the author has sold AI-related ETFs and shifted focus to accumulating Bitcoin within a $50k-$60k range, viewing it as a scarcer asset with a wider margin of safety amid high equity valuations. The piece contrasts the narrow, frothy AI rally with what it sees as a more rational long-term opportunity in Bitcoin, especially given indicators like high CAPE ratios and selective risk appetite. The author's personal strategy involves holding significant cash, with capital allocated across trading, long-term accumulation (primarily BTC), and illiquid investments.

marsbitHá 5m

Opinion: The AI Bubble in Stocks Has Arrived. Why I'm Turning to Bet on Bitcoin?

marsbitHá 5m

Bitwise CIO: STRC Plunge is a Bottom Signal, Bull Market to Begin in Autumn

Matt Hougan, Chief Investment Officer at Bitwise, explains the recent Bitcoin price drop below $60,000 and its connection to the steep decline in MicroStrategy's STRC (Strategy's Perpetual Preferred Stock). STRC, designed as a high-yield, stable-price instrument, fell from its $100 target to $75 due to market fears over MicroStrategy's ability to sustain its dividend amid Bitcoin's price weakness. Hougan clarifies that while MicroStrategy's overall financial position remains strong, with significant Bitcoin holdings and cash, the core market anxiety centered on the optional nature of the dividend payments. In response, MicroStrategy announced a new operational framework: it will sell some Bitcoin as needed to fund dividends, will no longer actively defend the $100 share price through dividend hikes, and may repurchase STRC on the open market. This shift marks a change in MicroStrategy's role from a consistent, one-way buyer of Bitcoin to a more dynamic participant that may both buy and sell. According to Hougan, the STRC volatility is a classic late-cycle event, signaling the painful but necessary process of flushing out excessive leverage from the market. He draws parallels to the unwinding of the GBTC premium in the previous cycle. He identifies key potential bottoming signals: MSTR trading at a discount to its net asset value (NAV), extreme readings on the Crypto Fear & Greed Index, and persistently negative Bitcoin funding rates. Hougan concludes that while the exact timing of the market bottom is unpredictable, the current deleveraging phase suggests it is near. He expresses confidence that a new bull market will begin in the fall of this year, with the next major wave of buying expected to come from institutional investors like banks, asset managers, and pension funds.

Foresight NewsHá 17m

Bitwise CIO: STRC Plunge is a Bottom Signal, Bull Market to Begin in Autumn

Foresight NewsHá 17m

ENS Founder Seeks to 'Seize Power' from DAO

On June 29th, the ENS community entered the on-chain voting phase for a proposal to renew the ENS DAO Security Council's veto power for two more years. Shortly after voting began, ENS founder Nick Johnson used his substantial ENS holdings to cast over 3.55 million votes against the proposal, swinging the outcome despite initial strong support. The Security Council was established in July 2024 with a 4/8 multisig veto power to protect the DAO's treasury (valued over $350 million) from malicious proposals during a period of low voter participation. Its powers were limited to vetoing only harmful proposals, not normal ones. Nick Johnson's opposition stems from broader concerns about ENS DAO's governance. In late 2025, he and others expressed frustration that the DAO had become mired in political gamesmanship, with capable contributors leaving and leadership falling to less experienced or misaligned parties. This context set the stage for a major restructuring proposal by ENS COO Katherine Wu on June 19th, titled "Next Era of ENS DAO: Empowering the ENS Foundation." The controversial proposal aims to transfer daily operations, treasury management, and long-term strategy to a restructured ENS Foundation with a professional board, while the DAO would retain core protocol governance powers. Critics, including original ENS constitution author Brantly Millegan, argue this effectively transfers treasury control from token holders to ENS Labs (the core development team), undermining the DAO's original decentralized design. Nick's massive "no" vote on the Security Council renewal is seen as the first move in this power struggle. He explained his vote was due to concerns about insufficient checks on the Council's power and the potential for its veto to be used politically. In response, Katherine Wu submitted a revised proposal with higher execution thresholds (5/8 instead of 4/8) and stricter limits. The push for change comes as ENS's annual revenue has declined significantly, from over $10 million in 2023 to under $2 million in 2025, increasing pressure to manage the treasury more effectively. Nick Johnson now faces the challenge of proving that a more structured foundation can steer ENS better than the current DAO model.

Foresight NewsHá 47m

ENS Founder Seeks to 'Seize Power' from DAO

Foresight NewsHá 47m

Zcash whale opens $8.1M long position: What’s next as ZEC struggles near $400?

Zcash (ZEC) is struggling to hold the $400 price level, currently trading around $399 after recent volatility. Despite this market weakness and a bearish technical structure, significant whale activity has emerged. A large whale deposited $10.12 million into HyperLiquid and opened an $8.1 million long position on ZEC. This aligns with a rising Long/Short Ratio, indicating growing trader optimism for price gains. However, ZEC remains below key moving averages, and momentum indicators suggest strong downside pressure. If whale demand fails to spark an upside, ZEC could fall toward $336. Conversely, if it triggers short liquidations, the price could hold $400 and rally toward $452.

ambcryptoHá 58m

Zcash whale opens $8.1M long position: What’s next as ZEC struggles near $400?

ambcryptoHá 58m

Predicting World Cup Knockout Matches: Why Are Different AI Models So Far Apart?

AI performance in predicting the 2026 FIFA World Cup knockout matches varied significantly, according to an analysis of models including ChatGPT, Grok, DeepSeek, Gemini, and Claude. The standout predictions came from DeepSeek and Gemini for the Netherlands vs. Morocco match. Gemini precisely forecasted a 1-1 draw and a penalty shootout win for Morocco, while DeepSeek correctly identified the high probability of a draw and Morocco's potential to advance via a defensive and counter-attacking strategy. Grok and Tongyi Qianwen (千问) demonstrated strength in predicting accurate scores for matches with clearer favorites. They correctly called the narrow 1-0 win for Canada over South Africa and Brazil's 2-1 victory over Japan, as well as Norway's 2-1 win over Ivory Coast. ChatGPT and Claude excelled more in match process analysis than in predicting exact scores or upsets. They frequently identified potential challenges for favorites, such as Japan's pressing against Brazil or DR Congo's defensive tactics against England, even when predicting the favorite's ultimate victory. A notable failure was the unanimous misjudgment of Germany vs. Paraguay. All models incorrectly favored Germany, underestimating Paraguay's ability to force a penalty shootout and cause an upset. In summary, Gemini and DeepSeek showed the most insight for high-stakes, unpredictable matches. Grok and Qianwen were reliable "score predictors" for less volatile games. ChatGPT and Claude were strong "analytical models," adept at outlining match dynamics but often hesitant to predict upsets.

Odaily星球日报Há 1h

Predicting World Cup Knockout Matches: Why Are Different AI Models So Far Apart?

Odaily星球日报Há 1h

Trading

Spot

Artigos em Destaque

Como comprar ATOM

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de Cosmos (ATOM) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar Cosmos (ATOM) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu Cosmos (ATOM)Depois de comprar o teu Cosmos (ATOM), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona Cosmos (ATOM)Transaciona facilmente Cosmos (ATOM) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

374 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2026.06.02

Discussões

Bem-vindo à Comunidade HTX. Aqui, pode manter-se informado sobre os mais recentes desenvolvimentos da plataforma e obter acesso a análises profissionais de mercado. As opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o preço de ATOM (ATOM) são apresentadas abaixo.