漳龙集团发行全国首单数字人民币“一带一路”公司债券

币界网Publicado em 2024-08-21Última atualização em 2024-08-21

币界网报道：

央广网北京8月21日消息（记者 孙汝祥）近日，福建漳龙集团有限公司在上海证券交易所成功发行2024年面向专业机构投资者非公开“一带一路”公司债券（第一期）（债券简称“24漳龙05”），本期债券发行规模10亿元，期限为10年期，主体和债项评级均为AAA，由中银证券担任独家主承销商，票面利率为2.62%。本期债券为全国首单数字人民币“一带一路”公司债券，同时也是福建省首单十年期私募债券。

日前，党的二十届三中全会明确提出“加快培育外贸发展新动能”与“高质量共建一带一路”的指导方针，本期债券募集资金主要用于支持与“一带一路”沿线国家和地区的贸易业务。此次长期限低成本债券的成功发行，不仅充分体现了广大机构投资者对漳龙集团产业布局的十足信心，而且进一步为企业多元化战略部署长期赋能，为推进高水平对外开放提供了新的强劲动能。

值得一提的是，本期债券以数字人民币形式发行，由中国银行、兴业银行担任数字人民币运营机构，是福建省首单数字人民币公司债。数字人民币具有安全性高、支付即结算、无手续费等优势，有效助力数币应用场景在债券领域的加速拓展，谱写数字金融新篇章。

漳龙集团始终积极响应福建省和漳州市政府的号召，持续推动形成更加开放、包容、共赢的经贸合作新格局，并深入贯彻中菲“两国双园”合作倡议，为高质量共建“一带一路”贡献出不可或缺的漳龙智慧和力量。（央广资本眼）

更多精彩资讯请在应用市场下载“央广网”客户端。欢迎提供新闻线索，24小时报料热线400-800-0088；消费者也可通过央广网“啄木鸟消费者投诉平台”线上投诉。版权声明：本文章版权归属央广网所有，未经授权不得转载。转载请联系：[email protected]，不尊重原创的行为我们将追究责任。

Leituras Relacionadas

Tencent Buys Baidu Chips

China's internet giants, once defined by building closed, self-sufficient empires, are undergoing a fundamental shift. A key signal is Baidu's plan to spin off its AI chip unit, Kunlun Xin, for a Hong Kong IPO targeting a $50 billion valuation, potentially exceeding its parent company's worth. Concurrently, Alibaba's T-Head is also pursuing independence. Most significantly, reports indicate that rival Tencent has become a major customer for Kunlun Xin's chips. This move, where competitors begin procuring each other's core technologies, marks a decisive break from the past era of internal duplication and isolation. It signals the maturation of China's AI industry into a more open, specialized ecosystem. The underlying driver is the immense and clear cost of AI infrastructure, particularly the exploding demand for inference compute driven by AI agents and applications. Hardware is no longer just an internal cost center but a profitable, strategic business in itself. Globally, a parallel trend is evident as OpenAI, Google, Amazon, and others develop their own AI chips to control costs and optimize performance. The competition has moved beyond model benchmarks to a deeper, foundational war over token cost efficiency, inference cluster performance, and secure, scalable computing power. Baidu and Alibaba aren't dismantling their empires but are instead decoupling non-core, capital-intensive infrastructure to participate in and shape a larger, collaborative industrial base. The era of the all-encompassing super-app is giving way to an age of strategic specialization and open ecosystem building in the AI race.

marsbitHá 13m

Tencent Buys Baidu Chips

marsbitHá 13m

The Token Itself Is an Asset: Three Types of Tokenized Stocks, Which One Suits You?

"Tokenized Stocks: Three Types, Which One Fits You? For investors outside the US, buying stocks like SpaceX or Nvidia is difficult, requiring brokers, cross-border transfers, and often accredited investor status. Blockchain offers an alternative through tokenized stocks, a term encompassing three distinct products with vastly different ownership, voting, and profit rights. 1. **Full Real Ownership**: Companies like Superstate register native equity directly on-chain (e.g., Solana). Holders are on the official shareholder registry, with full voting rights, dividends, and legal ownership. This offers maximum rights but potentially less DeFi flexibility. 2. **SPV-Backed Tokens (Surrendered Ownership for DeFi Composability)**: Issuers like Backed (xStocks) and Ondo use offshore Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs) to hold underlying shares 1:1 and issue tracking tokens. Investors get price exposure and dividends (reinvested as more tokens) but hold a claim on the SPV, not direct stock ownership. This enables use as collateral in DeFi protocols (Kamino, Morpho) and 24/7 minting/redemption, but carries SPV counterparty risk (highlighted by the PreStocks collapse). 3. **Perpetual Futures (Pure Price Speculation)**: Platforms like TradeXYZ (on Hyperliquid) and Ostium offer perpetual contracts. These are synthetic derivatives with no underlying stock ownership, using funding rates to track spot prices. They require only a price oracle, allowing extremely fast listing (e.g., SpaceX pre-IPO) and high leverage, attracting speculators. Their trading volume far exceeds tokenized spot products. The core value of tokens is that they don't need to replicate full stock ownership. Most retail investors never vote. Tokenization creates layered financial tools: full equity for institutions, composable tokens for DeFi users, and perpetuals for leveraged traders."

marsbitHá 13m

The Token Itself Is an Asset: Three Types of Tokenized Stocks, Which One Suits You?

marsbitHá 13m

AI as the Boss: Nearly Bankrupts 10 Companies...

A recent study from Princeton University tested 14 AI models, including large language models (LLMs) and a rule-based algorithm, in a simulation where they acted as CEOs of a virtual SaaS startup over 500 days. The goal was to grow an initial $1 million capital. The results were stark: only four "CEOs" ended with a profit. The top performer was Claude Fable 5, multiplying the capital 47-fold to $47.15 million. Claude Opus 4.8 and GPT-5.5 followed. Notably, the fourth profitable entity was a simple, pre-programmed rule-based algorithm, which outperformed many advanced LLMs with $15.76 million in profit. Five other models, including several major LLMs, went bankrupt before the simulation ended. Key takeaways from the research highlight that successful AI CEOs demonstrated a tendency for exploration and adaptation over caution. They excelled in discovering hidden information, predicting future cash flow, adapting quickly to changes (like competitor moves), and engaging in strategic "if-then" planning. The study also found that equipping LLMs with programming-agent frameworks, optimized for coding tasks, actually harmed their performance in this CEO role, suggesting a need for domain-specific adaptations. The article concludes by contrasting AI's current operational proficiency within defined frameworks with the type of visionary, intuitive decision-making—exemplified by figures like Steve Jobs—that truly drives transformative business strategy. This critical "matrix-drawing" capability, it argues, remains uniquely human.

marsbitHá 23m

AI as the Boss: Nearly Bankrupts 10 Companies...

marsbitHá 23m

Tokens as Assets: Which Type of Tokenized Stock Is Right for You?

**Tokenized Stocks: Three Models, Which Suits You?** For investors outside the US, accessing stocks like SpaceX or NVIDIA is often difficult, requiring compliant brokers and cross-border transfers. Blockchain offers an alternative through tokenized stocks, but this term encompasses three distinct models with vastly different ownership, voting rights, and economic benefits. The first model offers full, direct ownership. Platforms like Superstate register shares directly on-chain (e.g., Solana), with holders listed on the official shareholder registry, granting full voting rights, dividends, and legal status. The second model sacrifices direct ownership for DeFi composability. Issuers like Backed and Ondo use offshore Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs) to issue tokens 1:1 backed by real shares. Holders gain price exposure and automated dividend accruals (via token balance increases), and tokens can be used as collateral in DeFi protocols. However, this introduces SPV counterparty risk, as seen in the PreStocks collapse. The third model abandons ownership entirely for pure price speculation. Perpetual futures platforms like TradeXYZ (on Hyperliquid) and Ostium create synthetic markets using price oracles and funding rates to track stock prices. They require no underlying shares, enabling rapid listing (e.g., SpaceX pre-IPO) and high leverage, which explains their trading volumes being 4-5x higher than tokenized spot markets. The core insight is that tokens derive value without needing to replicate full stock ownership. Most retail investors rarely exercise voting rights. These three models cater to different needs: direct ownership for institutions, DeFi-composable tokens for on-chain users, and perpetuals for leveraged, speculative traders. Tokenization is not a mere stock substitute but a new class of layered financial instruments.

Foresight NewsHá 24m

Tokens as Assets: Which Type of Tokenized Stock Is Right for You?

Foresight NewsHá 24m

No supply shock yet – Why Bitcoin’s price bottom may have to wait

The article argues that while typical bear market signals suggest Bitcoin may be nearing a bottom, a true price recovery likely requires a "supply shock" that hasn't yet materialized. Key signals point to a potential bottom: short-term holders are selling at a loss, miner stress is increasing as production costs exceed the spot price, and market sentiment is in "extreme fear." This weak hand capitulation is often seen as a late-stage bearish sign. However, a critical piece is missing: sustained demand. On-chain data shows Bitcoin exchange reserves have increased in 2026, meaning selling pressure is flowing onto exchanges rather than being absorbed by buyers. Institutional flows from spot ETFs remain negative. Therefore, until exchange balances decline and buyers absorb the excess supply, a meaningful supply shock—a prerequisite for a sustained price bottom and reversal—remains unlikely. The current consolidation may be premature for calling a definitive bottom.

ambcryptoHá 29m

No supply shock yet – Why Bitcoin’s price bottom may have to wait

ambcryptoHá 29m

Trading

Spot
活动图片

Categorias popularesright-arrow

Etiquetas Popularesright-arrow