Matrixport 与 Chainalysis 合作利用链上数据监控加强监管合规性

链捕手Publicado em 2024-08-14Última atualização em 2024-08-14

“ Chainalysis 地址筛查是我们多方面运营的重要组成部分,显著提升了我们实时监控和降低加密货币交易风险的能力。”   – WEI FEN ONG  MATRIXPORT 合规经理。

Matrixport 是一家总部位于新加坡的一站式加密资产金融服务平台,是全球最大、受信任度最高的数字资产生态系统,其使命是满足投资者新兴的投资需求,并降低投资加密资产的准入门槛。 Matrixport 的客户群体非常多元化,既有加密资产原生投资者、高净值人群、家族办公室、个人投资者,也有加密资产基金、交易平台、传统金融投资公司等机构投资者。

公司还通过与 web3 初创企业的战略合作帮助更多创新者实现发展、增长和规模化。 Matrixport 的服务包括 Cactus Custody ™、现货 OTC 、大宗经纪服务、资产管理以及现实世界资产代币化等。其数字大宗经纪业务 Matrixport Institutional 为美国、欧洲、亚洲等地区超过 800 家机构提供服务,在传统金融和加密资产市场之间架起一座广受信任的桥梁。

挑战:严密监测可疑链上活动

作为一家涵盖数条业务线的加密资产公司, Matrixport 业务繁忙,拥有一支由近 25 名专业人士组成的合规团队,并坚信强有力的监管框架是取得成功的关键因素。 Matrixport 打造了加密资产合规解决方案,但也意识到一些问题的存在,例如产品频繁出现假正例、解决方案提供者缺乏中文语言支持难以与 Matrixport 的开发团队进行沟通等。合规团队需要更好的链上客户行为监测工具,以及更全面的区块链和代币覆盖。能够快速获取准确数据也是重中之重。

M atrixport 合规经理 Wei Fen Ong 负责带领监测与调查( M & I )团队,团队由分析师组成,致力于识别链上活动中的潜在可疑交易,并对客户交易进行市场监管。她表示,“除了管理好自身风险,我们也致力于帮助客户。我们需要严密监控可疑行为,更好地理解我们的风险情况,以便及时警示客户。”

Matrixport 希望寻找可靠的、过往业绩良好的合作伙伴来打造新的合规解决方案。这一方案不仅要求简便的使用操作,也希望能与公司现有系统无缝对接。

解决方案:全面精准的链上监测

Matrixport 对四家不同的解决方案提供商进行了评估。在筛选过程中, Matrixport 使用钱包地址覆盖和交易筛查功能对各个解决方案进行了测试,包括警示的交易详情颗粒度以及所提供数据的精确度。

Chainalysis 将链下研究与链上数据相结合进行归因分析,其覆盖范围给 Ong 留下了深刻印象。在评估过程中, Chainalysis 能够标记出其它服务商没有标记的受制裁地址。 Ong 了解到, Chainalysis 的法证专家是通过 YouTube 视频找到该受制裁地址的。

在评估过程中, Matrixport 了解到 Chainalysis 不仅有操作顺滑的产品界面,在各项测试中也表现突出。接入、培训、部署和售后支持都是这次采购所考虑的关键决定性因素,而 Chainalysis 则凭借出色的产品培训以及客户成功经理提供的持续高质量服务脱颖而出。

在决定选择 Chainalysis 后, M atrixport 的 M & I 团队便开始日常使用该合规解决方案来加强其端到端合规架构。团队分析师也通过了 Chainalysis 产品培训认证,最大限度提升了自身技能。在 KYT 监测中使用 Chainalysis 大幅提升了 M atrixport 实时识别高风险活动的能力。集成 Chainalysis AP I 后,团队可以对任何高风险行为进行客户流入筛查,如果存在制裁风险,或有资金流与受制裁地址有关,合规团队就会阻止交易并进行审查。

Matrixport 首席合规官 Christopher Liu 表示:“ Chainalysis 为我们提供了更多信息,现在我们可以真正采取行动了。”

Matrixport 旗下符合资质的机构级托管商 Cactus Custody ™,为 30 多个区块链上的 30 0多家机构客户提供数字资产保护服务。能够迅速识别并处理高风险活动给这 Cactus Custody 带来了重要价值。

Ong 表示,“一切的关键在于平衡好自身的风险管理与客户期望。”

顺滑的集成与接入体验

Matrixport 的内部开发团队认为 Chainalysis 的集成过程非常顺滑,也获得了足够的支持。团队获得了详细信息和指导,大幅减少了开发人员的工作量,接入过程也变得更轻松。 Liu 非常欣赏 Chainalysis 提供中文语言支持,使得 Matrixport 工程师在进行集成的全过程都得到了有效指导,。

Chainalysis 数据能够与公司现有系统无缝集成,提升了效率和合规过程的有效性。平台作为 Matrixport 技术栈的重要一环,提供了实时监测交易及地址有关风险的能力。此外,它还赋能合规团队做出更加明智的决策。

“加密资产的合规趋势在不断变化, Chainalysis 为我们应对这一挑战提供了强有力的支持,并且为我们的运营安全保驾护航。”

– WEI FEN ONG

MATRIXPORT 合规经理

结果:数据精确度、持续监测与响应支持共同促进监管合规

自部署以来, Chainalysis 系统通过根据不同地区法规特点制定的颗粒度类别和分类帮助 Matrixport 识别了不同程度的潜在非法行为。例如,在某些地区被定义为“赌博”的行为在其它地区并不一定违法,这样的识别能力加强了团队的合规措施。这样的因地制宜措施确保 Matrixport 的风险管理能够适应不同运营地区的监管环境。

此外, Chainalysis 还帮助 Matrixport 缩短了从初始警示到后续调查再到生成报告的响应时间,使得团队能够做出更快、更明智的决策。 Chainalysis 数据的广度和深度也使得 Matrixport 能够生成更高质量的可疑行为报告( SAR ),而 Chainalysis 的图表也经常被团队用于 SAR 报告中。

Ong 表示,“ Chainalysis 地址筛查是我们多方面运营的重要组成部分,显著提升了我们实时监测和降低了加密货币交易风险的能力。我们的客户在使用我们的平台时更加有信心了,因为他们知道,我们正在积极加强机构风险管理协议,为他们的交易和资产保驾护航。为客户提供更多保障也和我们为所有客户提供安全、可信任环境的初心一脉相承。”

在以前的合规解决方案下,如果警示存在受制裁钱包地址风险,由于服务商无法提供交易日期, Ong 的团队只能通过找到风险发生日来判断是受制裁前还是受制裁后出现的风险。而现在,如果有新地址被制裁,团队就不用担心风险问题,因为 Chainalysis 的监测功能会发出必要且精确的警示。这种类型的持续监测对减轻团队工作量、确保更有效、更积极的合规手段是极其有用的。

Liu 也分享了 Chainalysis 具体是如何减轻团队工作量的。他表示,“ Chainalysis 满足了我们的核心诉求,其产出是可衡量的,包括仪表板、复盘报告等,都能让我们对调查和使用的便利度进行量化。现在 Wei Fen 的团队再也不用登录两个系统了。警示出现后,他们可以立即从产品的一部分转移到另一部分,立即开始绘制图表,就紧急事项向我报告。又或者当我接收到执法请求,我就可以快速搜索并开始规划后续事宜。”

在很多人眼中,合规功能是业务发展的障碍,但 Matrixport 的合规团队却能带来业务。 Liu 表示,“我们相信,建立起强有力的合规文化可以带来商机,因为合规可以为我们带来许可、客户的信任,大家也会因为我们在做正确的事情而愿意跟我们合作。这是我们的一个巨大卖点。”

定制化、高感触与合作的重要性

Matrixport 和 Chain alysis 的合作源于对创新、响应客户反馈的承诺,客户成功经理的作用不可或缺。 Matrixport IT 团队能够和 Chain alysis 以中文沟通,得到的支持也非常有价值。公司积极参与反馈会,就产品功能提出建议,其建议也得到了重视。其中, Chain alysis 全力支持 Matrixport 用户喜爱的 BNB Smart Chain 上线就是一个很好的例子。

Matrixport 观察到, Chainalysis 产品,如对以太坊和 Optimism 代币的积极支持,一直在不断更新。公司认为,对全新 ERC -20代币的自动化支持反映了 Chainalysis 致力于做先行者的决心,这也将帮助 Matrixport 引领加密资产行业向前发展。

投资于成功、长期的合作伙伴关系

展望未来,在数字资产生态持续扩张、合规需求不断演变的大背景下, Matrixport 和 Chainalysis 的合作伙伴关系将继续深化。 Ong 表示:“加密资产的合规趋势在不断演变, Chainalysis 为我们应对这一挑战提供了强有力的支持,为我们的运营安全保驾护航。”

Liu 相信 Chainalysis 将帮助 Matrixport 以正确的方式成长,并让投资者和客户感到安心。 Liu 表示,每次向投资者提及公司在使用 Chainalysis 时,对方都知道这是顶级的解决方案。有一位机构客户在签约前要求确认 Matrixport 使用的是 Chainalysis 服务。提供服务确认信凸显了公司对合规的承诺,提振了客户信心。客户这样的要求也凸显了其对公司所采用合规解决方案的透明度和可信度的重视。

Liu 表示,“通过与 Chainalysis 合作,我们得以利用业界一流的安全与合规工具来加强我们的服务,帮助客户适应不断变化的合规报告标准,实现可持续增长。”

Leituras Relacionadas

EF's Epic Reorganization: 20% Layoffs, Budget Halved, Is Ethereum Gearing Up for a Leaner Future?

The Ethereum Foundation (EF) has announced a major organizational restructuring, involving a 20% staff reduction (approx. 54 employees) and a division into functional clusters like Protocol, Access, User, Community, and Institutional layers. Co-founder Vitalik Buterin further revealed plans to cut the EF's budget by around 40% over the coming years, aiming to reduce its annual spending rate from about 15% to roughly 5% by 2030, transitioning to an endowment-driven model. This overhaul is seen as a long-overdue correction to the EF's ambiguous role. As Ethereum grew, the foundation faced persistent criticism over ETH sales, perceived lack of execution, and unclear strategy, often becoming a focal point for community frustration amid ETH's price stagnation. The reform aims to redefine the EF's boundaries, narrowing its focus to core protocol research, public goods funding, and ecosystem coordination, while offloading more applied development work to the broader market. Concurrently, ecosystem forces like the newly formed Ethlabs (founded by ex-EF researchers) and other independent groups are stepping in to fill the space, signaling a shift from a centralized model to a more distributed, collaborative ecosystem structure. The move was notably praised by Solana co-founder toly, who viewed a "leaner" EF as potentially more decisive and agile.

Odaily星球日报Há 33m

EF's Epic Reorganization: 20% Layoffs, Budget Halved, Is Ethereum Gearing Up for a Leaner Future?

Odaily星球日报Há 33m

Dragonfly Partner Haseeb: The Fastest-Growing Companies of the Future May All Get Stuck at 149 Employees

Dragonfly partner Haseeb explores the distorted economics of AI model pricing, drawing parallels to tax policy. He notes that startups and small teams (under 150 users) enjoy heavily subsidized, fixed-price AI subscriptions (like Claude Code), where the marginal cost of an additional token is effectively zero. This creates a powerful incentive for them to maximize token usage ("token-maxxing") and innovate aggressively with AI automation. In contrast, large enterprises (over 150 users) are forced onto "Enterprise" plans, paying per-token API fees with high (~75%) markups. This acts like a steep "tax" on AI-powered labor, disincentivizing marginal automation and experimental use, and encouraging them to retain more human workers. Haseeb argues this pricing creates a "150-person cliff," a regulatory notch similar to labor laws in France that discourage firms from growing past 50 employees. He predicts the fastest-growing future companies may deliberately cap their headcount at 149 to avoid the punitive enterprise pricing. This would foster an "AI-first" management philosophy obsessed with automation and outsourcing to stay lean. While not intentionally designed, this bifurcated pricing could become one of the most influential de facto tax policies, shaping how AI replaces labor—not through mass layoffs at big firms, but through agile, AI-native startups outcompeting them.

marsbitHá 44m

Dragonfly Partner Haseeb: The Fastest-Growing Companies of the Future May All Get Stuck at 149 Employees

marsbitHá 44m

How xBubble Breaks Through in the VC-Heavily-Backed OPC Economy

xBubble: Addressing the Structural Gap in the VC-Backed OPC Economy The concept of OPC (One Person Company) is evolving from a buzzword to a significant AI-driven market. While AI coding tools like Replit and Lovable have validated demand from non-technical users wanting to build applications, a key gap remains: the leap from creating a demo to running a stable, evolving business. These tools still require users to manage the development process, including technical judgments for integrations, modifications, and deployments—a major hurdle for OPCs. xBubble, by DAPPOS, tackles this by shifting from "Prompt-to-Code" to "SOP-to-Business." Instead of generating code from instructions, its core is a system of pre-organized SOPs (Standard Operating Procedures) that translate business goals—like "sell World Cup merchandise"—into complete, executable workflows. This includes generating cohesive assets, pages, payment systems, and backend logic. The platform is augmented by a network of third-party service providers who handle infrastructure (hosting, domains, payment setup), acting like "on-site service engineers." Users can pay for these services directly with xBubble credits, simplifying onboarding. This ecosystem aims to deliver not just an app, but a complete, modifiable business launch path. xBubble targets a clear OPC segment: small commercial nodes (e.g., creators, merchants) with existing products, customers, or channels, but for whom a full tech team is unjustifiable. Its potential lies in SOPs accumulating expertise from real cases, improving reliability and reducing delivery costs over time. Additionally, its native support for crypto payments caters to global or digital-native OPCs. In summary, as AI democratizes software creation, xBubble's opportunity is to prove that "SOP-to-Business" provides more immediate value for launching a real, operational business than a powerful but unstructured AI coding tool.

链捕手Há 47m

How xBubble Breaks Through in the VC-Heavily-Backed OPC Economy

链捕手Há 47m

If It's Not a Clear Yes, It's a No: A Nine-Year Retrospective by a VC Who Survived Four Cycles

**"Invest Only When Certain": A Nine-Year Retrospective from a VC Across Four Cycles** IOSG founder Jocy shares hard-earned lessons from nine years and over a hundred investments in Web3. The core challenge isn't identifying successful founders, but understanding why talented founders with solid ideas still fail. Through building a "failed founder database," IOSG identified six recurring failure patterns. **Founder Trait Red Flags:** 1. **Emotionally Unstable:** Founders who react defensively to criticism or publicly lash out under pressure (e.g., 80% drawdowns) often fail. Resilience is key. 2. **Lacking Hunger / Having a Fallback:** Founders with significant safety nets (family wealth, cushy fallback jobs) may lack the "do-or-die" commitment needed to survive crypto's brutal cycles. 3. **Unchecked Ego:** Includes "polished execution machines" who excel in known frameworks but struggle when paradigms shift, and "professor-types" who are technically brilliant but resistant to commercial feedback or coaching. **Project Structure Red Flags:** 4. **Token-First, Not Product-First:** Treating the token solely as a fundraising tool with no real utility or connection to product value is a major warning sign. The project should have value even if the token goes to zero. 5. **No Day-1 Exit Thesis:** Founders must have a clear, staged capital strategy from the start, understanding what each funding round needs to prove to unlock the next. "Exit before entry" is crucial. 6. **No Full-Cycle Experience:** Founders who haven't lived through a complete crypto bull/bear cycle (e.g., 2018, 2022) often underestimate their vulnerability. IOSG limits initial checks for such teams to $250k, sizing for risk. **The Positive Flipside: Desirable Founder Traits** The ideal candidate exhibits: obsessive problem-depth, being a second-time founder with a non-consensus vision, strong communication skills with *controlled* ego, relentless perseverance, and a global perspective with agency and taste (increasingly vital in the AI era). **Three Survival Tips for Founders:** 1. **Cash Flow Over Narrative:** Real revenue is what sustains projects, not vanity metrics. 2. **Tokens Are a Liability:** Avoid issuing a token unless absolutely necessary. The hidden costs (market making, liquidity, compliance) are immense, often a multi-million-dollar burden. 3. **Respect Liquidity:** Sell during peaks to build treasury, buy back to support the protocol during troughs. Be realistic about valuations and your ability to deliver for the next round. The final principle is simple yet paramount: **"If it's a borderline 'yes' or 'no,' don't invest."** In an industry that reinvents itself every few years, the discipline to consistently say "no" is the ultimate secret to longevity.

Foresight NewsHá 1h

If It's Not a Clear Yes, It's a No: A Nine-Year Retrospective by a VC Who Survived Four Cycles

Foresight NewsHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片